|
From: Cygnus <cy...@po...> - 2001-06-07 09:03:41
|
On 6/7/01 12:09 AM, "Ben Hines" <bh...@al...> wrote: > At 10:53 PM -0700 6/6/01, Lark wrote: >> >> But here's an idea for a platform-independent GUI - the web! Make a >> CGI out of the scanner, implement the GUI as forms: bingo, eScribia. >> Of course we'd keep all data on the server, so we can check how >> everybody is training :-) > > <RANT> > > ehhh, web-based apps bug me. They are slow and not user-friendly. No > matter how nice of a web form you make and how fast of a connection > you have, it will never be as good as a real native application. > Example: Web-based email vs. Eudora. > Example: Newsgroups (MTNW) vs. Web message boards. > the list goes on. > > And with the way things are headed these days, it turns out the main > advantage of making a webbased app - platform independence - is being > thrown out the window by developers who write for IE Windows only. > What idiots. So now they have writted a crippled app - confined to a > browser window on a single platform that cant use your nice > 2000-generation OS features - and the only advantage is you dont have > to install it. But whats the point of that when everyone has 20 gigs > of free HD space and DSL connections? Clueless. > > </RANT> I've never been a huge fan of web based apps either. They're mainly slow and a pain like Ben ranted about. Plus, my log folder is up to about 102 megs now. I can't picture trying to send that much back and forth over the web. It'd take super fast scanner and turn it into Scribus's crippled old grandfather. Probably the easiest cross platform solution would be to do it in Java. But I don't know if you can generate the scanner for it. If its possible to, I could probably bang out a UI for it fairly quickly. I've had to do a bunch of swing stuff the last 2 semesters, so I'm getting pretty good with it. > I believe someone already has a web based CL stat tracker. He was > asking for all the trainers a few months back. I didnt send him our > list since i didnt want to encourage the competition and because i > think webbased apps suck. :) I haven't seen one that actually scans the logs. Just sites that let you enter what you have as a record storage facility. Which to me seems totally pointless. Consolidating from the other thread: > Adding a GUI to the scanner wasn't a huge amount of work, it just > takes a while when one does it in their spare time, and is not a > professional programmer. Perhaps I could learn one of the new > OSX/Un*x/Windows frameworks (are there free ones?) by porting scribia > to it. Don't know about Un*x or window frameworks. For os x, the only one that's really new is Cocoa. That I've seen so far at least. Everything else is just the carbon versions of the old ones, like powerplant. Cocoa's not that bad to learn. I just started in with it. Its set up and works a lot like Swing if you have any experience in it. Only problem with it right now though is no C++. Has to be done in either java or objective-C. Which falls into the problem of needing a flex compiler for it. Cygnus cy...@po... _________________________________________________________________ Oh the words that he spoke Seemed the wisest of philosophies There's nothing ever gained By a wet thing called a tear When the world is too dark And I need the light inside of me I'll walk into a bar And drink fifteen pints of beer - Shane MacGowen |