|
From: Dat H. <dat...@gm...> - 2007-10-30 16:29:17
|
I was told that polyphase is better than resample - at least i hope so as i switched to it a few months ago (luckily haven't run too many things thru it) - who would know (or should we let ears tell the tale i guess?!) On 10/30/07, Ryan Bair <rya...@gm...> wrote: > Rabbit? I've heard of rate, resample, and polyphase. Rate is > completely useless (poor quality to an extreme), polyphase is much > slower and not as high of quality as resample. > > > On 10/26/07, robs <aq...@ya...> wrote: > > --- Ryan Bair <rya...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > I'm trying to resample some audio from 44.1K to 48K. > > > If I use the -ql > > > option, it dies on me: > > > > Have you tried using "rabbit" instead of "resample"? |