Re: [SoX-devel] Deprecate some options?

[Chris B. <ch...@cn...>]

I'm fine with it at the highest level.  No reason to have so many ways to do
the same task.  But I do like short options for common features.

How would you want user to, for example, change a 8-bit unsigned .au file to
a 16-bit signed WAV file?

Chris

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 7:20 AM, robs <aq...@ya...> wrote:

>
> In modern parlance, everything is `bits' these days -- do you think we
> should now deprecate (and remove in future):
>
> -1/-2/-3/-4/-8
>
> .f4, .f8, .s1, .s2, .s3, .s4,
> .u1, .u2, .u3, .u4, .sb, .sw, .sl, .ub, .uw
>
> Also deprecating/removing:
>
> -s/-u/-f/-A/-U/-o/-i/-a/-g
>
> would free up a bunch of option characters.
>
> /Rob
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
> Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
> _______________________________________________
> SoX-devel mailing list
> SoX...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel
>