rezound-users Mailing List for ReZound
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
ddurham
You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(23) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(7) |
2004 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(53) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(11) |
2005 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(39) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(9) |
2006 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(6) |
2007 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
2009 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(11) |
2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: <tr...@tu...> - 2016-03-07 20:10:38
|
Hi, Some people may have encountered an issue when trying to record with JACK with being unable to see the Rezound output in the jack graph (typically in the QjackCtl connections windows). (I'm not a programmer at all so forgive me if I'm wrong here) I've tried to give it a shot : https://sourceforge.net/p/rezound/bugs/72/ Been trying it here on my LibraZiK system which is a Debian Jessie (stable) and it does work, trying to catch JACK (if launched) first and I'm able to use the record function thanks to the jack inputs being present in the QjackCtl's connection windows. Hope that helps, Olivier |
From: <tr...@tu...> - 2016-03-02 20:57:46
|
Davy, I just sent a message containing the fr.po file to the list. I received this following message from sourceforge. Let me know if you got my previous message or if you'd like me to send it to you straight to your personnal email address. Cheers. Olivier Le 2016-03-02 21:39, rez...@li... a écrit : > Your mail to 'ReZound-users' with the subject > > Re: [ReZound-users] ReZound is greatly awesome > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > Message body is too big: 194892 bytes with a limit of 100 KB > > Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive > notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel > this posting, please visit the following URL: > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/confirm/rezound-users/eec32a1fe010ac76f0a80b928d96efe9783c6c10 |
From: <tr...@tu...> - 2016-03-02 20:39:23
|
Le 2016-03-02 20:12, Davy Durham a écrit : > On 03/02/2016 10:48 AM, tr...@tu... wrote: >> >> I've been revisiting the whole french translation file (fr.po) >> for the review of what has been already done. >> We had a lot of inconsitency between FR strings >> translations as well as big "meaningfullness" mistakes leading >> to even bigger confusion. I've been translating a large bunch of >> untranslated stings as well and so I'm close to be finished with >> this review o the current state of the FR translation. >> >> All the fuzzy ones are gone and it only remains 3 strings to be >> translated which I don't understand quite well. So Davy, please >> allow me to ask for their use case and means : >> >> >> 1) In File -> About ReZound -> "About" tab, there is a line called >> "Original Autoconfiscation", what do you mean by "autoconfiscation" ? > > Nothing important. autoconfiscation is a term meaning the project > converted to GNU autotools. Just leave it spelled that way. OK, thanks for explaining to me. Still I changed this word since the meaning of "confiscation" in french is related to a "punishment". Then, the first time I read it on the first time, I stopped straight and I went to double-check the licensing and ownership. I understand that I can be a bit touchy and even paranoïd, but it did really gave me a strange impression when I read it. I hope you don't mind I changed it and, if you want, you can still reverse the translation to "Autoconfiscation originelle" which is the litteral translation. >> 2) In Filters -> Convolution filter..., there is a check box called >> "Wrap Decay back to Begginning" and I am not too sure what it is use >> for. I did a test (with and without the checkbox checked) but didn't >> get >> what it is supposed to be. > > When two signals a and b are convolved together, the total length is > the > length of a + length of b. If a is the loaded sound and b is the file > containing the signal to convolve it with, then what do we do with the > extra length? (If I remember correctly from YEARS ago) With the > checkbox check, we mix the extra length back on the beginning of the > file (with it unchecked we just discard the extra data). This is > useful > if you're creating a sound that's supposed to play repeated, in a loop. OK, that make sense. Thanks. That would be great to have this explanation when mouseovering the checkbox. I'll have a go at digging into the code to see if I can make it happen and will get back to you if/when successful. >> 3) there is a string called "When the Macro is Played Back and This >> Action is to be Performed..." but I didn't found where it is in the >> GUI. >> I might be because I'm facing a bug which cause ReZound to crash when >> I'm trying the "Record Macro" action. For this one, if you can Davy, >> please just explain me the meaning of the sentence as I do not want to >> completely report this bug (amongst a few other I found) before taking >> the time to do a fresh install of a Debian system + a fresh compile of >> ReZound since it might be my building system (.deb) which is doing >> something wrong. > > Yeah that does crash.. I should fix that :) I'll look into it and get > back to you. Sweet. Looking forward to be able to check it :) >> After those 3 outstanding strings translation will be made, I'll send >> a >> patch for the FR translation and will go for : >> - fresh build of ReZound >> - summarise some bugs I'm facing >> - adding some untranslatable yet strings (I saw the >> rezound-0.12.3beta2/po/README which is giving the way to go for that) > You can just send the whole fr.po file rather than a patch. If that's easier for you, no problem at all. Please find attached the fr.po file with 100% of the current strings translated in french thanks to your help. Please note that I had to remove the "#, c-format" line below the line "#: src/backend/Remaster/CBalanceAction.cpp:181" in fr.po for the build to succeed. I don't know what it is use for, I checked this string translation in the GUI after building it and it's working as expected. So I'm leaving that to your attention. I'll be looking at improving the translatable strings now since I found some which are not present in the *.po neither in the .pot file. Cheers. Olivier |
From: Davy D. <dd...@da...> - 2016-03-02 19:12:25
|
On 03/02/2016 10:48 AM, tr...@tu... wrote: > > I've been revisiting the whole french translation file (fr.po) > for the review of what has been already done. > We had a lot of inconsitency between FR strings > translations as well as big "meaningfullness" mistakes leading > to even bigger confusion. I've been translating a large bunch of > untranslated stings as well and so I'm close to be finished with > this review o the current state of the FR translation. > > All the fuzzy ones are gone and it only remains 3 strings to be > translated which I don't understand quite well. So Davy, please > allow me to ask for their use case and means : > > > 1) In File -> About ReZound -> "About" tab, there is a line called > "Original Autoconfiscation", what do you mean by "autoconfiscation" ? Nothing important. autoconfiscation is a term meaning the project converted to GNU autotools. Just leave it spelled that way. > 2) In Filters -> Convolution filter..., there is a check box called > "Wrap Decay back to Begginning" and I am not too sure what it is use > for. I did a test (with and without the checkbox checked) but didn't get > what it is supposed to be. When two signals a and b are convolved together, the total length is the length of a + length of b. If a is the loaded sound and b is the file containing the signal to convolve it with, then what do we do with the extra length? (If I remember correctly from YEARS ago) With the checkbox check, we mix the extra length back on the beginning of the file (with it unchecked we just discard the extra data). This is useful if you're creating a sound that's supposed to play repeated, in a loop. > 3) there is a string called "When the Macro is Played Back and This > Action is to be Performed..." but I didn't found where it is in the GUI. > I might be because I'm facing a bug which cause ReZound to crash when > I'm trying the "Record Macro" action. For this one, if you can Davy, > please just explain me the meaning of the sentence as I do not want to > completely report this bug (amongst a few other I found) before taking > the time to do a fresh install of a Debian system + a fresh compile of > ReZound since it might be my building system (.deb) which is doing > something wrong. Yeah that does crash.. I should fix that :) I'll look into it and get back to you. > After those 3 outstanding strings translation will be made, I'll send a > patch for the FR translation and will go for : > - fresh build of ReZound > - summarise some bugs I'm facing > - adding some untranslatable yet strings (I saw the > rezound-0.12.3beta2/po/README which is giving the way to go for that) You can just send the whole fr.po file rather than a patch. Thanks! > Cheers, > Olivier > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 > ------------------------------------------------------- > ReZound-users mailing list > ReZ...@li... > Subscribe/Unsubscribe and change options > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rezound-users > ReZound-users mailing list archive > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=rezound-users |
From: <tr...@tu...> - 2016-03-02 16:49:01
|
Hi Davy and all, Le 2016-03-01 05:29, Davy Durham a écrit : > On 02/29/2016 06:01 AM, tr...@tu... wrote: > >> PS: any idea about my other question in my previous email ? : >> "at the configure time, it does look that it's checking for cdrdao. >> >> Why that ? I am under the impression that cdrdao is only needed at >> runtime but I might be wrong." > > You are correct. The configure check is solely to notify the user > that without cdrdao some functionality will be unavailable when they > run the compiled output. This helps package maintainers (in theory) > to know the make cdrdao a dependency of the rezound package. > > The same is true for the 'lame' binary for encoding/decoding mp3s. > (which, incidentally, eliminates the need for rezound to link directly > to any proprietary mp3 encoding implementation.) OK, thanks for your answer. >> Le 2016-02-29 07:38, Davy Durham a écrit : >> >> There are a number of strings marked "#, fuzzy" in the po/fr.po >> (and >> others) file which happens as strings evolve in the code. Those >> entries need to be re-translated. and the "#, fuzzy" comment >> removed. I've been revisiting the whole french translation file (fr.po) for the review of what has been already done. We had a lot of inconsitency between FR strings translations as well as big "meaningfullness" mistakes leading to even bigger confusion. I've been translating a large bunch of untranslated stings as well and so I'm close to be finished with this review o the current state of the FR translation. All the fuzzy ones are gone and it only remains 3 strings to be translated which I don't understand quite well. So Davy, please allow me to ask for their use case and means : 1) In File -> About ReZound -> "About" tab, there is a line called "Original Autoconfiscation", what do you mean by "autoconfiscation" ? 2) In Filters -> Convolution filter..., there is a check box called "Wrap Decay back to Begginning" and I am not too sure what it is use for. I did a test (with and without the checkbox checked) but didn't get what it is supposed to be. 3) there is a string called "When the Macro is Played Back and This Action is to be Performed..." but I didn't found where it is in the GUI. I might be because I'm facing a bug which cause ReZound to crash when I'm trying the "Record Macro" action. For this one, if you can Davy, please just explain me the meaning of the sentence as I do not want to completely report this bug (amongst a few other I found) before taking the time to do a fresh install of a Debian system + a fresh compile of ReZound since it might be my building system (.deb) which is doing something wrong. After those 3 outstanding strings translation will be made, I'll send a patch for the FR translation and will go for : - fresh build of ReZound - summarise some bugs I'm facing - adding some untranslatable yet strings (I saw the rezound-0.12.3beta2/po/README which is giving the way to go for that) Cheers, Olivier |
From: Davy D. <dd...@da...> - 2016-03-01 04:57:34
|
On 02/29/2016 06:01 AM, tr...@tu... wrote: > PS: any idea about my other question in my previous email ? : > "at the configure time, it does look that it's checking for cdrdao. > Why that ? I am under the impression that cdrdao is only needed at > runtime but I might be wrong." > You are correct. The configure check is solely to notify the user that without cdrdao some functionality will be unavailable when they run the compiled output. This helps package maintainers (in theory) to know the make cdrdao a dependency of the rezound package. The same is true for the 'lame' binary for encoding/decoding mp3s. (which, incidentally, eliminates the need for rezound to link directly to any proprietary mp3 encoding implementation.) > > > Le 2016-02-29 07:38, Davy Durham a écrit : >> Okay, I just committed a change that converts all the current >> translation files to utf-8. There's no reason not to use utf-8 >> everywhere AFAIK. The language-specific charsets are outdated these >> days. >> >> Are you building from svn? >> >> There are a number of strings marked "#, fuzzy" in the po/fr.po (and >> others) file which happens as strings evolve in the code. Those >> entries need to be re-translated. and the "#, fuzzy" comment removed. >> >> On 02/28/2016 01:22 PM, tr...@tu... wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I've been compiling the 0.13-1 version and did a deb package for >>> "LibraZiK audio studio" which is based on Debian stable (Jessie). >>> I've been playing a bit with it today and it looks to be working. >>> >>> That's amazing that after all these years, ReZound is still able to >>> compile and work, thanks to everyone involved with that. >>> >>> I've got one question : at the configure time, it does look that >>> it's checking for cdrdao. Why that ? I am under the impression that >>> cdrdao is only needed at runtime but I might be wrong. >>> >>> I'm feeling that I'm hitting the ISO / UTF-8 bug related on : >>> * https://sourceforge.net/p/rezound/bugs/57/ [4] >>> * https://sourceforge.net/p/rezound/bugs/67/ [5] >>> since I'm running it in french (please find the screenshot >>> attached). >>> >>> I'll be trying to look at the ML archives and the bugtracker to >>> check if a patch has been already done for that. In the meantime, if >>> someone can/want point me in the right direction, it'll be >>> appreciated. >>> >>> Anyway, thanks again for this amazing piece of software! >>> Olivier >>> >>> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > ReZound-users mailing list > ReZ...@li... > Subscribe/Unsubscribe and change options > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rezound-users > ReZound-users mailing list archive > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=rezound-users |
From: <tr...@tu...> - 2016-02-29 12:01:14
|
Awesome. My previous version was compiled from the 0.13-1 tarball. I've just been repackaging it from the current svn2027 and I'm confirming that it does work as expected. No more accent issue (please see the image attached). I'll be looking at improving the french translation on the coming days. Thanks for your quickness! Olivier PS: any idea about my other question in my previous email ? : "at the configure time, it does look that it's checking for cdrdao. Why that ? I am under the impression that cdrdao is only needed at runtime but I might be wrong." Le 2016-02-29 07:38, Davy Durham a écrit : > Okay, I just committed a change that converts all the current > translation files to utf-8. There's no reason not to use utf-8 > everywhere AFAIK. The language-specific charsets are outdated these > days. > > Are you building from svn? > > There are a number of strings marked "#, fuzzy" in the po/fr.po (and > others) file which happens as strings evolve in the code. Those > entries need to be re-translated. and the "#, fuzzy" comment removed. > > On 02/28/2016 01:22 PM, tr...@tu... wrote: > >> Hi, >> I've been compiling the 0.13-1 version and did a deb package for >> "LibraZiK audio studio" which is based on Debian stable (Jessie). >> I've been playing a bit with it today and it looks to be working. >> >> That's amazing that after all these years, ReZound is still able to >> compile and work, thanks to everyone involved with that. >> >> I've got one question : at the configure time, it does look that >> it's checking for cdrdao. Why that ? I am under the impression that >> cdrdao is only needed at runtime but I might be wrong. >> >> I'm feeling that I'm hitting the ISO / UTF-8 bug related on : >> * https://sourceforge.net/p/rezound/bugs/57/ [4] >> * https://sourceforge.net/p/rezound/bugs/67/ [5] >> since I'm running it in french (please find the screenshot >> attached). >> >> I'll be trying to look at the ML archives and the bugtracker to >> check if a patch has been already done for that. In the meantime, if >> someone can/want point me in the right direction, it'll be >> appreciated. >> >> Anyway, thanks again for this amazing piece of software! >> Olivier >> >> |
From: Davy D. <dd...@da...> - 2016-02-29 07:05:50
|
Okay, I just committed a change that converts all the current translation files to utf-8. There's no reason not to use utf-8 everywhere AFAIK. The language-specific charsets are outdated these days. Are you building from svn? There are a number of strings marked "#, fuzzy" in the po/fr.po (and others) file which happens as strings evolve in the code. Those entries need to be re-translated. and the "#, fuzzy" comment removed. On 02/28/2016 01:22 PM, tr...@tu... wrote: > Hi, > I've been compiling the 0.13-1 version and did a deb package for > "LibraZiK audio studio" which is based on Debian stable (Jessie). > I've been playing a bit with it today and it looks to be working. > > That's amazing that after all these years, ReZound is still able to > compile and work, thanks to everyone involved with that. > > I've got one question : at the configure time, it does look that it's > checking for cdrdao. Why that ? I am under the impression that cdrdao > is only needed at runtime but I might be wrong. > > I'm feeling that I'm hitting the ISO / UTF-8 bug related on : > * https://sourceforge.net/p/rezound/bugs/57/ > * https://sourceforge.net/p/rezound/bugs/67/ > since I'm running it in french (please find the screenshot attached). > > I'll be trying to look at the ML archives and the bugtracker to check > if a patch has been already done for that. In the meantime, if someone > can/want point me in the right direction, it'll be appreciated. > > Anyway, thanks again for this amazing piece of software! > Olivier > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > ReZound-users mailing list > ReZ...@li... > Subscribe/Unsubscribe and change options > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rezound-users > ReZound-users mailing list archive > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=rezound-users |
From: <tr...@tu...> - 2016-02-28 19:23:03
|
Hi, I've been compiling the 0.13-1 version and did a deb package for "LibraZiK audio studio" which is based on Debian stable (Jessie). I've been playing a bit with it today and it looks to be working. That's amazing that after all these years, ReZound is still able to compile and work, thanks to everyone involved with that. I've got one question : at the configure time, it does look that it's checking for cdrdao. Why that ? I am under the impression that cdrdao is only needed at runtime but I might be wrong. I'm feeling that I'm hitting the ISO / UTF-8 bug related on : * https://sourceforge.net/p/rezound/bugs/57/ * https://sourceforge.net/p/rezound/bugs/67/ since I'm running it in french (please find the screenshot attached). I'll be trying to look at the ML archives and the bugtracker to check if a patch has been already done for that. In the meantime, if someone can/want point me in the right direction, it'll be appreciated. Anyway, thanks again for this amazing piece of software! Olivier |
From: Davy D. <dd...@da...> - 2013-12-27 06:34:53
|
This is a maintenance release just to fix some issues with compilers and platforms, stability issues, and other bugs. Newer library version updates as well. * Many bug fixes * Many compile fixes (newer autotools, newer gcc, clang, 64bit, etc) * PortAudio v19 support * fftw3 support * PulseAudio support * some jack fixes * Updated Finnish translation * New Czech translation |
From: Holger J. <hol...@gm...> - 2013-01-20 13:09:41
|
Hi, I used rezound from time to time for some years now and I came across several build issues with the 4.6 version of gcc and version 0.12.3beta of rezound that I haven't read about in the mail archive. #1: There are pointer to integer conversions that should force errors since version 4.3 of GCC (-fpermissive), regarding to this link: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/porting_to.html #2: The NULL pointer, which is not part of the C++ standard, is used undefined. #3: printf is used without including cstdio No big deal. I just mentioning it for documentation reasons. Some commit messages imply, that this might be already fixed in trunk. I managed to workaround this issues by defining NULL and using pragmas (not portable for older GCC versions though). Patch file attached. But there is one thing that seems not to be a language issue. After building rezound completely, it cannot be used since the file dialog is an empty window. So no selections can be made. I guess this is a pure GUI framework related problem so I'm adding that the libFOX used is version 1.6. I browsed the repository and mail archive and found no postings, newer branches or tags that might already solve this. So my question is if someone stumbled over this and there is already a fix somewhere. Thanks in advance for helpful answers and for this cool and useful peace of software. Regards, Holger |
From: Davy D. <dd...@da...> - 2012-11-29 07:10:46
|
FYI: will try to follow up on the recent emails this weekend or sooner.. |
From: Frank K. <goe...@ya...> - 2012-11-27 09:40:47
|
>________________________________ > De : Pavel Fric <pav...@se...> >À : Frank Kober <goe...@ya...>; rez...@li... >Envoyé le : Mardi 27 novembre 2012 8h41 >Objet : Re: [ReZound-users] qt branch patch addendum - localization > > >Hi, Hi Pavel :), > >glad to hear about that project. I made translation of ReZound into Czech, also I would like to see this possibility to see it released together with ReZund qt. I think release is still a bit far away. The patch just makes the qt4 branch build again, which is in the svn trunk on this sourceforge project. David has wisely left many TODO notes in the QT4_TODO file, maybe he can add some comments here? Regarding translations there are two possibilities (1) keep the gettext - po system and make it work with qt ui files (I found some python tools that might help here) or (2) migrate to qt linguist - ts system and convert the existing po files to ts (there are also tools for this). I'm not a fan of linguist at all, but maybe it better integrates and causes less pain after all, I don't know. If I understand David's TODO notes correctly, the order of things to do would be: - Cleanup of the autotools stuff - Decide where to install icons and setup autotools / paths correspondingly OR convert them to xpm and compile them into the code ? > >Does the project has its WWW site, and could you provide some screenshots of the neww look? I don't think this needs to be moved elsewhere, I did not add anything, and all is David's code so far, and it would just need some added contributors to the current project, maybe he can at least find the time to observe and control things a bit in the future? Yes I could send you a screenshot, will do. So far I edited and converted a soundfile with it, seems to work. Best Frank |
From: Pavel F. <pav...@se...> - 2012-11-27 07:41:55
|
Hi, glad to hear about that project. I made translation of ReZound into Czech, also I would like to see this possibility to see it released together with ReZund qt. Does the project has its WWW site, and could you provide some screenshots of the neww look? Greetings, Pavel Fric ---------- Původní zpráva ---------- Od: Frank Kober <goe...@ya...> Datum: 27. 11. 2012 Předmět: [ReZound-users] qt branch patch addendum "I forgot: in the source tree: apply the patch with -p0 touch NEWS AUTHORS ChangeLog autoreconf -i ./configure (only tested with --disable-portaudio) make ...should be the way it works... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov(http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov) ------------------------------------------------------- ReZound-users mailing list ReZ...@li... Subscribe/Unsubscribe and change options https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rezound-users (https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rezound-users) ReZound-users mailing list archive http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=rezound-users (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=rezound-users)" |
From: Frank K. <goe...@ya...> - 2012-11-27 01:11:08
|
I forgot: in the source tree: apply the patch with -p0 touch NEWS AUTHORS ChangeLog autoreconf -i ./configure (only tested with --disable-portaudio) make ...should be the way it works... |
From: Frank K. <goe...@ya...> - 2012-11-27 00:48:51
|
Hi, After various recent build problems with the fox version of ReZound I spent some time making the qt4-port branch build on my system. I attach a patch against svn revision 2001 that includes the changes. Many of them come from various previous patches various people already made for the last beta release, but some more were necessary to make it build. I was surprised to see how far the qt port actually was, and maybe this patch stimulates some more work on it :). There are a lot of gcc warnings still, most of them related to const type member function definitions (Wignored-qualifiers). If the patch is satisfying would it make sense to commit it to the svn trunk here as a starting point? Thanks Frank |
From: Eric G. <egu...@wa...> - 2012-09-18 19:28:13
|
OK, I got it to work in the src directory with patch -p2 < 11_gcc_4.3.patch but I realize that those errors I got previously are important. anyway... discovered how to patch. -e Hi, I hope this isn't too elementary. I am trying to get rezound to work on OpenSuse 12.1 and did some trial and error; Running Gnome 3.2.1 I installed all of the programs and libraries that where recommended in docs/INSTALL via the GUI ?frontend? to zypper as well as the development versions. without reading the following description, how does one apply a patch, in particular; 11_gcc_4.3.patch found here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1919151&group_id=5056&atid=305056 ---------------------------------------------------- downloaded rezound-0.12.3beta.tar.gz uncompressed with #tar -xzf rezound-0.12.3beta.tar.gz cd to rezound-0.12.3beta.tar.gz read a bit from /docs tried to #./configure no apparent problems, although, checking fftw.h presence... no checking for fftw.h... no configure: WARNING: ***** fftw.h (version 2) header file not found -- any FFT based actions will be disabled (http://www.fftw.org) ***** checking rfftw.h usability... no checking rfftw.h presence... no checking for rfftw.h... no configure: WARNING: ***** rfftw.h (version 2) header file not found -- any FFT based actions will be disabled (http://www.fftw.org) ***** configure: enabling LADSPA support by default checking soundtouch/SoundTouch.h usability... no checking soundtouch/SoundTouch.h presence... no checking for soundtouch/SoundTouch.h... no configure: WARNING: ***** libSoundTouch not found -- tempo and pitch changing will be disabled (http://www.iki.fi/oparviai/soundtouch) ** tried to #make " ----------:~/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta> make Making all in src make[1]: Entering directory `/home/----/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta/src' Making all in misc make[2]: Entering directory `/home/----/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta/src/misc' Making all in CNestedDataFile make[3]: Entering directory `/home/----/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta/src/misc/CNestedDataFile' if /bin/sh ../../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../config -I../../../src/misc -I../../../src/misc/missing/generated -I../../../src/PoolFile -g -Wall -Wno-unused-function -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-unused -MT CNestedDataFile.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/CNestedDataFile.Tpo" \ -c -o CNestedDataFile.lo `test -f 'CNestedDataFile.cpp' || echo './'`CNestedDataFile.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/CNestedDataFile.Tpo" ".deps/CNestedDataFile.Plo"; \ else rm -f ".deps/CNestedDataFile.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../config -I../../../src/misc -I../../../src/misc/missing/generated -I../../../src/PoolFile -g -Wall -Wno-unused-function -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-unused -MT CNestedDataFile.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/CNestedDataFile.Tpo -c CNestedDataFile.cpp -o CNestedDataFile.o CNestedDataFile.cpp:21:2: warning: #warning parseFile doesnt need to set the filename, only the constructor and setFilename should do that [-Wcpp] CNestedDataFile.cpp:22:2: warning: #warning see about retaining the order that things were parsed in the file [-Wcpp] In file included from CNestedDataFile.h:172:0, from CNestedDataFile.cpp:46: anytype.h:70:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:72:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:74:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:75:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:77:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:78:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:80:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:81:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:83:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:84:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:86:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:87:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:89:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:90:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:91:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class In file included from CNestedDataFile.h:172:0, from CNestedDataFile.cpp:46: anytype.h:122:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:124:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:126:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:127:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:129:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:130:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:132:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:133:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:135:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:136:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:138:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:139:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class In file included from CNestedDataFile.h:172:0, from CNestedDataFile.cpp:46: anytype.h:144:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:145:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:146:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class make[3]: *** [CNestedDataFile.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/-----/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta/src/misc/CNestedDataFile' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/-----/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta/src/misc' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/-----/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta/src' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 " So, did a little more, to find that there was a patch for something that seemed immediately related. 11_gcc_4.3.patch Fix build failure with gcc-4.3 - ID: 1919151 Last Update: Settings changed ( ddurham ) http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1919151&group_id=5056&atid=305056 and tried to... apply the patch, which I have never done... #apropos patch --------:~/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta> apropos patch mission-control-5 (8) - Telepathy account manager/chanel dispatcher patch (1) - apply a diff file to an original patch (1p) - apply changes to files patch-metamail (1) - Install a patch to the latest metamail release XtDispatchEvent (3) - query and process events and input XtDispatchEventToWidget (3) - extension event handling XtRegisterDrawable (3) - register a drawable with the Intrinsics event dispatcher XtSetEventDispatcher (3) - extension event handling XtUnregisterDrawable (3) - register a drawable with the Intrinsics event dispatcher -------------:~/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta> So, assumed "patch" is the program for the job. looked at man patch, tried #patch 11_gcc_4.3.patch and the system just didn't do anything for a time/ tried #sudo patch 11_gcc_4.3.patch again nothing, so I tried to figure out which file to patch.... to no avail. which leads me to the question above. thanks, e |
From: Eric G. <egu...@wa...> - 2012-09-17 17:43:57
|
Hi, I hope this isn't too elementary. I am trying to get rezound to work on OpenSuse 12.1 running Gnome 3.2.1. I installed all of the programs and libraries that where recommended in docs/INSTALL via the GUI ?frontend? to zypper as well as the development versions. Without reading the following description, how does one apply a patch, in particular; 11_gcc_4.3.patch found here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1919151&group_id=5056&atid=305056 or ---------------------------------------------------- downloaded rezound-0.12.3beta.tar.gz uncompressed with #tar -xzf rezound-0.12.3beta.tar.gz cd to rezound-0.12.3beta.tar.gz read a bit from /docs tried to #./configure no apparent problems, although, checking fftw.h presence... no checking for fftw.h... no configure: WARNING: ***** fftw.h (version 2) header file not found -- any FFT based actions will be disabled (http://www.fftw.org) ***** checking rfftw.h usability... no checking rfftw.h presence... no checking for rfftw.h... no configure: WARNING: ***** rfftw.h (version 2) header file not found -- any FFT based actions will be disabled (http://www.fftw.org) ***** configure: enabling LADSPA support by default checking soundtouch/SoundTouch.h usability... no checking soundtouch/SoundTouch.h presence... no checking for soundtouch/SoundTouch.h... no configure: WARNING: ***** libSoundTouch not found -- tempo and pitch changing will be disabled (http://www.iki.fi/oparviai/soundtouch) ** tried to #make " ----------:~/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta> make Making all in src make[1]: Entering directory `/home/----/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta/src' Making all in misc make[2]: Entering directory `/home/----/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta/src/misc' Making all in CNestedDataFile make[3]: Entering directory `/home/----/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta/src/misc/CNestedDataFile' if /bin/sh ../../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../config -I../../../src/misc -I../../../src/misc/missing/generated -I../../../src/PoolFile -g -Wall -Wno-unused-function -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-unused -MT CNestedDataFile.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/CNestedDataFile.Tpo" \ -c -o CNestedDataFile.lo `test -f 'CNestedDataFile.cpp' || echo './'`CNestedDataFile.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/CNestedDataFile.Tpo" ".deps/CNestedDataFile.Plo"; \ else rm -f ".deps/CNestedDataFile.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../config -I../../../src/misc -I../../../src/misc/missing/generated -I../../../src/PoolFile -g -Wall -Wno-unused-function -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-unused -MT CNestedDataFile.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/CNestedDataFile.Tpo -c CNestedDataFile.cpp -o CNestedDataFile.o CNestedDataFile.cpp:21:2: warning: #warning parseFile doesnt need to set the filename, only the constructor and setFilename should do that [-Wcpp] CNestedDataFile.cpp:22:2: warning: #warning see about retaining the order that things were parsed in the file [-Wcpp] In file included from CNestedDataFile.h:172:0, from CNestedDataFile.cpp:46: anytype.h:70:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:72:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:74:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:75:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:77:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:78:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:80:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:81:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:83:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:84:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:86:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:87:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:89:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:90:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:91:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class In file included from CNestedDataFile.h:172:0, from CNestedDataFile.cpp:46: anytype.h:122:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:124:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:126:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:127:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:129:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:130:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:132:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:133:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:135:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:136:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:138:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:139:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class In file included from CNestedDataFile.h:172:0, from CNestedDataFile.cpp:46: anytype.h:144:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:145:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class anytype.h:146:12: error: explicit template specialization cannot have a storage class make[3]: *** [CNestedDataFile.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/-----/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta/src/misc/CNestedDataFile' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/-----/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta/src/misc' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/-----/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta/src' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 " So, did a little more, to find that there was a patch for something that seemed immediately related. 11_gcc_4.3.patch Fix build failure with gcc-4.3 - ID: 1919151 Last Update: Settings changed ( ddurham ) http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1919151&group_id=5056&atid=305056 and tried to... apply the patch, which I have never done... #apropos patch --------:~/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta> apropos patch mission-control-5 (8) - Telepathy account manager/chanel dispatcher patch (1) - apply a diff file to an original patch (1p) - apply changes to files patch-metamail (1) - Install a patch to the latest metamail release XtDispatchEvent (3) - query and process events and input XtDispatchEventToWidget (3) - extension event handling XtRegisterDrawable (3) - register a drawable with the Intrinsics event dispatcher XtSetEventDispatcher (3) - extension event handling XtUnregisterDrawable (3) - register a drawable with the Intrinsics event dispatcher -------------:~/Downloads/rezound-0.12.3beta> So, assumed "patch" is the program for the job. looked at man patch, tried #patch 11_gcc_4.3.patch and the system just didn't do anything for a time/ tried #sudo patch 11_gcc_4.3.patch again nothing, so I tried to figure out which file to patch.... to no avail. which leads me to the question above. thanks, e |
From: Dirk <sch...@gm...> - 2011-12-02 17:35:27
|
+1 for Github -1 for Google Code On 12/02/2011 05:15 PM, Ben Keating wrote: > I think decentralized vc is a good move. Not sure if google code > supports git yet but in general its so much healthier of a vcs than svn. > > ReZound ain't a little CLI tool, it's a full blown app with a great > interface. It needs to be represented as such. It obviously has a > dedicated group of users, or at least developers. This should be > embraced. Google Code is boring and outdated and everyone knows it. > Nothing awesome happens there. Submitting an issue or updating the > Project description is a like pulling teeth. > > With GitHub, we can all fork a copy if we wish. Apply our efforts and > push them back to Davy for his review. This means I can tweak with > those interface graphic resources I've been wanting to get at, Another > guy can throw in his translation efforts and all of it gets presented > to Davy with a beautiful Pull Request. People can comment on proposed > pull requests, even. That's healthy. > > GitHub is superior. The folks behind it also use it and care about it. > This shows. I'm not affiliated with them, I just see this being such > an obvious path to take. I've placed all my work (mostly private > repos) on GitHub. > > Davy, it shouldn't take much to get the project up. What are your > concerns/hesitations? > > GutHub has my vote for a healthier, more productive home for ReZound > development. > > On Thursday, December 1, 2011, Davy Durham <dd...@da... > <mailto:dd...@da...>> wrote: > > Hey guys.. Thanks for your kind comments. > > > > > > I'm not opposed to moving. I'm not up on exactly what github or > google code would offer above sf.net <http://sf.net>. Is sf.net > <http://sf.net> just seen as passe now and people don't visit there? > We can certainly redo the public www page at sourceforge if that's all > it needs > > > > github vs google code. Anyone have thoughts? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 22:55 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote: > > > > I am a web developer and theoretically I can do something, but to me > what looks outdated on the site are the news ) > > Design is secondary. In fact, I enjoy the retro feel. The bad thing > is that development is really not happening (almost, as far > > as I understand), so the site looks outdated, thus reflecting reality. > > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Ben Keating <bke...@gm... > <mailto:bke...@gm...>> wrote: > > > > ReZound development should be moved over to GitHub (or BitBucket). > Activity will certainly pick up. Also, the site needs a revamp. Anyone > interested in working on this? Im a web developer and would love to > work with some folks interested in this. > > > > GitHub + refreshed web site. How awesome would this be? > > > > -- > > > > Ben Keating > > > > be...@lo... <mailto:be...@lo...> > > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Johan De Groote wrote: > > > > Same thought here: > > > > - Rezound is excellent > > > > - it is very quiet here > > > > On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:20:21 +0300 > > > > Louigi Verona <lou...@gm... > <mailto:lou...@gm...>> wrote: > > > > Hey everybody! > > > > I still think Rezound is the best sound editor for Linux! > > > > So, mr. Developer, it might not be your first priority, but when you > > > > do think of Rezound, do remember that there are people in the world > > > > who are really eager for Rezound to be alive! > > > > < > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > ReZound-users mailing list > ReZ...@li... > Subscribe/Unsubscribe and change options > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rezound-users > ReZound-users mailing list archive > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=rezound-users |
From: Louigi V. <lou...@gm...> - 2011-12-02 16:54:14
|
Isn't Google Code planned to close in spring? -- Louigi Verona http://www.louigiverona.ru/ |
From: Rui N. C. <rn...@rn...> - 2011-12-02 16:38:08
|
On 12/02/2011 04:15 PM, Ben Keating wrote: > I think decentralized vc is a good move. let me throw some and make a splash over the pond :) decentralized vcs is a good-thing iif there are a _lot_ of developers and contributors working on the same project _and_ each one are responsible for _most_of_each_ the separate parts the work can be divided upon. when this "developer mass" counts under a few dozen, pardon me, that will lead to a spiral of confusion and questions like "which branch is the official one" will pop like mushrooms on fall :) Davy is (i think he still is) the main and only one developer of rezound. i've been told, a few years ago, that he was working on a qt4 port of rezound how's that going? only Davy can tell ;) cheers -- rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela rn...@rn... |
From: Ben K. <bke...@gm...> - 2011-12-02 16:19:18
|
Ha, "GutHub". A great(?) name for an all you can eat buffet... ... Or a not-so-encouraging fitness gym. On Friday, December 2, 2011, Ben Keating <bke...@gm...> wrote: > I think decentralized vc is a good move. Not sure if google code supports git yet but in general its so much healthier of a vcs than svn. > > ReZound ain't a little CLI tool, it's a full blown app with a great interface. It needs to be represented as such. It obviously has a dedicated group of users, or at least developers. This should be embraced. Google Code is boring and outdated and everyone knows it. Nothing awesome happens there. Submitting an issue or updating the Project description is a like pulling teeth. > > With GitHub, we can all fork a copy if we wish. Apply our efforts and push them back to Davy for his review. This means I can tweak with those interface graphic resources I've been wanting to get at, Another guy can throw in his translation efforts and all of it gets presented to Davy with a beautiful Pull Request. People can comment on proposed pull requests, even. That's healthy. > > GitHub is superior. The folks behind it also use it and care about it. This shows. I'm not affiliated with them, I just see this being such an obvious path to take. I've placed all my work (mostly private repos) on GitHub. > > Davy, it shouldn't take much to get the project up. What are your concerns/hesitations? > > GutHub has my vote for a healthier, more productive home for ReZound development. > > On Thursday, December 1, 2011, Davy Durham <dd...@da...> wrote: >> Hey guys.. Thanks for your kind comments. >> >> >> I'm not opposed to moving. I'm not up on exactly what github or google code would offer above sf.net. Is sf.net just seen as passe now and people don't visit there? We can certainly redo the public www page at sourceforge if that's all it needs >> >> github vs google code. Anyone have thoughts? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 22:55 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote: >> >> I am a web developer and theoretically I can do something, but to me what looks outdated on the site are the news ) >> Design is secondary. In fact, I enjoy the retro feel. The bad thing is that development is really not happening (almost, as far >> as I understand), so the site looks outdated, thus reflecting reality. >> >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Ben Keating <bke...@gm...> wrote: >> >> ReZound development should be moved over to GitHub (or BitBucket). Activity will certainly pick up. Also, the site needs a revamp. Anyone interested in working on this? Im a web developer and would love to work with some folks interested in this. >> >> GitHub + refreshed web site. How awesome would this be? >> >> -- >> >> Ben Keating >> >> be...@lo... >> >> On Thursday, December 1, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Johan De Groote wrote: >> >> Same thought here: >> >> - Rezound is excellent >> >> - it is very quiet here >> >> On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:20:21 +0300 >> >> Louigi Verona <lou...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Hey everybody! >> >> I still think Rezound is the best sound editor for Linux! >> >> So, mr. Developer, it might not be your first priority, but when you >> >> do think of Rezound, do remember that there are people in the world >> >> who are really eager for Rezound to be alive! >> >> < |
From: Ben K. <bke...@gm...> - 2011-12-02 16:15:40
|
I think decentralized vc is a good move. Not sure if google code supports git yet but in general its so much healthier of a vcs than svn. ReZound ain't a little CLI tool, it's a full blown app with a great interface. It needs to be represented as such. It obviously has a dedicated group of users, or at least developers. This should be embraced. Google Code is boring and outdated and everyone knows it. Nothing awesome happens there. Submitting an issue or updating the Project description is a like pulling teeth. With GitHub, we can all fork a copy if we wish. Apply our efforts and push them back to Davy for his review. This means I can tweak with those interface graphic resources I've been wanting to get at, Another guy can throw in his translation efforts and all of it gets presented to Davy with a beautiful Pull Request. People can comment on proposed pull requests, even. That's healthy. GitHub is superior. The folks behind it also use it and care about it. This shows. I'm not affiliated with them, I just see this being such an obvious path to take. I've placed all my work (mostly private repos) on GitHub. Davy, it shouldn't take much to get the project up. What are your concerns/hesitations? GutHub has my vote for a healthier, more productive home for ReZound development. On Thursday, December 1, 2011, Davy Durham <dd...@da...> wrote: > Hey guys.. Thanks for your kind comments. > > > I'm not opposed to moving. I'm not up on exactly what github or google code would offer above sf.net. Is sf.net just seen as passe now and people don't visit there? We can certainly redo the public www page at sourceforge if that's all it needs > > github vs google code. Anyone have thoughts? > > Thanks > > > > On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 22:55 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote: > > I am a web developer and theoretically I can do something, but to me what looks outdated on the site are the news ) > Design is secondary. In fact, I enjoy the retro feel. The bad thing is that development is really not happening (almost, as far > as I understand), so the site looks outdated, thus reflecting reality. > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Ben Keating <bke...@gm...> wrote: > > ReZound development should be moved over to GitHub (or BitBucket). Activity will certainly pick up. Also, the site needs a revamp. Anyone interested in working on this? Im a web developer and would love to work with some folks interested in this. > > GitHub + refreshed web site. How awesome would this be? > > -- > > Ben Keating > > be...@lo... > > On Thursday, December 1, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Johan De Groote wrote: > > Same thought here: > > - Rezound is excellent > > - it is very quiet here > > On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:20:21 +0300 > > Louigi Verona <lou...@gm...> wrote: > > Hey everybody! > > I still think Rezound is the best sound editor for Linux! > > So, mr. Developer, it might not be your first priority, but when you > > do think of Rezound, do remember that there are people in the world > > who are really eager for Rezound to be alive! > > < |
From: Pavel F. <pav...@se...> - 2011-12-02 06:47:37
|
Hi, from my perspective - new release with my already sent Czech translation would encourage me to continue in translating of ReZound´s interface. :) Greetings, Pavel Fric |
From: Davy D. <dd...@da...> - 2011-12-02 05:32:00
|
Hey guys.. Thanks for your kind comments. I'm not opposed to moving. I'm not up on exactly what github or google code would offer above sf.net. Is sf.net just seen as passe now and people don't visit there? We can certainly redo the public www page at sourceforge if that's all it needs github vs google code. Anyone have thoughts? Thanks On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 22:55 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote: > I am a web developer and theoretically I can do something, but to me > what looks outdated on the site are the news ) > Design is secondary. In fact, I enjoy the retro feel. The bad thing is > that development is really not happening (almost, as far > as I understand), so the site looks outdated, thus reflecting reality. > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Ben Keating <bke...@gm...> > wrote: > > ReZound development should be moved over to GitHub (or > BitBucket). Activity will certainly pick up. Also, the site > needs a revamp. Anyone interested in working on this? Im a web > developer and would love to work with some folks interested in > this. > > > > GitHub + refreshed web site. How awesome would this be? > > > -- > Ben Keating > be...@lo... > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Johan De Groote > wrote: > > > > Same thought here: > > - Rezound is excellent > > - it is very quiet here > > > > > > On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:20:21 +0300 > > Louigi Verona <lou...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > > > Hey everybody! > > > I still think Rezound is the best sound editor for Linux! > > > > > > > > > So, mr. Developer, it might not be your first priority, > > > but when you > > > do think of Rezound, do remember that there are people in > > > the world > > > who are really eager for Rezound to be alive! > > > > > > > > > Just chiming in to create a small turmoil in an otherwise > > > quiet > > > mailing list! > > > > > > > > > Cheers! > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > All the data continuously generated in your IT > > infrastructure > > contains a definitive record of customers, application > > performance, > > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk > > takes this > > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > ReZound-users mailing list > > ReZ...@li... > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe and change options > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rezound-users > > ReZound-users mailing list archive > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=rezound-users > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application > performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes > this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > ------------------------------------------------------- > ReZound-users mailing list > ReZ...@li... > Subscribe/Unsubscribe and change options > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rezound-users > ReZound-users mailing list archive > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=rezound-users > > > > > -- > Louigi Verona > http://www.louigiverona.ru/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > ------------------------------------------------------- ReZound-users mailing list ReZ...@li... Subscribe/Unsubscribe and change options https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rezound-users ReZound-users mailing list archive http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=rezound-users |