Menu
▾
▴
Re: [SoX-users] [SoX-devel] Poll on Windows version of SoX
|
From: Dat H. <dat...@gm...> - 2008-01-28 23:56:42
|
dathead said:
> > I don't think the sox release on cygwin has sox's "play" command - i'll
> > have to triple check but i'm pretty sure it doesn't (because I wanted to
> > use it and it could not be found) - i think the version i still have is
> > some sox 12.x version - maybe cygwin has newer now? I updated
> > cygwin only a few months ago.
chris B said:
> So were did you get your copy of cygwin sox? I can't find a version
> available via cygwin's "setup.exe" and no obvious external sites came up
> on google.
>
> Maybe I released a cygwin version sometime during the 12.x cycle; before
> I got mingw working. For sure it wouldn't have had play support back
> then because the cygwin DLL didn't really support it at that time.
>
> Once you compile SoX 14.0.1 and cygwin, its as simple as "copy sox.exe
> play.exe" to make the playing version of SoX. If windows vista supports
> something like unix symlinks then there is a chance just linking
> play.exe to sox.exe will work as well.
>
> Internally, it using the program name play as a shorthand to add "-t oss
> /dev/dsp" as the output filename.
I found the zip file, so it wasn't from cygwin directly, but this zip:
Archive: sox12182.zip
testing: sox12182/ OK
testing: sox12182/sox.txt OK
testing: sox12182/soxexam.txt OK
testing: sox12182/README OK
testing: sox12182/LICENSE.GPL OK
testing: sox12182/sox.exe OK
testing: sox12182/soxmix.exe OK
so is that the mingw version (as i see no special cygwin.dll), but no play.exe
is 14.0.0 from sox.sourceforge.net fully stable?
wonder why fedora 8 still is using 13.0.0?
is resample using rabbit diff between 13.0.0 and 14.0.0 (or 14.0.1)?
i'm using polyphase now (unfortunately used -ql for a long time on
some of my most favorite recording to downsample 48k DATs to
44k CDs - they seem to sound pretty good but wondering how much
I lost with -ql?)
sorry for all the questions, thanx for your time!
|
