You can subscribe to this list here.
2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(23) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
Jan
(68) |
Feb
(121) |
Mar
(59) |
Apr
(49) |
May
(110) |
Jun
(109) |
Jul
(146) |
Aug
(122) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(94) |
Nov
(90) |
Dec
(157) |
2002 |
Jan
(169) |
Feb
(186) |
Mar
(168) |
Apr
(353) |
May
(338) |
Jun
(278) |
Jul
(220) |
Aug
(336) |
Sep
(122) |
Oct
(183) |
Nov
(111) |
Dec
(265) |
2003 |
Jan
(358) |
Feb
(135) |
Mar
(343) |
Apr
(419) |
May
(277) |
Jun
(145) |
Jul
|
Aug
(134) |
Sep
(118) |
Oct
(97) |
Nov
(240) |
Dec
(293) |
2004 |
Jan
(412) |
Feb
(217) |
Mar
(202) |
Apr
(237) |
May
(333) |
Jun
(201) |
Jul
(303) |
Aug
(218) |
Sep
(285) |
Oct
(249) |
Nov
(248) |
Dec
(229) |
2005 |
Jan
(314) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(386) |
Apr
(223) |
May
(281) |
Jun
(230) |
Jul
(200) |
Aug
(197) |
Sep
(110) |
Oct
(243) |
Nov
(279) |
Dec
(324) |
2006 |
Jan
(335) |
Feb
(396) |
Mar
(383) |
Apr
(358) |
May
(375) |
Jun
(190) |
Jul
(212) |
Aug
(320) |
Sep
(358) |
Oct
(112) |
Nov
(213) |
Dec
(95) |
2007 |
Jan
(136) |
Feb
(104) |
Mar
(156) |
Apr
(115) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(75) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(35) |
Sep
(50) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(35) |
2008 |
Jan
(90) |
Feb
(63) |
Mar
(47) |
Apr
(42) |
May
(72) |
Jun
(85) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(39) |
2009 |
Jan
(39) |
Feb
(46) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(51) |
Jun
(66) |
Jul
(78) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-12 22:26:00
|
Dear ziggy, In message <200...@in...> you wrote: > if it comes to that: ziggy @ instaviewDOTcom when we find a place to put it > ( dont want to email 1000 people the archive :) ) Thanks. > Perhaps someone should just go ahead and setup a yahoo list or someting in the > interim until things are sorted out? Nothing else it will be a place we can > call home if the official list dissapears next. Let's wait what Dieter has to say. If needed, we can have a list on our server in less than 10 minutes. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd...@de... The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the pavement is precisely 1 bananosecond. |
From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-12 22:12:09
|
if it comes to that: ziggy @ instaviewDOTcom when we find a place to put it ( dont want to email 1000 people the archive :) ) Perhaps someone should just go ahead and setup a yahoo list or someting in the interim until things are sorted out? Nothing else it will be a place we can call home if the official list dissapears next. On Sunday 12 July 2009 05:13:15 pm sql...@li... wrote: > Dear sql...@li..., > > In message <200...@in...> you wrote: > > I have malling list history back to 12/30/2004, if that helps. > > You gotta add your mail address to the posting, otherwise nobody could > contact you about it. > > Does anybody know if this list is mirrored on gmane, nabble or > similar? > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk |
From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-12 21:29:30
|
Dear sql...@li..., In message <200...@in...> you wrote: > I have malling list history back to 12/30/2004, if that helps. You gotta add your mail address to the posting, otherwise nobody could contact you about it. Does anybody know if this list is mirrored on gmane, nabble or similar? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd...@de... "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary saftey deserve neither liberty not saftey." - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-12 04:35:18
|
I've been reading the mailing list and it seems everyone is saying it will stop. However I do not see any sort of mention of that anywhere. Where is everyone getting these rumors from? Just because the forums are closed or gone doesn't mean it is closing IMO. Links to references or facts? |
From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-12 01:46:01
|
I can tell you right now that if Dieter closed the source again(!) then we are leaving permanently. SL has it's advantages but Dieter has never allowed a developer community to grow around it and the package has suffered as a result. "Many eyes make shallow bugs", isn't just an aphorism, and good quality code can be written a heck of a lot faster by one guy leading a team than one guy working alone! And if the source is closed and Dieter gets hit by a bus then all of his customers are hosed. That's not acceptable in any business environment and we sure as heck aren't going to take that risk! Thanks, Michael On Jul 11, 2009, at 6:15 PM, sql...@li... wrote: I agree as well. I don't think it is opensource any longer and it makes me nervous. I have been looking at LedgerSMB and they are coming out with a new version soon. They have fixed many of the problems with SQL-Ledger, although they have some of their own, but at least they listen to the community. As of now I don't think you can import your data from the current versions of SQL-Ledger but they are working on fixing that in the next release. I don't know that it is any better but I think I will install it and have a look. On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:37 PM, <sql-ledger- us...@li...>wrote: > I agree, that it is sad to see if that is the planned direction. > And i also > agree, that its their choice. > > I do have some moral concerns of absorbing information that was > gathered > from > the community and then later 'closed off' from the same community > ( if > that > is happening ), but that is just me. > > But not having seen any new mission statement, who knows. > > On Saturday 11 July 2009 02:29:32 pm > sql...@li... > wrote: >> On 11-Jul-09 6:57 PM, sql...@li... wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Today all list emails seem to be coming from >>> sql...@li... instead of actual user email >>> addresses. >>> >>> Just wondering, is it an issue at my end or any body else >>> experienced >>> this too? >> >> Same here. Plus there is no more forum. >> >> I am sad. It looks like sql-ledger is becoming closed. >> >> I hope the forum will be open to the public. I also hope it will >> update >> sql-ledger with the new modules. >> >> Please not this is just a request. The owner of sql-ledger has full >> rights. I respect the whatever the decision. >> >> P.V.Anthony >> >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----- >> --- Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >> This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited >> time, >> vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) >> will have >> the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full > prize >> details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge >> _______________________________________________ >> sql-ledger-users mailing list >> sql...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------- > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited > time, > vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) > will have > the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See > full prize > details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > > -- Br Nicholas Thirkettle OSB St. Joseph's Monastery Natchez, Mississippi ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ sql-ledger-users mailing list sql...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users |
From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-12 01:15:49
|
I agree as well. I don't think it is opensource any longer and it makes me nervous. I have been looking at LedgerSMB and they are coming out with a new version soon. They have fixed many of the problems with SQL-Ledger, although they have some of their own, but at least they listen to the community. As of now I don't think you can import your data from the current versions of SQL-Ledger but they are working on fixing that in the next release. I don't know that it is any better but I think I will install it and have a look. On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:37 PM, <sql...@li...>wrote: > I agree, that it is sad to see if that is the planned direction. And i also > agree, that its their choice. > > I do have some moral concerns of absorbing information that was gathered > from > the community and then later 'closed off' from the same community ( if > that > is happening ), but that is just me. > > But not having seen any new mission statement, who knows. > > On Saturday 11 July 2009 02:29:32 pm > sql...@li... > wrote: > > On 11-Jul-09 6:57 PM, sql...@li... wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Today all list emails seem to be coming from > > > sql...@li... instead of actual user email > > > addresses. > > > > > > Just wondering, is it an issue at my end or any body else experienced > > > this too? > > > > Same here. Plus there is no more forum. > > > > I am sad. It looks like sql-ledger is becoming closed. > > > > I hope the forum will be open to the public. I also hope it will update > > sql-ledger with the new modules. > > > > Please not this is just a request. The owner of sql-ledger has full > > rights. I respect the whatever the decision. > > > > P.V.Anthony > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >--- Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > > This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, > > vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have > > the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full > prize > > details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge > > _______________________________________________ > > sql-ledger-users mailing list > > sql...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, > vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have > the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize > details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > > -- Br Nicholas Thirkettle OSB St. Joseph's Monastery Natchez, Mississippi |
From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-12 00:41:18
|
I agree, that it is sad to see if that is the planned direction. And i also agree, that its their choice. I do have some moral concerns of absorbing information that was gathered from the community and then later 'closed off' from the same community ( if that is happening ), but that is just me. But not having seen any new mission statement, who knows. On Saturday 11 July 2009 02:29:32 pm sql...@li... wrote: > On 11-Jul-09 6:57 PM, sql...@li... wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Today all list emails seem to be coming from > > sql...@li... instead of actual user email > > addresses. > > > > Just wondering, is it an issue at my end or any body else experienced > > this too? > > Same here. Plus there is no more forum. > > I am sad. It looks like sql-ledger is becoming closed. > > I hope the forum will be open to the public. I also hope it will update > sql-ledger with the new modules. > > Please not this is just a request. The owner of sql-ledger has full > rights. I respect the whatever the decision. > > P.V.Anthony > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >--- Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, > vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have > the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize > details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users |
From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-11 18:30:21
|
On 11-Jul-09 6:57 PM, sql...@li... wrote: > Hi all, > > Today all list emails seem to be coming from > sql...@li... instead of actual user email > addresses. > > Just wondering, is it an issue at my end or any body else experienced this too? Same here. Plus there is no more forum. I am sad. It looks like sql-ledger is becoming closed. I hope the forum will be open to the public. I also hope it will update sql-ledger with the new modules. Please not this is just a request. The owner of sql-ledger has full rights. I respect the whatever the decision. P.V.Anthony |
From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-11 06:31:05
|
Hi Jeff, I've seen (reconciliation?) balances that remain affected by phantom transactions --transactions that were deleted but some aspect of the transaction remains hidden in the system. I'm not sure of the cause, because there were numerous people entering and reconciling data in multiple databases. From what I recall, the problem is associated with transactions that have been at least partially reconciled against one or more of the accounts associated with it prior to the transaction being deleted. Fixing has been arduous: 1. making a backup of the database 2. tracking down and deleting the transaction detail in the database tables that are associated with the error. Identifying the offending transaction can be tricky. I would verify the balance on the account from beginning of the account and note the month (or approximate date) where the balance is not accurately reflecting balance of shown transactions. Then I would examine the transaction detail for every transaction with at least a date in that time frame, looking for inconsistencies with associated transaction dates or transactions that show up in the database but not through the web. Try repairing any problem first by using the web-based UI. If unsuccessful, then you may have found the culprit! If so, carefully go through the various tables noting and removing the fragments of the transaction. Be sure to check the data returned from DELETE criteria (where...) by using a Select before deleting, or you might accidentally remove a portion of a transaction that was previously okay (thereby compounding the problem). 3. verify the balance accurately reflects transactions shown 4. regenerate the removed transaction (if need be) 5. regenerate any year end GL transactions that occurred after the transaction Wouldn't it be nice to have an AUDIT button that identified transaction inconsistencies in the DB? Some day.. cheers, Torben sql...@li... wrote: > I do not think updating can have caused this kind of anomalies in the > accounts. > Been using this package for years and never found anything to that effect. > > Two more ideas: > > 1) if you use reports with headers inbetween (you can see by different > colors and subtotals) in your General Ledger scheme: remove those and rerun > report. That might do the trick, especially since you say that the accounts > are actually balanced. > > 2) If the COGS in the opening balance (when you started using SQL-Ledger) is > not entered correctly, the opening stock will be sold with a sales price of > x, and a COGS of ZERO. > > That might explain te extra income. Hope you did not have to pay tax on > that, since it is not actual income, just a bookkeeping error! > > As a last resort, if you want to you can do a backup to file and personal > mail me the zip. I can then restore over here local and have a look if I can > find anything from the accounting point of view. > > Cheers, > Paul > > 2009/7/11 <sql...@li...> > >> Yes, we have someone with basic book keeping skills. No we have not found >> anything to suggest why it keeps occurring every year for the same amount. >> What we do know is that this amount has been off since 2004 maybe 2003. Its >> an error that occurred many years ago. >> >> 1. Current Earnings is 50k, more than expected. >> 2. We do not suspect fraud. >> 3. We have done several year end closes. 2002 was off my 17k, 2003 was off >> by I think 53k, and its been the same number every year. >> >> I'm not concerned so much why we are off by 53k, we believe its an error >> that was created in the system during one of the version upgrades. I want >> to make Current Earnings match our Income Statement (As in, if I the only >> way to do it, is to manipulate the database, then tell me how, and I'll do >> it) >> >> thoughts on how to fix it? >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >> On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:30:10 +0200, sql...@li... >> wrote: >>> Did you have anybody with basic book keeping skils look at your files? >>> Current earnings would be the difference between expenses and income for >>> any >>> given period. Also known as result. >>> >>> Now if my result was off by 50k, personally I would start to wonder what >>> is >>> going on. Basic sanity check: >>> >>> 1) Do you have more or less than expected? >>> 2) If less, would it be possible somebody is doing something with funds >>> that >>> is not entirely the way it should be? (Also known as fraud). >>> >>> 3) Wild guess: did you do any year-end processing at all? If not, all >>> results from day one till now would be seen as current earnings. At year >>> end, it is a good habit to add any profits to the available reserves >>> (equity) and start over for the new year. >>> If we skip that, how is SQL-Ledger to know the period for which we want >> to >>> calculate profit has ended? >>> >>> HtH >>> Paul >>> >>> 2009/7/9 <je...@ix...> >>> >>>> Here's my issue. Our current earnings is off by 54,300.03 its been off >>> by >>>> this number for years. I'd would like to correct it, but I am not seeing >>>> how to affect current earnings without putting my income statement out >>> of >>>> wack. I tried modifying retained earnings and using long term loans as >>> the >>>> offesetting account, but it had zero effect on current earnings. >>>> >>>> Any suggestions? >>>> >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:32:40 -0400, "J.P. Possenti" <jp...@pi...> >>> wrote: >>>>> Hello I had posted this in the message board on the site about 3 weeks >>>>> ago and no response; not sure if this is more active or not. >>>>> >>>>> So I will ask here: >>>>> >>>>> I have a number of items that when I entered into sql ledger, I picked >>>>> the wrong income account. When going back to editing these items, I do >>>>> not see all of my income accounts even though I know they exist. I >>> know >>>>> this because I see them in the Chart of Accounts and when I add a new >>>>> item I get the full list. >>>>> >>>>> Is this a bug or is it like that for a reason? >>>>> >>>>> I can simply delete and re-add the item with the correct income >>> account >>>>> but I am wondering if this will affect any reports or previous >>> invoices >>>>> I made with that item. I would be keeping everything exactly alike >>>>> except the income account. Would this be ok? >>>>> >>>>> So bug or is it like that for a reason? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> JP >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> sql-ledger-users mailing list >>>>> sql...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >>>> This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, >>>> vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will >>> have >>>> the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full >>> prize >>>> details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sql-ledger-users mailing list >>>> sql...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users >>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >>> This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, >>> vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have >>> the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full >>> prize >>> details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sql-ledger-users mailing list >>> sql...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >> This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, >> vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have >> the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize >> details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge >> _______________________________________________ >> sql-ledger-users mailing list >> sql...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, > vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have > the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize > details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users |
From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-11 05:29:30
|
No, it is moved to the paying customers however: SQL-Ledger is backed by commercial support. With our support plans you get guaranteed response times and access to valuable resources. Support subscriptions are priced per company, one contact. User Tech Dev Reference manual x x x updates for 1 year x x x Access to support forum x x x Access to wiki x x x 2009/7/11 <sql...@li...> > Hi, > > Is the web forum stopped at www.sql-ledger.com? > > P.V.Anthony > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, > vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have > the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize > details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > |
From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-11 05:26:21
|
I do not think updating can have caused this kind of anomalies in the accounts. Been using this package for years and never found anything to that effect. Two more ideas: 1) if you use reports with headers inbetween (you can see by different colors and subtotals) in your General Ledger scheme: remove those and rerun report. That might do the trick, especially since you say that the accounts are actually balanced. 2) If the COGS in the opening balance (when you started using SQL-Ledger) is not entered correctly, the opening stock will be sold with a sales price of x, and a COGS of ZERO. That might explain te extra income. Hope you did not have to pay tax on that, since it is not actual income, just a bookkeeping error! As a last resort, if you want to you can do a backup to file and personal mail me the zip. I can then restore over here local and have a look if I can find anything from the accounting point of view. Cheers, Paul 2009/7/11 <sql...@li...> > Yes, we have someone with basic book keeping skills. No we have not found > anything to suggest why it keeps occurring every year for the same amount. > What we do know is that this amount has been off since 2004 maybe 2003. Its > an error that occurred many years ago. > > 1. Current Earnings is 50k, more than expected. > 2. We do not suspect fraud. > 3. We have done several year end closes. 2002 was off my 17k, 2003 was off > by I think 53k, and its been the same number every year. > > I'm not concerned so much why we are off by 53k, we believe its an error > that was created in the system during one of the version upgrades. I want > to make Current Earnings match our Income Statement (As in, if I the only > way to do it, is to manipulate the database, then tell me how, and I'll do > it) > > thoughts on how to fix it? > > Jeff > > > > On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:30:10 +0200, sql...@li... > wrote: > > Did you have anybody with basic book keeping skils look at your files? > > Current earnings would be the difference between expenses and income for > > any > > given period. Also known as result. > > > > Now if my result was off by 50k, personally I would start to wonder what > > is > > going on. Basic sanity check: > > > > 1) Do you have more or less than expected? > > 2) If less, would it be possible somebody is doing something with funds > > that > > is not entirely the way it should be? (Also known as fraud). > > > > 3) Wild guess: did you do any year-end processing at all? If not, all > > results from day one till now would be seen as current earnings. At year > > end, it is a good habit to add any profits to the available reserves > > (equity) and start over for the new year. > > If we skip that, how is SQL-Ledger to know the period for which we want > to > > calculate profit has ended? > > > > HtH > > Paul > > > > 2009/7/9 <je...@ix...> > > > >> Here's my issue. Our current earnings is off by 54,300.03 its been off > > by > >> this number for years. I'd would like to correct it, but I am not seeing > >> how to affect current earnings without putting my income statement out > > of > >> wack. I tried modifying retained earnings and using long term loans as > > the > >> offesetting account, but it had zero effect on current earnings. > >> > >> Any suggestions? > >> > >> Jeff > >> > >> > >> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:32:40 -0400, "J.P. Possenti" <jp...@pi...> > > wrote: > >> > Hello I had posted this in the message board on the site about 3 weeks > >> > ago and no response; not sure if this is more active or not. > >> > > >> > So I will ask here: > >> > > >> > I have a number of items that when I entered into sql ledger, I picked > >> > the wrong income account. When going back to editing these items, I do > >> > not see all of my income accounts even though I know they exist. I > > know > >> > this because I see them in the Chart of Accounts and when I add a new > >> > item I get the full list. > >> > > >> > Is this a bug or is it like that for a reason? > >> > > >> > I can simply delete and re-add the item with the correct income > > account > >> > but I am wondering if this will affect any reports or previous > > invoices > >> > I made with that item. I would be keeping everything exactly alike > >> > except the income account. Would this be ok? > >> > > >> > So bug or is it like that for a reason? > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > > >> > JP > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > sql-ledger-users mailing list > >> > sql...@li... > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > >> This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, > >> vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will > > have > >> the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full > > prize > >> details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge > >> _______________________________________________ > >> sql-ledger-users mailing list > >> sql...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > > This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, > > vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have > > the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full > > prize > > details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge > > _______________________________________________ > > sql-ledger-users mailing list > > sql...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, > vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have > the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize > details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > |
From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-11 04:22:44
|
Hi, Is the web forum stopped at www.sql-ledger.com? P.V.Anthony |
From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-10 22:32:33
|
For what it's worth we've had several problems with the summary reports completely missing accounts resulting in totally incorrect values. The actual account balances are correct though so we gave up trying to figure out why the summaries were off and just do our own reports based on that. In all fairness even though we had a support contract with Dieter we never bothered to ask him, so there could have been a simple answer - might be worth it! Thanks, Michael ----- Original Message ----- From: je...@ix... To: sql...@li... Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2009 10:49:57 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: [SL] How can I affect Current Earnings without Changing my net income? Here's my issue. Our current earnings is off by 54,300.03 its been off by this number for years. I'd would like to correct it, but I am not seeing how to affect current earnings without putting my income statement out of wack. I tried modifying retained earnings and using long term loans as the offesetting account, but it had zero effect on current earnings. Any suggestions? Jeff On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:32:40 -0400, "J.P. Possenti" <jp...@pi...> wrote: > Hello I had posted this in the message board on the site about 3 weeks > ago and no response; not sure if this is more active or not. > > So I will ask here: > > I have a number of items that when I entered into sql ledger, I picked > the wrong income account. When going back to editing these items, I do > not see all of my income accounts even though I know they exist. I know > this because I see them in the Chart of Accounts and when I add a new > item I get the full list. > > Is this a bug or is it like that for a reason? > > I can simply delete and re-add the item with the correct income account > but I am wondering if this will affect any reports or previous invoices > I made with that item. I would be keeping everything exactly alike > except the income account. Would this be ok? > > So bug or is it like that for a reason? > > > Thanks > > JP > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ sql-ledger-users mailing list sql...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users |
From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-10 22:25:45
|
Yes, we have someone with basic book keeping skills. No we have not found anything to suggest why it keeps occurring every year for the same amount. What we do know is that this amount has been off since 2004 maybe 2003. Its an error that occurred many years ago. 1. Current Earnings is 50k, more than expected. 2. We do not suspect fraud. 3. We have done several year end closes. 2002 was off my 17k, 2003 was off by I think 53k, and its been the same number every year. I'm not concerned so much why we are off by 53k, we believe its an error that was created in the system during one of the version upgrades. I want to make Current Earnings match our Income Statement (As in, if I the only way to do it, is to manipulate the database, then tell me how, and I'll do it) thoughts on how to fix it? Jeff On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:30:10 +0200, sql...@li... wrote: > Did you have anybody with basic book keeping skils look at your files? > Current earnings would be the difference between expenses and income for > any > given period. Also known as result. > > Now if my result was off by 50k, personally I would start to wonder what > is > going on. Basic sanity check: > > 1) Do you have more or less than expected? > 2) If less, would it be possible somebody is doing something with funds > that > is not entirely the way it should be? (Also known as fraud). > > 3) Wild guess: did you do any year-end processing at all? If not, all > results from day one till now would be seen as current earnings. At year > end, it is a good habit to add any profits to the available reserves > (equity) and start over for the new year. > If we skip that, how is SQL-Ledger to know the period for which we want to > calculate profit has ended? > > HtH > Paul > > 2009/7/9 <je...@ix...> > >> Here's my issue. Our current earnings is off by 54,300.03 its been off > by >> this number for years. I'd would like to correct it, but I am not seeing >> how to affect current earnings without putting my income statement out > of >> wack. I tried modifying retained earnings and using long term loans as > the >> offesetting account, but it had zero effect on current earnings. >> >> Any suggestions? >> >> Jeff >> >> >> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:32:40 -0400, "J.P. Possenti" <jp...@pi...> > wrote: >> > Hello I had posted this in the message board on the site about 3 weeks >> > ago and no response; not sure if this is more active or not. >> > >> > So I will ask here: >> > >> > I have a number of items that when I entered into sql ledger, I picked >> > the wrong income account. When going back to editing these items, I do >> > not see all of my income accounts even though I know they exist. I > know >> > this because I see them in the Chart of Accounts and when I add a new >> > item I get the full list. >> > >> > Is this a bug or is it like that for a reason? >> > >> > I can simply delete and re-add the item with the correct income > account >> > but I am wondering if this will affect any reports or previous > invoices >> > I made with that item. I would be keeping everything exactly alike >> > except the income account. Would this be ok? >> > >> > So bug or is it like that for a reason? >> > >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > JP >> > >> > >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > _______________________________________________ >> > sql-ledger-users mailing list >> > sql...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users >> >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >> This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, >> vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will > have >> the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full > prize >> details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge >> _______________________________________________ >> sql-ledger-users mailing list >> sql...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, > vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have > the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full > prize > details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users |
From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-10 20:49:11
|
A few questions: Is your trial balance in balance? You say that your income is out of whack- is the balance sheet out of whack? Normaly two accounts would be off as debits equals credits. Unless a transaction is dated in the future. Sent from my phone On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:49 PM, <je...@ix...> wrote: > Here's my issue. Our current earnings is off by 54,300.03 its been > off by > this number for years. I'd would like to correct it, but I am not > seeing > how to affect current earnings without putting my income statement > out of > wack. I tried modifying retained earnings and using long term loans > as the > offesetting account, but it had zero effect on current earnings. > > Any suggestions? > > Jeff > > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:32:40 -0400, "J.P. Possenti" <jp...@pi...> > wrote: >> Hello I had posted this in the message board on the site about 3 >> weeks >> ago and no response; not sure if this is more active or not. >> >> So I will ask here: >> >> I have a number of items that when I entered into sql ledger, I >> picked >> the wrong income account. When going back to editing these items, I >> do >> not see all of my income accounts even though I know they exist. I >> know >> this because I see them in the Chart of Accounts and when I add a new >> item I get the full list. >> >> Is this a bug or is it like that for a reason? >> >> I can simply delete and re-add the item with the correct income >> account >> but I am wondering if this will affect any reports or previous >> invoices >> I made with that item. I would be keeping everything exactly alike >> except the income account. Would this be ok? >> >> So bug or is it like that for a reason? >> >> >> Thanks >> >> JP >> >> > --- > --- > --- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> _______________________________________________ >> sql-ledger-users mailing list >> sql...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > > > --- > --- > --- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited > time, > vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will > have > the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See > full prize > details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users |
From: <sql...@li...> - 2009-07-10 20:30:19
|
Did you have anybody with basic book keeping skils look at your files? Current earnings would be the difference between expenses and income for any given period. Also known as result. Now if my result was off by 50k, personally I would start to wonder what is going on. Basic sanity check: 1) Do you have more or less than expected? 2) If less, would it be possible somebody is doing something with funds that is not entirely the way it should be? (Also known as fraud). 3) Wild guess: did you do any year-end processing at all? If not, all results from day one till now would be seen as current earnings. At year end, it is a good habit to add any profits to the available reserves (equity) and start over for the new year. If we skip that, how is SQL-Ledger to know the period for which we want to calculate profit has ended? HtH Paul 2009/7/9 <je...@ix...> > Here's my issue. Our current earnings is off by 54,300.03 its been off by > this number for years. I'd would like to correct it, but I am not seeing > how to affect current earnings without putting my income statement out of > wack. I tried modifying retained earnings and using long term loans as the > offesetting account, but it had zero effect on current earnings. > > Any suggestions? > > Jeff > > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:32:40 -0400, "J.P. Possenti" <jp...@pi...> wrote: > > Hello I had posted this in the message board on the site about 3 weeks > > ago and no response; not sure if this is more active or not. > > > > So I will ask here: > > > > I have a number of items that when I entered into sql ledger, I picked > > the wrong income account. When going back to editing these items, I do > > not see all of my income accounts even though I know they exist. I know > > this because I see them in the Chart of Accounts and when I add a new > > item I get the full list. > > > > Is this a bug or is it like that for a reason? > > > > I can simply delete and re-add the item with the correct income account > > but I am wondering if this will affect any reports or previous invoices > > I made with that item. I would be keeping everything exactly alike > > except the income account. Would this be ok? > > > > So bug or is it like that for a reason? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > JP > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > sql-ledger-users mailing list > > sql...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, > vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have > the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize > details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > |
From: <je...@ix...> - 2009-07-09 18:16:38
|
Here's my issue. Our current earnings is off by 54,300.03 its been off by this number for years. I'd would like to correct it, but I am not seeing how to affect current earnings without putting my income statement out of wack. I tried modifying retained earnings and using long term loans as the offesetting account, but it had zero effect on current earnings. Any suggestions? Jeff On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:32:40 -0400, "J.P. Possenti" <jp...@pi...> wrote: > Hello I had posted this in the message board on the site about 3 weeks > ago and no response; not sure if this is more active or not. > > So I will ask here: > > I have a number of items that when I entered into sql ledger, I picked > the wrong income account. When going back to editing these items, I do > not see all of my income accounts even though I know they exist. I know > this because I see them in the Chart of Accounts and when I add a new > item I get the full list. > > Is this a bug or is it like that for a reason? > > I can simply delete and re-add the item with the correct income account > but I am wondering if this will affect any reports or previous invoices > I made with that item. I would be keeping everything exactly alike > except the income account. Would this be ok? > > So bug or is it like that for a reason? > > > Thanks > > JP > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users |
From: J.P. P. <jp...@pi...> - 2009-07-09 15:24:56
|
Has anyone made a variety of sales invoice templates that they could share? There is nothing wrong with the original one really, but I was wondering if anyone has made a cleaner looking design or maybe modified it in ways I am not sure can be done. I am not a latex guru, so did not really want to start messing around too much. If you have some to share, it would be great! JP |
From: Yves L. ing. <yve...@gm...> - 2009-06-29 20:41:30
|
Hi, Is it possible to link multiple expenses account to a service to track purchase of goods and/or services? My business is service oriented. I don't sell goods and seldom buy some. But I do rely on providers for services that I resell. Yves |
From: Armaghan S. <sa...@le...> - 2009-06-29 11:34:45
|
Here is how the whole thing works: 1. You can edit the account links only if there is no transaction referencing this part. 2. If you use the 'Change up' menu, you can edit the accounts links. However a new part with same part number is created with you save. This might add to the confusion because now there are two parts with same number. 3. You can mark a part obsolete and it will not appear in parts lookups during transaction entry. To mark a part obsolete, its onhand should be zero. You can add a new part again with same part number but with different account links. You can correct the account postings for past transactions for that part using a GL transaction. The 3rd point seems the best way to change any account inaccuracies without mucking around with existing transactions. Hope this helps. Let me know if I am not clear. On our sql-ledger hosting, we can allow the user to change the account links any time he or she likes to. There is a reposting script which, when run, corrects all past transactions. Regards Armaghan -- - free sql-ledger hosting, documentation, support - http://www.ledger123.com - http://wiki.ledger123.com - http://help.ledger123.com |
From: J.P. P. <jp...@pi...> - 2009-06-29 04:13:52
|
Not sure if this is the correct mailing list to request the features. Is it possible to add a field for vendors and customers where I can write down their website in addition to the email? I have some vendors that I deal with strictly online, not really a b&m location so it would really be ideal to have a website field instead of an address field. As far as the customer side, I think it is also possible to sell to a website or a company based strictly on the web. Any reasons why it has not been implemented? Best, JP |
From: Paul T. <pt...@wa...> - 2009-06-27 07:05:20
|
As a work-around, if the change works for future and income is wrong but the COGS are handled ok, you could make a Journal Entry moving the income from wrong account x to right account y. 2009/6/26 J.P. Possenti <jp...@pi...> > Thanks, I will try this and report back. > > On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 06:05 +0200, Paul Tammes wrote: > > It is a way to change the income account for certain goods (COGS). > > I am not sure it will change previous sales as well, I rather think not. > > I suggest you open a test-firm and do some trial and error before making > > errors in the actual accounting program. > > > > in sql-ledger, backup to file. Unzip the file and rename to test.sql > > Then in /admin.pl create TESTFIRM with accompanying user test. > > su postgres > > psql TESTFIRM < test.sql > > > > /login and choos TESTFIRM. > > > > Now you have a copy of the recent accounts to test to your hearts desire. > > Once you knwo what to do and how to do it, replicate those actuions in > the > > actual database and Bob is a close relative. > > > > 2009/6/26 Jeff Roberts <je...@jr...> > > > > > I don't know JP > > > > > > I'm way back on 2.6.22 and I don't have that function so I can't tell. > > > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > > J.P. Possenti wrote: > > > > Since I never got a reply from anyone else confirming this statement. > > > > Although I see I can change it, is this the correct way to do this? > > > > > > > > Is this still the suggested method instead of deleting and re-adding > > > > and > > > > remaking the old invoices or transactions that had to do with those > > > > items? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 10:23 -0600, Dieter Simader wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, J.P. Possenti wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>> Right I have those checked as they should. However I had not added > that > > > >>> income account at the time, so right now I cannot change it. > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks for your response! > > > >>> > > > >>> Is this also the correct place to put suggestions? Or is there > another > > > >>> mailing list for that? > > > >>> > > > >> To change account links go to > > > >> > > > >> Goods & Services -> Changeup > > > >> > > > >> DS > > > >> > > > >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > >> sql-ledger-users mailing list > > > >> sql...@li... > > > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > sql-ledger-users mailing list > > > > sql...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > sql-ledger-users mailing list > > > sql...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > sql-ledger-users mailing list > > sql...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > |
From: J.P. P. <jp...@pi...> - 2009-06-26 15:51:12
|
Thanks, I will try this and report back. On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 06:05 +0200, Paul Tammes wrote: > It is a way to change the income account for certain goods (COGS). > I am not sure it will change previous sales as well, I rather think not. > I suggest you open a test-firm and do some trial and error before making > errors in the actual accounting program. > > in sql-ledger, backup to file. Unzip the file and rename to test.sql > Then in /admin.pl create TESTFIRM with accompanying user test. > su postgres > psql TESTFIRM < test.sql > > /login and choos TESTFIRM. > > Now you have a copy of the recent accounts to test to your hearts desire. > Once you knwo what to do and how to do it, replicate those actuions in the > actual database and Bob is a close relative. > > 2009/6/26 Jeff Roberts <je...@jr...> > > > I don't know JP > > > > I'm way back on 2.6.22 and I don't have that function so I can't tell. > > > > Jeff > > > > > > J.P. Possenti wrote: > > > Since I never got a reply from anyone else confirming this statement. > > > Although I see I can change it, is this the correct way to do this? > > > > > > Is this still the suggested method instead of deleting and re-adding > > > and > > > remaking the old invoices or transactions that had to do with those > > > items? > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 10:23 -0600, Dieter Simader wrote: > > > > > >> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, J.P. Possenti wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>> Right I have those checked as they should. However I had not added that > > >>> income account at the time, so right now I cannot change it. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks for your response! > > >>> > > >>> Is this also the correct place to put suggestions? Or is there another > > >>> mailing list for that? > > >>> > > >> To change account links go to > > >> > > >> Goods & Services -> Changeup > > >> > > >> DS > > >> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> sql-ledger-users mailing list > > >> sql...@li... > > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > > >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > sql-ledger-users mailing list > > > sql...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > sql-ledger-users mailing list > > sql...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users |
From: Paul T. <pt...@wa...> - 2009-06-26 04:05:53
|
It is a way to change the income account for certain goods (COGS). I am not sure it will change previous sales as well, I rather think not. I suggest you open a test-firm and do some trial and error before making errors in the actual accounting program. in sql-ledger, backup to file. Unzip the file and rename to test.sql Then in /admin.pl create TESTFIRM with accompanying user test. su postgres psql TESTFIRM < test.sql /login and choos TESTFIRM. Now you have a copy of the recent accounts to test to your hearts desire. Once you knwo what to do and how to do it, replicate those actuions in the actual database and Bob is a close relative. 2009/6/26 Jeff Roberts <je...@jr...> > I don't know JP > > I'm way back on 2.6.22 and I don't have that function so I can't tell. > > Jeff > > > J.P. Possenti wrote: > > Since I never got a reply from anyone else confirming this statement. > > Although I see I can change it, is this the correct way to do this? > > > > Is this still the suggested method instead of deleting and re-adding > > and > > remaking the old invoices or transactions that had to do with those > > items? > > > > > > On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 10:23 -0600, Dieter Simader wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, J.P. Possenti wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Right I have those checked as they should. However I had not added that > >>> income account at the time, so right now I cannot change it. > >>> > >>> Thanks for your response! > >>> > >>> Is this also the correct place to put suggestions? Or is there another > >>> mailing list for that? > >>> > >> To change account links go to > >> > >> Goods & Services -> Changeup > >> > >> DS > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> sql-ledger-users mailing list > >> sql...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > sql-ledger-users mailing list > > sql...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > |
From: Jeff R. <je...@jr...> - 2009-06-25 23:16:55
|
I don't know JP I'm way back on 2.6.22 and I don't have that function so I can't tell. Jeff J.P. Possenti wrote: > Since I never got a reply from anyone else confirming this statement. > Although I see I can change it, is this the correct way to do this? > > Is this still the suggested method instead of deleting and re-adding > and > remaking the old invoices or transactions that had to do with those > items? > > > On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 10:23 -0600, Dieter Simader wrote: > >> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, J.P. Possenti wrote: >> >> >>> Right I have those checked as they should. However I had not added that >>> income account at the time, so right now I cannot change it. >>> >>> Thanks for your response! >>> >>> Is this also the correct place to put suggestions? Or is there another >>> mailing list for that? >>> >> To change account links go to >> >> Goods & Services -> Changeup >> >> DS >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> sql-ledger-users mailing list >> sql...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > sql-ledger-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users > |