Re: [Swig-user] SWIG vectors with const

[Adam A S. <aa...@cs...>]

> No way it's legal.  Did you really compile it?

Pretty sure I did...but I'll grant that I was pretty sleep-deprived at the 
time.  Maybe I did something else, similar.  Or maybe it's the kind of 
thing that would break later on, and cause a really evil bug.

> That would happen if you were to return a null pointer.

Well, it's a constructor, so it doesn't return anything.  Or are there 
special rules for constructors when %extend'ed using SWIG?

Thanks,
Adam