From: David P. <dpi...@me...> - 2007-10-03 16:59:07
|
> > I think I'm stuck. Have you had any luck Kevin? > > > > > What I did was to patch in the capability to specify > %feature("valuetype") on a member variable. If that is specified, it > circumvents the logic that converts the type to a reference or pointer, > only for that one member. Yup, that was one of the three possibilities I suggested in my email an hour ago. Sounds reasonable, although I wonder if that name is specific enough. maybe %feature("rvalueattribute") is a better name (or do I assume too much, thinking people know what an "rvalue" is?). In any case it would be good if the name conveyed its association with attributes/member variables, as it does not apply to methods or types. > Now hopefully we can work on a more general solution. I can get a patch > together and put it up in the issue tracker if that's appropriate. Is > there an issue open for this one? Not that I know of. |