Re: [Springframework-developer] new bean factory and application context features

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

I suppose, although to tell you the truth I prefer to declare my 
trnasactions separately from the source. Putting them in the source 
couples things too closely for my taste, and makes management harder, 
given that I want to change things around for unit tests and the like.


Kopylenko, Dmitry wrote:

>Colin,
>
>that will be possible when the metadata support and "magic"
>TransactionAutoProxy creator will be in place ;-)
>
>Regards,
>Dmitriy.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Colin Sampaleanu
>To: "jürgen höller [werk3AT]"
>Cc: spr...@li...
>Sent: 10/14/2003 5:49 PM
>Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] new bean factory and application
>context features
>
>jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote:
>
>  
>
>>...
>>
>>This is a BeanPostProcessor bean that can be set up as follows to proxy
>>    
>>
>the beans with the given names with the given interceptors. Note that
>this is only one bean with proxy settings to define, although there
>might be dozens of target beans with the same proxy behavior.
>  
>
>><bean id="autoProxyCreator"
>>    
>>
>class="org.springframework.aop.framework.support.AutoProxyCreator">
>  
>
>> <property
>>    
>>
>name="beanNames"><value>myBean1,myBean2,myBean3</value></property>
>  
>
>> <property name="interceptors>
>>   <list>
>>     <ref bean="myInterceptor1"/>
>>     <ref bean="myInterceptor2"/>
>>   </list>
>> </property>
>></bean>
>>
>>So setting up 10 transactional beans would just involve 1
>>    
>>
>AutoProxyCreator and 1 transaction interceptor plus the 10 target beans
>(12 beans in total), instead of 10 TransactionProxyFactoryBeans plus the
>10 target beans (20 beans in total). The transaction attributes would be
>centralized though, in contrast to TransactionProxyFactoryBean that
>keeps them local per individual proxy definition.
>  
>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>Hi Juergen,
>
>How do you see this being used (if at all) with the current 
>TransactionInterceptor, since its TransactionAttributeSource property 
>gets satisfied via a MethodMapTransactionAttributeSource instance (which
>
>needs definitions in the format 'FQN.methodName'). While this works fine
>
>when doing individual interceptors for use with ProxyFactoryBean, short 
>of adding new code I'm at a loss as to how I could use 
>TransactionInterceptor with BeanNameAutoProxy to do transactions on all 
>methods in all the beans I feed to the auto proxy.
>
>Just wondering if I missed something?
>
>Regards,
>Colin
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
>SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
>See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
>Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
>_______________________________________________
>Springframework-developer mailing list
>Spr...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>  
>