|
From: Martin L. <mar...@gm...> - 2012-09-02 23:17:19
|
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Ulrich Klauer <ul...@ch...> wrote: > Martin Lukac <mar...@gm...>: > >> Is there some reason that the spectrogram output in sox does not have >> a stdout option? Is it because sox may output other things to stdout >> (some info messages)? > > I guess it's just because noone had asked for it. :) SoX may write to > stdout in other situations (most notably when "-" is given as the > output file), but we have a mechanism to make sure there is only one > user of stdout per invocation. So I've added this feature, it's > possible to write "spectrogram -o -" now and the spectrogram will be > written to standard output. > > Ulrich > Awesome! Thank you so much. I checked out the diff... much more proper than what I had done. It compiled and works great! Thanks again! M. |