|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-04-16 13:54:39
|
Feature Requests item #2768630, was opened at 2009-04-16 13:54 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by janx2 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=360706&aid=2768630&group_id=10706 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Jan (janx2) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Mac OS X binaries info Initial Comment: I am very thankful for the experimental, static Mac OS X executable package. The binaries run perfectly on my Intel Mac. As I would really like to hit the road with it and use it on my ancient PowerBook G4, I have tried building sox statically and dynamically on the PPC Mac (same Mac OS X 10.5.6, XCode 3.1.2) and I always run into one issue or another. It would help me tremendously if the generous person who is regularly building the current (Intel) binaries for Mac OS X would provide details as to how this static and feature rich build is achieved. Alternatively it would be even better if the process could be modified to build universal binaries. These documents have helped me getting some of the libs to build as universal binaries: http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Porting/Conceptual/PortingUnix/intro/intro.html http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Porting/Conceptual/PortingUnix/compiling/compiling.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40002850-BAJCFEBA I am thankful for any help whatsoever! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=360706&aid=2768630&group_id=10706 |