|
From: Seth L. <set...@gm...> - 2004-09-02 18:31:44
|
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 15:30:53 +0200, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] <jue...@we...> wrote: > http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SPR-299 >=20 > I'm not intimately familar with the HTTP spec, so I can't really judge th= is. >=20 > A possible compromise could be to just send 303 in case of a POST request= , and keep sending 302 via response.sendRedirect else. Thoughts? Experience= s? It also sounds like we should send 302 always for HTTP 1.0 clients.=20 If the client is HTTP 1.1 aware, then 302 for GET and 303 for POST sounds like what the RFC wants us to do. Seth |