scrollkeeper-devel — Developer discussion list for ScrollKeeper

[Scrollkeeper-devel] Japanese translation update

[Yukihiro N. <yn...@re...>]

Hi,

The attached is the updated Japanese translation for scrollkeeper CVS.
I could not find any appropriate mail address for .po file update,
so mailed here.

Thank you.
--
Yukihiro Nakai, Red Hat Japan

Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Release of 0.3.13 shortly -- build testers wanted

[Christian M. <mar...@wa...>]

Malcolm Tredinnick <ma...@co...> writes:

> On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 22:08, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Malcolm Tredinnick <ma...@co...> writes:
>> 
>> > In a couple of days (literally, it will be on Friday), I am going to
>> > release version 0.3.13 of scrollkeeper. This is partly because we have
>> > done a lot of work recently fixing bugs and merging patches and partly
>> > out of self defense. Every man and their goldfish is trying to build on
>> > Solaris at the moment and is discovering that it doesn't work. That bug
>> > is being reported about once a day recently, so I want it to stop.
>> 
>> I still don't see this new version. Any problems ?
>
> Sorry, my bad. Shall do it this evening.

Really ?

Christian

Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Release of 0.3.13 shortly -- build testers wanted

[Malcolm T. <ma...@co...>]

On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 22:08, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Malcolm Tredinnick <ma...@co...> writes:
> 
> > In a couple of days (literally, it will be on Friday), I am going to
> > release version 0.3.13 of scrollkeeper. This is partly because we have
> > done a lot of work recently fixing bugs and merging patches and partly
> > out of self defense. Every man and their goldfish is trying to build on
> > Solaris at the moment and is discovering that it doesn't work. That bug
> > is being reported about once a day recently, so I want it to stop.
> 
> I still don't see this new version. Any problems ?

Sorry, my bad. Shall do it this evening.

Malcolm

RE: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Release of 0.3.13 shortly -- build testers wanted

[Chip C. <wil...@mc...>]
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Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Release of 0.3.13 shortly -- build testers wanted

[Christian M. <mar...@wa...>]

Chip Cuntz <wil...@mc...> writes:

> I can do a build for you...

For 0.3.13 ? I don't see a tarball on sf.

Christian

RE: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Release of 0.3.13 shortly -- build testers wanted

[Chip C. <wil...@mc...>]

SSBjYW4gZG8gYSBidWlsZCBmb3IgeW91Li4uDQoNCkNoaXAgQ3VudHoNCk1DSSBTb2Z0d2FyZSBE
ZXYNCg0KLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IHNjcm9sbGtlZXBlci1kZXZl
bC1hZG1pbkBsaXN0cy5zb3VyY2Vmb3JnZS5uZXQNClttYWlsdG86c2Nyb2xsa2VlcGVyLWRldmVs
LWFkbWluQGxpc3RzLnNvdXJjZWZvcmdlLm5ldF1PbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YNCkNocmlzdGlhbiBNYXJp
bGxhdA0KU2VudDogVHVlc2RheSwgT2N0b2JlciAxNCwgMjAwMyA2OjA4IEFNDQpUbzogc2Nyb2xs
a2VlcGVyLWRldmVsQGxpc3RzLnNvdXJjZWZvcmdlLm5ldA0KU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFtTY3JvbGxr
ZWVwZXItZGV2ZWxdIFJlbGVhc2Ugb2YgMC4zLjEzIHNob3J0bHkgLS0gYnVpbGQNCnRlc3RlcnMg
d2FudGVkDQoNCg0KTWFsY29sbSBUcmVkaW5uaWNrIDxtYWxjb2xtQGNvbW1zZWN1cmUuY29tLmF1
PiB3cml0ZXM6DQoNCj4gSW4gYSBjb3VwbGUgb2YgZGF5cyAobGl0ZXJhbGx5LCBpdCB3aWxsIGJl
IG9uIEZyaWRheSksIEkgYW0gZ29pbmcgdG8NCj4gcmVsZWFzZSB2ZXJzaW9uIDAuMy4xMyBvZiBz
Y3JvbGxrZWVwZXIuIFRoaXMgaXMgcGFydGx5IGJlY2F1c2Ugd2UgaGF2ZQ0KPiBkb25lIGEgbG90
IG9mIHdvcmsgcmVjZW50bHkgZml4aW5nIGJ1Z3MgYW5kIG1lcmdpbmcgcGF0Y2hlcyBhbmQgcGFy
dGx5DQo+IG91dCBvZiBzZWxmIGRlZmVuc2UuIEV2ZXJ5IG1hbiBhbmQgdGhlaXIgZ29sZGZpc2gg
aXMgdHJ5aW5nIHRvIGJ1aWxkIG9uDQo+IFNvbGFyaXMgYXQgdGhlIG1vbWVudCBhbmQgaXMgZGlz
Y292ZXJpbmcgdGhhdCBpdCBkb2Vzbid0IHdvcmsuIFRoYXQgYnVnDQo+IGlzIGJlaW5nIHJlcG9y
dGVkIGFib3V0IG9uY2UgYSBkYXkgcmVjZW50bHksIHNvIEkgd2FudCBpdCB0byBzdG9wLg0KDQpJ
IHN0aWxsIGRvbid0IHNlZSB0aGlzIG5ldyB2ZXJzaW9uLiBBbnkgcHJvYmxlbXMgPw0KDQpDaHJp
c3RpYW4NCg0KDQotLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t
LS0tLS0tLS0tDQpUaGlzIFNGLm5ldCBlbWFpbCBpcyBzcG9uc29yZWQgYnk6IFNGLm5ldCBHaXZl
YmFjayBQcm9ncmFtLg0KU291cmNlRm9yZ2UubmV0IGhvc3RzIG92ZXIgNzAsMDAwIE9wZW4gU291
cmNlIFByb2plY3RzLg0KU2VlIHRoZSBwZW9wbGUgd2hvIGhhdmUgSEVMUEVEIFVTIHByb3ZpZGUg
YmV0dGVyIHNlcnZpY2VzOg0KQ2xpY2sgaGVyZTogaHR0cDovL3NvdXJjZWZvcmdlLm5ldC9zdXBw
b3J0ZXJzLnBocA0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f
X18NClNjcm9sbGtlZXBlci1kZXZlbCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNClNjcm9sbGtlZXBlci1kZXZlbEBs
aXN0cy5zb3VyY2Vmb3JnZS5uZXQNCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlzdHMuc291cmNlZm9yZ2UubmV0L2xpc3Rz
L2xpc3RpbmZvL3Njcm9sbGtlZXBlci1kZXZlbA==

Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Release of 0.3.13 shortly -- build testers wanted

[Christian M. <mar...@wa...>]

Malcolm Tredinnick <ma...@co...> writes:

> In a couple of days (literally, it will be on Friday), I am going to
> release version 0.3.13 of scrollkeeper. This is partly because we have
> done a lot of work recently fixing bugs and merging patches and partly
> out of self defense. Every man and their goldfish is trying to build on
> Solaris at the moment and is discovering that it doesn't work. That bug
> is being reported about once a day recently, so I want it to stop.

I still don't see this new version. Any problems ?

Christian

[Scrollkeeper-devel] RE: Another garnome on Solaris x86 issue - scrollkeeper bug

[<Mur...@Co...>]

From: Carson Gaspar [mailto:car...@ta...] 
> An additional problem - scrollkeeper uses the completely non-standard 
> strndup() function in libs/i18n.c.

[snip].

There's a cross-platform version in glib and it would be best to use that.
The scrollkeeper people probably prefer patches in bugzilla.

-- 
garnome-list mailing list
gar...@gn... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/garnome-list

Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Re: Another garnome on Solaris x86 issue - scrollkeeper bug

[Malcolm T. <ma...@co...>]

On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 10:31, Carson Gaspar wrote:
> FYI, scrollkeeper 0.3.12 is just hopeless on non-GNU platforms. The 
> included intl library doesn't build, and the Makefile.in files don't 
> include $(INTLLIB) in the link commands of targets that use the intl 
> functions. So if your libc doesn't include GNU gettext, you're hosed.
> 
> I'm hacking the Makefile.in files, one link target at a time as they fail 
> to link. Ah, I love open sores...

OK, let's see now:

(a) Thanks for the bug report and patch, but..

(b) In future, we have a bug tracker at sourceforge for these.

(c) Both these problems are already fixed in CVS (has been for a long
time). A new release if due out shortly.

(d) You should never touch Makefile.in, you should only Makefile.am for
tools that use automake, etc. Otherwise your changes get overwritten.

Malcolm

[Scrollkeeper-devel] Another garnome on Solaris x86 issue - scrollkeeper bug

[Carson G. <car...@ta...>]

An additional problem - scrollkeeper uses the completely non-standard 
strndup() function in libs/i18n.c. Folks seem to assume everyone runs Linux 
- ah well. The following patch should be equivalent, if I read the strndup 
man page correctly. The patch assumes strlcpy() is available - it really 
should be a configure test, or use strncpy() and explicitly null terminate, 
but I'm feeling lazy. And yes, I may return NULL pointers, but only if the 
original code would. Blech - I feel slimy...

--- i18n.c.DIST 2003-09-28 19:52:29.573124000 -0400
+++ i18n.c      2003-09-28 19:55:08.190046000 -0400
@@ -62,7 +62,10 @@

        if (dot_pos) {
                mask |= CODESET;
-               *codeset = strndup(dot_pos, at_pos - dot_pos);
+               *codeset = malloc((at_pos - dot_pos) + 1);
+               if (*codeset != NULL) {
+                   strlcpy(*codeset, dot_pos, ((at_pos - dot_pos) + 1));
+               }
        } else {
                dot_pos = at_pos;
                *codeset = strdup("");
@@ -70,13 +73,19 @@

        if (uscore_pos) {
                mask |= TERRITORY;
-               *territory = strndup(uscore_pos, dot_pos - uscore_pos);
+               *territory = malloc((dot_pos - uscore_pos) + 1);
+               if (*territory != NULL) {
+                       strlcpy(*territory, uscore_pos, ((dot_pos - 
uscore_pos) + 1));
+               }
        } else {
                uscore_pos = dot_pos;
                *territory = strdup("");
        }

-       *language = strndup(locale, uscore_pos - locale);
+       *language = malloc((uscore_pos - locale) + 1);
+       if (*language != NULL) {
+               strlcpy(*language, locale, ((uscore_pos - locale) + 1));
+       }

        return mask;
 }

[Scrollkeeper-devel] Re: Another garnome on Solaris x86 issue - scrollkeeper bug

[Carson G. <car...@ta...>]

FYI, scrollkeeper 0.3.12 is just hopeless on non-GNU platforms. The 
included intl library doesn't build, and the Makefile.in files don't 
include $(INTLLIB) in the link commands of targets that use the intl 
functions. So if your libc doesn't include GNU gettext, you're hosed.

I'm hacking the Makefile.in files, one link target at a time as they fail 
to link. Ah, I love open sores...

-- 
Carson

Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Serbian translation of ScrollKeeper

[Miloslav T. <mi...@vo...>]

Hello,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:00:33AM +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 02:48, Danilo Segan wrote:
> > Hi, here's the Serbian and Serbian latin translation of ScrollKeeper.
> > 
> > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=803302&group_id=11543&atid=311543
> Thanks for the patch you submitted anyway. I'll try to incorporate it.
I have added the translations to CVS now.
	Mirek

Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Serbian translation of ScrollKeeper

[Malcolm T. <ma...@co...>]

On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 02:48, Danilo Segan wrote:
> Hi, here's the Serbian and Serbian latin translation of ScrollKeeper.
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=803302&group_id=11543&atid=311543
> 
> 
> I didn' check out from CVS (I'll do it later), because only now I've  
> noticed that 0.3.13 is soon to go out.
> 
> Please wait at least one more day so I can provide updated translations  
> -- if you've changed any strings, of course ;-)

Sorry, although the release has not yet been done (I was having some
problems with one last bugfix last night), I cannot wait any longer. It
is vital that we get a release out as soon as possible.

Note that all translations for Scrollkeeper are done via the Translation
Project (http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/), so you should
try to submit any new updates via there.

Thanks for the patch you submitted anyway. I'll try to incorporate it.

Cheers,
Malcolm

[Scrollkeeper-devel] Serbian translation of ScrollKeeper

[Danilo S. <ds...@gm...>]

Hi, here's the Serbian and Serbian latin translation of ScrollKeeper.

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=803302&group_id=11543&atid=311543


I didn' check out from CVS (I'll do it later), because only now I've  
noticed that 0.3.13 is soon to go out.

Please wait at least one more day so I can provide updated translations  
-- if you've changed any strings, of course ;-)


Thanks,
Danilo

Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Feature wish

[Miloslav T. <mi...@vo...>]

Hello,
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 12:25:34PM -0400, jb...@co... wrote:
> It would be nice if the configure program could check for the existence of the strndup function and conditionally compile with an alternative if not found.  Some of us do not have the strndup function on our sytems.
This is fixed in CVS.
	Mirek

[Scrollkeeper-devel] Feature wish

[<jb...@co...>]

It would be nice if the configure program could check for the existence of the strndup function and conditionally compile with an alternative if not found.  Some of us do not have the strndup function on our sytems.

Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Release of 0.3.13 shortly -- build testers wanted

[Laszlo K. - S. I. <las...@su...>]

> 
> I *think* we are fine, since I have been a lot more careful lately, plus
> half the recent patches have come from Sun, where they have already been
> reviewed and tested (and hopefully compiled). But it would not hurt to
> make sure.

Oh yeah. They have certainly been compiled:-)

Laszlo

Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Release of 0.3.13 shortly -- build testers wanted

[Malcolm T. <ma...@co...>]

On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 13:32, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> In a couple of days (literally, it will be on Friday), I am going to
> release version 0.3.13 of scrollkeeper. This is partly because we have
> done a lot of work recently fixing bugs and merging patches and partly
> out of self defense. Every man and their goldfish is trying to build on
> Solaris at the moment and is discovering that it doesn't work. That bug
> is being reported about once a day recently, so I want it to stop.
> 
> So, in order to save me from messing up, can any kind people who are not
> running Red Hat Linux and who have a couple of spare minutes try to
> build what is in CVS at sourceforge. Just post a quick note back here if
> it all works, or let me know what exploded.

I forgot to mention: the current CVS version core dumps pretty quickly
when you try to use it. I know this and am going to fix it tonight -- it
is something I have introduced (unintentionally) recently. I am just
after build tests here.

Cheers,
Malcolm

[Scrollkeeper-devel] Release of 0.3.13 shortly -- build testers wanted

[Malcolm T. <ma...@co...>]

In a couple of days (literally, it will be on Friday), I am going to
release version 0.3.13 of scrollkeeper. This is partly because we have
done a lot of work recently fixing bugs and merging patches and partly
out of self defense. Every man and their goldfish is trying to build on
Solaris at the moment and is discovering that it doesn't work. That bug
is being reported about once a day recently, so I want it to stop.

So, in order to save me from messing up, can any kind people who are not
running Red Hat Linux and who have a couple of spare minutes try to
build what is in CVS at sourceforge. Just post a quick note back here if
it all works, or let me know what exploded.

I *think* we are fine, since I have been a lot more careful lately, plus
half the recent patches have come from Sun, where they have already been
reviewed and tested (and hopefully compiled). But it would not hurt to
make sure.

There is a much longer mail coming after the release with some areas
that still need working on, but it would not be too surprising if 0.3.14
follows 0.3.13 fairly quickly with some more bug-fixes, etc.

Cheers,
Malcolm

[Scrollkeeper-devel] Warning: E-mail viruses detected

[MailScanner <pos...@co...>]

Our virus detector has just been triggered by a message you sent:-
  To: di...@tt...
  Subject: Re: Re: My details
  Date: Mon Sep  1 15:43:16 2003
Any infected parts of the message (document_9446.pif)
have not been delivered.

This message is simply to warn you that your computer system may have a
virus present and should be checked.

The virus detector said this about the message:
Report: >>> Virus 'W32/Sobig-F' found in file document_9446.pif


-- 
MailScanner
Email Virus Scanner
www.mailscanner.info
Mailscanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] Locale fallback

[Laszlo K. - S. I. <las...@su...>]

Hi Malcolm,

You are right. I have to confess I haven't looked at the CVS before 
writing this email (my mistake). And we indeed use 0.3.11. So we will 
have to upgrade to 0.3.13 when it is out.

Thanks for the help,

Laszlo


> This should already be happening. I added some code back in September of
> last year (9/9/2002) to do this sort of stuff and it has been tested
> fairly thoroughly (since it affects the GNOME help system, for example).
> The code in question is in libs/i18n.c and should work exactly as you
> describe. This should have been in the 0.3.12 release.
> 
> Now, it may not be being called in all the correct places, but as soon
> as we identify those, then it should be easy to fix up.
> 
> I am going to release 0.3.13 very shortly (and probably 0.3.14 pretty
> soon thereafter to include whatever bug fixes are reported from the
> first release for a while). So if there are problems like this,
> encourage the Sun guys to whack them into Sourceforge's bug tracking
> system (as evil as it is, it's still a good place to track these
> problems) and I shall attend to them as soon as possible.
> 
> Cheers,
> Malcolm
> 

Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] category codes

[Laszlo K. - S. I. <las...@su...>]

I sticked a patch with a fix into the tracker.

Laszlo

Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] category codes

[Laszlo K. - S. I. <las...@su...>]

> Welcome back (even if only briefly). :-)
> 
> Grrr. These would be the issues that they have not put into the bug
> tracker so that nobody else can see them or fix them? I recently
> received some patches from Glynn Foster that have been bouncing around
> Sun for a while, too, that I had never seen before. Please, please,
> please encourage whoever works with Scrollkeeper at Sun to use the bug
> tracker so that things get fixed at the source.

Ok, I'll try. Be cautious with those patches (check them before checking 
them in) from Glynn, some of them might be incorrect (I saw at least one 
that is). Nothing to do with Glynn really, he is just passing patches 
that he gets from the docs team. The problem is that in the last two 
years (while Sun pulled me from Gnome) nobody worked consistently 
with/on Scrollkeeper here so it kind of fell on the floor. This should 
improve now a bit.

> 
> I have reduced the number of outstanding bugs in the tracker by a large
> number recently (from around 50 to about a dozen), so they do get read
> and acted upon.
> 
> 
>>I noticed that install.c:add_doc_to_content_list() uses the titles 
>>content list entries to insert docs into them. I think this is exactly 
>>what the category codes (in the OMF files) have been designed for. The 
>>category codes should identify the sections where docs should be 
>>inserted, they should be the same for all the locales. Titles are 
>>different in every locale so they either don't work or impose extra 
>>translation effort on package maintainers (category entries in OMF files 
>>need translation).
>>
>>Or am I missing something?
> 
> 
> This sounds convincing. I'll have a look at it. I thought it should be
> working that way, too, so if it's not it may just be a bug.

I'll log a bug in the tracker. I don't have a proper patch yet, but when 
I will have one I will add it there.

Thanks for the help.

Laszlo

Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] category codes

[Malcolm T. <ma...@co...>]

On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 17:56, Laszlo Kovacs - Sun Ireland wrote:
> > Welcome back (even if only briefly). :-)
> > 
> > Grrr. These would be the issues that they have not put into the bug
> > tracker so that nobody else can see them or fix them? I recently
> > received some patches from Glynn Foster that have been bouncing around
> > Sun for a while, too, that I had never seen before. Please, please,
> > please encourage whoever works with Scrollkeeper at Sun to use the bug
> > tracker so that things get fixed at the source.
> 
> Ok, I'll try. Be cautious with those patches (check them before checking 
> them in) from Glynn, some of them might be incorrect (I saw at least one 
> that is). Nothing to do with Glynn really, he is just passing patches 
> that he gets from the docs team.

Yeah, I undertood that Glynn was just the messenger. The patches
themselves were mostly things that were already in CVS or that I had
existing patches for (I think one was new and that's still on my pile of
things to review). So I think we're being careful enough. 

In any case, just receiving patches -- no matter what the quality -- is
always good. Worst case, it often shows another way to think about
things, so I am always going to encourage it.

>  The problem is that in the last two 
> years (while Sun pulled me from Gnome) nobody worked consistently 
> with/on Scrollkeeper here so it kind of fell on the floor. This should 
> improve now a bit.

Cool. :-)

Cheers,
Malcolm

Re: [Scrollkeeper-devel] category codes

[Malcolm T. <ma...@co...>]

On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 13:51, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 22:06, Laszlo Kovacs - Sun Ireland wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > It's been a long time, but recently I had to look at some issues the Sun 
> > docs team had with Scrollkeeper.
[...]
> 
> Grrr. These would be the issues that they have not put into the bug
> tracker so that nobody else can see them or fix them? 

I apologise: this was rude. I am taking my frustrations out on the wrong
person.

Malcolm