|
From: Arturo R. <art...@gm...> - 2010-05-25 23:08:26
|
Il 25/05/2010 20:30, Chris Bagwell ha scritto: > > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Pascal Giard <evi...@gm... > <mailto:evi...@gm...>> wrote: > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Arturo Rinaldi > <art...@gm... <mailto:art...@gm...>> wrote: > > i'm trying to build sox 14.3.1 from source on ubuntu jaunty 9.04 > but i get > > this error in the "make" > > > > mp3.c: In function 'startwrite': > > mp3.c:740: error: 'id3tag_set_pad' undeclared (first use in this > function) > > mp3.c:740: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > > mp3.c:740: error: for each function it appears in.) > > make[1]: *** [libsox_la-mp3.lo] Errore 1 > > make[1]: uscita dalla directory > «/home/artynet/Scrivania/sox-14.3.1/src» > > make: *** [all-recursive] Errore 1 > > > > i satisfied all the dependencies by > > > > sudo apt-get build-dep sox > > > > and the ./configure goes smoothly > [...] > > Hmm... that's weird... I didn't have any issue building SoX myself nor > did Debian's buildd [1] or even Ubuntu's maverick [2]... > > I doubt it's a cpu architecture issue as all of them are supported (13 > Linux, 1 hurd, 2 kFreeBSD) besides m68k, powerpcspe and sparc64. > (By forcing me to have a look at the buildd logs, you made me realize > that i should disable libltdl for powerpcspe but that's off topic). > > > Can you let me know what version of lame you have installed? Your > hitting a part of the code were it attempts to handle id3tag_set_pad > being an optional symbol but seems not working on your system correctly. > > Perhaps the background on Pascal saying disabling litltdl is related > to this topic? Is something special about powerpcspe and dynamic linking? > > Chris > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sox-users mailing list > Sox...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users > my lame version is 3.98. *libmp3lame0* and *libmp3lame-dev* version 3.98 . My architecture is a standard i386. The build process was successful without any problems on karmic and lucid ! ! ! I don't explain to myself why it isn't so on jaunty..... i attach my build log http://www.box.net/shared/4k4lcripsg thx in advance....:D |