On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 15:30:53 +0200, j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]
<jue...@we...> wrote:
> http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SPR-299
>=20
> I'm not intimately familar with the HTTP spec, so I can't really judge th=
is.
>=20
> A possible compromise could be to just send 303 in case of a POST request=
, and keep sending 302 via response.sendRedirect else. Thoughts? Experience=
s?
It also sounds like we should send 302 always for HTTP 1.0 clients.=20
If the client is HTTP 1.1 aware, then 302 for GET and 303 for POST
sounds like what the RFC wants us to do.
Seth
|