You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(36) |
Nov
(85) |
Dec
(151) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(51) |
Mar
(71) |
Apr
(87) |
May
(91) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(160) |
Aug
(229) |
Sep
(85) |
Oct
(89) |
Nov
(85) |
Dec
(98) |
2004 |
Jan
(40) |
Feb
(98) |
Mar
(149) |
Apr
(106) |
May
(153) |
Jun
(77) |
Jul
(85) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(50) |
Oct
(53) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(32) |
2005 |
Jan
(97) |
Feb
(124) |
Mar
(60) |
Apr
(79) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(62) |
Jul
(70) |
Aug
(130) |
Sep
(115) |
Oct
(32) |
Nov
(46) |
Dec
(54) |
2006 |
Jan
(114) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(54) |
May
(82) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(54) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(46) |
Nov
(105) |
Dec
(83) |
2007 |
Jan
(105) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(57) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(18) |
Jun
(80) |
Jul
(108) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(36) |
Oct
(49) |
Nov
(94) |
Dec
(46) |
2008 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(200) |
Apr
(92) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(54) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(66) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(44) |
2009 |
Jan
(68) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(95) |
Jun
(33) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(61) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(61) |
2010 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(47) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(42) |
Jun
(59) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(102) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(11) |
2011 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(115) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(61) |
Sep
(143) |
Oct
(78) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(33) |
2012 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(57) |
Mar
(62) |
Apr
(38) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(25) |
2013 |
Jan
(55) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(81) |
2014 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(133) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
|
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(1) |
2015 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(7) |
2016 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(18) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
From: Masao M. <mu...@hi...> - 2002-10-21 15:22:33
|
Hi, On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:06:43 +0800 "Joshua Keith" <jos...@li...> wrote: > >* Deprecated/Obsolete/Enable broken classes/methods >will be all removed before 0.1 will be released. > >* setter/getter/is_ methods have some rules. > >See http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/naming.html > > > Are you working from the old ruby/GTK src, or is this all new source? (just wondering, as the source is where I pulled all of my information from). New source. Because Ruby/GTK2 and Ruby/GTK2 have a few compatiblity. > >If there are some methods which do not follow the > >rules that'll be bug(please tell me you find such >methods). > >Now I have checked about it in Ruby/GTK. > >See http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/status.html. > > > I will certianlly tell you of any bugs that I find. Thanks. > I am working on an example application now that will hopefully contain most, > if not all of the methods and all widgets. I find it helpful to actually see > what things do before I start playing with them. When It is completed, > I'll send you the src. Cool. > >* Some methods have aliases. For example > >Gtk::CellRendererToggle#active=, #set_active. > >It is better to collect them in a class. > >* How do you think about >signals/properties/constants/etc... ? > > > Everything will be broken down by the final release of the docs, > including signals, properties, constants, and public/private methods. > This version is pre-alpha at best, and was just sent to provide proof > that I am working on the docs. It was not intended as a final release (by far), > especially with the code still being CVS and the API likely to undergo changes. I see. > >BTW, Do you create Gtk.rd by hand? > >rbbr's library(especially metainfo) may help you. > > > Yes. I pulled everything from the included source code (hence why I found the typos) > I will take a look at rbbr when I get the chance :) > > >I attempt sample.rb(and result.txt) which creates >all class/methods list of Ruby/GTK, GLib, GDK. > >As this is sample, you may change it for your >documents. But I think it's easy. > > > I'll take a look at it, but I think I have pulled almost everything out of the gtk source(perhaps more ;) than I need. > > >After installing rbbr in CVS, check it. > >#Ruby is so cool ... I feel again:->. > > > I will take a look at it. I've only one more method on GtkWindow before > it is completed (in it's current form). Will functions such as 'gtk_window_add_mnemonic ()', 'gtk_window_stick ()', 'gtk_window_set_icon ()' be making an appearance, or is it free to > be added by a 3rd party? They'll be all implemented until released Ruby-GNOME2 1.0. Also someone can make patch:->. Have you already checked "Ruby-GNOME2 Milestones and Status Matrix" ? (See http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/status.html) # Maybe you couldn't understand my English ... Please point out it;-> -- .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...> |
From: Nikolai :: lone-s. :: W. <lon...@ho...> - 2002-10-21 15:17:22
|
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 21:01:29 +0000, Masao Mutoh wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:40:16 +0200 > "Nikolai [pcp/lone-star] Weibull" <lon...@ho...> wrote: > > > so is ruby-gnome2 actually usable now? great! how far 'til finished? > > I'm not sure when it will be finished ... . Because there are too many > tasks. > > > are we 50% there? > > For initial release, I think we have done 50% over. > Please keep to check http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/status.html > > > btw, if you need any help with anything i'd gladly help in > > any way i can. > > Great! > > There are so many tasks. OK, I write them as follows. > If you can help us to do any parts of them, please tell us. > #Though they do not need until releasing 0.1. > > Implementations > 1. Implement other classes in Ruby/GTK. > 2. Implement gtk-demo with Ruby/GTK. > 3. Implement other libraries like Ruby/Bonobo, Ruby/Pango ... > ok, i'll see how much time i can spare the coming weeks...i have an interest in implementing a GStreamer interface, i'll have to review your stuff and soo how to do it (if possible) and i have still to review GStreamer =). sadly my knowledge of the whole GObject system is a bit weak, and of GTK2 in general so i have a lot of catching up to do =/.. > Documents > 1. Ruby-GNOME2's API reference. > 2. Ruby-GNOME2's Tutorial.(like http://ruby-gnome.sourceforge.net/tutorial/) > > Unit Testing > 1. Using Test::Unit, implement test cases. > > Reporting Bugs > 1. Make an application with Ruby/GTK2. And report bugs/problems/feature request. > > Thanks in advance. > > Masao. -- ::: name: Nikolai Weibull :: aliases: pcp / lone-star ::: ::: born: Chicago, IL USA :: loc now: Gothenburg, Sweden ::: ::: page: http://pcppopper.org/ :: top ref: google "pcp rocks" ::: main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);} |
From: Masao M. <mu...@hi...> - 2002-10-21 15:10:08
|
Hi, On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 22:49:41 +0800 "Joshua Keith" <jos...@li...> wrote: > > Cool. I like it. > > I want to see smaller version early :->. > > > > Cheers, > > Masao. > > > > Done. :) Thanks, I want smaller icons(48x48) for gnome-panel. Would you make it? IMO, Especially smaller icons, GNOME foot mark seems too small... It may be better to make larger for GNOME foot mark. Or for smaller version, only center part(inner side of the octagon) may be better. Cheers, Masao -- .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...> |
From: Joshua K. <jos...@li...> - 2002-10-21 15:06:55
|
>Great. >My comments are: >* It is better to devide private/public, >instance/class methods. >Refer to http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/man >1.4/bundle.html. I will take a look and make adjustments to the docs. >* Deprecated/Obsolete/Enable broken classes/methods >will be all removed before 0.1 will be released. >* setter/getter/is_ methods have some rules. >See http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/naming.html > Are you working from the old ruby/GTK src, or is this all new source? (just wondering, as the source is where I pulled all of my information from). >If there are some methods which do not follow the >rules that'll be bug(please tell me you find such >methods). >Now I have checked about it in Ruby/GTK. >See http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/status.html. > I will certianlly tell you of any bugs that I find. I am working on an example application now that will hopefully contain most, if not all of the methods and all widgets. I find it helpful to actually see what things do before I start playing with them. When It is completed, I'll send you the src. >* Some methods have aliases. For example >Gtk::CellRendererToggle#active=, #set_active. >It is better to collect them in a class. >* How do you think about >signals/properties/constants/etc... ? > Everything will be broken down by the final release of the docs, including signals, properties, constants, and public/private methods. This version is pre-alpha at best, and was just sent to provide proof that I am working on the docs. It was not intended as a final release (by far), especially with the code still being CVS and the API likely to undergo changes. >BTW, Do you create Gtk.rd by hand? >rbbr's library(especially metainfo) may help you. > Yes. I pulled everything from the included source code (hence why I found the typos) I will take a look at rbbr when I get the chance :) >I attempt sample.rb(and result.txt) which creates >all class/methods list of Ruby/GTK, GLib, GDK. >As this is sample, you may change it for your >documents. But I think it's easy. > I'll take a look at it, but I think I have pulled almost everything out of the gtk source(perhaps more ;) than I need. >After installing rbbr in CVS, check it. >#Ruby is so cool ... I feel again:->. > I will take a look at it. I've only one more method on GtkWindow before it is completed (in it's current form). Will functions such as 'gtk_window_add_mnemonic ()', 'gtk_window_stick ()', 'gtk_window_set_icon ()' be making an appearance, or is it free to be added by a 3rd party? Thanks, Josh Cheers, Masao. -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze |
From: Joshua K. <jos...@li...> - 2002-10-21 14:51:29
|
> Cool. I like it. > I want to see smaller version early :->. > > Cheers, > Masao. > Done. :) http://www.ruby-gnome2.netfirms.com/logo-big.png http://www.ruby-gnome2.netfirms.com/logo-med.png http://www.ruby-gnome2.netfirms.com/logo-small.png I'll have the front page of the website done later this evening, then back to work on the API docs and tutorial for me :) Thanks, Josh -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze |
From: Masao M. <mu...@hi...> - 2002-10-21 10:29:00
|
Hi, On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:00:05 +0800 "Joshua Keith" <jos...@li...> wrote: > Here is my submission for the offcial Ruby-GNOME2 logo. Any suggestions, flames, or praises accepted. > > http://www.ruby-gnome2.netfirms.com/ruby-GNOME2-logo.png > > (size==134k--Logo will be scaled down) Cool. I like it. I want to see smaller version early :->. Cheers, Masao. -- .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...> |
From: Joshua K. <jos...@li...> - 2002-10-21 04:00:20
|
Here is my submission for the offcial Ruby-GNOME2 logo. Any suggestions, flames, or praises accepted. http://www.ruby-gnome2.netfirms.com/ruby-GNOME2-logo.png (size==134k--Logo will be scaled down) Thanks, Josh -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze |
From: Masao M. <mu...@hi...> - 2002-10-20 12:16:48
|
Hi, On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 22:38:54 +0200 Markus Jais <mj...@we...> wrote: > hello > > I am about to write a article about ruby news in the german magazin > linuxenterprise ( http://www.linuxenterprise.de ) Cool. > this is only a small column with ruby news. I would like to mention > ruby-gnome2 with a few lines. I would just write that the stuff in under heavy > development but one can already play with the examples. > I have to finish the article by the end of october, but the magazin will > appear first in dezember. > > is this okay that I will mention it in the magazine ?? Okay. It welcomes. But you need to notice some APIs of Ruby-GNOME2 will be changed. #I think it'll be a first magazine which mention Ruby-GNOME2:) > ruby in germany is getting more and more popular and I am sure that german > ruby fans are interested in this project. Really? Great! > do you have a idea how stable it might be in dezember ?? Stable? No. I'll be not able to say it until we release version 1.0. I'll be able to release some unstable versions of Ruby-GNOME2 until this December. > does it also run on windows ? at least the Gtk+ part ?? Have you visited our Website? If you have never done yet. See http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/. I think you can get some informations what you want. P.S. Please notice Ruby-GNOME2 is not ruby-gnome2. See http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/naming.html. When you write the article, notice Ruby-GNOME2 library naming rules. -- .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...> |
From: Markus J. <mj...@we...> - 2002-10-19 20:38:10
|
hello I am about to write a article about ruby news in the german magazin linuxenterprise ( http://www.linuxenterprise.de ) this is only a small column with ruby news. I would like to mention ruby-gnome2 with a few lines. I would just write that the stuff in under heavy development but one can already play with the examples. I have to finish the article by the end of october, but the magazin will appear first in dezember. is this okay that I will mention it in the magazine ?? ruby in germany is getting more and more popular and I am sure that german ruby fans are interested in this project. do you have a idea how stable it might be in dezember ?? does it also run on windows ? at least the Gtk+ part ?? I played with it lately and I really like it although I do not know much about Gtk+ right now or gnome. any hints welcome markus -- Markus Jais http://www.mjais.de in...@mj... The road goes ever on and on - Bilbo Baggins |
From: Masao M. <mu...@hi...> - 2002-10-19 13:27:01
|
Hi, On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 08:47:38 +0800 "Joshua Keith" <jos...@li...> wrote: > rbgtktreeview.c > > rb_define_method(gTv, "columns_sutosize", treeview_columns_autosize, 0); > --->Should be > rb_define_method(gTv, "columns_autosize", treeview_columns_autosize, 0); > > > && > rb_define_method(gTv, "move_colun_after", treeview_move_column_after, 2); > --->Should be > rb_define_method(gTv, "move_column_after", treeview_move_column_after, 2); Thanks, I fixed them. Cheers, Masao -- .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...> |
From: Joshua K. <jos...@li...> - 2002-10-19 00:47:54
|
rbgtktreeview.c rb_define_method(gTv, "columns_sutosize", treeview_columns_autosize, 0); --->Should be rb_define_method(gTv, "columns_autosize", treeview_columns_autosize, 0); && rb_define_method(gTv, "move_colun_after", treeview_move_column_after, 2); --->Should be rb_define_method(gTv, "move_column_after", treeview_move_column_after, 2); Unless you guys are changing the naming scheme :) Thanks, Josh -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze |
From: Masao M. <mu...@hi...> - 2002-10-17 12:17:35
|
Hi, On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 04:37:01 +0800 "Joshua Keith" <jos...@li...> wrote: > >But I couldn't work it yet. > > > No problem. The source is pretty self-explanatory, and it is commented well, so I should be able to pick it up from there. Cool. But, until 0.1 will be released, some API will be changed ... Sometimes you'll revise them. > > I can provide you "a central place". It's here. > > Also if you need, I can provide you CVS and SF's >website of Ruby-GNOME2. > > > Excellent. I sent you an email regarding the web site and icons that we had discussed > earlier. If you like, I can give you a proof later on tonight(I suppose early morning >for you guys ;). Wow, that's great. I'd like to wait you. Thanks, Masao -- .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...> |
From: Joshua K. <jos...@li...> - 2002-10-16 20:37:30
|
<snip> > Great! > > As far as I know, anyone have never started yet. > Not a problem. I have a couple of methods roughly documented, but I'm still a long way from finished. > I think documents are very important for our >project. > I agree. >But I couldn't work it yet. > No problem. The source is pretty self-explanatory, and it is commented well, so I should be able to pick it up from there. > #While regrettable, Ruby-GNOME has a few documents ... . > > So I'd like to help you as much as I can. > > I can provide you "a central place". It's here. > Also if you need, I can provide you CVS and SF's >website of Ruby-GNOME2. > Excellent. I sent you an email regarding the web site and icons that we had discussed earlier. If you like, I can give you a proof later on tonight(I suppose early morning for you guys ;). > BTW, > Ruby-GNOME2 is not Ruby-Gnome2. > Please check "Ruby-GNOME2 naming/conversion rule" > before you'll start your "Doc" project ;->. > (http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/naming.html) > #Although I know it's trifles, but important. > I agree and it was my mistake. I will re-review the docs on the website again today to make sure I do not repeat the mistake :) > Thanks in advance, > Masao Thank you, Josh Keith -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze |
From: Masao M. <mu...@hi...> - 2002-10-16 17:05:52
|
Hi, On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:30:10 +0800 "Joshua Keith" <jos...@li...> wrote: > Hi, > I am in the process of documenting Ruby-Gnome2 (using source and GTK2 docs). If anyone is intrested in assisting, or has already started the docs, please let me know and maybe we can get something in a central place for all to share :) > Great! As far as I know, anyone have never started yet. I think documents are very important for our project. But I couldn't work it yet. #While regrettable, Ruby-GNOME has a few documents ... . So I'd like to help you as much as I can. I can provide you "a central place". It's here. Also if you need, I can provide you CVS and SF's website of Ruby-GNOME2. BTW, Ruby-GNOME2 is not Ruby-Gnome2. Please check "Ruby-GNOME2 naming/conversion rule" before you'll start your "Doc" project ;->. (http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/naming.html) #Although I know it's trifles, but important. Thanks in advance, Masao -- .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...> |
From: Joshua K. <jos...@li...> - 2002-10-16 16:30:50
|
Hi, I am in the process of documenting Ruby-Gnome2 (using source and GTK2 docs). If anyone is intrested in assisting, or has already started the docs, please let me know and maybe we can get something in a central place for all to share :) Thanks, Josh Keith -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze |
From: Masao M. <mu...@hi...> - 2002-10-15 12:01:34
|
Hi, On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:40:16 +0200 "Nikolai [pcp/lone-star] Weibull" <lon...@ho...> wrote: > so is ruby-gnome2 actually usable now? great! how far 'til finished? I'm not sure when it will be finished ... . Because there are too many tasks. > are we 50% there? For initial release, I think we have done 50% over. Please keep to check http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/status.html > btw, if you need any help with anything i'd gladly help in > any way i can. Great! There are so many tasks. OK, I write them as follows. If you can help us to do any parts of them, please tell us. #Though they do not need until releasing 0.1. Implementations 1. Implement other classes in Ruby/GTK. 2. Implement gtk-demo with Ruby/GTK. 3. Implement other libraries like Ruby/Bonobo, Ruby/Pango ... Documents 1. Ruby-GNOME2's API reference. 2. Ruby-GNOME2's Tutorial.(like http://ruby-gnome.sourceforge.net/tutorial/) Unit Testing 1. Using Test::Unit, implement test cases. Reporting Bugs 1. Make an application with Ruby/GTK2. And report bugs/problems/feature request. Thanks in advance. Masao. -- .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...> |
From: Nikolai [pcp/lone-s. W. <lon...@ho...> - 2002-10-14 17:40:51
|
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 02:59:26 +0000, Masao Mutoh wrote: > Hi, > > rbbr for Ruby/GTK2 is now available on CVS! > > I'd like to say this is very important news > because this is the first application for > Ruby/GTK2, and proved Ruby/GTK2 has already worked fine. > > * What's rbbr? > rbbr (RuBy BRowser) is an application to browse > modules/classes hierarchy and their constants, methods, > properties and signals. If the optionally modules to > refer documents are installed, you can also refer the > document of methods in the browser. > > Enjoy! > so is ruby-gnome2 actually usable now? great! how far 'til finished? are we 50% there? btw, if you need any help with anything i'd gladly help in any way i can. -- /* Name: Nikolai 'pcp' Weibull -- Age: 22 -- Born in: Chicago, IL USA * * Where @: Gothenburg, Sweden -- Homepage: http://www.pcppopper.org/ * * Email: da...@ho..., pc...@pc... -- System: GeForce2 MX 32 * * Celeron 667at950, Fujitsu 20.49gb UDMA-66, ASUS CUV4X, 256mb PC133 * * main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);} */ |
From: Masao M. <mu...@hi...> - 2002-10-13 17:59:26
|
Hi, rbbr for Ruby/GTK2 is now available on CVS! I'd like to say this is very important news because this is the first application for Ruby/GTK2, and proved Ruby/GTK2 has already worked fine. * What's rbbr? rbbr (RuBy BRowser) is an application to browse modules/classes hierarchy and their constants, methods, properties and signals. If the optionally modules to refer documents are installed, you can also refer the document of methods in the browser. Enjoy! -- .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...> |
From: KUBO T. <ku...@ji...> - 2002-10-06 10:31:42
|
Hi, Allmost all functions of libgnomecanvas2 except internally used ones are implemented as ruby's methods. Checkout from CVS repository and try it. Samples using 'Bezier Curve' and 'RichText' are also added. There is a problem. When you write 50 bezier curves and close the window, it warns as the following; (canvas.rb:1733): GnomeCanvas-CRITICAL **: file gnome-canvas.c: line 3698 (gnome_canvas_request_redraw): assertion `GNOME_IS_CANVAS (canvas)' failed This will be fixed after Ruby/Glib's G_TYPE_POINTER support is done. -- KUBO Takehiro email: ku...@ji... web: http://www.jiubao.org GnuPG fingerprint = 5F7B C8EF CA16 57D0 FDE1 9F47 C001 1F93 AC08 2262 |
From: Markus J. <mj...@we...> - 2002-09-18 17:10:54
|
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 18:34, Masao Mutoh wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 23:24:46 +0200 > > Markus Jais <mj...@we...> wrote: > > Hello > > > > compiling glib2 and gtk2 works without problems but I can not load > > gtk2 > > > > irb(main):001:0> require "glib2" > > true > > irb(main):002:0> require "gtk2" > > irb: relocation error: /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.7/i686-linux/gtk2.so: > > undefined symbol: Init_gtk_inits > > > > > > any ideas what went wrong here? > > Oops, this was a bug. I fixed it in CVS. Please check it out again. thanks. now it works. within the next days I hope I can play a little with gtk2 and ruby. if I find any error I will let you know thanks for your great work markus > > Thanks, > Masao. -- Markus Jais http://www.mjais.de in...@mj... The road goes ever on and on - Bilbo Baggins |
From: Masao M. <mu...@hi...> - 2002-09-18 16:34:30
|
Hi, On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 23:24:46 +0200 Markus Jais <mj...@we...> wrote: > Hello > compiling glib2 and gtk2 works without problems but I can not load > gtk2 > > irb(main):001:0> require "glib2" > true > irb(main):002:0> require "gtk2" > irb: relocation error: /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.7/i686-linux/gtk2.so: undefined > symbol: Init_gtk_inits > > > any ideas what went wrong here? Oops, this was a bug. I fixed it in CVS. Please check it out again. Thanks, Masao. -- .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...> |
From: Markus J. <mj...@we...> - 2002-09-17 21:20:29
|
Hello I have updated my system to gtk 2.0.6 ruby 1.7.3 and updated my ruby-gnome2 from cvs today compiling glib2 and gtk2 works without problems but I can not load gtk2 irb(main):001:0> require "glib2" true irb(main):002:0> require "gtk2" irb: relocation error: /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.7/i686-linux/gtk2.so: undefined symbol: Init_gtk_inits any ideas what went wrong here? markus -- Markus Jais http://www.mjais.de in...@mj... The road goes ever on and on - Bilbo Baggins |
From: Masao M. <mu...@hi...> - 2002-09-16 08:03:07
|
Hi, On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 09:50:40 +0200 markus jais <mj...@we...> wrote: > hello > I found a parse error in extconf.rb for gtk > this error occured on my Suse 7.3 system, ruby 1.6.7 This works in ruby 1.7.x ... But OK. I'll fix it both version will work fine. Thanks! -- .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...> |
From: markus j. <mj...@we...> - 2002-09-16 07:50:50
|
hello I found a parse error in extconf.rb for gtk in the lines 161, 166, 184, 188 the double quotes must be escaped for example line 161: @cp lib/gtk2.rb #{Config::CONFIG["rubylibdir"]} must be changed to @cp lib/gtk2.rb #{Config::CONFIG[\"rubylibdir\"]} this error occured on my Suse 7.3 system, ruby 1.6.7 markus =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F Die clevere Geldreserve: der DiBa-Privatkredit. Funktioniert wie ein Dispo= ,=20 ist aber viel g=FCnstiger! Alle Infos: http://diba.web.de/=3Fmc=3D021104 |
From: Masao M. <mu...@hi...> - 2002-09-16 07:03:41
|
Hi, I wrote two documents. Ruby-GNOME2 naming/conversion rules http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/naming.html How to implement Ruby-GNOME2 http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/howto_gnome.html Both documents is not enough(I welcome any comments), but I think you can start to hack Ruby-GNOME2 libraries easily. Yes, I need your help. Ruby/GTK2 is lack of classes/modules, and old classes(which is taken over Ruby-GNOME) don't conform Ruby-GNOME2 naming rules. I want to fix it as soon as possible. Does anyone help me? -- .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...> |