From: Mark W. <ma...@os...> - 2006-03-08 18:15:55
|
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 07:48:12 -0800 Mark Wong <ma...@os...> wrote: > On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 16:17:40 -0800 > Craig Thomas <cr...@os...> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 11:11 -0800, Mark Wong wrote: > > > We have a reserved word issue with "test" and Rails. I think this is > > > why the unit/functional testing isn't working. Anyone want to offer a > > > new name suggestion for the test table? > > > > try one of tcase, testcase, tester, testit > > > > Its the actual token string of "test" right? If so, just add another > > character to it so it won't be the literal string "test" > > It appears to be some sort of name collision for the unit/functional > testing. A 'test' class is created to map to the 'test' table. Then > the unit/functional testing framework also has a 'test' class defined > for it. I'll try one of those. Ok, here is a patch that renames the 'tests' table to 'test_cases', including fixes to the unit and funcitonal tests. These initial set of test cases are not very interesting and don't test much of the functionality yet. Mark |