From: S P. <ski...@ea...> - 2007-08-31 07:43:18
|
> Eep² wrote: S Page replied: >> Also, why require ":=" over simply "::" for creating properties? "::" > > ("shift+;;") is easier to type than ":=" (requires "shift+;" >> and "=")? > > You're assigning a value to the property, hence :=. IMO colon already > does too much in MediaWiki. In current (pre-release) code, :: and := > are equivalent but :: is only for backwards compatibility. I was wrong, it's the other way around. Markus told me 'we now suggest the use of "::" instead of ":=" since the latter fails in some uses (especially in template parameters that contain annotated content), while "::" works most of the time.' This affects documentation and sample code more than anything else. -- =S |