Re: [Schematics-development] testing infrastructure and Scheme Unit

[Peter K. <ps...@cs...>]

On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 11:05:59PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> Sorry for being unclear.  I was meaning that you would need one of the
> exception-capable SRFIs to be supported by the implementation.  I think
> SRFI-34 might be useful to you?

Well, I just looked at the list of scheme implementations supporting SRFIs and
34 isn't in any of them. When it gets more adopted, I can add it.

-pete