From: William S F. <ws...@fu...> - 2006-05-12 04:46:26
|
It would be easier if we just stayed with cvs. However, if cvs is always down, we ought to consider moving to subversion. Does anyone have any idea on whether SF are pushing a move to svn? Any ideas as to why cvs is so flaky right now? I raised a SF ticket about the lack of cvs a few days ago, but no response yet. William Damian Dimmich wrote: > Migrating swig to svn would be quite cool.. the updates are quite a bit > faster, especially given that sf's cvs is very slow and doesn't always seem > to work. > > Cheers, > Damian > > On Thursday 11 May 2006 10:29, Surendra Singhi wrote: >>Hello, >> I am having lot of woes with sourceforge and SWIG cvs access. Are there >>any plans of moving to Subversion? >> >>The sourceforge SVN offering is pretty stable now, and I use it for other >>projects and haven't had any problems so far. >> >>Thanks. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Swig-devel mailing list > Swi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/swig-devel > |