From: Marcelo M. <mm...@ac...> - 2006-01-27 18:26:20
|
hmm, let me see if we can do something... in the meantime, why do you replace it?, is there a problem with it? Marcelo Robin Dunn wrote: > Yes, I see the "#define t_output_helper SWIG_Python_AppendOutput" but > I would like to be able to replace the implementation for all calls to > SWIG_Python_AppendOutput, not just my own uses of t_output_helper. > > > Marcelo Matus wrote: > >> There is a backward version of t_output_helper, just use it as usual >> >> Robin Dunn wrote: >> >>> Marcelo Matus wrote: >>> >>>> to overcome the fact that swig reports the argument error using the >>>> "C" convention, ie, arg1 is the >>>> 'this' element, in subersion-1.3 there are several typemaps that >>>> are re-writing them and using some >>>> fragments that are not longer available, since in the new UTL they >>>> are not needed. I have to >>>> see how to add backward comp. to these 'undocumented' fragments. >>>> >>> >>> Speaking of fragments, I was previously replacing the >>> t_output_helper with my own fragment. I see that now we are using >>> SWIG_Python_AppendOutput instead, but it is no longer a fragment so >>> I don't see how I can easily replace it with my own implementation. >>> Can it be changed to be a %fragment again? >>> > > |