|
From: Sergei S. <ser...@ya...> - 2013-01-22 10:47:06
|
Fundamentally, SoX supports biquadds, so any filter after its transfer function is expressed as biquads can be implemented. My earlier comments on phase vs magnitude response and pre-echoes still stand. Regards, Sergei. --- On Mon, 1/21/13, Jerry <lan...@qw...> wrote: > From: Jerry <lan...@qw...> > Subject: Re: [SoX-users] looking for a really tight (48db) lowpass filter with minimal effect on the remaining stuff > To: sox...@li... > Date: Monday, January 21, 2013, 6:46 PM > > On Jan 21, 2013, at 2:42 PM, Fmiser wrote: > > >> Benjamin Wild wrote: > > > >> another wish of mine is to have a really tight > (48db) lowpass > >> filter with minimal effect on the remaining stuff. > > > > So would at least 10,000 other people - including me. > :) > > > >> it would be really nice to have a filter to remove > those > >> things without touching the rest.. > > > > Gentle filters sound better. Abrupt filters keep > the junk out. > > _You_ have to decide what is an appropriate compromise > for your > > content and your ears. Sorry. > > > > The SoX command "lowpass" is a 3 or 6 dB/octave, so > that > > probably isn't abrupt enough for you. > > Surely you don't mean 3 db/octave. > Jerry > > > > The command "filter" can be used. It also > supports "plot" if > > you wish to see a graph. The man page give > details on how to > > use it. > > > > -- Philip > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master SQL Server Development, Administration, T-SQL, SSAS, > SSIS, SSRS > and more. Get SQL Server skills now (including 2012) with > LearnDevNow - > 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs > and experts. > SALE $99.99 this month only - learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122512 > _______________________________________________ > Sox-users mailing list > Sox...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users > |