|
From: Alef A. \(JTeam\) <al...@jt...> - 2003-09-01 07:06:24
|
+1 About the databinder, I've having a small discussion lately about the possibility of changing the databinder implementation used. Right now it works with servletrequestparameters, however, I'd like to investigate the possiblity to for instance have a databinder that works with for instance castor XML contained in the servletrequest... Any idea, or would this make things needlessly complex? Alef -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: spr...@li... [mailto:spr...@li...] Namens Rod Johnson Verzonden: Sunday, August 31, 2003 8:48 PM Aan: spr...@li... Onderwerp: [Springframework-developer] Validation package Is anyone using the addPropertyChangeListener() or addVetoableChangeListener() method of DataBinder? I'm looking at removing the JavaBean event propagation from the BeanWrapper, as I mentioned before. The only other functionality affected is in the validator. A consequence is that setPropertyValues() methods will not throw any checked exceptions (PropertyVetoException from JavaBeans API is checked). Is everyone happy with this change, which I think is a worthwhile simplification of API and implementation? Regards, Rod ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |