ruby-gnome2-devel-en — Ruby-GNOME2 developer's list in English.

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Ruby/GConf

[Nikolai :: lone-s. :: W. <lon...@ho...>]

On Thu, 07 Nov 2002 22:27:23 +0000, Nikolai :: lone-star :: Weibull wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 17:46:24 +0000, Masao Mutoh wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, 3 Nov 2002 21:07:02 +0100
> > "Nikolai :: lone-star :: Weibull" <lon...@ho...> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, i have plans on writing a Ruby/GConf conversion.
> >
> > Great.
> >
> > > is anyone else assigned this part or can i dig into it?
> >
> > No.
> > Though Ruby-GNOME version has already existed.
> >
> > If you think Ruby/GConf2 makes as a part of Ruby-GNOME2,
> > I can provide you the CVS of Ruby-GNOME2.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Masao.
> >
> i'll see what i can do. i'll email again when i have something
> half-done. i'll look at the old version and see what needs to be done.
>
btw, i've run into a problem. it seems that GConfEngine isn't a
decendant of GObject. How should i wrap it? I mean, in GConfClient i
would like to take an optional GConfEngine as a parameter to initialize,
but i can't figure out how to do typechecking of it. should i use
Glib::Boxed for GConfEngine perhaps?

--
::: name: Nikolai Weibull       :: aliases: pcp / lone-star    :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA       :: loc now: Gothenburg, Sweden :::
::: page: http://pcppopper.org/ :: top ref: google "pcp rocks" :::
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] rbgtkentry.c

[Joshua K. <jos...@li...>]

> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 19:08:03 -0700
> "Joshua Keith" <jos...@li...> wrote:
> 
> > I have a question regarding rbgtkentry.c, as I have noticied several of the 
> > methods have been removed from this widget. One of the most important being 
> > 'get_text'. I've figured out that get_chars(0, -1) can be substituted, but 
> > why has a non-deprecated method been removed? (see
> >  http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/GtkEntry.html ). 
> > The get_text method was in the 1.11 rev, but was removed, 
> > and I was wondering if it's coming back, and if not...why?
> 
> Because they are properties.
> Property accessors are auto-generated.
> 
> Gtk::Entry#set_text, Gtk::Entry#text=, Gtk::Entry#text are defined automaticaly.
> You can check them in rbbr.
> 
> See below the message again.
> And also check http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/naming.html.
> 
Apologies if I'm just dense, but I've played with it quite a bit, and I can not pull the text from the entry widget. Seems like most of the ways to pull the text from the widget only returns the widget itself, not the data contained within. In addition, while playing with the entry widget, when ever the 'activate' signal is emitted (as well as when entry.delete-text is called), I get the following error:
** (filename:1925): WARNING **: rbgobj_rvalue_to_gvalue: unsupported type: (null)

the offending lines of code are:
entry.signal_connect('activate') {
   self.display(entry)
}

def display(entry)
   data = entry.get_chars(0, -1)
   entry.set_text('') <----Workaround for the entry.delete-text (silenced the orginal error)
end

Am I missing something in this, or did I trip over a bug? (BTW, seems that the ListStore is working great. Expect some docs on ListStore this weekend(In the format you specified). Still trying to wrap my head around the TreeStore though).

Question 2:
   Regarding Gtk.input_add:
      I get the error: :tried to create a Proc object without a block(ArguementError)
   The line of code in question is as follows:
      @sock = TCPSocket.new(server, port)
      Gtk.input_add(self.test(), @sock)

I'm assuming that this is something I'm doing incorrectly, (most likely not setting up blocking up on the socket being called), but I thought I would pass it along to see if you could shed any light on it for me.


Thanks for your time,
Josh

PS - I know I badger you a lot, but wanted to say thanks for all the hard work you guys have put into Ruby-GNOME2.
-- 
______________________________________________
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with POP3/IMAP access for only US$19.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Ruby/GConf

[Nikolai :: lone-s. :: W. <lon...@ho...>]

On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 17:46:24 +0000, Masao Mutoh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 3 Nov 2002 21:07:02 +0100
> "Nikolai :: lone-star :: Weibull" <lon...@ho...> wrote:
>
> > Hi, i have plans on writing a Ruby/GConf conversion.
>
> Great.
>
> > is anyone else assigned this part or can i dig into it?
>
> No.
> Though Ruby-GNOME version has already existed.
>
> If you think Ruby/GConf2 makes as a part of Ruby-GNOME2,
> I can provide you the CVS of Ruby-GNOME2.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Masao.
>
i'll see what i can do. i'll email again when i have something
half-done. i'll look at the old version and see what needs to be done.

--
::: name: Nikolai Weibull       :: aliases: pcp / lone-star    :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA       :: loc now: Gothenburg, Sweden :::
::: page: http://pcppopper.org/ :: top ref: google "pcp rocks" :::
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] rbgtkentry.c

[Masao M. <mu...@hi...>]

Hi,

On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 19:08:03 -0700
"Joshua Keith" <jos...@li...> wrote:

> I have a question regarding rbgtkentry.c, as I have noticied several of the 
> methods have been removed from this widget. One of the most important being 
> 'get_text'. I've figured out that get_chars(0, -1) can be substituted, but 
> why has a non-deprecated method been removed? (see
>  http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/GtkEntry.html ). 
> The get_text method was in the 1.11 rev, but was removed, 
> and I was wondering if it's coming back, and if not...why?

Because they are properties.
Property accessors are auto-generated.

Gtk::Entry#set_text, Gtk::Entry#text=, Gtk::Entry#text are defined automaticaly.
You can check them in rbbr.

See below the message again.
And also check http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/naming.html.

---------------
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:46:55 +0900
Masao Mutoh <mu...@hi...> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:10:08 -0700
> "Joshua Keith" <jos...@li...> wrote:
> 
> > I was looking through the source and noticied that set_title was missing. Was it moved, or will it be taken out (and will it be returning)?
> 
> Property accessors are auto-generated in Ruby-GNOME2.
> So we don't need implement them by hand.
> 
> I recommand you to use rbbr for finding methods/constants.
> And my script what I sended you is also useful to examine 
> what methods has already implemented.
> 
> Cheers,
> Masao.
> 
-- 
.:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...>

[ruby-gnome2-devel-en] rbgtkentry.c

[Joshua K. <jos...@li...>]

I have a question regarding rbgtkentry.c, as I have noticied several of the methods have been removed from this widget. One of the most important being 'get_text'. I've figured out that get_chars(0, -1) can be substituted, but why has a non-deprecated method been removed? (see http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/GtkEntry.html ). The get_text method was in the 1.11 rev, but was removed, and I was wondering if it's coming back, and if not...why?

Thanks,
Joshua Keith

-- 

Powered by Outblaze

[ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Release preparation

[Masao M. <mu...@hi...>]

Hi,

I'm going to release Ruby-GNOME2-0.1 in near future.
#If there are no big problems, It'll be this weekend.

Would you check latest CVS, and report bugs/comments?

-----
And I think to release the follow 3 tar-balls.

* ruby-gtk2-0.1.tar.gz
 - glib
 - gtk

* ruby-gnome2-0.1.tar.gz 
 - glib
 - gtk
 - gnome
 - gnomecanvas
 - gdkpixbuf
 - libart(If I can fix all problems)
 - libglade(If I can fix all problems)
 - panel-applet(If I can fix all problems)

* rbbr-0.1.tar.gz
 - rbbr

Any suggestions?

Cheers,
Masao.

-- 
.:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...>

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Ruby/GConf

[Masao M. <mu...@hi...>]

Hi,

On Sun, 3 Nov 2002 21:07:02 +0100
"Nikolai :: lone-star :: Weibull" <lon...@ho...> wrote:

> Hi, i have plans on writing a Ruby/GConf conversion. 

Great.

> is anyone else assigned this part or can i dig into it?

No. 
Though Ruby-GNOME version has already existed.

If you think Ruby/GConf2 makes as a part of Ruby-GNOME2,
I can provide you the CVS of Ruby-GNOME2.

Thanks in advance,
Masao.

-- 
.:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...>

[ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Ruby/GConf

[Nikolai :: lone-s. :: W. <lon...@ho...>]

Hi, i have plans on writing a Ruby/GConf conversion. is anyone else
assigned this part or can i dig into it?

--
::: name: Nikolai Weibull       :: aliases: pcp / lone-star    :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA       :: loc now: Gothenburg, Sweden :::
::: page: http://pcppopper.org/ :: top ref: google "pcp rocks" :::
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Documentation

[Masao M. <mu...@hi...>]

Hi Josh,

On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:51:06 +0900
Masao Mutoh <mu...@hi...> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>> On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:47:57 -0700
>> "Joshua Keith" <jos...@li...> wrote:

> OK, I write an first example what I want.
> I'll send here it by RD tonight.

See attached files.

You can create HTML files as follows:

rd2 -rrd/rd2html-lib --with-css=style.css gtk_window.rd > tmp.html

style.css is sample CSS.

* Instance methods express with '#' like Gtk::Window#foo.
* Class/Module methods express with '.' like Gtk::Window.bar.
* Constants express with '::' like Gtk::Window:TOPLEVEL.

How do you think?

-- 
.:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...>

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Documentation

[Masao M. <mu...@hi...>]

Hi,

On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:47:57 -0700
"Joshua Keith" <jos...@li...> wrote:

> To get an update on the status of the docs, take a look at
> http://www.ruby-gnome2.netfirms.com/api-main.html for the 
> Ruby-GNOME2 API docs, or http://www.ruby-gnome2.netfirms.com/toc.htm 
> for the Ruby-GNOME2 tutorial. Please be aware that the docs are not 
> even pre-alpha yet, but I am working on them and I will try and keep 
> up with changes of the API as I go along.

Great.

My comments are:
Both of documents
* Deprecated/Obsolete/Enable broken classes/methods will be all removed 
  before 0.1 will be released(Already some classes/methods have removed.
  They won't implement in Ruby-GNOME2.

api-main.html
* setter/getter/is_ methods have some rules. 
  Some methods have aliases. For example Gtk::CellRendererToggle#active=, #set_active.
  They are all needed.
  *NOTICE* Some methods are auto-generated. You should check it in rbbr or my script.
* Devide public/protected/private methods and also signals/properties/constants/etc.
* I don't like static type definition style and they are not Ruby-type ....
  Ruby-GNOME2 users do not need to recognize C and GTK+. 
  You should express API reference with Ruby class/modules only
  (int or bool or string or GtkWindow are not Ruby class/modules).

OK, I write an first example what I want.
I'll send here it by RD tonight.


P.S.
Do you know ruby-doc project ?
I don't know what the project do. But it may be helpful for you.

-- 
.:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...>

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Question regarding rbgtkwindow.c

[Masao M. <mu...@hi...>]

Hi,

On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:10:08 -0700
"Joshua Keith" <jos...@li...> wrote:

> I was looking through the source and noticied that set_title was missing. Was it moved, or will it be taken out (and will it be returning)?

Property accessors are auto-generated in Ruby-GNOME2.
So we don't need implement them by hand.

I recommand you to use rbbr for finding methods/constants.
And my script what I sended you is also useful to examine 
what methods has already implemented.

Cheers,
Masao.

-- 
.:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...>

[ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Question regarding rbgtkwindow.c

[Joshua K. <jos...@li...>]

I was looking through the source and noticied that set_title was missing. Was it moved, or will it be taken out (and will it be returning)?

Thanks,
Josh
-- 

Powered by Outblaze

[ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Documentation

[Joshua K. <jos...@li...>]

To get an update on the status of the docs, take a look at http://www.ruby-gnome2.netfirms.com/api-main.html for the Ruby-GNOME2 API docs, or http://www.ruby-gnome2.netfirms.com/toc.htm for the Ruby-GNOME2 tutorial. Please be aware that the docs are not even pre-alpha yet, but I am working on them and I will try and keep up with changes of the API as I go along.

Thanks,
Josh
-- 

Powered by Outblaze

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Documents

[Joshua K. <jos...@li...>]

 > Please post your URL for the present.
> After concreted the ideas of docs format(or some other issues),
> we'll use CVS on sourceforge.
> 
Ok..will do. I'll put the site together this weekend and send the URL when it's up.

Thanks,
Josh
-- 

Powered by Outblaze

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Documents

[Masao M. <mu...@hi...>]

Hi,

On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:31:49 -0700
jos...@li... wrote:

> > 
> I have a question regarding the release of the docs....
> should I post a URL to the ML, send it direct to you, 
> (in rd format :), or some other method? You had spoke about
> CVS before, but I'm not sure I have enough yet to start adding 
> to CVS :) (the sourceforge name is T1nk though, if you want to 
> go that route). Let me know.

Please post your URL for the present.
After concreted the ideas of docs format(or some other issues),
we'll use CVS on sourceforge.

Cheers,
Masao.
 
-- 
.:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...>

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Ruby-GNOME2 Logo

[Masao M. <mu...@hi...>]

Hi,

On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:28:11 -0700
jos...@li... wrote:

> Something like direction arrows, a close all, etc?

Just rbbr's icon. I would like to use it for gnome-panel or 
it is shown when the application is iconized(minimized).

> No problem. Something came up, so it may be tomorrow 
>before I can get to it, but it will be done by week's end :)

Thanks in advance.
 
Cheers,
Masao.

-- 
.:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...>

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Documents

[<jos...@li...>]

<snip>
> OK, If you have some issues, please ask me.
> 
> Cheers,
> Masao.
> -- 
> .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...>
> 
> 
I have a question regarding the release of the docs....should I post a URL to the ML, send it direct to you, (in rd format :), or some other method? You had spoke about CVS before, but I'm not sure I have enough yet to start adding to CVS :) (the sourceforge name is T1nk though, if you want to go that route). Let me know.

Thanks,
Josh
-- 

Powered by Outblaze

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Ruby-GNOME2 Logo

[<jos...@li...>]

<snip>
> type? do you mean file type of images?
>
No. What do you need the icons for? Example (printing, home, forward, etc). 

> Then pixmap or png or jpg, both OK, but pixmap is useful in Ruby-GNOME2.
> Or if you mean what applications I want to use the icons in, then
> for example, gtk-demo(ruby-version) or some samples, rbbr ... though it's
> just idea.
>
Something like direction arrows, a close all, etc?

> > > IMO,
> > > Especially smaller icons, GNOME foot mark seems too small...
> > 
> > I have a few adjustments that I need to make to it. The foot will stand
> out more 
> > in the next version, even on the smaller sizes.
> 
> Thanks.
>
No problem. Something came up, so it may be tomorrow before I can get to it, but it will be done by week's end :)

> > > It may be better to make larger for GNOME foot mark.
> > > Or for smaller version, only center part(inner side of 
> > > the octagon) may be better.
> > >
> > I'll try it out and see, but I think I can keep the current logo as is
> with 
> > a few adjustments and make the foot stand out more.
> 
> I see. I leave it to you.
> 
> Cheers,
> Masao.
> 
> -- 
> .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...>
> 
> 
Thanks,
Josh
-- 

Powered by Outblaze

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] rbbr is now available!

[Masao M. <mu...@hi...>]

Hi,

> > Ruby/GLib provides cool macros for other libraries which use GObject system.
> > They help you. See "How to implement Ruby-GNOME2" on our Website.
> > (http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/howto_gnome.html).
> >
> > Also many of hints are already existed in Ruby/GLib2 and Ruby/GTK2 source codes.
> > It may be better to study some classes in Ruby/GTK2 before you start your project.
> > #Especially the classes which inherited GLib::Object, GLib::Boxed directory is helpful.
> >
> ok, i haven't really dug deep into the whole GLib thing, but i am
> wondering why we need things such as GLib::Boxed. i mean when will we
> need it in Ruby? GLib::Boxed is apparently for wrapping C structs to
> GObjects right? and when is this useful from Ruby? am i missing
> something in the abstraction layers here?

Good question. But I may be not able to answer well in my poor English ...

GLib/GTK+ have three type of C Structure which make GLib/GTK+ classes.
#Of course there are some other classes like GSignal, GParamSpec.
#But I don't tell about them here.

1. GOBject subclasses - follow GType system.
2. GBoxed subclasses  - follow GType system.
3. others - not follow GType system.

GLib::Boxed is not GObject. Both of them follow GType system, but the
mechanism are quite different.

GObject is:
 - follow GType system.
 - have properties using GParamSpec.
 - reference counting.
 - have some other useful methods.
 - others:->.

GBoxed is:
 - follow GType system.
 - don't have parent classes.
 - provide copy()/free() but not reference counting.

So I think we can't merge them in a GObject or GBoxed.
We may be able to inherit both of them from common abstract class, but
I didn't think it's better way(I thought it was overdoing).

----
3. others which are not follow GType system
  We can implement them using Ruby's standard APIs, as Data_Make/Get_Struct.
But it is very complicated to implement with GType macros.
So we re-implemented these C structs as GBoxed object.
(It's very easy. implement copy, free, get_type and G*_TYPE_* macro. 
 See gtk/src/rbgdkgeometry.c and others).


The other side, Ruby users viewpoint,
GLib::Boxed, GLib::Object both have own methods. Usually it'll be used.
But sometimes you may need them.
#Usually abstract classes are not used necessarily by user, I think;->.


P.S.
"GLib::Boxed" may be bad name. Because it isn't native GBoxed only.
And general Ruby-GNOME2 users may be not able to understand 
why they are 'Boxed'.
The name may be changed something like "GLib::Data" in the future.
However, I think the priority is low for the moment.

Cheers,
Masao

-- 
.:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...>

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Ruby-GNOME2 Logo

[Masao M. <mu...@hi...>]

Hi,

> > I want smaller icons(48x48) for gnome-panel.
> > Would you make it?
> >
> Be happy to.
> I'll have that done sometime tonight or tomorrow. 
> Let me know what type of icons you need as well (aside from Ruby-GNOME2). 
> I plan on creating a set to be used with the pixbuf stuff, so It might
> work together.

type? do you mean file type of images?
Then pixmap or png or jpg, both OK, but pixmap is useful in Ruby-GNOME2.
Or if you mean what applications I want to use the icons in, then
for example, gtk-demo(ruby-version) or some samples, rbbr ... though it's
just idea.

> > IMO,
> > Especially smaller icons, GNOME foot mark seems too small...
> 
> I have a few adjustments that I need to make to it. The foot will stand
out more 
> in the next version, even on the smaller sizes.

Thanks.

> > It may be better to make larger for GNOME foot mark.
> > Or for smaller version, only center part(inner side of 
> > the octagon) may be better.
> >
> I'll try it out and see, but I think I can keep the current logo as is
with 
> a few adjustments and make the foot stand out more.

I see. I leave it to you.

Cheers,
Masao.

-- 
.:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...>

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Documents

[Masao M. <mu...@hi...>]

Hi,

> Yes. I actually printed that out before I planned on documenting
everything. 
> I've mainly been looking at the current src.

I see.

> (See http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/status.html)
> # Maybe you couldn't understand my English ... Please point out it;->
> Your English was fine. 
> I did have some trouble with the Ruby-GNOME2 naming conventions however, 
> but I have re-written a bit of it and added it into the tutorial.

OK, If you have some issues, please ask me.

Cheers,
Masao.
-- 
.:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...>

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] rbbr is now available!

[Nikolai :: lone-s. :: W. <lon...@ho...>]

On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 00:49:39 +0000, Masao Mutoh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:12:18 +0200
> "Nikolai :: lone-star :: Weibull" <lon...@ho...> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 21:01:29 +0000, Masao Mutoh wrote:
> > > Hi,
>
> > > Implementations
> > > 1. Implement other classes in Ruby/GTK.
> > > 2. Implement gtk-demo with Ruby/GTK.
> > > 3. Implement other libraries like Ruby/Bonobo, Ruby/Pango ...
> > >
> > ok, i'll see how much time i can spare the coming weeks...i have an
> > interest in implementing a GStreamer interface, i'll have to review your
> > stuff and soo how to do it (if possible) and i have still to review
> > GStreamer =).
>
> Cool.
>
> > sadly my knowledge of the whole GObject system is a bit
> > weak, and of GTK2 in general so i have a lot of catching up to do =/..
>
> Not problem.
> When I started this project, I didn't know them too;->.
>
ok, good =)
> BTW,
> Ruby/GLib provides cool macros for other libraries which use GObject system.
> They help you. See "How to implement Ruby-GNOME2" on our Website.
> (http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/howto_gnome.html).
>
> Also many of hints are already existed in Ruby/GLib2 and Ruby/GTK2 source codes.
> It may be better to study some classes in Ruby/GTK2 before you start your project.
> #Especially the classes which inherited GLib::Object, GLib::Boxed directory is helpful.
>
ok, i haven't really dug deep into the whole GLib thing, but i am
wondering why we need things such as GLib::Boxed. i mean when will we
need it in Ruby? GLib::Boxed is apparently for wrapping C structs to
GObjects right? and when is this useful from Ruby? am i missing
something in the abstraction layers here?
> Cheers,
> Masao.
>
thanks for your quick and complete answers btw! i'm really looking
forward to start working with this! :-)

--
::: name: Nikolai Weibull       :: aliases: pcp / lone-star    :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA       :: loc now: Gothenburg, Sweden :::
::: page: http://pcppopper.org/ :: top ref: google "pcp rocks" :::
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Ruby-GNOME2 Logo

[Joshua K. <jos...@li...>]

> I want smaller icons(48x48) for gnome-panel.
> Would you make it?
>
Be happy to. I'll have that done sometime tonight or tomorrow. Let me know what type of icons you need as well (aside from Ruby-GNOME2). I plan on creating a set to be used with the pixbuf stuff, so It might work together.

> IMO,
> Especially smaller icons, GNOME foot mark seems too small...

I have a few adjustments that I need to make to it. The foot will stand out more in the next version, even on the smaller sizes.

> It may be better to make larger for GNOME foot mark.
> Or for smaller version, only center part(inner side of 
> the octagon) may be better.
>
I'll try it out and see, but I think I can keep the current logo as is with a few adjustments and make the foot stand out more.

Thanks,
Josh
-- 
Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org 


Powered by Outblaze

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] Documents

[Joshua K. <jos...@li...>]

<snip> 
> They'll be all implemented until released Ruby-GNOME2 1.0.
> Also someone can make patch:->.
>
Cool. If I have time this week/end, I'll work on some of the patches. No promises though :)

> Have you already checked "Ruby-GNOME2 Milestones and Status Matrix" ?

Yes. I actually printed that out before I planned on documenting everything. I've mainly been looking at the current src.

> (See http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/status.html)
> # Maybe you couldn't understand my English ... Please point out it;->
>
Your English was fine. I did have some trouble with the Ruby-GNOME2 naming conventions however, but I have re-written a bit of it and added it into the tutorial.

Thanks,
Josh
-- 
Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org 


Powered by Outblaze

Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] rbbr is now available!

[Masao M. <mu...@hi...>]

Hi,

On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:12:18 +0200
"Nikolai :: lone-star :: Weibull" <lon...@ho...> wrote:

> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 21:01:29 +0000, Masao Mutoh wrote:
> > Hi,

> > Implementations
> > 1. Implement other classes in Ruby/GTK.
> > 2. Implement gtk-demo with Ruby/GTK.
> > 3. Implement other libraries like Ruby/Bonobo, Ruby/Pango ...
> >
> ok, i'll see how much time i can spare the coming weeks...i have an
> interest in implementing a GStreamer interface, i'll have to review your
> stuff and soo how to do it (if possible) and i have still to review
> GStreamer =). 

Cool.

> sadly my knowledge of the whole GObject system is a bit
> weak, and of GTK2 in general so i have a lot of catching up to do =/..

Not problem.
When I started this project, I didn't know them too;->.

BTW,
Ruby/GLib provides cool macros for other libraries which use GObject system.
They help you. See "How to implement Ruby-GNOME2" on our Website.
(http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/howto_gnome.html).

Also many of hints are already existed in Ruby/GLib2 and Ruby/GTK2 source codes.
It may be better to study some classes in Ruby/GTK2 before you start your project.
#Especially the classes which inherited GLib::Object, GLib::Boxed directory is helpful.

Cheers,
Masao.

-- 
.:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...>