Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements
Brought to you by:
dmegginson
From: Robin B. <ro...@kn...> - 2002-05-30 22:13:42
|
On Thursday 30 May 2002 00:45, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: > David Brownell wrote: > > And > > moreover, I'd certainly _prefer_ that elements not in any namespace > > still have a localName (regardless of the namespace setting) > > What is the localName in "foo:bar" and "foo:bar:foo" which are legal > element names in XML 1.0 and should therefore be passed through when > namespaces are off? When namespaces are off, they are respectively "foo:bar" and "foo:bar:foo". When namespaces are on, the latter is illegal. At least, that is how I read the spec. -- Robin Berjon <ro...@kn...> -- for hire: http://robin.berjon.com/ Mathematicians often resort to something called Hilbert space, which is described as being n-dimensional. Like modern sex, any number can play. -- James Blish, the Quincunx of Time |