I can remoe it. If the inline bean def stuff is going to be rolled back
then the dtd is going to change anyway.
Keith Donald wrote:
>Well,
>
>Keep in mind this SWF 1.0 DTD has not yet been published, as SWF 1.0 RC1 has
>not yet been released. While I guess it's ok to be out on the website now,
>that's why it wasn't done so yet. It wasn't an oversight.
>
>Keith
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: spr...@li...
>[mailto:spr...@li...] On Behalf Of
>Colin Sampaleanu
>Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 11:15 AM
>To: spr...@li...
>Subject: [Springframework-developer] spring-webflow-1.0.dtd is now on
>www.springframework.org
>
>I've added spring-webflow-1.0.dtd on www.springframework.org as
> http://www.springframework.org/dtd/spring-webflow-1.0.dtd
>as referred to inside itself.
>
>Just a reminder that whenever any dtd (webflow or spring) is updated, we
>need to update it on the web site too, for people using xml editors and
>the like.
>
>Of course for the libs themselves, they will get them out of the jar
>file with the internal entity resolver.
>
>Also a reminder to anybody using xmlbuddy that if a dtd file changes,
>you need to kill xmlbuddy's cache. I don't know offhand if Eclipe WTP
>caches DTDs permanently like this; I don't think so.
>
>Regards,
>
>
>
|