From: Yaron K. <ya...@gm...> - 2009-12-15 17:59:08
|
Hi, Actually, Semantic Forms already has querying functionality - the "Run query" feature: [1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Forms#Querying_data Hauke - Were you aware of this? If so, how would what you're proposing be different? Sergey - He was talking about using the addition of querying as an excuse to refactor SF to use POM - which is not a bad instinct in principle. :) <http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Forms#Querying_data>-Yaron On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Sergey Chernyshev < ser...@gm...> wrote: > I'm not sure if you can reuse SF form language as it seems to be targeted > specifically at data entry. > Also, did you check out Semantic DrillDown? It does some filtered > navigation and allows for drop-downs and stuff. > > Not sure how POM is related to this... did you include wrong link? > > Sergey > > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Hauke Pribnow <hau...@gm...>wrote: > >> Hello everybody! >> >> While working on my Semantic Multi Edit Page I got the idea of also >> creating another extension for Semantic MediaWiki which would allow >> more-skilled users to create something like "search forms" for >> less-skilled users who might not directly understand the semantic query >> syntax. >> >> It would be great if the form design syntax for such an extension was >> similar to the one of the already existing Semantic Forms extension; IMO >> it would make even more sense to pretty much re-design the FormPrinter >> from scratch and - during this process - turn it into a more general >> code base for creating all sorts of forms, i.e. make the whole thing >> more extendable. >> >> As already mentioned here >> <http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Forms/POM>, the >> current FormPrinter implementation acutally doesn't just print the form >> (as the name suggests), but also does up to five other tasks like >> parsing the page that should be edited, handling form input and actually >> committing the change to a page that was modified through a form. To me, >> this is way too much work for a class that - going by its name - should >> only print out a neat form. Redesigning that class is/will be necessary >> anyway. >> >> What do you think about these ideas? >> >> >> Hauke Pribnow >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Return on Information: >> Google Enterprise Search pays you back >> Get the facts. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Semediawiki-devel mailing list >> Sem...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Return on Information: > Google Enterprise Search pays you back > Get the facts. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev > > _______________________________________________ > Semediawiki-devel mailing list > Sem...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel > > |