|
From: Colin S. <col...@ex...> - 2005-11-12 16:34:40
|
I can remoe it. If the inline bean def stuff is going to be rolled back then the dtd is going to change anyway. Keith Donald wrote: >Well, > >Keep in mind this SWF 1.0 DTD has not yet been published, as SWF 1.0 RC1 has >not yet been released. While I guess it's ok to be out on the website now, >that's why it wasn't done so yet. It wasn't an oversight. > >Keith > >-----Original Message----- >From: spr...@li... >[mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf Of >Colin Sampaleanu >Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 11:15 AM >To: spr...@li... >Subject: [Springframework-developer] spring-webflow-1.0.dtd is now on >www.springframework.org > >I've added spring-webflow-1.0.dtd on www.springframework.org as > http://www.springframework.org/dtd/spring-webflow-1.0.dtd >as referred to inside itself. > >Just a reminder that whenever any dtd (webflow or spring) is updated, we >need to update it on the web site too, for people using xml editors and >the like. > >Of course for the libs themselves, they will get them out of the jar >file with the internal entity resolver. > >Also a reminder to anybody using xmlbuddy that if a dtd file changes, >you need to kill xmlbuddy's cache. I don't know offhand if Eclipe WTP >caches DTDs permanently like this; I don't think so. > >Regards, > > > |