RE: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support

[Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...>]

I don't object to anything that'll simplifies API's. I'll have a look
into in this afternoon...

Alef


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Rod Johnson [mailto:rod...@in...] 
Verzonden: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 12:42 AM
Aan: al...@jt...; spr...@li...
Onderwerp: Re: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support


Alef,

Do you mean you do or don't object to removing shared object support?

The only thing that removing it breaks is the Tiles support. If you
agree it should be removed, are you happy to change this first?

Regards,
Rod


----- Original Message -----
From: "Alef Arendsen (JTeam)" <al...@jt...>
To: "'Rod Johnson'" <rod...@in...>;
<spr...@li...>
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 8:04 AM
Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support


> +1
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: spr...@li...
> [mailto:spr...@li...] Namens 
> Rod Johnson
> Verzonden: Sunday, August 31, 2003 9:04 PM
> Aan: spr...@li...
> Onderwerp: [Springframework-developer] Shared object support
>
>
> Another candidate on my simplification hitlist: shared object support 
> for ApplicationContexts.
>
> I added this relatively late before the project went open source. 
> Juergen and I agree it's probably not necessary.
>
> Anyone using it? Please let me know if you object to it being removed.
>
> As I've said, I'm keen to simplify the API and implementation to just 
> what's necessary and best practice before 1.0.
>
> Regards,
> Rod
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf 
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>