From: William S F. <ws...@fu...> - 2013-01-01 22:06:56
|
On 31/12/12 18:06, William S Fulton wrote: > On 30/12/12 17:58, Alexey Sokolov wrote: >> 31.12.2012 00:36, William S Fulton пишет: >>> Thanks. I found these multiple roots broke interactive rebase, but I >>> suppose it only is a problem if you rebase going back far into the >>> history. >>> >> >> Well, very simple test of rebasing 1 "side" commit whose parent is >> grandgrandfather of master onto master works fine. >> > Thanks Alexey. > > I've cleaned up some more and have deleted all the old tags except for > the release tags and the branches which have been merged into trunk or > have been superceded by other branches. This leaves us with: > > $ git branch -r > origin/HEAD -> origin/master > origin/a11426-fortran > origin/gsoc2008-jezabek > origin/gsoc2009-matevz > origin/gsoc2009-sploving > origin/gsoc2012-c > origin/gsoc2012-doxygen > origin/gsoc2012-javascript > origin/gsoc2012-objc > origin/gsoc2012-scilab > origin/joelandersson-matlab > origin/master > origin/oliverb-javascript-v8 > origin/swig-2.0 > origin/talby-perl5-improvements > origin/yziquel-ocaml > > One of the Javascript branches could probably go - Oliver? > > I think it is ready to use now. I suppose it is okay to just rename the > repository from 'source-temporary2' to 'swig' or would it be better to > push it again as 'swig'? I've renamed it to swig now - https://github.com/swig/swig and it seems to work. William |