[Swig-devel] [ swig-Bugs-3166793 ] php proxy class + overloading + std_vector.i causes segfault

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #3166793, was opened at 2011-01-28 12:24
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by olly
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101645&aid=3166793&group_id=1645

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: php
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Jay Buffington (jaybuffington)
Assigned to: Olly Betts (olly)
Summary: php proxy class + overloading + std_vector.i causes segfault

Initial Comment:

$ cat example.i 
%module example

%include "std_vector.i"
%include "std_string.i"

namespace std {
    %template(StringVector) vector<std::string>;
}

%include example.h

-----------------------------------------

$ cat example.h 
#include <string>
#include <vector>

class Job {
public:
    void arguments( const std::vector<std::string> & args );
    const std::vector<std::string> & arguments() const;
};

-----------------------------------------
$ swig  -php -cppext cxx -c++ -o example_wrap.cc example.i  
Segmentation fault

$ swig -noproxy -php -cppext cxx -c++ -o example_wrap.cc example.i  
$ 


Note that if I rename one of my functions the segfault goes away.  Also, using vector<int> works, but vector<std::string> does not.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Olly Betts (olly)
Date: 2011-02-18 19:49

Message:
This works for me in SVN trunk.

I assumed at first it was fixed by r12471 (which is at least superficially
similar, and the reason i was testing this bug):

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3168531&group_id=1645&atid=101645

However undoing that fix I find SWIG doesn't segfault for me either.

I guess this must have been fixed by another recent change - closing as
"works for me" for now, but please reopen if you can reproduce this with
current SVN trunk, or with SWIG 2.0.2 once that is released.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jay Buffington (jaybuffington)
Date: 2011-01-28 12:24

Message:
I should have mentioned this is swig 2.0.1

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101645&aid=3166793&group_id=1645