|
From: Malcolm T. <ma...@co...> - 2003-08-26 01:56:03
|
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 17:56, Laszlo Kovacs - Sun Ireland wrote: > > Welcome back (even if only briefly). :-) > > > > Grrr. These would be the issues that they have not put into the bug > > tracker so that nobody else can see them or fix them? I recently > > received some patches from Glynn Foster that have been bouncing around > > Sun for a while, too, that I had never seen before. Please, please, > > please encourage whoever works with Scrollkeeper at Sun to use the bug > > tracker so that things get fixed at the source. > > Ok, I'll try. Be cautious with those patches (check them before checking > them in) from Glynn, some of them might be incorrect (I saw at least one > that is). Nothing to do with Glynn really, he is just passing patches > that he gets from the docs team. Yeah, I undertood that Glynn was just the messenger. The patches themselves were mostly things that were already in CVS or that I had existing patches for (I think one was new and that's still on my pile of things to review). So I think we're being careful enough. In any case, just receiving patches -- no matter what the quality -- is always good. Worst case, it often shows another way to think about things, so I am always going to encourage it. > The problem is that in the last two > years (while Sun pulled me from Gnome) nobody worked consistently > with/on Scrollkeeper here so it kind of fell on the floor. This should > improve now a bit. Cool. :-) Cheers, Malcolm |