You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
(55) |
Mar
(100) |
Apr
(203) |
May
(330) |
Jun
(190) |
Jul
(302) |
Aug
(323) |
Sep
(197) |
Oct
(245) |
Nov
(490) |
Dec
(330) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(194) |
Feb
(400) |
Mar
(416) |
Apr
(415) |
May
(359) |
Jun
(381) |
Jul
(491) |
Aug
(311) |
Sep
(291) |
Oct
(273) |
Nov
(355) |
Dec
(266) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(306) |
Feb
(303) |
Mar
(520) |
Apr
(346) |
May
(255) |
Jun
(221) |
Jul
(171) |
Aug
(247) |
Sep
(147) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(165) |
Dec
(65) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(90) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(121) |
Apr
(103) |
May
(113) |
Jun
(103) |
Jul
(104) |
Aug
(67) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(78) |
Dec
(70) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(77) |
Feb
(76) |
Mar
(63) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(41) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(21) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(45) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(33) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(97) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(50) |
Apr
(71) |
May
(70) |
Jun
(64) |
Jul
(45) |
Aug
(62) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2025 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2026 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2003-09-03 14:05:17
|
Sounds sort of useful, although unless I am misunderstanding how this would work, it would not be useful for a lot of beans since you can use a lot of beans without setting all properties, relying on defaults, etc. What I think would be useful for Spring is a tool for verifying that all classes and interfaces which have been specified in a context definition are actually available on the classpath. I have been hit by typos a few times, and having a tool in the build which would verify the context in this respect would be useful... rod...@in... wrote: >All, > >As I can see it the only arguable advantage that >PicoContainer has over Spring is that it can satisfy all >dependencies before allowing an object to be invoked, so that >an object can never be used when incompletely configured. I >don't like their constructor way of doing this, and I think >that it often makes sense to have optional properties, with >sensible default. So I've never been worried by this in >Spring. > >However, it's pretty easy to add optional dependency >checking. I've successfully prototyped the following, which >required very minor changes: >- add a new DTD attribute for the "bean" element called >dependencyCheck >- if this is set to true, XmlBeanFactory checks that all >properties on that bean have been set. If not it throws an >UnsatisfiedDependencyException. We can't do the PicoContainer- >style automatic wiring up as we can support multiple objects >of any type. They can only accomplish this because they >support only a single object of each type, which doesn't >satisfy the kind of real-world requirements I've used Spring >in. > >At present my prototype checks only Object properties >(presumably other beans in the factory). It might be good to >have three values for dependencyCheck: "no" >(default), "object" (collaborators) and "all" (primitives and >collaborators). > >As this is backward compatible and easy to do I'm inclined to >add it, if only for marketing value. There may be real value >in that it means that an init method wouldn't need to check >that a certain property was non-null. > >What do you think? Is this worthwhile? > >Regards, >Rod > > |
|
From: Ken K. <kk...@kk...> - 2003-09-03 13:45:05
|
+1 rod...@in... wrote: >All, > >As I can see it the only arguable advantage that >PicoContainer has over Spring is that it can satisfy all >dependencies before allowing an object to be invoked, so that >an object can never be used when incompletely configured. I >don't like their constructor way of doing this, and I think >that it often makes sense to have optional properties, with >sensible default. So I've never been worried by this in >Spring. > >However, it's pretty easy to add optional dependency >checking. I've successfully prototyped the following, which >required very minor changes: >- add a new DTD attribute for the "bean" element called >dependencyCheck >- if this is set to true, XmlBeanFactory checks that all >properties on that bean have been set. If not it throws an >UnsatisfiedDependencyException. We can't do the PicoContainer- >style automatic wiring up as we can support multiple objects >of any type. They can only accomplish this because they >support only a single object of each type, which doesn't >satisfy the kind of real-world requirements I've used Spring >in. > >At present my prototype checks only Object properties >(presumably other beans in the factory). It might be good to >have three values for dependencyCheck: "no" >(default), "object" (collaborators) and "all" (primitives and >collaborators). > >As this is backward compatible and easy to do I'm inclined to >add it, if only for marketing value. There may be real value >in that it means that an init method wouldn't need to check >that a certain property was non-null. > >What do you think? Is this worthwhile? > >Regards, >Rod > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >Welcome to geek heaven. >http://thinkgeek.com/sf >_______________________________________________ >Springframework-developer mailing list >Spr...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > |
|
From: <rod...@in...> - 2003-09-03 13:36:49
|
All, As I can see it the only arguable advantage that PicoContainer has over Spring is that it can satisfy all dependencies before allowing an object to be invoked, so that an object can never be used when incompletely configured. I don't like their constructor way of doing this, and I think that it often makes sense to have optional properties, with sensible default. So I've never been worried by this in Spring. However, it's pretty easy to add optional dependency checking. I've successfully prototyped the following, which required very minor changes: - add a new DTD attribute for the "bean" element called dependencyCheck - if this is set to true, XmlBeanFactory checks that all properties on that bean have been set. If not it throws an UnsatisfiedDependencyException. We can't do the PicoContainer- style automatic wiring up as we can support multiple objects of any type. They can only accomplish this because they support only a single object of each type, which doesn't satisfy the kind of real-world requirements I've used Spring in. At present my prototype checks only Object properties (presumably other beans in the factory). It might be good to have three values for dependencyCheck: "no" (default), "object" (collaborators) and "all" (primitives and collaborators). As this is backward compatible and easy to do I'm inclined to add it, if only for marketing value. There may be real value in that it means that an init method wouldn't need to check that a certain property was non-null. What do you think? Is this worthwhile? Regards, Rod |
|
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?<jp....@ti...> - 2003-09-03 13:15:23
|
Dmitriy,=0D=0A=0D=0AI will split the answer in two parts:=0D=0A1) Html si=
ngle values (most form elements)=0D=0A2) Html multiple values (checkboxes=
, selects with "multiple")=0D=0A=0D=0A1) There is no support for multiple=
commands as I know. In an earlier discussion on this topic, Juergen was =
against this possibility. What I use is a command embedding others as now=
the problems with inner fields are fixed. So you can set 'subCmd1.person=
.name' for example.=0D=0A=0D=0A2) When using multiple Html values, These =
values are wrapped into a Strings array by default. If you prefer have a =
kind of collection instead, you will have to write a propertiesEditor for=
your data type. In this case, you will receive as text value a comma del=
imited String including the values from the array.=0D=0A=0D=0AI use it fo=
r creating an Objects list receiving the ids by this way. If you are inte=
rested, I can provide you some examples. =0D=0A=0D=0ARegards,=0D=0AJean-=
Pierre=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A---------- Initial Header -----------=0D=0A=0D=0A=
From : spr...@li...=0D=0ATo=
: "'spr...@li...'" <springfr=
ame...@li...>=0D=0ACc : =0D=0ADate =
: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 08:37:25 -0400=0D=0ASubject : [Springframework-devel=
oper] Binding to a Collection=0D=0A=0D=0AHi everybody. I have one questio=
n, if any one has a quick answer :-) What=0D=0Awould be the best way to "=
bind" html data into a collection of objects? =0D=0A=0D=0ALet's say I hav=
e an html table in the form, each row representing a=0D=0Amodel/command o=
bject. When submitting this form to a Controller, I would=0D=0Alike to bi=
nd the values from the html table into a Collection of=0D=0Amodel/command=
objects. What would be the best way to do that?=0D=0A=0D=0AThanks,=0D=0A=
Dmitriy.=0D=0A=0D=0AP.S.=0D=0A=0D=0AI believe there was a message about t=
his issue on the list, but I'm to lazy=0D=0Ato search for it ;-)=0D=0A=0D=
=0A=0D=0A=0A=0A********** L'ADSL A 20 EUR/MOIS********** =0AAvec Tiscali,=
l'ADSL est =E0 20 EUR/mois. Vous pourrez chercher longtemps avant de tro=
uver moins cher ! =0APour profiter de cette offre exceptionnelle, cliquez=
ici : http://register.tiscali.fr/adsl/=0AOffre soumise =E0 conditions.=0A=
|
|
From: Kopylenko, D. <dko...@ac...> - 2003-09-03 12:37:29
|
Hi everybody. I have one question, if any one has a quick answer :-) What would be the best way to "bind" html data into a collection of objects? Let's say I have an html table in the form, each row representing a model/command object. When submitting this form to a Controller, I would like to bind the values from the html table into a Collection of model/command objects. What would be the best way to do that? Thanks, Dmitriy. P.S. I believe there was a message about this issue on the list, but I'm to lazy to search for it ;-) |
|
From: <rod...@in...> - 2003-09-03 10:31:13
|
Thomas, We still have com.interface21 Javadocs on the web site. (I've only noticed after linking to the DataAccessException Javadoc directly on a TSS thread :-( Can you please update them. Maybe leave the I21 docs as well!?? Would be great to add some deprecation message to all of them, but that might be a pain. Thanks, Rod |
|
From: Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...> - 2003-09-03 07:03:54
|
There are two major things I'd like to address before M2 and a minor issues 1 (major). Addition of propertyeditor support for reference data. A customer has a language (Locale). A controller returns a formbackingobject containing the setter for the Locale. The referencedata method returns a list of Locale available to choose from. For the BeanWrapper to be able to set the Locale the user has chosen from the list, it (the reference data locale list) must be 'transformed' using the PropertyEditor that has been registered for that specific field (implications: additions of getter for the PropertyEditoron Errors interface and a TransformTag actually allowing the transformation) 3 (major). Documentation. I plan to do a lot more JavaDOC (especially the MVC package) and make it more accessible (by creating better package descriptions). 2 (minor). Possibility of specifying which Binder to use, to allow for transformation of input to Beanproperties based on something other than http-params (for instance XML or whatever). Feedback please ;-) Alef P.s. Yeah Juergen..., I keep on getting amazed by the guy... -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Rod Johnson [mailto:rod...@in...] Verzonden: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:17 AM Aan: al...@jt...; jp....@ti... CC: 'springframework-developer' Onderwerp: Re: [Springframework-developer] Tiles Example (was: Integration samples) >I don't know what the time-span for the next release is, I might have some time to document things a bit further (we also need some kind of tiles-howto), but not until at least next week... We've been doing one release every 3 weeks, but I think 4-5 weeks is more appropriate for M2. Early October. It was urgent to get the first org.springframework release out ASAP My main priority at present is source level metadata at present. That and ResultSet returns from stored procedures might justify a release before the end of September. If anyone else is aware of any other pressing enhancements, let me know. With Juergen away the pace of change will probably slow a bit...I don't think I've ever come across anyone with that much (well-directed) energy! Regards, Rod |
|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2003-09-02 22:17:12
|
>I don't know what the time-span for the next release is, I might have some time to document things a bit further (we also need some kind of tiles-howto), but not until at least next week... We've been doing one release every 3 weeks, but I think 4-5 weeks is more appropriate for M2. Early October. It was urgent to get the first org.springframework release out ASAP My main priority at present is source level metadata at present. That and ResultSet returns from stored procedures might justify a release before the end of September. If anyone else is aware of any other pressing enhancements, let me know. With Juergen away the pace of change will probably slow a bit...I don't think I've ever come across anyone with that much (well-directed) energy! Regards, Rod |
|
From: Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...> - 2003-09-02 22:10:01
|
Ahh, forgot to say one other thing... The retrieval of the news is doen right now on a per request basis, so it's kinda slow... When I have time, I'll implement a small caching mech. Alef -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Alef Arendsen (JTeam) [mailto:al...@jt...]=20 Verzonden: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:20 AM Aan: 'jp....@ti...' CC: 'springframework-developer' Onderwerp: Tiles Example (was: Integration samples) Tiles example is in the CVS right now... I id _not_ add it to the sandbox, since that only contains .java files and must frustrate users wanting to build the sandbox? Anyway, the example it quite straightforward, however it does not have _any_ documentation, except for a small piece in the webapp itself. 1. run ant warfile in the tiles-example-dir 2. deploy the tiles-example.war from dist 3. goto <host:port>/tiles-example/index.html 4. there it is... It has a couple two templates (one for the complete site, one for the newsfeeds that are automatically imported into the site). The main template is re-used for the index, about and contact pages, the news template is used for the news from worldpress, theserverside and slashdot (two sources are displayed on every page, which ones depends on what page you're viewing). The news template uses a Controller (extending ComponentControllerSupport) so it can reach the appCtx to retrieve the feedConfigurator (mentioning the feed names and urls). How many and what feeds are displayed is defined in the definitions.xml file... I don't know what the time-span for the next release is, I might have some time to document things a bit further (we also need some kind of tiles-howto), but not until at least next week... Alef -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: jp....@ti... [mailto:jp....@ti...]=20 Verzonden: Monday, September 01, 2003 11:01 AM Aan: alef CC: springframework-developer Onderwerp: RE: [Springframework-developer] Integration samples Alef, Obviously, Tiles being integrated to Spring, it had to be first listed. Maybe I or someone else could find any time for finishing the Tiles sample. Could you upload it in the CVS? As long as it is not finished, perhaps the sandbox could be a better place? Regards, Jean-Pierre ---------- Initial Header ----------- From : "Alef Arendsen \(JTeam\)" <al...@jt...> To : "'JP Pawlak'" <jp....@ti...>, <spr...@li...> Cc :=20 Date : Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:08:29 +0200 Subject : RE: [Springframework-developer] Integration samples I still have a Tiles example lying around, however, I haven't got enough time right now to finish it... Alef -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] Namens JP Pawlak Verzonden: Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:51 PM Aan: spr...@li... Onderwerp: [Springframework-developer] Integration samples Hi all, In addition to the samples discussion I provided two messages ago, another family will certainly be helpful and no great work. I mean integration samples with some others frameworks like : - Tapestry - Webwork - Struts Jean-Pierre ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ********** L'ADSL A 20 EUR/MOIS**********=20 Avec Tiscali, l'ADSL est =E0 20 EUR/mois. Vous pourrez chercher = longtemps avant de trouver moins cher !=20 Pour profiter de cette offre exceptionnelle, cliquez ici : http://register.tiscali.fr/adsl/ Offre soumise =E0 conditions. |
|
From: Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...> - 2003-09-02 22:07:03
|
Tiles example is in the CVS right now... I id _not_ add it to the sandbox, since that only contains .java files and must frustrate users wanting to build the sandbox? Anyway, the example it quite straightforward, however it does not have _any_ documentation, except for a small piece in the webapp itself. 1. run ant warfile in the tiles-example-dir 2. deploy the tiles-example.war from dist 3. goto <host:port>/tiles-example/index.html 4. there it is... It has a couple two templates (one for the complete site, one for the newsfeeds that are automatically imported into the site). The main template is re-used for the index, about and contact pages, the news template is used for the news from worldpress, theserverside and slashdot (two sources are displayed on every page, which ones depends on what page you're viewing). The news template uses a Controller (extending ComponentControllerSupport) so it can reach the appCtx to retrieve the feedConfigurator (mentioning the feed names and urls). How many and what feeds are displayed is defined in the definitions.xml file... I don't know what the time-span for the next release is, I might have some time to document things a bit further (we also need some kind of tiles-howto), but not until at least next week... Alef -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: jp....@ti... [mailto:jp....@ti...]=20 Verzonden: Monday, September 01, 2003 11:01 AM Aan: alef CC: springframework-developer Onderwerp: RE: [Springframework-developer] Integration samples Alef, Obviously, Tiles being integrated to Spring, it had to be first listed. Maybe I or someone else could find any time for finishing the Tiles sample. Could you upload it in the CVS? As long as it is not finished, perhaps the sandbox could be a better place? Regards, Jean-Pierre ---------- Initial Header ----------- From : "Alef Arendsen \(JTeam\)" <al...@jt...> To : "'JP Pawlak'" <jp....@ti...>, <spr...@li...> Cc :=20 Date : Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:08:29 +0200 Subject : RE: [Springframework-developer] Integration samples I still have a Tiles example lying around, however, I haven't got enough time right now to finish it... Alef -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] Namens JP Pawlak Verzonden: Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:51 PM Aan: spr...@li... Onderwerp: [Springframework-developer] Integration samples Hi all, In addition to the samples discussion I provided two messages ago, another family will certainly be helpful and no great work. I mean integration samples with some others frameworks like : - Tapestry - Webwork - Struts Jean-Pierre ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ********** L'ADSL A 20 EUR/MOIS**********=20 Avec Tiscali, l'ADSL est =E0 20 EUR/mois. Vous pourrez chercher = longtemps avant de trouver moins cher !=20 Pour profiter de cette offre exceptionnelle, cliquez ici : http://register.tiscali.fr/adsl/ Offre soumise =E0 conditions. |
|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2003-09-02 22:00:38
|
Thanks Alef, I've now removed shared object support. Regards, Rod ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alef Arendsen (JTeam)" <al...@jt...> To: "'Rod Johnson'" <rod...@in...> Cc: <spr...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 10:59 PM Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support > Rod, > > I've removed the dependencies on the shared object support from the > Tiles classes, so you're free to remove it from the context classes and > the tests. > > Cheers, > Alef > > > |
|
From: Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...> - 2003-09-02 21:46:20
|
Rod, I've removed the dependencies on the shared object support from the Tiles classes, so you're free to remove it from the context classes and the tests. Cheers, Alef |
|
From: Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...> - 2003-09-02 19:20:19
|
Sorry for the delay, it'll be there this evening... Alef -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: jp....@ti... [mailto:jp....@ti...]=20 Verzonden: Monday, September 01, 2003 11:01 AM Aan: alef CC: springframework-developer Onderwerp: RE: [Springframework-developer] Integration samples Alef, Obviously, Tiles being integrated to Spring, it had to be first listed. Maybe I or someone else could find any time for finishing the Tiles sample. Could you upload it in the CVS? As long as it is not finished, perhaps the sandbox could be a better place? Regards, Jean-Pierre ---------- Initial Header ----------- From : "Alef Arendsen \(JTeam\)" <al...@jt...> To : "'JP Pawlak'" <jp....@ti...>, <spr...@li...> Cc :=20 Date : Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:08:29 +0200 Subject : RE: [Springframework-developer] Integration samples I still have a Tiles example lying around, however, I haven't got enough time right now to finish it... Alef -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] Namens JP Pawlak Verzonden: Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:51 PM Aan: spr...@li... Onderwerp: [Springframework-developer] Integration samples Hi all, In addition to the samples discussion I provided two messages ago, another family will certainly be helpful and no great work. I mean integration samples with some others frameworks like : - Tapestry - Webwork - Struts Jean-Pierre ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer ********** L'ADSL A 20 EUR/MOIS**********=20 Avec Tiscali, l'ADSL est =E0 20 EUR/mois. Vous pourrez chercher = longtemps avant de trouver moins cher !=20 Pour profiter de cette offre exceptionnelle, cliquez ici : http://register.tiscali.fr/adsl/ Offre soumise =E0 conditions. |
|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2003-09-02 18:00:01
|
Guys, We've just exceeded 1000 downloads on SourceForge (probably more as their count is usually a bit out of date). I think this is pretty good as we've only had anything to download for 2 months! I've begun the draft of an article for TSS called "Introduction to the Spring Framework". When I get time to get it into a coherent state (probably late this week) I'll put it into CVS for other developers to review (probably via Word comments) and possibly add material. After the review (say about a week) I'll revise it again and send it to Floyd mid September. Floyd told me in Boston he'd be happy to publish such an article. I think a TSS article will help boost interest significantly. Regards, Rod |
|
From: Kopylenko, D. <dko...@ac...> - 2003-09-02 11:13:56
|
+1 -----Original Message----- From: Rod Johnson To: spr...@li... Sent: 8/31/2003 3:03 PM Subject: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support Another candidate on my simplification hitlist: shared object support for ApplicationContexts. I added this relatively late before the project went open source. Juergen and I agree it's probably not necessary. Anyone using it? Please let me know if you object to it being removed. As I've said, I'm keen to simplify the API and implementation to just what's necessary and best practice before 1.0. Regards, Rod ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...> - 2003-09-02 08:32:27
|
I don't object to anything that'll simplifies API's. I'll have a look into in this afternoon... Alef -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Rod Johnson [mailto:rod...@in...] Verzonden: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 12:42 AM Aan: al...@jt...; spr...@li... Onderwerp: Re: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support Alef, Do you mean you do or don't object to removing shared object support? The only thing that removing it breaks is the Tiles support. If you agree it should be removed, are you happy to change this first? Regards, Rod ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alef Arendsen (JTeam)" <al...@jt...> To: "'Rod Johnson'" <rod...@in...>; <spr...@li...> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 8:04 AM Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support > +1 > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: spr...@li... > [mailto:spr...@li...] Namens > Rod Johnson > Verzonden: Sunday, August 31, 2003 9:04 PM > Aan: spr...@li... > Onderwerp: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support > > > Another candidate on my simplification hitlist: shared object support > for ApplicationContexts. > > I added this relatively late before the project went open source. > Juergen and I agree it's probably not necessary. > > Anyone using it? Please let me know if you object to it being removed. > > As I've said, I'm keen to simplify the API and implementation to just > what's necessary and best practice before 1.0. > > Regards, > Rod > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > |
|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2003-09-02 06:59:00
|
> Is this explained anywhere? No, another reason for wanting to get rid of it :-) >Perhaps you could point me to the class or > package if it takes more than a sentence or two to describe what it is... org.sfw.context.ApplicationContext interface and org.sfw.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext. Regards, Rod > > Rod Johnson wrote: > > >Another candidate on my simplification hitlist: shared object support for > >ApplicationContexts. > > > >I added this relatively late before the project went open source. Juergen > >and I agree it's probably not necessary. > > > >Anyone using it? Please let me know if you object to it being removed. > > > >As I've said, I'm keen to simplify the API and implementation to just what's > >necessary and best practice before 1.0. > > > >Regards, > >Rod > > > > > > > > |
|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2003-09-02 06:47:41
|
Is anyone using, or does anyone have suggestions as to how to improve, the BeanFactoryBootstrap class (in beans.factory.support)? I'm inclined to demote it to the sandbox, unless it can be made significantly more useful. The motivation was to provide a generic way of configuring a BeanFactory on those occasions when a BeanFactory had to be loaded as a singleton. It works by looking at System properties to find a bean definition called "bootstrapBeanFactory". The problem with this is that most BeanFactory implementations, like the XmlBeanFactory, are not JavaBeans, and hence can't easily be configured themselves via a BeanFactory. I did also once consider supporting alternative sources of properties--properties file on classpath etc--that could be searched in a documented order. Is this a potentially useful piece of functionality that we should get right? Or should we just leave users to write their own custom singletons if they really need to bootstrap via a Singleton rather than a J2EE hook like ServletContext? Regards, Rod |
|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2003-09-01 23:54:42
|
Is this explained anywhere? Perhaps you could point me to the class or package if it takes more than a sentence or two to describe what it is... Regards, Colin Rod Johnson wrote: >Another candidate on my simplification hitlist: shared object support for >ApplicationContexts. > >I added this relatively late before the project went open source. Juergen >and I agree it's probably not necessary. > >Anyone using it? Please let me know if you object to it being removed. > >As I've said, I'm keen to simplify the API and implementation to just what's >necessary and best practice before 1.0. > >Regards, >Rod > > |
|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2003-09-01 22:46:23
|
Alef, Do you mean you do or don't object to removing shared object support? The only thing that removing it breaks is the Tiles support. If you agree it should be removed, are you happy to change this first? Regards, Rod ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alef Arendsen (JTeam)" <al...@jt...> To: "'Rod Johnson'" <rod...@in...>; <spr...@li...> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 8:04 AM Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support > +1 > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: spr...@li... > [mailto:spr...@li...] Namens > Rod Johnson > Verzonden: Sunday, August 31, 2003 9:04 PM > Aan: spr...@li... > Onderwerp: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support > > > Another candidate on my simplification hitlist: shared object support > for ApplicationContexts. > > I added this relatively late before the project went open source. > Juergen and I agree it's probably not necessary. > > Anyone using it? Please let me know if you object to it being removed. > > As I've said, I'm keen to simplify the API and implementation to just > what's necessary and best practice before 1.0. > > Regards, > Rod > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > |
|
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?<jp....@ti...> - 2003-09-01 09:02:16
|
Alef,=0D=0A=0D=0AObviously, Tiles being integrated to Spring, it had to b= e first listed.=0D=0A=0D=0AMaybe I or someone else could find any time fo= r finishing the Tiles sample. Could you upload it in the CVS? As long as = it is not finished, perhaps the sandbox could be a better place?=0D=0A=0D= =0ARegards,=0D=0AJean-Pierre=0D=0A=0D=0A---------- Initial Header -------= ----=0D=0A=0D=0AFrom : "Alef Arendsen \(JTeam\)" <al...@jt...>=0D=0A= To : "'JP Pawlak'" <jp....@ti...>, <springframework-dev= el...@li...>=0D=0ACc : =0D=0ADate : Mon, 1= Sep 2003 09:08:29 +0200=0D=0ASubject : RE: [Springframework-developer] I= ntegration samples=0D=0A=0D=0AI still have a Tiles example lying around, = however, I haven't got enough=0D=0Atime right now to finish it...=0D=0A=0D= =0AAlef=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----=0D=0AVan: sprin= gfr...@li...=0D=0A[mailto:springframe= wor...@li...] Namens JP=0D=0APawlak=0D=0AVe= rzonden: Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:51 PM=0D=0AAan: springframework-deve= lo...@li...=0D=0AOnderwerp: [Springframework-developer] I= ntegration samples=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0AHi all,=0D=0A=0D=0AIn addition to the= samples discussion I provided two messages ago,=0D=0Aanother family will= certainly be helpful and no great work. I mean=0D=0Aintegration samples = with some others frameworks like :=0D=0A=0D=0A- Tapestry=0D=0A- Webwork=0D= =0A- Struts=0D=0A=0D=0AJean-Pierre=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A---= ----------------------------------------------------=0D=0AThis sf.net ema= il is sponsored by:ThinkGeek=0D=0AWelcome to geek heaven.=0D=0Ahttp://thi= nkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________=0D=0ASpring= framework-developer mailing lis...@li...= rceforge.net=0D=0Ahttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springfram= ework-developer=0D=0A=0D=0A=0A=0A********** L'ADSL A 20 EUR/MOIS*********= * =0AAvec Tiscali, l'ADSL est =E0 20 EUR/mois. Vous pourrez chercher long= temps avant de trouver moins cher ! =0APour profiter de cette offre excep= tionnelle, cliquez ici : http://register.tiscali.fr/adsl/=0AOffre soumise= =E0 conditions.=0A |
|
From: Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...> - 2003-09-01 07:07:55
|
I still have a Tiles example lying around, however, I haven't got enough time right now to finish it... Alef -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] Namens JP Pawlak Verzonden: Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:51 PM Aan: spr...@li... Onderwerp: [Springframework-developer] Integration samples Hi all, In addition to the samples discussion I provided two messages ago, another family will certainly be helpful and no great work. I mean integration samples with some others frameworks like : - Tapestry - Webwork - Struts Jean-Pierre ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...> - 2003-09-01 07:06:24
|
+1 About the databinder, I've having a small discussion lately about the possibility of changing the databinder implementation used. Right now it works with servletrequestparameters, however, I'd like to investigate the possiblity to for instance have a databinder that works with for instance castor XML contained in the servletrequest... Any idea, or would this make things needlessly complex? Alef -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] Namens Rod Johnson Verzonden: Sunday, August 31, 2003 8:48 PM Aan: spr...@li... Onderwerp: [Springframework-developer] Validation package Is anyone using the addPropertyChangeListener() or addVetoableChangeListener() method of DataBinder? I'm looking at removing the JavaBean event propagation from the BeanWrapper, as I mentioned before. The only other functionality affected is in the validator. A consequence is that setPropertyValues() methods will not throw any checked exceptions (PropertyVetoException from JavaBeans API is checked). Is everyone happy with this change, which I think is a worthwhile simplification of API and implementation? Regards, Rod ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...> - 2003-09-01 07:04:38
|
+1 -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] Namens Rod Johnson Verzonden: Sunday, August 31, 2003 9:04 PM Aan: spr...@li... Onderwerp: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support Another candidate on my simplification hitlist: shared object support for ApplicationContexts. I added this relatively late before the project went open source. Juergen and I agree it's probably not necessary. Anyone using it? Please let me know if you object to it being removed. As I've said, I'm keen to simplify the API and implementation to just what's necessary and best practice before 1.0. Regards, Rod ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |
|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2003-08-31 19:06:39
|
Another candidate on my simplification hitlist: shared object support for ApplicationContexts. I added this relatively late before the project went open source. Juergen and I agree it's probably not necessary. Anyone using it? Please let me know if you object to it being removed. As I've said, I'm keen to simplify the API and implementation to just what's necessary and best practice before 1.0. Regards, Rod |