You can subscribe to this list here.
2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(23) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
Jan
(68) |
Feb
(121) |
Mar
(59) |
Apr
(49) |
May
(110) |
Jun
(109) |
Jul
(146) |
Aug
(122) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(90) |
Dec
(157) |
2002 |
Jan
(169) |
Feb
(186) |
Mar
(168) |
Apr
(353) |
May
(338) |
Jun
(278) |
Jul
(220) |
Aug
(336) |
Sep
(122) |
Oct
(183) |
Nov
(111) |
Dec
(265) |
2003 |
Jan
(358) |
Feb
(135) |
Mar
(343) |
Apr
(419) |
May
(277) |
Jun
(145) |
Jul
|
Aug
(134) |
Sep
(118) |
Oct
(97) |
Nov
(240) |
Dec
(293) |
2004 |
Jan
(412) |
Feb
(217) |
Mar
(202) |
Apr
(237) |
May
(333) |
Jun
(201) |
Jul
(303) |
Aug
(218) |
Sep
(285) |
Oct
(249) |
Nov
(248) |
Dec
(229) |
2005 |
Jan
(314) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(386) |
Apr
(223) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(230) |
Jul
(200) |
Aug
(197) |
Sep
(110) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(279) |
Dec
(324) |
2006 |
Jan
(335) |
Feb
(396) |
Mar
(383) |
Apr
(358) |
May
(375) |
Jun
(190) |
Jul
(212) |
Aug
(320) |
Sep
(358) |
Oct
(112) |
Nov
(213) |
Dec
(95) |
2007 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(104) |
Mar
(156) |
Apr
(115) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(75) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(35) |
Sep
(50) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(35) |
2008 |
Jan
(90) |
Feb
(63) |
Mar
(47) |
Apr
(42) |
May
(72) |
Jun
(85) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(39) |
2009 |
Jan
(39) |
Feb
(46) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(51) |
Jun
(66) |
Jul
(78) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Jess <je...@oz...> - 2001-06-10 02:44:30
|
Hi Dieter, What is a symlink? I don't believe that exists in Windows 2000 Pro does it.? How can I set it up to work under W2K-Pro? Thankyou for your help. Regards Jess ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dieter Simader" <dsi...@sq...> To: <sql...@li...> Sent: Sunday, 10 June, 2001 2:00 AM Subject: Re: Problems with 1.4.? > symlink admin.pl to login.pl > > > Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.org (780) 472-8161 > DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: 478-5281 > =========== On a clear disk you can seek forever =========== > > On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Jess wrote: > > > > Now there is no http://localhost/cgi-bin/sql-ledger/admin.pl in that > > directory there is only login.pl and am.pl > > > |
From: Glenn R. <gl...@co...> - 2001-06-10 01:40:25
|
Are there any plans to make a user guide for sql-ledger? I remember seeing this near the top of a TO DO list on the web site a while ago but I can't find it now. If no-one is working on this then I'll start it, however since my accounting knowledge is quite limited I'd need a bit of help from people on this list. If there is already a manual started, then can someone please direct me to it? g -- Glenn Ramsey gl...@co... |
From: Neil J. <ne...@jo...> - 2001-06-09 16:01:00
|
On June 9, 2001 09:04 am, you wrote: > Hi Dieter, > > Just to make this clear straight of the bat prior to version 1.4 of > SQL-Ledger I had no problems running SQL-Ledger in the 1.2.* variety. > > I clean installed SQL ledger. > > Now I cleaned out all the SQL tables and downloaded SQL-Ledger 1.4.4 from > your Web Site unpacked it and recreated the tables from the acc-PG.sql > file. I removed any traces of the previous SQL-LEDGER 1.2.* which was > working. I then move the SQL-Ledger directory with the login.pl and > sql-ledger.conf file and all subdirectories to the web document root called > /www/websites/bookmen/sqll I also created any directories that where > called in the sql-ledger.conf file so that it could find anything it was > looking for. > I read the FAQ and the README and it said to: > SNIP I had the same problems trying to move from 1.2 to a fresh install of 1.4.4. Grab the latest version (1.4.5), and try it. I had no problems whatsoever with 1.4.5. Neil |
From: Dieter S. <dsi...@sq...> - 2001-06-09 16:00:24
|
symlink admin.pl to login.pl Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.org (780) 472-8161 DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: 478-5281 =========== On a clear disk you can seek forever =========== On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Jess wrote: > > Now there is no http://localhost/cgi-bin/sql-ledger/admin.pl in that > directory there is only login.pl and am.pl |
From: Jess <je...@oz...> - 2001-06-09 15:03:39
|
Hi Dieter, Just to make this clear straight of the bat prior to version 1.4 of SQL-Ledger I had no problems running SQL-Ledger in the 1.2.* variety. I clean installed SQL ledger. Now I cleaned out all the SQL tables and downloaded SQL-Ledger 1.4.4 from your Web Site unpacked it and recreated the tables from the acc-PG.sql file. I removed any traces of the previous SQL-LEDGER 1.2.* which was working. I then move the SQL-Ledger directory with the login.pl and sql-ledger.conf file and all subdirectories to the web document root called /www/websites/bookmen/sqll I also created any directories that where called in the sql-ledger.conf file so that it could find anything it was looking for. I read the FAQ and the README and it said to: SETUP A USER: ------------- Load your web browser and enter the URL http://localhost/cgi-bin/sql-ledger/admin.pl and add a user. If you specify a different database then the one you just created in the previous step, make sure the database and tables exist. (see previous step) LOAD THE ACCOUNTING PROGRAM: ---------------------------- Load your web browser and enter the URL http://localhost/cgi-bin/sql-ledger/login.pl Now there is no http://localhost/cgi-bin/sql-ledger/admin.pl in that directory there is only login.pl and am.pl If I open the admin.pl in the "bin/mozilla" directory the is no shebang line or "require" command for the .conf file on any of these files which leads me to believe that these files are read into a calling .pl file probably login.pl. How do you add or create a user? What .pl file in what directory needs to be run and what needs to be entered in the Browser URL to call it? There is something fundamental I am not aware of that must be causing these problems? Your assistence is needed. SQL Ledger is being run on W2K Pro with PG 703 and perl5, apache 1.3.14. Regards Jess |
From: Jess <je...@oz...> - 2001-06-09 15:01:19
|
Hi Dieter, Just to make this clear straight of the bat prior to version 1.4 of SQL-Ledger I had no problems running SQL-Ledger in the 1.2.* variety. I clean installed SQL ledger. Now I cleaned out all the SQL tables and downloaded SQL-Ledger 1.4.4 from your Web Site unpacked it and recreated the tables from the acc-PG.sql file. I removed any traces of the previous SQL-LEDGER 1.2.* which was working. I then move the SQL-Ledger directory with the login.pl and sql-ledger.conf file and all subdirectories to the web document root called /www/websites/bookmen/sqll I also created any directories that where called in the sql-ledger.conf file so that it could find anything it was looking for. I read the FAQ and the README and it said to: SETUP A USER: ------------- Load your web browser and enter the URL http://localhost/cgi-bin/sql-ledger/admin.pl and add a user. If you specify a different database then the one you just created in the previous step, make sure the database and tables exist. (see previous step) LOAD THE ACCOUNTING PROGRAM: ---------------------------- Load your web browser and enter the URL http://localhost/cgi-bin/sql-ledger/login.pl Now there is no http://localhost/cgi-bin/sql-ledger/admin.pl in that directory there is only login.pl and am.pl If I open the admin.pl in the "bin/mozilla" directory the is no shebang line or "require" command for the .conf file on any of these files which leads me to believe that these files are read into a calling .pl file probably login.pl. How do you add or create a user? What .pl file in what directory needs to be run and what needs to be entered in the Browser URL to call it? There is something fundamental I am not aware of that must be causing these problems? Your assistence is needed. SQL Ledger is being run on W2K Pro with PG 703 and perl5, apache 1.3.14. Regards Jess ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dieter Simader" <dsi...@sq...> To: <sql...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, 05 June, 2001 5:22 AM Subject: Re: NEED taxes on taxes here > Tax on tax can be managed by adding the tax to the tax. > > i.e first tax @ 7% second tax @ 8% > 8% would effectively be 8.56% > > If taxes are tax on tax as well as tax included you'll have to adjust the > tax rates accordingly. > > Tax included applies to all taxes and not just one or the other. > > > Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.org (780) 472-8161 > DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: 478-5281 > =========== On a clear disk you can seek forever =========== > > On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Andre Felipe Machado wrote: > > > Hello, Dieter: > > I just had send out messages to many brazilian linux lists asking for > > accountant help and found your message below. > > > > Here, in Brazil, we have a real tax hell. > > We have TAXES ON TAXES at different points of price setup process, > > feeding multiple taxes accounts to balance at month end. > > > > I am not an accountant, so I can not explain right this complex subject. > > But in order to other people help to customize tables, sql-ledger will > > have to allow multiple taxes on taxes, included and on top, at different > > points of price. > > > > Two significant taxes here: IPI is "on top", aaaaaaannnnnd ICMS "is > > included". > > And they are only two of many, many other taxes, some included, other on > > top of others! > > Cascading taxes!!! > > And these taxes depends on WHAT product or service is to be invoiced. > > > > Please, are there other brazilian people in this list? > > Any accountant to help? > > Many thanks. > > Andre Felipe Machado > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mensagem anterior <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > > > > No dia 28/05/01, 13:58:06, Dieter Simader <dsi...@sq...> > > escreveu o seguinte sobre o tema About Taxes: > > > > > > > Taxes are calculated differently if included in price or shown on top. > > > i.e. $100 item, taxable at 7% > > > tax included -> net price is 93.46, tax portion is 6.54 > > > tax on top -> net price is 100.00, tax is 7.00 > > > > > multiple taxes are always additive and not calculated tax on tax. > > > So, the same $100 item at 7% and 8% > > > tax included -> net price is 86.96, tax is 13.04 > > > tax on top -> net price is 100.00, tax is 15.00 > > > > > > > > > > > |
From: Pedro A. G. P. <pp...@ya...> - 2001-06-08 05:05:00
|
Hi Rick Same thing happened to me when installing new version 1.44. What I did (as suggested by the FAQ) was to convert all the symlinks into hardlinks. After that, the main menu or the admin menu came up with no problem. Hope this helps. Regards Pedro On Thu, 07 Jun 2001, you wrote: > I'm trying to install SQL-Ledger 1.4.4 on a new Redhat 7.1 system. Things > went fine until I got to the Setup a User step. First time I tried to > access admin.pl I got a page not found. Finding it existed in bin/mozilla I > created a link to it in the sql-ledger directory.When I try to access > admin.pl now I get: Error! No such file or directory. The error_log file > entry shows: Died at SL/User.pm line 261. > Can anyone help with this? > Also, I installed phpPgAdmin and created a user: rick If I try to login > as rick I get Error! rick is not a member. I tried manually editing the > users/members file to add it there and got the same response. > Thanks > ------------------------------- > Rick Seibel > Seibel Technologies > Tel 215-997-7998 > Fax 215-997-8745 > Web www.seibel.net _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com |
From: Rick S. <ri...@se...> - 2001-06-07 18:50:01
|
I'm trying to install SQL-Ledger 1.4.4 on a new Redhat 7.1 system. Things went fine until I got to the Setup a User step. First time I tried to access admin.pl I got a page not found. Finding it existed in bin/mozilla I created a link to it in the sql-ledger directory.When I try to access admin.pl now I get: Error! No such file or directory. The error_log file entry shows: Died at SL/User.pm line 261. Can anyone help with this? Also, I installed phpPgAdmin and created a user: rick If I try to login as rick I get Error! rick is not a member. I tried manually editing the users/members file to add it there and got the same response. Thanks ------------------------------- Rick Seibel Seibel Technologies Tel 215-997-7998 Fax 215-997-8745 Web www.seibel.net |
From: Steve D. <sd...@sw...> - 2001-06-06 04:13:55
|
Hi Jaco. Jaco van Staden wrote: > Hi > > What is the best way of inserting corporate taxes to be paid. And taxes > already paid. > > I tried a ledger entry, but that does not work. It should. Book the following when you calculate your tax liability (hypothetical amounts): debit: 5680 - Income tax expense 10,000 credit: 2160 - Corporate taxes payable 10,000 when you pay it, book: debit: 2160 - Corporate taxes payable 10,000 credit: 1061 - Checking Account 1 10,000 (or whatever cash account you use to pay them) As with any accrual account, you should have a good feel for what's left in the ending balance, because you'll rarely get to zero it out due to timing differences of accruals vs. payments. > > > Furthermore, I cannot determine from the online demo how it was done. Sql-ledger has the option to enter an opening balance when you set up an account. The balance in Corporate Taxes Payable was entered as an opening balance, so no detail is available in Sql-ledger. It's also entered as a negative amount which wouldn't be appropriate for most payables accounts. In the real world you presumably would have support for that opening balance from your previous system. I hope that clarifies things. Steve > > > Regards > > -- > Jaco van Staden > Cyber Seal Information Systems Development > Tel: +27 12 998 5674, Fax: +27 12 998 0249, > Cell: +27 82 927 5513, http://www.cyberseal.co.za |
From: Jaco v. S. <ja...@cy...> - 2001-06-05 18:42:37
|
Hi What is the best way of inserting corporate taxes to be paid. And taxes already paid. I tried a ledger entry, but that does not work. Furthermore, I cannot determine from the online demo how it was done. Regards -- Jaco van Staden Cyber Seal Information Systems Development Tel: +27 12 998 5674, Fax: +27 12 998 0249, Cell: +27 82 927 5513, http://www.cyberseal.co.za |
From: Andre F. M. <and...@te...> - 2001-06-05 15:46:42
|
Hello, Dieter: Many thanks for your answer. As I am not an accountant, I will "try" to explain the insane complexity= . In Brasil, until yesterday, we suffer 57 different taxes (help!), at=20 city, state, country level. Not all of them apply to all products or services. The ones that apply to a certain product or service, must be applied at = an exact order. Lets say,=20 value 1 =3D cost with tax 1 and tax 2 included. Value 2 =3D value1 + tax 3 on top. Value 3 =3D value 2 with tax 3 and tax 4 included. Value 4 =3D value 3 + tax 5 on top value 5 =3D value 4 + tax 6 on top etc, etc, etc.... Final price =3D value x + tax y on top (or included). They apply tax on tax, included and on top at a fixed sequence for each = kind of product or service. Each tax must have an account, with closed balance at fiscal month end. When a component is purchased, all applied taxes go to a tax account. When the product is finished product is selled, the suitable applied=20 taxes go to the taxes account. Each tax have a balance sheet. At fiscal month end, we all have to pay the tax balance dues.... Is there an easier way to configure this tax nightmare? This tax adjust seems to be very error prone... Any help from a brazilian accountant here? Many thanks Andr=E9 Felipe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mensagem anterior <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< No dia 04/06/01, 16:22:42, Dieter Simader <dsi...@sq...>=20 escreveu o seguinte sobre o tema Re: NEED taxes on taxes here : > Tax on tax can be managed by adding the tax to the tax. > i.e first tax @ 7% second tax @ 8% > 8% would effectively be 8.56% > If taxes are tax on tax as well as tax included you'll have to adjust = the > tax rates accordingly. > Tax included applies to all taxes and not just one or the other. > Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.org (780) 472-8161 > DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: 478-5281 |
From: Dieter S. <dsi...@sq...> - 2001-06-04 22:08:54
|
Tax on tax can be managed by adding the tax to the tax. i.e first tax @ 7% second tax @ 8% 8% would effectively be 8.56% If taxes are tax on tax as well as tax included you'll have to adjust the tax rates accordingly. Tax included applies to all taxes and not just one or the other. Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.org (780) 472-8161 DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: 478-5281 =========== On a clear disk you can seek forever =========== On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Andre Felipe Machado wrote: > Hello, Dieter: > I just had send out messages to many brazilian linux lists asking for > accountant help and found your message below. > > Here, in Brazil, we have a real tax hell. > We have TAXES ON TAXES at different points of price setup process, > feeding multiple taxes accounts to balance at month end. > > I am not an accountant, so I can not explain right this complex subject. > But in order to other people help to customize tables, sql-ledger will > have to allow multiple taxes on taxes, included and on top, at different > points of price. > > Two significant taxes here: IPI is "on top", aaaaaaannnnnd ICMS "is > included". > And they are only two of many, many other taxes, some included, other on > top of others! > Cascading taxes!!! > And these taxes depends on WHAT product or service is to be invoiced. > > Please, are there other brazilian people in this list? > Any accountant to help? > Many thanks. > Andre Felipe Machado > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mensagem anterior <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > > No dia 28/05/01, 13:58:06, Dieter Simader <dsi...@sq...> > escreveu o seguinte sobre o tema About Taxes: > > > > Taxes are calculated differently if included in price or shown on top. > > i.e. $100 item, taxable at 7% > > tax included -> net price is 93.46, tax portion is 6.54 > > tax on top -> net price is 100.00, tax is 7.00 > > > multiple taxes are always additive and not calculated tax on tax. > > So, the same $100 item at 7% and 8% > > tax included -> net price is 86.96, tax is 13.04 > > tax on top -> net price is 100.00, tax is 15.00 > > > |
From: Bryan J. S. <b.j...@ie...> - 2001-06-03 04:15:43
|
Upgrading 1.4.2 to 1.4.4 ... Hmmm, having trouble upgrading here. What's the best course of action? What directories should I be dumping in? -- TheBS -- Bryan J. Smith, President mailto:b.j...@ie... (407)366-7013 pager:(888)694-5793 chat:thebs413@AOL/MS/Yho ========================================================== SmithConcepts, Inc. http://www.SmithConcepts.com Consulting Engineers and IT Professionals |
From: Andre F. M. <and...@te...> - 2001-06-02 22:43:10
|
Hello, Dieter: I just had send out messages to many brazilian linux lists asking for=20 accountant help and found your message below. Here, in Brazil, we have a real tax hell. We have TAXES ON TAXES at different points of price setup process,=20 feeding multiple taxes accounts to balance at month end. I am not an accountant, so I can not explain right this complex subject.= =20 But in order to other people help to customize tables, sql-ledger will=20 have to allow multiple taxes on taxes, included and on top, at different= =20 points of price. Two significant taxes here: IPI is "on top", aaaaaaannnnnd ICMS "is=20 included". And they are only two of many, many other taxes, some included, other on= =20 top of others! Cascading taxes!!!=20 And these taxes depends on WHAT product or service is to be invoiced. Please, are there other brazilian people in this list? Any accountant to help? Many thanks. Andre Felipe Machado >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mensagem anterior <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< No dia 28/05/01, 13:58:06, Dieter Simader <dsi...@sq...>=20 escreveu o seguinte sobre o tema About Taxes: > Taxes are calculated differently if included in price or shown on top.= > i.e. $100 item, taxable at 7% > tax included -> net price is 93.46, tax portion is 6.54 > tax on top -> net price is 100.00, tax is 7.00 > multiple taxes are always additive and not calculated tax on tax. > So, the same $100 item at 7% and 8% > tax included -> net price is 86.96, tax is 13.04 > tax on top -> net price is 100.00, tax is 15.00 |
From: Benjamin L. <ben...@co...> - 2001-05-31 22:15:14
|
In reference to v1.4.4, I think there is a small bug in rp.pl, where the Retained Earnings should be the last equity account, so should be pushed after the call to ->balance_sheet, not before. In this order: $form->{period} = $form->current_date(\%myconfig); RP->balance_sheet(\%myconfig, \%$form); # define Retained Earnings account push(@{$form->{equity_account}}, $locale->text('Retained Earnings')); Not this: # define Retained Earnings account push(@{$form->{equity_account}}, $locale->text('Retained Earnings')); $form->{period} = $form->current_date(\%myconfig); RP->balance_sheet(\%myconfig, \%$form); -- B. http://makelinux.org/ "Always real." http://realthought.net/ __________________________________________________________________________ He who despises himself nevertheless esteems himself as a self-despiser. -- Friedrich Nietzsche |
From: Martin L. <ma...@li...> - 2001-05-31 21:14:32
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jaco van Staden" <ja...@cy...> To: <sql...@li...> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 9:14 PM Subject: Driver name in Create user? > Hi > > What is the driver name, database username, password when I create user? > Is it necessary to fill this in? Driver name is Pg (reference to DBD::Pg). set username to 'postgres' and leave password blank, if using default install. that should do it in single-user machines and trusted environments. however, if you want to restrict db access with username and password, here's one way to do it: 1. Connect to sql-ledger database as user postgres: psql database -U postgres 2. Assign user postgres a password: ALTER USER postgres WITH PASSWORD 'admin_password'; 3. Create new user: CREATE USER user WITH PASSWORD 'password'; 4. Assign appropriate permissions to all sql-ledger tables GRANT SELECT,INSERT,DELETE,UPDATE ON acc_trans, ap, ar, chart, customer, customertax, defaults, gl, invoice, makemodel, parts, partstax, tax, vendor, vendortax TO user; 5. Enable postgresql password check: set access levels in pg_hba.conf from trust to crypt 6. set new db username and password in sql-ledger admin. -- martin |
From: Jaco v. S. <ja...@cy...> - 2001-05-31 19:13:20
|
Hi What is the driver name, database username, password when I create user? Is it necessary to fill this in? -- Jaco van Staden Cyber Seal Information Systems Development Tel: +27 12 998 5674, Fax: +27 12 998 0249, Cell: +27 82 927 5513, http://www.cyberseal.co.za |
From: Rod R. <ro...@su...> - 2001-05-31 13:04:36
|
See my post to this list from 5/22: http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/7966/0/5805077/ -- Rod On Wednesday 30 May 2001 23:02, nyk wrote: > Thanks for the much help rendered thus far. I have figured out > the problems. The problem actually liaised within the Postgresql. It > look like Postgresql 7.1 give problems with RedHat 6.2. After > reinstall Postgresql 7.0.2 on my RedHat 6.2, SQL-Ledger is running > without any problems. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ian (the webguy)" <ia...@in...> > To: <sql...@li...> > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 7:34 PM > Subject: Re: Compilation errors > > > Is PostGreSQL running? > > > > > > (in case you don't know, this should be what you need to type in) > > > > % su - (postgresql user) > > % postmaster -i > > > > > > Ian > > > > nyk writes: > > > I downloaded your SQL-Ledger 1.4.3 and trying to install > > > onto my > > RedHat linux box running RedHat 6.2. There were no problems in > getting the users created but when I wanted to login into the > system, following message > > appears in my server error log: > > > Unknown error > > > Compilation failed in require at > > /home/paging2.easycall.com.my/htdocs/sql-ledger/login.pl line 61. > > > > [Mon May 28 22:22:59 2001] [error] [client 172.1.1.20] Premature > > > end of > > script headers: > /home/paging2.easycall.com.my/htdocs/sql-ledger/login.pl > > > > Is there anything else that I have missed out in configuring > > > the > > system? To my knowledge, I have correctly installed the DBD::Pg > drivers as well as the DBI > > > > I appreciate if any help can be rendered. > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Ng Yit Khuang > > > ny...@ru... > > > > ---- > > Ian W., MCSE, MCSE+I, MCSD, CNE, CNA, LNA, EMT-B. > > Webmaster, Internationalsportsagency.com > > A division of Remani International > > Web Division > > P.O. Box 304 > > Ada, Ohio 45810 > > > > (419) 634-2286 > > (419) 634-2289 FAX > > (419) 204-0874 CELL > > (888) 218-3996 PAGER > > > > "Network Administration: It's a dirty job, but someone made me do > > it." "Knowledge unburdened by Ignorance is shallow; Ignorance > > ungiven to Knowledge is the only kind for which to apologize." |
From: Jess <je...@oz...> - 2001-05-31 07:40:57
|
Yes there is a users directory and there are files in there something like: user.conf user:chart Regards Jess ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dieter Simader" <dsi...@sq...> To: <sql...@li...> Sent: Thursday, 31 May, 2001 4:01 AM Subject: Re: Compilation errors > check if there are any files in the users directory. > > You probably forgot to make the users directory writable. > > > Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.org (780) 472-8161 > DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: 478-5281 > =========== On a clear disk you can seek forever =========== > > On Wed, 30 May 2001, nyk wrote: > > > I downloaded your SQL-Ledger 1.4.3 and trying to install onto my RedHat linux box running RedHat 6.2. There were no problems in getting the users created but when I wanted to login into the system, following message appears in my server error log: > > > > Unknown error > > Compilation failed in require at /home/paging2.easycall.com.my/htdocs/sql-ledger/login.pl line 61. > > [Mon May 28 22:22:59 2001] [error] [client 172.1.1.20] Premature end of script headers: /home/paging2.easycall.com.my/htdocs/sql-ledger/login.pl > > > > Is there anything else that I have missed out in configuring the system? To my knowledge, I have correctly installed the DBD::Pg drivers as well as the DBI > > > > I appreciate if any help can be rendered. > > > > > > Regards > > > > Ng Yit Khuang > > ny...@ru... > > > > > |
From: nyk <ny...@ru...> - 2001-05-31 06:05:05
|
Thanks for the much help rendered thus far. I have figured out the problems. The problem actually liaised within the Postgresql. It look like Postgresql 7.1 give problems with RedHat 6.2. After reinstall Postgresql 7.0.2 on my RedHat 6.2, SQL-Ledger is running without any problems. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian (the webguy)" <ia...@in...> To: <sql...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 7:34 PM Subject: Re: Compilation errors > Is PostGreSQL running? > > > (in case you don't know, this should be what you need to type in) > > % su - (postgresql user) > % postmaster -i > > > Ian > > > > nyk writes: > > > I downloaded your SQL-Ledger 1.4.3 and trying to install onto my RedHat linux box running RedHat 6.2. There were no problems in getting the users created but when I wanted to login into the system, following message appears in my server error log: > > > > Unknown error > > Compilation failed in require at /home/paging2.easycall.com.my/htdocs/sql-ledger/login.pl line 61. > > [Mon May 28 22:22:59 2001] [error] [client 172.1.1.20] Premature end of script headers: /home/paging2.easycall.com.my/htdocs/sql-ledger/login.pl > > > > Is there anything else that I have missed out in configuring the system? To my knowledge, I have correctly installed the DBD::Pg drivers as well as the DBI > > > > I appreciate if any help can be rendered. > > > > > > Regards > > > > Ng Yit Khuang > > ny...@ru... > > > > ---- > Ian W., MCSE, MCSE+I, MCSD, CNE, CNA, LNA, EMT-B. > Webmaster, Internationalsportsagency.com > A division of Remani International > Web Division > P.O. Box 304 > Ada, Ohio 45810 > > (419) 634-2286 > (419) 634-2289 FAX > (419) 204-0874 CELL > (888) 218-3996 PAGER > > "Network Administration: It's a dirty job, but someone made me do it." > "Knowledge unburdened by Ignorance is shallow; Ignorance ungiven to > Knowledge is the only kind for which to apologize." > > > |
From: Thomas S. <ps...@on...> - 2001-05-31 03:49:39
|
All this talk on the variations of language inclines me to reiterate my personal opinion on application langauge support. I believe the old standard model, used by SQL-Ledger, is quickly reaching then end of its life-span. The new approach, to replace the old model, will stand completely apart from the actual development of an application. Rather, translation will occur at runtime, preformed by a seperate "software appliance". Much like the Babel Fish on AltaVista does to web pages currently. If fact, the technology behind the Babel Fish will probably be the first of these type of "software appliances". They arn't rigid either, but can be tweked for personal, or regional, tastes. -- Thomas Sawyer ps...@on... - email (303) 285-3487 x1594 - voicemail/fax ---- "Maria Gabriela Fong" <mg...@ma...> wrote: > I agree with Antonio and German, one version in spanish is enough for > me, > even though I can see Dieter's point when he thought of country versions > for > the language modules. > > For example, I am no accountant, but a consultant, so technology and > changing terms come easily to me... > Accountants tend to be very picky about their terminology and how you > call > this and that, and even though I know that they do get used over time > as > anyone else with new programs and new terms, it's nice to know I can > get a > template made exactly to my country and work with it... > > For example, Tax names changes thru the countries, I think the standard > name > is IVA, but one country is called IGV, in mine is ITBM, and so on... > Other terms that do change are related to "Spanglish". In my country, > the > term "postear" is very commons since we had a strong influence with > Americans all over the place, so we have hacked the english/spanish > language > more than most countries. > And about Spaniards, they do tend to call things in a very unique way > that > sometimes even they don't like. > > So, even though one spanish version seems like enough, maybe our users > will > not think the same. > So, how about we make sure the standard "es" template is the most correct > of > all as Antonio suggests, and we keep the country templates as a > customization template for our terms. ;) > > Regards, > Gaby > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > Mantenimiento - Computadoras - Redes - Consultoria - Linux - Seguridad > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > Tecno Parque Internacional, Edificio 218, Planta Baja, Clayton > Maria Gabriela Fong - Aptitudes, S.A. > mg...@ap... > > Panama: Apdo 87-2472, Zona 7, Panama > Tel: +507-317-0145 / 46, Fax: +507-317-0145 [507 country > code] > > USA Mail: 1601 N.W. 97th Ave., PTY-823, Unit C-102, Miami, FL 33172, > USA > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <ag...@ib...> > To: <sql...@li...> > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 5:13 PM > Subject: [SQL-Ledger-users] Spanish version > > > > Hi everybody! > > > > Please excuse me for this mail written in Spanish, but we want to > find a > way to know how many spanish version of SQL-Ledger will exist. > > > > Estimados usuario de SQL-Ledger en Español: > > > > Recientemente se ha abierto una discusion acerca de la localizacion > de > SQL-Ledger (SQLL) para cada pais de habla hispana. > > > > Esperando llegar a un acuerdo entre los hispano parlantes acerca > de > cuantas versiones de SQLL existiran, escribo este mensaje. > > > > Actualmente existen dos opiniones: > > > > 1- Mantener una version unica de SQL-Ledger en español. > > 2- Crear una version especial para cada pais. (Actualmente esta es > la > tendencia que lleva SQL-Ledger). > > > > Yo estoy de acuerdo con la primera opcion porque: > > > > 1-Aunque entiendo muy bien lo que son los regionalismos y particularidades > de cada pais. Creo que es muy bueno que podamos comunicarnos todos > en el > mismo idioma. > > > > 2-No soy un experto en contabilidad, pero creo que entre los contadores > de > todos los paises hispanos utilizan los mismo terminos. (Apelo a los > terminos > correctos en español, no a los anglicismos empleados en algunos paises). > > > > 3-Por otro creo que la realidad lationamericana es un poco diferente > de > España, según lo planteado por el Eugenio en un correo enviado. Pero > a nivel > latinoamericano se usan los mismos terminos. Debido a esto es posible > que > pueda existir una version para España (Aunque tengo mis dudas). > > > > 4-La ventaja de mantener un solo lenguaje ahorra esfuerzos. En lugar > de > utilizar esfuerzos en regionalizar para cada pais, podemos unir esfuerzos > y > mejorar la calidad de la documentacion en español. > > > > Bueno, estos son algunos de los motivos que tengo ahora en mente. > Espero > sus comentarios y les agradezco de antemano su colaboracion para hacer > mejor > este sistema del que nos beneficiamos todos. > > > > Saludos, > > > > Ing. Antonio Gallardo > > AG Software > > Managua, NICARAGUA. > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ FREE voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place. Sign Up Now! http://www.onebox.com |
From: Antonio G. <ag...@ib...> - 2001-05-30 20:57:43
|
Thanks Grabriela for your comments! Now the vote are: One Spanish Version: 3 votes. Spanish Version for each country: 1 vote. I also think why Microsoft dont have a localizated version for each Spani= sh spoken country? This is because: 1- Save Financial Costs. 2- All of us understand the spanish version of any application, even if t= he application is high oriented like CAD, CASE, etc. Regards, Ing. Antonio Gallardo. AG Software, S. A. Managua, NICARAGUA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Maria Gabriela Fong" <mg...@ma...> To: <sql...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:09 AM Subject: Re: [SQL-Ledger-users] Spanish version > I agree with Antonio and German, one version in spanish is enough for m= e, > even though I can see Dieter's point when he thought of country version= s for > the language modules. > > For example, I am no accountant, but a consultant, so technology and > changing terms come easily to me... > Accountants tend to be very picky about their terminology and how you c= all > this and that, and even though I know that they do get used over time a= s > anyone else with new programs and new terms, it's nice to know I can ge= t a > template made exactly to my country and work with it... > > For example, Tax names changes thru the countries, I think the standard name > is IVA, but one country is called IGV, in mine is ITBM, and so on... > Other terms that do change are related to "Spanglish". In my country, = the > term "postear" is very commons since we had a strong influence with > Americans all over the place, so we have hacked the english/spanish language > more than most countries. > And about Spaniards, they do tend to call things in a very unique way t= hat > sometimes even they don't like. > > So, even though one spanish version seems like enough, maybe our users will > not think the same. > So, how about we make sure the standard "es" template is the most corre= ct of > all as Antonio suggests, and we keep the country templates as a > customization template for our terms. ;) > > Regards, > Gaby > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= --- -- > -- > Mantenimiento - Computadoras - Redes - Consultoria - Linux - Seguri= dad > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= --- -- > -- > Tecno Parque Internacional, Edificio 218, Planta Baja, Clayton > Maria Gabriela Fong - Aptitudes, S.A. > mg...@ap... > > Panama: Apdo 87-2472, Zona 7, Panama > Tel: +507-317-0145 / 46, Fax: +507-317-0145 [507 country cod= e] > > USA Mail: 1601 N.W. 97th Ave., PTY-823, Unit C-102, Miami, FL 33172, US= A > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <ag...@ib...> > To: <sql...@li...> > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 5:13 PM > Subject: [SQL-Ledger-users] Spanish version > > > > Hi everybody! > > > > Please excuse me for this mail written in Spanish, but we want to fin= d a > way to know how many spanish version of SQL-Ledger will exist. > > > > Estimados usuario de SQL-Ledger en Espa=F1ol: > > > > Recientemente se ha abierto una discusion acerca de la localizacion d= e > SQL-Ledger (SQLL) para cada pais de habla hispana. > > > > Esperando llegar a un acuerdo entre los hispano parlantes acerca de > cuantas versiones de SQLL existiran, escribo este mensaje. > > > > Actualmente existen dos opiniones: > > > > 1- Mantener una version unica de SQL-Ledger en espa=F1ol. > > 2- Crear una version especial para cada pais. (Actualmente esta es la > tendencia que lleva SQL-Ledger). > > > > Yo estoy de acuerdo con la primera opcion porque: > > > > 1-Aunque entiendo muy bien lo que son los regionalismos y particularidades > de cada pais. Creo que es muy bueno que podamos comunicarnos todos en e= l > mismo idioma. > > > > 2-No soy un experto en contabilidad, pero creo que entre los contador= es de > todos los paises hispanos utilizan los mismo terminos. (Apelo a los terminos > correctos en espa=F1ol, no a los anglicismos empleados en algunos paise= s). > > > > 3-Por otro creo que la realidad lationamericana es un poco diferente = de > Espa=F1a, seg=FAn lo planteado por el Eugenio en un correo enviado. Per= o a nivel > latinoamericano se usan los mismos terminos. Debido a esto es posible q= ue > pueda existir una version para Espa=F1a (Aunque tengo mis dudas). > > > > 4-La ventaja de mantener un solo lenguaje ahorra esfuerzos. En lugar = de > utilizar esfuerzos en regionalizar para cada pais, podemos unir esfuerz= os y > mejorar la calidad de la documentacion en espa=F1ol. > > > > Bueno, estos son algunos de los motivos que tengo ahora en mente. Esp= ero > sus comentarios y les agradezco de antemano su colaboracion para hacer mejor > este sistema del que nos beneficiamos todos. > > > > Saludos, > > > > Ing. Antonio Gallardo > > AG Software > > Managua, NICARAGUA. > > > > > > > > > |
From: Ian \(t. webguy\) <ia...@in...> - 2001-05-30 18:36:30
|
Is PostGreSQL running? (in case you don't know, this should be what you need to type in) % su - (postgresql user) % postmaster -i Ian nyk writes: > I downloaded your SQL-Ledger 1.4.3 and trying to install onto my RedHat linux box running RedHat 6.2. There were no problems in getting the users created but when I wanted to login into the system, following message appears in my server error log: > > Unknown error > Compilation failed in require at /home/paging2.easycall.com.my/htdocs/sql-ledger/login.pl line 61. > [Mon May 28 22:22:59 2001] [error] [client 172.1.1.20] Premature end of script headers: /home/paging2.easycall.com.my/htdocs/sql-ledger/login.pl > > Is there anything else that I have missed out in configuring the system? To my knowledge, I have correctly installed the DBD::Pg drivers as well as the DBI > > I appreciate if any help can be rendered. > > > Regards > > Ng Yit Khuang > ny...@ru... ---- Ian W., MCSE, MCSE+I, MCSD, CNE, CNA, LNA, EMT-B. Webmaster, Internationalsportsagency.com A division of Remani International Web Division P.O. Box 304 Ada, Ohio 45810 (419) 634-2286 (419) 634-2289 FAX (419) 204-0874 CELL (888) 218-3996 PAGER "Network Administration: It's a dirty job, but someone made me do it." "Knowledge unburdened by Ignorance is shallow; Ignorance ungiven to Knowledge is the only kind for which to apologize." |
From: Dieter S. <dsi...@sq...> - 2001-05-30 18:01:07
|
check if there are any files in the users directory. You probably forgot to make the users directory writable. Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.org (780) 472-8161 DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: 478-5281 =========== On a clear disk you can seek forever =========== On Wed, 30 May 2001, nyk wrote: > I downloaded your SQL-Ledger 1.4.3 and trying to install onto my RedHat linux box running RedHat 6.2. There were no problems in getting the users created but when I wanted to login into the system, following message appears in my server error log: > > Unknown error > Compilation failed in require at /home/paging2.easycall.com.my/htdocs/sql-ledger/login.pl line 61. > [Mon May 28 22:22:59 2001] [error] [client 172.1.1.20] Premature end of script headers: /home/paging2.easycall.com.my/htdocs/sql-ledger/login.pl > > Is there anything else that I have missed out in configuring the system? To my knowledge, I have correctly installed the DBD::Pg drivers as well as the DBI > > I appreciate if any help can be rendered. > > > Regards > > Ng Yit Khuang > ny...@ru... > |
From: Dieter S. <dsi...@sq...> - 2001-05-30 17:52:29
|
Version 1.4.4 is tarred up from a working system. All you need to do is ungzip/untar, move the sql-ledger directory to your cgi-bin directory, read the FAQ and the files in the doc directory and follow the instruction. Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.org (780) 472-8161 DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: 478-5281 =========== On a clear disk you can seek forever =========== On Wed, 30 May 2001, Jess wrote: > Hi People, > Could some kind sole send me the following in a tar or zip file from a > working system, Please? > > The whole directory under: > sql-ledger/bin > > And these individual files. > sql-ledger/admin.pl > sql-ledger/login.pl > sql-ledger/sql-ledger.conf > > > Where is setup/pl supposed to be, on what I have it is in the > "sql-ledger/bin" is this right? > > Thankyou to those who can help. > > I can't believe how much trouble I am having getting this to run. > I had no problem with the 1.2.* versions. > > Regards Jess > > > |