Re: [Springframework-developer] Package names

[<tri...@tr...>]

Rod,

> I think it's a question of feasibility. It will be hard for me to get up and
> talk about Spring when there's no release.  So if we can't do
> springframework.org before Boston it's gonna have to be 0.95. If we can,
> let's change now.
> 
> I vote
> 0.9 as is (assuming we can't change): this is as much for marketing as
> anything else
> 0.91 with new package names soon after (even within a week)
> 

I would agree.  I don't think anyone could be upset if the package names changed
the following release - how much code could they write in a week?  Especially if
we give everybody a heads up.

I'm OK with org.springframework - I'll just use an IDE that autogenerates the
imports.

Thomas