From: Erez Z. <ere...@gm...> - 2009-05-20 06:22:15
|
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Erez Zilber <ere...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Vlad, > > I'm testing some error scenarios with scst_user. During the 'alloc' > phase, I'm adding a long delay in order to receive an 'abort' from the > initiator. Some commands get aborted, and later when another command > is sent, it passes the 'alloc' & 'exec' phases, but after the 'free' > command is added to the ready cmd list, nobody wakes up the ioctl that > waits for it. It looks like this: Vlad, Did you see my question? Thanks, Erez |