romaframework-development Mailing List for Roma Framework (Page 4)
Brought to you by:
lvca
Menu
▾
▴
romaframework-development — Development on RomaFramework
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(201) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-04-03 11:49:42
|
Feature Requests item #1693538, was opened at 2007-04-03 13:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1693538&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Divide Spring's applicationContext.xml in more files Initial Comment: Spring allows to divide configuration file in many sub-files. This will make things much more clear since any aspect/module may have own applicationContext.xml file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1693538&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-03-30 14:42:46
|
Feature Requests item #1502095, was opened at 2006-06-07 10:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lvca You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1502095&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: ViewAspect Group: None >Status: Deleted Priority: 2 Private: No Submitted By: Luca Garulli (lvca) >Assigned to: Luca Garulli (lvca) Summary: Google Web Toolkit support Initial Comment: The Google Web Toolkit (GWT) seems to be intended very famous. The idea is simple and powerful: convert POJO to JavaScript and execute it on the browser. The approach is quite different from Echo2, but both frameworks have some points in common. And here the idea: why don't use the best of both worlds? Creating the plugin for Roma, we should decide what POJO will be rendered with Echo2 (Client-Side + Server-Side) and what with GWT (Client-Side only). What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-03-30 16:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: YES This module has no so much interest. Deleted until anyone can develop it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1502095&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-03-30 14:42:01
|
Feature Requests item #1691341, was opened at 2007-03-30 16:42 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1691341&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: ViewAspect Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Laszlo support Initial Comment: Roma uses Echo2 as default rendering engine. Laszlo seems to be the best alternative since it renders as Flash and DHTML (JavaME in the future). Roma needs a Laszlo module. Anyone offer himself? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1691341&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-03-30 14:16:19
|
Feature Requests item #1536911, was opened at 2006-08-08 20:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lvca You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1536911&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: ViewAspect Group: None >Status: Deleted Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Elifarley C. Coelho (elifarley) >Assigned to: Luca Garulli (lvca) Summary: SWT Visualization Plugin Initial Comment: How about an SWT visualization plugin for Roma ? Using the current infrastructure, would it be easy to integrate such a plugin with Roma ? Regards, Elifarley ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-03-30 16:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: NO Hi, seems there is not much interest in this SWT plugin. If you'd like to develop it I'm happy to include in the Roma distribution! Ciao ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2006-08-10 10:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Hi, yes, it would be a great idea to support SWT! We need a SWT View Aspect. Since now ROMA supports only Echo2 as plugin, I'm excited to see if the View Aspect interfaces are enought. It will be clear only when another view aspect will be realized. Let me know if you'd like to start this adventure, probably some developers might help into development. Ciao, Luca ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1536911&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-03-29 21:49:56
|
Feature Requests item #1528454, was opened at 2006-07-25 17:48 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by lvca You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1528454&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Generic Aspect Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Massimo Losco (maxlos) Assigned to: Luca Garulli (lvca) Summary: Roma + SHARK Initial Comment: Hi all, ROMA Framewrok should operate with Shark (Work Flow engine). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-03-29 23:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: NO Hi, if you want to develop the Shark module you're welcome. Roma starting to the next week will comes with a pojo based workflow engine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2006-07-27 10:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Yes it should :-) What do you think to commit the first alpha versione? bye, Lvc@ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1528454&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-03-29 21:49:42
|
Feature Requests item #1528454, was opened at 2006-07-25 17:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lvca You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1528454&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Generic Aspect Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Massimo Losco (maxlos) >Assigned to: Luca Garulli (lvca) Summary: Roma + SHARK Initial Comment: Hi all, ROMA Framewrok should operate with Shark (Work Flow engine). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-03-29 23:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: NO Hi, if you want to develop the Shark module you're welcome. Roma starting to the next week will comes with a pojo based workflow engine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2006-07-27 10:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Yes it should :-) What do you think to commit the first alpha versione? bye, Lvc@ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1528454&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-03-29 21:48:20
|
Feature Requests item #1538563, was opened at 2006-08-11 11:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lvca You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1538563&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: ViewAspect Group: Next Release (example) >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Calendar Initial Comment: Hi, is possibile to introduce the choise or the changing of the Year in the Calendar? Thks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-03-29 23:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: NO Hi, I'm sorry but that component is owned by Echo2. You had to change yourself or try to integrate another client-side component. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1538563&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-03-29 21:30:47
|
Feature Requests item #1641869, was opened at 2007-01-22 20:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lvca You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1641869&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Generic Aspect Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Terracotta integration for cluster Initial Comment: Why don't integrate Open Terracotta platform to makes Roma application distributed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-03-29 23:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: YES Today I met Jonas Boner, one of Terracotta people: very cool. I'll integrate very soon! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-01-26 01:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: YES Clustering with Terracotta could be done via DSO version or by replicating Http Sessions. To study soon... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1641869&group_id=162641 |
|
From: Luca G. <luc...@as...> - 2007-03-29 14:55:14
|
Luca Molino are developing a new plugin as the first one implementation of WorkFlow Aspect. The temporary name is workflow-pojo since not uses any external workflow engine, but uses simple POJOs and the Command pattern. Luca Molino hopes to release a working version for the next week. bye, Luca Garulli Blogging on: http://zion-city.blogspot.com http://www.AssetData.it http://www.RomaFramework.org - The new way to build applications http://www.OrienTechnologies.com - Light ODBMS, All in one JDO solution |
|
From: Luca G. <luc...@as...> - 2007-03-29 14:54:18
|
Paolo Spizzirri are developing the first Scheduler Aspect implementation using the Open Symphony Quartz engine: http://www.opensymphony.com/quartz Thanks to the scheduler module you'll can schedule events in your application using the Web front end and triggers will reside in database (using the persistence aspect). Paolo plans to release a working versione for the next week. bye, Luca Garulli Blogging on: http://zion-city.blogspot.com http://www.AssetData.it http://www.RomaFramework.org - The new way to build applications http://www.OrienTechnologies.com - Light ODBMS, All in one JDO solution |
|
From: Luca G. <luc...@as...> - 2007-03-25 18:45:27
|
Luca Molino is the new committer of the Roma Framework project. He built some extensions to the Exego Social Network platform (developed in PHP) using Java5 + Roma: http://www.exego.it. Extensions allow the users to handle Rich HTML profile, multiple photo albums, songs and YouTube video. Now he is developing a CRM solution for an Italian customer entirely based on Roma Meta Framework. Before to release it he is releasing a very simple workflow engine based on Spring... Welcome aboard! Note: It's a real coincidence that the name of most people in the Roma Staff is Luca! Luca (Luke in english) is a quite common name in Italy, but not so much! bye, Luca Garulli Blogging on: http://zion-city.blogspot.com http://www.AssetData.it http://www.RomaFramework.org - The new way to build applications http://www.OrienTechnologies.com - Light ODBMS, All in one JDO solution |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-03-19 19:43:27
|
Feature Requests item #1683917, was opened at 2007-03-19 20:43 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1683917&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: JDO-JPOX-PersistenceAspect Group: None Status: Open Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Assigned to: Luca Garulli (lvca) Summary: JDOPersistenceAspect should work also in no-detach mode Initial Comment: Current JDO/JPOX aspect works always in detach mode. In few words it detaches entire object graph (following fetch plans). We need a much deeper tuning avoiding detaching and benefit of JDO Lazy Loading feature. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1683917&group_id=162641 |
|
From: Luca G. <luc...@as...> - 2007-03-19 18:11:22
|
Hi to anyone! Despite forum is much more attended than this ML, I want to write this post for the next release of Roma <Meta>Framework 1.0 RC1. In the meantime many improvements are developed in Roma. The latest one is the support for the Portlets! They are not JSR-168 portlets but just POJO that are rendered as seperated-independent boxes. You can move the portlets around your desktop ala Google Personalized Homepage. Each box lives independently from others. Very cool! I've adjusted the Roma Test Presentation demo application to use this feature. http://romaframework.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/Doc/Portlet bye, Luca Garulli Blogging on: http://zion-city.blogspot.com http://www.AssetData.it http://www.RomaFramework.org - The new way to build applications http://www.OrienTechnologies.com - Light ODBMS, All in one JDO solution |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-03-19 14:58:42
|
Feature Requests item #1633539, was opened at 2007-01-11 22:05 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by lvca You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1633539&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: ViewAspect Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Luca Garulli (lvca) >Assigned to: Luca Garulli (lvca) Summary: Portlet support Initial Comment: Roma needs a easy way to create portal divided in multiple portlets. Each portlet should be configurable by the user. Should it support JSR 188 and next? Maybe. Surely not by first releases since it should be a very light smart solution using POJO only and new Ajax render modes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-03-19 15:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: YES Implemented! Using the new Echo2 tucana components you can use the desktop mode = dashboard to obtain a portal like application with each portlet independent by others http://romaframework.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/Doc/Portlet ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-03-19 15:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: YES Resolved. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1633539&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-03-19 14:57:11
|
Feature Requests item #1633539, was opened at 2007-01-11 22:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lvca You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1633539&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: ViewAspect Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Portlet support Initial Comment: Roma needs a easy way to create portal divided in multiple portlets. Each portlet should be configurable by the user. Should it support JSR 188 and next? Maybe. Surely not by first releases since it should be a very light smart solution using POJO only and new Ajax render modes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-03-19 15:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: YES Implemented! Using the new Echo2 tucana components you can use the desktop mode = dashboard to obtain a portal like application with each portlet independent by others http://romaframework.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/Doc/Portlet ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-03-19 15:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: YES Resolved. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1633539&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-02-27 15:43:48
|
Feature Requests item #1670094, was opened at 2007-02-27 16:43 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1670094&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: ADMIN Module Group: None Status: Open Priority: 4 Private: No Submitted By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Admin module: Log4J configuration Initial Comment: Roma allows many useful operations by admin user. It could be nice to add a Log4J module to change Log4J configuration at run-time. Think in situations where you need to activate DEBUG level! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1670094&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-02-26 19:48:51
|
Feature Requests item #1669409, was opened at 2007-02-26 20:48 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1669409&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Documentation Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Oleh Lozynskyy (o_lozinskij) Assigned to: Luca Garulli (lvca) Summary: Prepare sample application Initial Comment: Please provide a sample applications to download, well... something as you said ala Rails ;-) Would be fine to have more UI and views examples. Also some common used features devided in small sample projects (maybe I'm asking to much... with tutorials?): - login sample - file upload sample - e tc... THanks! Oleg ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1669409&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-02-23 19:07:07
|
Feature Requests item #1566004, was opened at 2006-09-26 23:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lvca You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1566004&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: USERS Module Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 4 Private: No Submitted By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Assigned to: Luca Garulli (lvca) Summary: Display active user session Initial Comment: Why don't implement in the User Module "Active sessions"? It could show active sessions, statuses, properties, HTTP info such as source IP Address, TimeZone, Browser, etc. Plus allow to send a popup to a single user or in broadcast. Cooool ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-02-23 20:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: YES Implemented Http session inspection! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-02-23 20:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: YES Resolved. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-01-26 01:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: YES Partially implemented in Admin module. It missed Http Session inspection to navigate inside each user session and allowing to change values. Soon ;-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1566004&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-02-23 19:06:18
|
Feature Requests item #1575821, was opened at 2006-10-12 12:31 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by lvca You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1575821&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: USERS Module Group: None Status: Open >Priority: 1 Private: No Submitted By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Import Export of user/profile/permissions Initial Comment: The USERS Module need to Import/Export all users, profiles and permissions in a XML file. In this way users can easy migrate long profiling setting across installations and, why not, different version of own application. Any volounteer? I'd like to use XML because is easy to write by cruise the Object DOM and to parse it you can choose tens of implementations ;-) Cool! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1575821&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-26 00:51:41
|
Feature Requests item #1566004, was opened at 2006-09-26 23:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lvca You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1566004&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: USERS Module Group: None Status: Open Priority: 4 Private: No Submitted By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Assigned to: Luca Garulli (lvca) Summary: Display active user session Initial Comment: Why don't implement in the User Module "Active sessions"? It could show active sessions, statuses, properties, HTTP info such as source IP Address, TimeZone, Browser, etc. Plus allow to send a popup to a single user or in broadcast. Cooool ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-01-26 01:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: YES Partially implemented in Admin module. It missed Http Session inspection to navigate inside each user session and allowing to change values. Soon ;-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1566004&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-26 00:50:33
|
Feature Requests item #1644889, was opened at 2007-01-26 01:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lvca You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1644889&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: ADMIN Module Group: None >Status: Closed >Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Luca Garulli (lvca) >Assigned to: Luca Garulli (lvca) Summary: Log management Initial Comment: It could be useful to access to the application logs. Usually they are readable by WebApp. Roma should parse log4j.xml file and know where logs are placed and to allow access by administrator user. In this way you can see logs without call system manager of your application in production contest ;-) Cool... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-01-26 01:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: YES Implemented in SVN revision: 712 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-01-26 01:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: YES Resolved. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1644889&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-26 00:48:38
|
Feature Requests item #1644889, was opened at 2007-01-26 01:48 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1644889&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: ADMIN Module Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Log management Initial Comment: It could be useful to access to the application logs. Usually they are readable by WebApp. Roma should parse log4j.xml file and know where logs are placed and to allow access by administrator user. In this way you can see logs without call system manager of your application in production contest ;-) Cool... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1644889&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-26 00:32:37
|
Feature Requests item #1641869, was opened at 2007-01-22 20:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lvca You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1641869&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Generic Aspect Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Terracotta integration for cluster Initial Comment: Why don't integrate Open Terracotta platform to makes Roma application distributed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Date: 2007-01-26 01:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=75115 Originator: YES Clustering with Terracotta could be done via DSO version or by replicating Http Sessions. To study soon... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1641869&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-22 19:06:29
|
Feature Requests item #1641869, was opened at 2007-01-22 20:06 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1641869&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Generic Aspect Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Terracotta integration for cluster Initial Comment: Why don't integrate Open Terracotta platform to makes Roma application distributed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1641869&group_id=162641 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-11 21:05:13
|
Feature Requests item #1633539, was opened at 2007-01-11 22:05 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1633539&group_id=162641 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: ViewAspect Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Luca Garulli (lvca) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Portlet support Initial Comment: Roma needs a easy way to create portal divided in multiple portlets. Each portlet should be configurable by the user. Should it support JSR 188 and next? Maybe. Surely not by first releases since it should be a very light smart solution using POJO only and new Ajax render modes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=824593&aid=1633539&group_id=162641 |
4 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
