From: Stephan G. <s7...@gm...> - 2014-02-11 20:26:11
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Hans, what about using/extending Semantic Forms for this? This way you could avoid all the problems involved with editing properties in free text and instead just edit form field values. As a bonus you could utilize the input widgets available for SF without having to reimplement them. Of course, this is not even close to the modification of free form text, but IMHO that would not be generally feasible, anyway. And SF covers a huge part of SMW pages (no statistics, just my impression), so this would already help a lot of people. Even more so considering that your table editing would be geared towards wikis with many pages having the same properties. Which as it happens are wikis that would usually employ SF. Cheers, Stephan On 2014-02-11 16:57, Hans Oleander wrote: > Hello Yaron & List, > > I have been a SMW user for 2 years now, and my liking of this > software has been constantly rising ever since then. I have just > completed my first little piece of code (part of SRF) and will ask > the community in the coming days whether it would be worthwhile > offering it for inclusion to SRF. > > There is one idea about SMW I have been wanting and wondering about > more than once. I am inclined to put this on the idea/suggestion > list mentioned below. But before doing so I would highly appreciate > to get a few statements/opinions of experienced SMW folks (i.e. > some of you guys) whether this might simply be a dumb or completely > unfeasible idea, not worth bothering the SCoC suggestion list > with. > > The idea is, simply put, to write an extension or even modify SMW > core by an option that allows users to modify property values > within #ask-result tables. E.g. you have pages of objects > containing a price property, you do a query, and could then edit > the resulting list with new prices. A special "write back > properties" then modifies all the values in the source pages. > > I am fully aware that this would be quite some task, and even the > concept requires thoughtful consideration (what happens with pages > containing a property more than once, etc.pp.). However I have had > many user requests that seemed to justify to at least give it a > try. > > Any kind of comment (be frank, please) is appreciated. > > Regards, Hans -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS+pU/AAoJENc2Q4BsPGAQL4gP/3lP/MWPGWpoKoFafDMuauDA O+vhxrC3txJAWS15WgCKqZiHQtBUAjXu4dJ9i3cWP9t74/TX58rMFoAFqNGB9l1U p9DuBVayXFr6NG/4vjp+Rfc8icv5iQ6G6YcX1Ow5Qnkz8KInmuoDrA+m0lhHcdYs /oHNycreobAdCr9rkgKn0Heia3gZxnvBR0AzHApiA7mZeVULhkTZjoAb8MSXOgSe 3dxHbAwM5NR4MigWa2biQcvVtZMcU64YebEHZ42asuBbirfj6tzk3SknTh2zg4AL irGDupul3PAs1Sfr2o7SH0CmcS9erFiP9jBwBP4NSA6+SlqjcaZESi92IXDVPRGC NVaFCgallzUPYsraWkl2637R929k4jEwJsONb99V9/TjDfwt1CBURReXr3hBPxga wpAuWFX6aTe0GUgif5Ze8yQ5UyLGCRgitWGiH0dSR+t3YHJjoApiv70MggD8OUKU R+ya5UiDDdQw9xZZNoDihIVoD330yvD44TlTwB3jzBAzBUx3pOnk5UBxE4Jnd0DG VeIXu8bYwPkev9HVRdvS+fIJ6IOcRfRxY0grW11D8PLn/OxVHuWQUCss+gokvoOP J3ExKzvYzzl1XA1BvG+ILymCMTuAVTEVYWh4CY4ZsEVC/gvW2HohvIj4qq2Pde0h YwTebvone0vT1pUqguC3 =hRHb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |