Re: [Serious-discuss] Java VM's vs native Binaries

[<ji...@li...>]

>>> Basically, from a selfish POV, I just want a nice GUI to develop my 
projects
>>> in, be it small apps, database front ends, CGI processes off web servers, 
or
>>> what not, and not have to learn C++ or Java
 I will miss some of the functionality, too. However, I figure my older
 Macs will be less useful anyway by the time we have a build to test.
 
 With MacOS X, Java 2 will run natively.
 
 If there isn't already an effort out there somewhere to turn Java Beans
 into standalone binaries, there probably will be...
 
 
 
>If we follow the AppWare example, you should be able to drop a few
> object on a screen, connect them, define some parameters and compile.
 Also, with a JavaBean based serious project, I could create a wizard that
 can build perl scripts for me. Or it could spit out VB Script code for
 me. Or shell scripts. Or Applescripts, Flash ActionScripts, REALBasic> 
code(?), etc. 

 

 I look forward to the Java Bean based serious project because it will

 once again enable me to create (almost) anything I want - without having
 to try and keep the (blasted!) syntax straight in all of these darn
 scripting languages.
 
 
 jim kreinbrink
 ji...@li...