|
From: Bernhard R. <ber...@in...> - 2014-09-22 07:46:22
|
On Saturday 20 September 2014 at 14:08:53, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Stuart McGraw wrote: > > Has any consideration been given to dropping support for psycopg1? > > I don't know if dropping it has been considered, I also don't remember, but we should consider it. So thanks for bringing it up. > but issue 2086536 has a > patch attached that (among other things) prefers psycopg2 to psycopg1, > which would be an obvious starting point. > > (I'm not aware of anything substantially wrong with that patch Thanks for the evaluation! (I believe our contributors and our maintainer Ralf are currently mostly working in burst mode, so it seems sometimes a bit slow in here, but please let your contributions coming. :) ) > - a version > of which I've been using for some time - although to some extent the > retries are probably working around a problem that something like > <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bug-tracking.roundup.devel/4812> may > be needed to address better; quite possibly both changes make sense.) -- www.intevation.de/~bernhard (CEO) www.fsfe.org (Founding GA Member) Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, Germany; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998 Owned and run by Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner |