From: Divye K. <div...@gm...> - 2008-03-07 19:30:47
|
Hello, I just saw Mr Fulton's posting on the GSoC page and I had a look at the ideas page. I am interested in pursuing idea number 2: the one on parsing source code documentation comments. I've also had a look at some of the documentation and it seems that documentation from the interface file is already being extracted (according to the introduction section) and that documentation from the actual header files needs to be extracted, parsed and set into a format suitable for providing output in the preferred format of the target language. Am I right? Also, the documentation is silent about supporting SWIG on WinXP/Vista (Win9x and ME support is indicated in the Introduction section of the docs). I would assume that it works out of the box on Windows XP and Vista but I just wanted to confirm. As I have never used SWIG before, I have no idea of the complexity of the task and the amount of work to be done. I would be grateful if some of the more experienced developers could shed some light on this point. I'm sorry if I'm repeating a question asked previously. Yours sincerely, Divye Kapoor PS: Just for the record, I'm a second year student of the Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee pursuing my Integrated Dual Degree (Bachelors and Masters) program in Computer Science. I have a strong background in C++ and the STL and I am a user of some of the Boost libraries like Lambda (for some functional programming) and Spirit (an inline EBNF parser-generator). PPS: Sorry if this is off-topic, but I really liked the quality of the documentation. :-) -- Whether the chicken crossed the road or the road moved beneath the chicken depends upon your frame of reference. My official web site: http://www.iitr.ernet.in/studenthomepages/homepages/061305 |