Re: (socks) srelay - without syslog - rules...
Brought to you by:
bulkstream
From: Tomo M <bul...@us...> - 2012-05-11 00:24:14
|
Hi Markus, On Thu, 10 May 2012 23:47:26 +0200, Markus Ferlitsch <m.f...@gm...> wrote: > why it's not possible to run srelay without syslogging? > It's possible to force syslog-function but why it's not possible to > start it without logging? yes indeed, but, just I haven't the situation of operating without syslog. it's not so hard to add the option. > Why it's not possible in srelay.conf to say that only some IPs can > send data through the Socks proxy? do you mean access controls ? I didn't implement it myself, instead, using TcpWrappers. Thanks, --- Tomo. |