Re: [Seeks-users] Pros and Cons of using IPSec for DHT routing and P2P transport ?
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
beniz
|
From: Alexandre C. P. <ale...@la...> - 2011-01-23 14:21:28
|
From my point of view, i think it would be better to use ssl instead of IPSec. For indirect technical reason. First of all IPSec is designed to connect ip network (like wan) and not for application dial. More over SSL/TLS is well known and used for Software to Software secure dial. I will conclude by the fact that SSL is recognized on 443 port as https which usually is an easy way to pass-through firewalls and proxies. So to be able to reach the most possible nodes i would recommend ssl. Le 23/01/2011 11:10, Emmanuel Benazera a écrit : > > Hi, > > I'm not familiar with IPSec (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPsec) yet. I'm wondering > whether IPSec could be used for certification / authentification of DHT nodes, > as well as for P2P connections among users (for exchanging URLs, appreciations, queries) ? > > Any thoughts on these issues ? > > Thanks, > > Em. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! > Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! > Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires > February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > Seeks-users mailing list > See...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/seeks-users > > |