|
From: Kevin C. <ke...@co...> - 2008-03-21 15:12:26
|
On 20 March 2008 at 16:31, "Dat Head" <dat...@gm...> wrote: > i've never heard of wavpack but was an interesting read of their > webpage, but it appears flac already does all of this and sox does > support flac. > > anybody know some pros/cons to wavpack vs flac? i am a very > satisfied flac user - converting my entire archives over to it (over > 1.5TB already) WavPack supports 32-bit floating point WAV file compression, which is the native format of Ardour. FLAC doesn't support 32-bit floating point WAV file compression. The history of SoX is that it supports conversion between just about anything and anything else. Leaving out X because it already supports Y seems counter to this. Cheers.... -- Kevin |