replicator-users — Open discussion about using replicator

[Replicator-users] Lenny Version will be ready in an few days

[<mar...@jp...>]

Hello,

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 06:38:30PM +0200, Thomas Lange wrote:
> The package was orphaned over a year ago. Martin worked on it, but
> still did not produced a package that could be uploaded. It also was
> only prepared for etch, never for lenny nor squeeze.

I am now working an a Replicator version for Lenny. It will be ready in 
a few days.

> BTW, it FTBFS, because build -depends are missing:

Thanks for the report, I will add a build dependency to LyX.


Regards,
Martin

[Replicator-users] Package be removed now

[Thomas L. <la...@in...>]

The package was orphaned over a year ago. Martin worked on it, but
still did not produced a package that could be uploaded. It also was
only prepared for etch, never for lenny nor squeeze.

The last mail on this topic is more than 6 month ago. IMO this
package should be removed from the debian archive now.

If there will be a working version for the next release, it can be
reincluded easily.


BTW, it FTBFS, because build -depends are missing:

.
.
.
dh_installdirs: Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated.
        install -d debian/tmp
        install -d debian/tmp/usr/bin debian/tmp/usr/sbin
# Add here commands to install the package into debian/tmp.
/usr/bin/make install DESTDIR=`pwd`/debian/tmp
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/replicator'
/usr/bin/lyx --export pdf Replicator-UserGuide.lyx
make[1]: /usr/bin/lyx: Command not found
make[1]: *** [doc-build] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/replicator'
make: *** [install] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error
exit status 2

-- 
regards Thomas

[Replicator-users] New replicator version in cvs

[<mar...@jp...>]

Hello,

I have updated replicator for etch compatibility and fixed most of the bugs 
on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=replicator

The packages is not yet lintian clean. I will provide binary packages 
for download after I have fixed that. 

In the meantime you can very easy checkout the latest source package from CVS 
and build a binary package yourself. You can use the following 
commands for that:

 $ cd some-dir/
 $ cvs -z3 -d :pserver:ano...@re...:/cvsroot/replicator co replicator
 $ cd replicator
 $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
 $ su -c "dpkg --install replicator_X.Y_i386.deb"

Please, use the bugtracking system on https://sourceforge.net/projects/replicator/ 
for all bugs you may found in the cvs version.


Regards,
Martin

[Replicator-users] Bug: question about mirror to use in repli-miniroot should show ftp:// too

[Jerome W. <jwa...@be...>]

The question for repli-miniroot suggests only "http://" and "file:/"
URLs are allowed to access a Debian mirror.
I tested, and it allows too "ftp://" at least. I guess it allows any
debootstrap-supported method. I looked in the manpage of debootstrap,
but it indicates exactly the same as repli-miniroot, while it allows
actually more than that, but don't know where to look.
I suspect debootstrap uses wget, so it should accept at least the same
methods.

Also, the "file:/" is wrong, as said in DBTS #226662.

-- 
Jerome Warnier <jwa...@be...>
BeezNest s.a r.l.

[Replicator-users] Bug: $debian_version mandatory

[Jerome W. <jwa...@be...>]

In Replicator 3.0, the configuration file replicator.conf says the
following:
"""
#comment out to let replicator guess for you
                                                                               $debian_version=3.0;
"""
If you comment out, repli-miniroot fails because $debian_version is not
defined.

Hope it helps.
-- 
Jerome Warnier <jwa...@be...>
BeezNest s.a r.l.

Re: [Replicator-users] Devfs fix in repli-bootdisk

[Sebastien C. <Seb...@en...>]

Le jeu 19/06/2003 à 17:22, Jérôme Warnier a écrit :
> I just realized my contributed patch to repli-bootdisk isn't yet
> applied.
> 

It is since a long time, in the branch : woody-proposed-update .read
line 435 of repli-miniroot.

SEb



-- 
Sebastien CHAUMAT           
Ecole Normale Superieure     PR@TIC : Direction Technique
46, Allée d'Italie           +33 4 72 72 87 79  fax: +33 4 72 72 81 81
69364 LYON CEDEX 07 FRANCE   E-mail : Seb...@en...

[Replicator-users] Missing dependency on pciutils

[W. <jwa...@be...>]

repli-xconfig uses "lspci", which is part of package "pciutils", which
is not "essential".
Replicator should then depend on "pciutils".

Regards

[Replicator-users] Devfs fix in repli-bootdisk

[W. <jwa...@be...>]

I just realized my contributed patch to repli-bootdisk isn't yet
applied.

To remember what it was all about:
when the machine on which you create the bootdisk uses devfs, there is
no way to create that damn bootdisk because repli-bootdisk tries to cp
some /dev/* files, which are not there or at least are not "copy-able".
See starting from line 429 to some lines further.

My submitted patch was the only way to achieve this cleanly: untar some
of the /usr/lib/debootstrap/devices.tar.gz. It doesn't add any new
dependency as debootstrap is already used and tar is essential.
I don't see why it is still not applied, after so many months.

One more thing: devfs is going to be *the only way* to go with kernel
2.5/2.6.
Thanks to commit my patch (I'll try to find it back or do it again if
necessary).

BTW: would it be possible to have CVS access?
And to be an official Replicator developper on SourceForge?

Re: [Replicator-users] Is this ml still alive?

[W. <jwa...@be...>]

Le mar 17/06/2003 =E0 16:00, Sebastien Chaumat a =E9crit :
> Le mar 17/06/2003 =E0 14:37, J=E9r=F4me Warnier a =E9crit :
> > It's already been several month since I didn't receive anything from
> > this ml.
> >=20
> > Has Replicator gone further?
>=20
> not much in the cvs. a bit more among developpers We are waiting for a
> merging party.
>=20
> > What about the devfs support?
> Devfs support is in the CVS.
I'll need it on Thursday morning.

When do we organize this merging party?
Will it take place on IRC or what?
>=20
> SEb

Re: [Replicator-users] Is this ml still alive?

[Sebastien C. <Seb...@en...>]

Le mar 17/06/2003 =E0 14:37, J=E9r=F4me Warnier a =E9crit :
> It's already been several month since I didn't receive anything from
> this ml.
>=20
> Has Replicator gone further?

not much in the cvs. a bit more among developpers We are waiting for a
merging party.

> What about the devfs support?
Devfs support is in the CVS.

SEb

--=20
Sebastien CHAUMAT          =20
Ecole Normale Superieure     PRATIC : Direction Technique
46, All=E9e d'Italie           +33 4 72 72 84 66  fax: +33 4 72 72 81 81
69364 LYON CEDEX 07 FRANCE   E-mail : Seb...@en...

[Replicator-users] Is this ml still alive?

[W. <jwa...@be...>]

It's already been several month since I didn't receive anything from
this ml.

Has Replicator gone further?
What about the devfs support?

[Replicator-users] Sanitization of TODO list

[<jwa...@bx...>]

I just took a look at the TODO file, and saw a lot of typing errors, 
here is a small cleaning up. I hope someone will apply it soon.

cvs server: Diffing .
Index: TODO
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/replicator/replicator/TODO,v
retrieving revision 1.62
diff -r1.62 TODO
3,10c3,10
< -test rsync option --whole-file (should speed up by 10!)
< - One subdir of /etc/replicator per classe
< - after replication (within the class foo) copy the 
/etc/replicator/foo-sync
< - Doc : lilo-template.
< -woody transfert:
<  change get_deb_using_wget to allow apssing the name of the mirror, 
then use
< it to retreive additionnal .debs for the woody miniroot.
< -use mount -n to avoid writing in the /etc/mtab (so that the miniroot 
can be used by multiple targets)
---
 > - test rsync option --whole-file (should speed up by 10!)
 > - one subdir of /etc/replicator per classe
 >  after replication (within the class foo) copy the 
/etc/replicator/foo-sync
 > - document lilo-template
 > - woody transfer:
 >  change get_deb_using_wget to allow passing the name of the mirror, 
then use
 > it to retrieve additionnal .debs for the woody miniroot.
 > - use mount -n to avoid writing in the /etc/mtab (so that the 
miniroot can be used by multiple targets)
15c15
< - remove perl warning (because of dialog.pl)
---
 > - remove Perl warning (because of dialog.pl)
17a18
 >
26c27
< #
---
 >
29c30
<   make a template for lilo. By default it contains serial entry. it should
---
 > - make a template for LILO. By default it contains serial entry. it 
should
31d31
<
33,35c33,35
< - DONE :add support for debootstrap (add external list of package 
support in
< debootstrap or add a "replicator" list (same as "woody").
< - create repli-kernel that compile the correct kernel for boottime.
---
 > - DONE : add support for debootstrap (add external list of package 
support in
 > debootstrap or add a "replicator" list (same as "woody")
 > - create repli-kernel that compile the right kernel for boottime
40,41c40,41
< - repli-dialog should tell wich disk it wants to install on.
<  * make a repli-instakll hdsetup (without real) and grep the name of 
the disk
---
 > - repli-dialog should tell wich disk it wants to install on
 >  * make a repli-install hdsetup (without real) and grep the name of 
the disk
45c45
< - should handle dhcpcd and dhcp-client.
---
 > - should handle dhcpcd and dhcp-client
47,48c47,48
< - allow to choose grub or lilo to put on the HD
< - preserve public/private keys in case of reinstallation
---
 > - allow to choose betweeb GRUB and LILO to put on the HD
 > - preserve SSH public/private keys in case of reinstallation
51c51
<     and proposed reboot.
---
 >     and propose reboot
59c59
< - shall we copy the whole  /var/lib? Shall we recreate only the 
directory stu
cture of /var??
---
 > - shall we copy the whole /var/lib? Shall we recreate only the 
directory stuct
ure of /var??
63c63
< -tree install (model->c1 then simultaneously c1->c2 an model->c3):
---
 > - tree install (model->c1 then simultaneously c1->c2 an model->c3):
87c87
<  nxt you'll make: model->c4 c1->c6 c2->c7 c3->c8
---
 >  next you'll make: model->c4 c1->c6 c2->c7 c3->c8
93c93
<  -explain whyu getting 127.0.0.1 is bad
---
 > - explain why getting 127.0.0.1 is bad

[Replicator-users] Bug report Replicator: using devfs on server

[W. <jwa...@bx...>]

At last, I tested the new Replicator (3.0.2-1) from Sid (but a backport
of mine to Woody).

I noticed 2 important problems that really do annoy me:
- NFS miniroot is still rw and no_root_squash, we should improve that
I'm really conscious about the problems that may happen on some hardware
configuration when using devfs. I think, however, that it *is* possible
and usefull to use devfs most of the time, and be prepared to the case
it is not possible.

- repli-bootdisk still doesn't support devfs on the machine where it is
run, because it looks into /dev to copy files on the bootdisk image. It
should really use /usr/lib/debootstrap/devices.tar.gz instead. I'm going
to submit a patch to Sébastien about that.

Regards

[Replicator-users] Re: Working repli-sync

[Bernd H. <bj...@da...>]

Hi,

On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 09:57:54PM +0100, Sebastien Chaumat wrote:
> To be precise : I fix bugs, add $fs, fix doc, upload woody package.
> Then I start cleaning repli-update and add new functionnality.
> I start tommorow (I'm still in vacation :).

Please commit to CVS frequently. I like to have a look and test it.

Have you get the patch for the woody-packaging from Jerome ?


> > My proposal is:
> >=20
> > 1.) Make a list of the known bugs. (e.g. the ones listed in my
> >     attachment and in the buglist on sourceforge.
> > 2.) Fix this bugs.
> > 3.) Update documentation.
> >     I can provide an (update) howto for the first replication
> >     (repli-install) and repli-sync.
>=20
>  Yep send it!

The Howto for repli-sync is what you get with my last mail. I update it
after the known bugs are fixed.

The Howto for repli-install can be a rewrite of chapter 4 of your
Replicator-UserGuide.tex.

Whats up with the source format of the documentation. I like to write
docs with LyX. Are you using another tool that directly reads/writes
LaTeX ? I see the following possibilities.

a) I rewrite all docs using LyX and we put the lyx-file in CVS and the
   debian source package. The debian/rules can than build the docs
   using e.g.:
   lyx -x buffer-open Source-File.lyx -e ps
   But then we Build-Depends on LyX and some additional tools.

b) I rewrite all docs using LyX and we put the lyx-file and a manually=20
   generated LaTex-file in CVS. The package-building scripts will only
   use the LaTeX-file but all changes go to the LyX-file.
  =20
c) You tell my which tools you use to write the last docs and I have a
   look if it is to much work to learn it. (I do not want to learn
   LaTeX, except a few single commands)

What do you think?


> > 4.) Release replicator for woody.
> > 5.) Collecting wishes for the next release.
> > What do you think about this? I like to help on all points.
> Great. The bug list will help me a lot. Do you use IRC?

I have zero experience in IRC. I can try it if it is important, but
because of my slow english typespeed and full diary I feel I like
e-mail more. I can write it when I have time and you can read it when
you have time.


Should we keep discussing on replicator-user, create a replicator-devel
or simply CC all interested persons (you, Jerome and me?)
I prefer replicator-devel.


Regards,
Bernd

[Replicator-users] Working repli-sync [was: Tests for repli-sync ?]

[Bernd H. <bj...@da...>]

Hello,

first of all, I should apologize. In the repli-sync test I report on
Fri, 25 Oct 2002, I forget the --real param. After working around some
bugs I have simply forgotten it.

To prevent this in futur and to help others using repli-sync I write a
small howto. You find it attached in the formats PDF and LyX.

At the End of this document you find a list of bugs I found and a list
of proposals for the futur of replicator. The howto must be corrected
after fixing the mentioned bugs, but then I like it t be included in
replicator.

What do you think about that?


On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 10:15:16PM +0100, Sebastien Chaumat wrote:
> The "-text2" is superseeded by the future -t$fs :)
> (I though I did commit this... maybe it still on my hd)
> Can you check, in documentations, if "mkfs -t fs" works whatever fs is?
> I mean is there any filesysteme that do not follow the "mkfs -t"
> convention. 

Looking in the manpage I see that the following types are supportet:

       -t vfstype
              The argument following the -t is used to indicate  the  file  system  type.
              The  file  system types which are currently supported are: adfs, affs, aut­
              ofs, coda, cramfs, devpts,  efs,  ext2,  ext3,  hfs,  hpfs,
              iso9660,  jfs, minix, msdos, ncpfs, nfs, ntfs, proc, qnx4, reiserfs, romfs,
              smbfs, sysv, tmpfs, udf, ufs, umsdos, vfat, xfs.

I had some problems with the "autofs" type in the past. Sometimes (on
floppies) the filesystem was not correctly detected. I think you should
not use this option.


> The point is that repli-update need cleaning. I want to use standard
> argument parser (as in repli-miniroot).

Is this important enough to delay the first release for woody or can it
wait for the relase after that.


>  The folowing maybe interresting :
> 
> split replicator.deb in 3 :
> 
> replicator-miniroot-server : only repli-miniroot 
> replicator-model-server : only repli-bootdisk and something to get info
> about the model (I guess maximum info about the model should be gathered
> at replication time only via rsync)
> replicator-target-syncer : repli-sync

I do not understand what the goal of this is. Replicator is a small
tool and it does no harm, I think, to have all tools present on all
hosts. Nevertheless this makes it nessesary to prevent
"replicator-*-server" from beeing synchronized to the targets.
I feel, this is less important extra work, but maybe you can explain it
a bit.


What do you think are the things, that should be done for the first
woody release and what do you plan after this?

My proposal is:

1.) Make a list of the known bugs. (e.g. the ones listed in my
    attachment and in the buglist on sourceforge.
2.) Fix this bugs.
3.) Update documentation.
    I can provide an (update) howto for the first replication
    (repli-install) and repli-sync.
4.) Release replicator for woody.
5.) Collecting wishes for the next release.

What do you think about this? I like to help on all points.


Regards,
Bernd

Re: [Replicator-users] Tests for repli-sync ?

[Sebastien C. <Seb...@en...>]

Hi,

about your patch

 The "-text2" is superseeded by the future -t$fs :)
 (I though I did commit this... maybe it still on my hd)

The point is that repli-update need cleaning. I want to use standard
argument parser (as in repli-miniroot).

 The folowing maybe interresting :

split replicator.deb in 3 :

replicator-miniroot-server : only repli-miniroot=20
replicator-model-server : only repli-bootdisk and something to get info
about the model (I guess maximum info about the model should be gathered
at replication time only via rsync)
replicator-target-syncer : repli-sync


I'm busy for the next 2 days (conferences :)

Le jeu 31/10/2002 =E0 15:07, Bernd Harmsen a =E9crit :
>=20
> Hello all,
>=20
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 07:45:34PM +0100, Sebastien Chaumat wrote:
> It's nice to read from you. Hope that you had a good holiday.
>=20
>=20
> > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
> > > > >3) Take a deeper look in the code of "repli-update" and understand
> > > > >what is doing what.
> > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
> > >=20
> > > > >$excludefile =3D "/tmp/excl.rsync.$$";
> > > > >$fh =3D new FileHandle $excludefile,"w" or die "opening exclude fi=
le:$!\n";;
> > > > >foreach (@slash_exclude) { print $fh "- $_\n"; }
> > > > >$fh->close; =20
> > > > >dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt --one-file-system --exclude-from=3D$excl=
udefile=20
> > > > >${model}::replicator/ $destdir 2>&1");
> > > > >
> > > > >The content of the list @slash_exclude is written to a file, line =
by
> > > > >line. But for what is the "-" in { print $fh "- $_\n"; } ?
> > sure: the "-" tell rsync to force exclusion of the file even if there i=
s
> > a wildcard to include it.
>=20
> From the manpage of rsync (I have thought the - is perl syntax, before):
>=20
>  o      if  the  pattern  starts  with "+ " (a plus followed by a space) =
then it is
>         always considered an include pattern, even  if  specified  as  pa=
rt  of  an
>         exclude option. The "+ " part is discarded before matching.
>=20
>  o      if  the  pattern  starts with "- " (a minus followed by a space) =
then it is
>         always considered an exclude pattern, even  if  specified  as  pa=
rt  of  an
>         include option. The "- " part is discarded before matching.
>=20
> As I understand in an exclude-option you never need a "-" and in an
> include-option you never need a "+". (But is does no harm) The exclude
> and include options are parsed from the first to the last param and in
> the e/i-lists from the first line to the last. The first patern match
> is valid, no matter if there is a "+" or "-" sign.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
> > > > >4) Correct "repli-update" and/or call it with other params
> > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
> > I will correct repli-update : this is my first taskj after fixing the
> > woody package.
>=20
> Because Jerome already fixed the woody package, I feel it is good to
> wait for his patch and concentrate on repli-update in the meantime.
>=20
> I will run some deeper tests this afternoon, to find out what files are
> exclude during repli-sync and what files not. Do you think it is good
> to do a new repli-install before or is it sufficient only to install
> the new debian package (CVS from 30.10.2002) on model and target.
>=20
> I you like that I run a spezial test, watch a spezial behavior or
> include a spezial patch before, just write me.
>=20

Can you check, in documentations, if "mkfs -t fs" works whatever fs is?
I mean is there any filesysteme that do not follow the "mkfs -t"
convention.=20


Thanks for you interrest in this project

SEb

> After repli-update is working I think it is good to:
> a) write some documentation (e.g. manpages, more clean installation
>    instructions)=20
> b) implement some nice new features (e.g. the @change_hostname list).
>=20
> Attached you find my "cvs diff" from today.
>=20
>=20
> Regards,
> Bernd
> ----
>=20

> ? Replicator-UserGuide.ps
> ? build-stamp
> ? debian/tmp
> Index: Makefile
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> RCS file: /cvsroot/replicator/replicator/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.35
> diff -u -r1.35 Makefile
> --- Makefile	7 Aug 2002 10:37:56 -0000	1.35
> +++ Makefile	31 Oct 2002 13:09:30 -0000
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -DESTDIR=3D
> +DESTDIR=3D./debian/tmp/
>  VERSION=3D2.1.0
>  CFLAGS=3D-O
>  INSTALL=3Dinstall -o root -g root
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
>  #pci.lst
>  MINIROOT-FILES-DEST=3D$(DESTDIR)/usr/share/replicator
> =20
> -DOC=3Dreplicator.conf.example repli-postinst.example\
> +DOC=3Dreplicator.conf.example examples/repli-postinst.example\
>  Replicator-UserGuide.ps\
>  Replicator-UserGuide.tex copyright TODO=20
>  #repli-postinst.diskless.example=20
> Index: repli-install
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> RCS file: /cvsroot/replicator/replicator/repli-install,v
> retrieving revision 1.81
> diff -u -r1.81 repli-install
> --- repli-install	1 Oct 2002 06:18:47 -0000	1.81
> +++ repli-install	31 Oct 2002 13:09:31 -0000
> @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@
>        if (!$firstpart or $firstpart ne $p) {
>  	print STDERR "mkpath:/target\n";
>  	$dryrun or mkpath(["/target"],1,0755);
> -	dodryrun('mount',$p->[$PDEVICE],"/target");
> +	dodryrun("mount -text2 $p->[$PDEVICE] /target");
>        }
>      }
>    }
> @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@
>        print STDERR "mkpath:$dir\n";
>        $dryrun or mkpath([$dir],1,0755);
>        if (!$firstpart or $firstpart ne $p) {
> -	dodryrun('mount',$p->[$PDEVICE],$dir);
> +	dodryrun("mount -text2 $p->[$PDEVICE] $dir");
>        }
>      }
>    }
> Index: update_rules.default
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> RCS file: /cvsroot/replicator/replicator/update_rules.default,v
> retrieving revision 1.17
> diff -u -r1.17 update_rules.default
> --- update_rules.default	14 Jun 2002 16:14:12 -0000	1.17
> +++ update_rules.default	31 Oct 2002 13:09:31 -0000
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
>  /etc/isapnp.conf
>  /etc/minirc*
>  /etc/gpm.conf
> -/etc/replicator*
>  /etc/fstab
>  /etc/lilo.conf
>  /etc/hostname
> Index: debian/changelog
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> RCS file: /cvsroot/replicator/replicator/debian/changelog,v
> retrieving revision 1.9
> diff -u -r1.9 changelog
> --- debian/changelog	14 Jun 2002 16:14:12 -0000	1.9
> +++ debian/changelog	31 Oct 2002 13:09:31 -0000
> @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
> +replicator (3.0-cvs20021030) unstable; urgency=3Dlow
> +
> +  * Add updates from CVS
> +
> + -- Bernd Harmsen <bj...@da...>  Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:12:43 +0100
> +
> +replicator (3.0-cvs20020820) unstable; urgency=3Dlow
> +
> +  * Compiled from CVS.
> +  * Add -text2 to mount options in repli-install
> +
> + -- Bernd Harmsen <bj...@da...>  Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:11:52 +0100
> +
>  replicator (3.0) unstable; urgency=3Dlow
> =20
>    * woody compliance improved
> Index: debian/control
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> RCS file: /cvsroot/replicator/replicator/debian/control,v
> retrieving revision 1.11
> diff -u -r1.11 control
> --- debian/control	14 Jun 2002 16:14:12 -0000	1.11
> +++ debian/control	31 Oct 2002 13:09:31 -0000
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> =20
>  Package: replicator
>  Architecture: i386
> -Depends: rsync (>=3D 2.3.2), ${perl:Depends}, wget, dialog, nfs-server, =
grub, debootstrap (>=3D 0.1.16.3)
> +Depends: rsync (>=3D 2.3.2), ${perl:Depends}, wget, dialog, nfs-server, =
grub, debootstrap (>=3D 0.1.16.3), binutils
>  Description: automate new computer installations in a networked site.
>   Using a nfs-root filesystem and rsync, replicator allow=20
>   you to non-interactively install a target computer=20
> Index: debian/files
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> RCS file: /cvsroot/replicator/replicator/debian/files,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> diff -u -r1.1 files
> --- debian/files	20 Feb 2001 20:25:28 -0000	1.1
> +++ debian/files	31 Oct 2002 13:09:31 -0000
> @@ -1 +1 @@
> -replicator_2.0.1_i386.deb admin optional
> +replicator_3.0-cvs20021030_i386.deb admin optional
> Index: debian/postinst.debhelper
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> RCS file: /cvsroot/replicator/replicator/debian/postinst.debhelper,v
> retrieving revision 1.2
> diff -u -r1.2 postinst.debhelper
> --- debian/postinst.debhelper	17 May 2001 13:45:18 -0000	1.2
> +++ debian/postinst.debhelper	31 Oct 2002 13:09:31 -0000
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
>  fi
>  # End automatically added section
>  # Automatically added by dh_installdocs
> -if command -v install-docs >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> +if [ "$1" =3D configure ] && command -v install-docs >/dev/null 2>&1; th=
en
>  	install-docs -i /usr/share/doc-base/replicator
>  fi
>  # End automatically added section
> Index: debian/prerm.debhelper
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> RCS file: /cvsroot/replicator/replicator/debian/prerm.debhelper,v
> retrieving revision 1.2
> diff -u -r1.2 prerm.debhelper
> --- debian/prerm.debhelper	17 May 2001 13:45:18 -0000	1.2
> +++ debian/prerm.debhelper	31 Oct 2002 13:09:31 -0000
> @@ -4,7 +4,8 @@
>  fi
>  # End automatically added section
>  # Automatically added by dh_installdocs
> -if command -v install-docs >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> +if [ "$1" =3D remove -o "$1" =3D upgrade ] && \
> +   command -v install-docs >/dev/null 2>&1; then
>  	install-docs -r replicator
>  fi
>  # End automatically added section
> Index: debian/substvars
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> RCS file: /cvsroot/replicator/replicator/debian/substvars,v
> retrieving revision 1.2
> diff -u -r1.2 substvars
> --- debian/substvars	17 May 2001 13:45:18 -0000	1.2
> +++ debian/substvars	31 Oct 2002 13:09:31 -0000
> @@ -1 +1 @@
> -perl:Depends=3Dperl5
> +perl:Depends=3Dperl
--=20
Sebastien CHAUMAT          =20
Ecole Normale Superieure     Laboratoire de Physique / PR@TIC
46, All=E9e d'Italie           +33 4 72 72 84 66  fax: +33 4 72 72 81 81
69364 LYON CEDEX 07 FRANCE   E-mail : Seb...@en...

[Replicator-users] Tests for repli-sync ?

[Bernd H. <bj...@da...>]

Hello all,

On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 07:45:34PM +0100, Sebastien Chaumat wrote:
It's nice to read from you. Hope that you had a good holiday.


> > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >3) Take a deeper look in the code of "repli-update" and understand
> > > >what is doing what.
> > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > > >$excludefile = "/tmp/excl.rsync.$$";
> > > >$fh = new FileHandle $excludefile,"w" or die "opening exclude file:$!\n";;
> > > >foreach (@slash_exclude) { print $fh "- $_\n"; }
> > > >$fh->close;  
> > > >dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt --one-file-system --exclude-from=$excludefile 
> > > >${model}::replicator/ $destdir 2>&1");
> > > >
> > > >The content of the list @slash_exclude is written to a file, line by
> > > >line. But for what is the "-" in { print $fh "- $_\n"; } ?
> sure: the "-" tell rsync to force exclusion of the file even if there is
> a wildcard to include it.

From the manpage of rsync (I have thought the - is perl syntax, before):

 o      if  the  pattern  starts  with "+ " (a plus followed by a space) then it is
        always considered an include pattern, even  if  specified  as  part  of  an
        exclude option. The "+ " part is discarded before matching.

 o      if  the  pattern  starts with "- " (a minus followed by a space) then it is
        always considered an exclude pattern, even  if  specified  as  part  of  an
        include option. The "- " part is discarded before matching.

As I understand in an exclude-option you never need a "-" and in an
include-option you never need a "+". (But is does no harm) The exclude
and include options are parsed from the first to the last param and in
the e/i-lists from the first line to the last. The first patern match
is valid, no matter if there is a "+" or "-" sign.



> > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >4) Correct "repli-update" and/or call it with other params
> > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> I will correct repli-update : this is my first taskj after fixing the
> woody package.

Because Jerome already fixed the woody package, I feel it is good to
wait for his patch and concentrate on repli-update in the meantime.

I will run some deeper tests this afternoon, to find out what files are
exclude during repli-sync and what files not. Do you think it is good
to do a new repli-install before or is it sufficient only to install
the new debian package (CVS from 30.10.2002) on model and target.

I you like that I run a spezial test, watch a spezial behavior or
include a spezial patch before, just write me.

After repli-update is working I think it is good to:
a) write some documentation (e.g. manpages, more clean installation
   instructions) 
b) implement some nice new features (e.g. the @change_hostname list).

Attached you find my "cvs diff" from today.


Regards,
Bernd

Re: [Replicator-users] Re: A look in "repli-update"

[Sebastien C. <Seb...@en...>]

Le mer 30/10/2002 =E0 18:55, Bernd Harmsen a =E9crit :
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:40:20PM +0100, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > Before anything else, tell me which version you are currently using.
>=20
> I use a Debian-Package from the CVS-Version from 20.08.2002 with some
> small bugfixes (see my bug reports) and some fixes to allow the package
> build prozess.
>=20
> Today I have build a new debian package with the upstream changes and
> my fixes. CVS from 30.10.2002. I will test it tomorrow.
>=20
>=20
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >2) Write a list of the Param "repli-update" understands and what they
> > >should do.
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >repli-install calls:
> > >repli-update --config $confile $ssh_opt --dev $rupdate_dry=20
> > >$netcopy_exclude --model $model --destdir $installtarget
> > >But I don't know, what is in the variables at that time.
> > >
> > >
> > >repli-sync calls:
> > >$share_dir_on_server/repli-update --destdir / --model $model --config=20
> > >$confile @ARGV
> > >$confile is "/etc/replicator/repli-sync" on the replicated host and
> > >$model ist taken from that file.
> > >


ouch..I feel a mistake here...

I'll check that=20
> > >Why these calls behave different ?
>=20
> Can you explain the contents of the params during the call from
> repli-install.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >3) Take a deeper look in the code of "repli-update" and understand
> > >what is doing what.
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
>=20
> > >$excludefile =3D "/tmp/excl.rsync.$$";
> > >$fh =3D new FileHandle $excludefile,"w" or die "opening exclude file:$=
!\n";;
> > >foreach (@slash_exclude) { print $fh "- $_\n"; }
> > >$fh->close; =20
> > >dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt --one-file-system --exclude-from=3D$excludef=
ile=20
> > >${model}::replicator/ $destdir 2>&1");
> > >
> > >The content of the list @slash_exclude is written to a file, line by
> > >line. But for what is the "-" in { print $fh "- $_\n"; } ?
>=20
> Can you explain this ?
>=20
>=20
> > >my $usr_exclude =3D '';
> > >foreach (@usr_exclude) { $usr_exclude .=3D " --exclude '- $_' "; }    =
=20
> > >dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt $usr_exclude  ${model}::replicator/usr/.=20
> > >$destdir/usr/. 2>&1");
> > >
> > >Interesting in how many different way a list can be passed to rsync. I=
s
> > >there a matter for the different ways? I have somewhere heard about a
> > >maximum length of the command line. Do you know how long a command lin=
e
> > >can be?
>=20
>=20
> > >$dryrun or -d "$destdir/var/." or mkdir "$destdir/var",0755 or die "ca=
nnot=20
> > >make $destdir/var";;
> > >dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt  --include '+ */' --exclude '- *'=20
> > >${model}::replicator/var/. $destdir/var/.");
> > >foreach (@var_include) {
> > >dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt ${model}::replicator/var/$_/ $destdir/var/$_=
=20
> > >2>&1");
> > >}
> > >
> > >For what is the "+" and the "-" sign in the [ei][xn]clude-rules? Is is=
t
> > >perl-syntax or parsed by rsync?
>=20
> Can you enlight this ?
>=20
>=20
>=20
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >4) Correct "repli-update" and/or call it with other params
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
>=20
> > >- What do you think about a @change_hostname list with files in which
> > > the name of the model should be replaced with the name of the target
> > > host. This can be implemented in repli-update or the example
> > > repli-postint.
> > I don't understand.
>=20
> After repli-install there are some files in which the name of the model
> must be replaced with the name of the targed. eg:
> 	/etc/hostname
>         /etc/hosts
>         /etc/logcheck/ignore.d/local (in my setup)
>         /etc/mailname
>         /etc/motd
>         /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf
> I think it is nice to have a list to put such files in to let
> replicator do the replacing (e.g. using seed).
> I want files like /etc/logcheck/ingore.d/local and
> /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf updated during repli-sync. So the names must
> replaced often.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> > >- The config files replicator.conf and update_rules are not copied to
> > > the target during repli-install bacause of the default
> > > @shlash_exclude list. If we need them for repli.sync we should remove
> > > /etc/replicator from this list.
> > I did notice this too.
>=20
> Because /etc/replicator in the modell contains only the following files
> I feel it is save to remove them from #slash_exclude
>=20
> bilbo:/etc/replicator# ls -l
> insgesamt 32
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root         6661 21. Sep 19:28 replicator.conf
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root          684 21. Sep 19:32 repli-postinst
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root           94 26. Aug 12:03 repli-sync.conf
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root          215 20. Aug 17:14 rsyncd.conf
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root         1780 26. Aug 11:17 update_rules
>=20
>=20
> > >- More ideas ?
> > Yes, a lot.
> > Sadly, I don't have access today to the machine were my replicator has=20
> > been modified. I cannot tell much more today, and probably this week.
>=20
> I like to hear.
>=20
>=20
> Regards,
> Bernd
--=20
Sebastien CHAUMAT          =20
Ecole Normale Superieure     Laboratoire de Physique / PR@TIC
46, All=E9e d'Italie           +33 4 72 72 84 66  fax: +33 4 72 72 81 81
69364 LYON CEDEX 07 FRANCE   E-mail : Seb...@en...

Re: [Replicator-users] Re: A look in "repli-update"

[Jerome W. <jwa...@bx...>]

Sebastien Chaumat wrote:

>Le mer 30/10/2002 =E0 19:54, Jerome Warnier a =E9crit :
> =20
>
>>>     =20
>>>
>>>>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
>>>>>>4) Correct "repli-update" and/or call it with other params
>>>>>>-------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
>>>>>>      =20
>>>>>>
>>>>>>           =20
>>>>>>
>>>I will correct repli-update : this is my first taskj after fixing the
>>>woody package.
>>>=20
>>>
>>>     =20
>>>
>>You don't have to: I already did it.
>>I have working Woody packages since june, working fine, but much tweake=
d.
>>
>>   =20
>>
>
>Send it :)
> =20
>

Arrrrgh!! I just realized my copy is on a laptop running far away from=20
any Internet connection till next Monday!
What I've got corrected was the automatic generation of documentation=20
(or help), which didn't work at all. It was a mix between fixing and=20
disabling components.
Other small fixes were in update_rules.defaults.
I also updated the pci.lst to the last version in discover-data.

I don't remember the other things, but if you wait until Monday, I'd=20
make a cvs diff.
During this time, I suggest to document the items Bernd asked for.

Sorry

Re: [Replicator-users] Re: A look in "repli-update"

[Jerome W. <jwa...@bx...>]

>
>
>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>4) Correct "repli-update" and/or call it with other params
>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>        
>>>>
>
>I will correct repli-update : this is my first taskj after fixing the
>woody package.
>  
>
You don't have to: I already did it.
I have working Woody packages since june, working fine, but much tweaked.

Re: [Replicator-users] Re: A look in "repli-update"

[Sebastien C. <Seb...@en...>]

Le mer 30/10/2002 =E0 18:55, Bernd Harmsen a =E9crit :
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:40:20PM +0100, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > Before anything else, tell me which version you are currently using.
>=20
> I use a Debian-Package from the CVS-Version from 20.08.2002 with some
> small bugfixes (see my bug reports) and some fixes to allow the package
> build prozess.
>=20
> Today I have build a new debian package with the upstream changes and
> my fixes. CVS from 30.10.2002. I will test it tomorrow.
>=20
>=20
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >2) Write a list of the Param "repli-update" understands and what they
> > >should do.
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >repli-install calls:
> > >repli-update --config $confile $ssh_opt --dev $rupdate_dry=20
> > >$netcopy_exclude --model $model --destdir $installtarget
> > >But I don't know, what is in the variables at that time.
> > >
> > >
> > >repli-sync calls:
> > >$share_dir_on_server/repli-update --destdir / --model $model --config=20
> > >$confile @ARGV
> > >$confile is "/etc/replicator/repli-sync" on the replicated host and
> > >$model ist taken from that file.
> > >
> > >Why these calls behave different ?
>=20
> Can you explain the contents of the params during the call from
> repli-install.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >3) Take a deeper look in the code of "repli-update" and understand
> > >what is doing what.
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
>=20
> > >$excludefile =3D "/tmp/excl.rsync.$$";
> > >$fh =3D new FileHandle $excludefile,"w" or die "opening exclude file:$=
!\n";;
> > >foreach (@slash_exclude) { print $fh "- $_\n"; }
> > >$fh->close; =20
> > >dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt --one-file-system --exclude-from=3D$excludef=
ile=20
> > >${model}::replicator/ $destdir 2>&1");
> > >
> > >The content of the list @slash_exclude is written to a file, line by
> > >line. But for what is the "-" in { print $fh "- $_\n"; } ?
>=20
> Can you explain this ?
>=20

sure: the "-" tell rsync to force exclusion of the file even if there is
a wildcard to include it.
>=20
> > >my $usr_exclude =3D '';
> > >foreach (@usr_exclude) { $usr_exclude .=3D " --exclude '- $_' "; }    =
=20
> > >dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt $usr_exclude  ${model}::replicator/usr/.=20
> > >$destdir/usr/. 2>&1");
> > >
> > >Interesting in how many different way a list can be passed to rsync. I=
s
> > >there a matter for the different ways? I have somewhere heard about a
> > >maximum length of the command line. Do you know how long a command lin=
e
> > >can be?
>=20
>=20
> > >$dryrun or -d "$destdir/var/." or mkdir "$destdir/var",0755 or die "ca=
nnot=20
> > >make $destdir/var";;
> > >dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt  --include '+ */' --exclude '- *'=20
> > >${model}::replicator/var/. $destdir/var/.");
> > >foreach (@var_include) {
> > >dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt ${model}::replicator/var/$_/ $destdir/var/$_=
=20
> > >2>&1");
> > >}
> > >
> > >For what is the "+" and the "-" sign in the [ei][xn]clude-rules? Is is=
t
> > >perl-syntax or parsed by rsync?
>=20
> Can you enlight this ?
>=20

rsync
>=20
>=20
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >4) Correct "repli-update" and/or call it with other params
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
>=20

I will correct repli-update : this is my first taskj after fixing the
woody package.


> > >- What do you think about a @change_hostname list with files in which
> > > the name of the model should be replaced with the name of the target
> > > host. This can be implemented in repli-update or the example
> > > repli-postint.
> > I don't understand.
>=20
> After repli-install there are some files in which the name of the model
> must be replaced with the name of the targed. eg:
> 	/etc/hostname
>         /etc/hosts
>         /etc/logcheck/ignore.d/local (in my setup)
>         /etc/mailname
>         /etc/motd
>         /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf
> I think it is nice to have a list to put such files in to let
> replicator do the replacing (e.g. using seed).
> I want files like /etc/logcheck/ingore.d/local and
> /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf updated during repli-sync. So the names must
> replaced often.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> > >- The config files replicator.conf and update_rules are not copied to
> > > the target during repli-install bacause of the default
> > > @shlash_exclude list. If we need them for repli.sync we should remove
> > > /etc/replicator from this list.
> > I did notice this too.
>=20

I'll look at this.

> Because /etc/replicator in the modell contains only the following files
> I feel it is save to remove them from #slash_exclude
>=20
> bilbo:/etc/replicator# ls -l
> insgesamt 32
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root         6661 21. Sep 19:28 replicator.conf
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root          684 21. Sep 19:32 repli-postinst
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root           94 26. Aug 12:03 repli-sync.conf
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root          215 20. Aug 17:14 rsyncd.conf
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root         1780 26. Aug 11:17 update_rules
>=20
>=20
> > >- More ideas ?
> > Yes, a lot.
> > Sadly, I don't have access today to the machine were my replicator has=20
> > been modified. I cannot tell much more today, and probably this week.
>=20
> I like to hear.
>=20
>=20
> Regards,
> Bernd
--=20
Sebastien CHAUMAT          =20
Ecole Normale Superieure     Laboratoire de Physique / PR@TIC
46, All=E9e d'Italie           +33 4 72 72 84 66  fax: +33 4 72 72 81 81
69364 LYON CEDEX 07 FRANCE   E-mail : Seb...@en...

Re: [Replicator-users] How to use "repli-sync"

[Sebastien C. <Seb...@en...>]

Hi all,

 I'm back from vacations (my phd is over :))

So lets go for replicator.

I have a talk about debian in 2 days so I'm still a bit busy but
replicator is now on top of my todo list. Lets Rock!

SEb


Le sam 26/10/2002 =E0 21:04, Jerome Warnier a =E9crit :
> Bernd Harmsen wrote:
>=20
> >Hello Jerome,
> >
> >On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 08:37:49PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > =20
> >
> >>>This mail describes how I try to get repli-sync working. At the end
> >>>there are some new files an the model (bilbo) missing on the replicat
> >>>(frodo).
> >>>It would be nice if you can give me a hint, how I get the hosts
> >>>completly synchronizes with repli-sync. If you need some additional
> >>>information or if I can do some tests I like to do it.
> >>>
> >>>     =20
> >>>
> >>I have the exact same problem, and I am going to fix it some near day.
> >>Do you have *any* knowledge about Perl?
> >>   =20
> >>
> >
> >I have *very* less perl knowledge but good programming experience in
> >some other languages. I like to help.
> > =20
> >
> ;-)
>=20
> >At first I feel, that there is less concept or less (detailed)
> >dokumentation. (What are the function of the different skripts of
> >replicator).
> > =20
> >
> You do not mean "less", but "not much".
>=20
> >First I think it is important to fully understand the function of
> >repli-update.
> >
> >What do you think about writing some dokumentation, as preparation for
> >programming an fixing error? Are one of the Maintainers willing to to
> >help on this, answer questions ?
> > =20
> >
> I can help documenting the whole lot, but starting with repli-sync and=20
> repli-update is a good idea, as I'll have to use them soon also, and=20
> have recently put an eye on them.
> Sadly, I'm not someone who makes things by itself, I always need a reason=
.
> The maintainers are good-willing, off course, but have other things to=20
> do right now, as I understood.
>=20
> >What do you think the next step should be?
> > =20
> >
> We should contact each other and discuss (on IRC) about the code (I know=20
> it enough to reply to common questions).
>=20
> >Regards,
> >Bernd
> > =20
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
> Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
> fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com
> _______________________________________________
> Replicator-users mailing list
> Rep...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/replicator-users
--=20
Sebastien CHAUMAT          =20
Ecole Normale Superieure     Laboratoire de Physique / PR@TIC
46, All=E9e d'Italie           +33 4 72 72 84 66  fax: +33 4 72 72 81 81
69364 LYON CEDEX 07 FRANCE   E-mail : Seb...@en...

[Replicator-users] Re: A look in "repli-update"

[Bernd H. <bj...@da...>]

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:40:20PM +0100, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> Before anything else, tell me which version you are currently using.

I use a Debian-Package from the CVS-Version from 20.08.2002 with some
small bugfixes (see my bug reports) and some fixes to allow the package
build prozess.

Today I have build a new debian package with the upstream changes and
my fixes. CVS from 30.10.2002. I will test it tomorrow.


> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> >2) Write a list of the Param "repli-update" understands and what they
> >should do.
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >repli-install calls:
> >repli-update --config $confile $ssh_opt --dev $rupdate_dry=20
> >$netcopy_exclude --model $model --destdir $installtarget
> >But I don't know, what is in the variables at that time.
> >
> >
> >repli-sync calls:
> >$share_dir_on_server/repli-update --destdir / --model $model --config=20
> >$confile @ARGV
> >$confile is "/etc/replicator/repli-sync" on the replicated host and
> >$model ist taken from that file.
> >
> >Why these calls behave different ?

Can you explain the contents of the params during the call from
repli-install.



> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> >3) Take a deeper look in the code of "repli-update" and understand
> >what is doing what.
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------

> >$excludefile =3D "/tmp/excl.rsync.$$";
> >$fh =3D new FileHandle $excludefile,"w" or die "opening exclude file:$!\=
n";;
> >foreach (@slash_exclude) { print $fh "- $_\n"; }
> >$fh->close; =20
> >dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt --one-file-system --exclude-from=3D$excludefil=
e=20
> >${model}::replicator/ $destdir 2>&1");
> >
> >The content of the list @slash_exclude is written to a file, line by
> >line. But for what is the "-" in { print $fh "- $_\n"; } ?

Can you explain this ?


> >my $usr_exclude =3D '';
> >foreach (@usr_exclude) { $usr_exclude .=3D " --exclude '- $_' "; }    =
=20
> >dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt $usr_exclude  ${model}::replicator/usr/.=20
> >$destdir/usr/. 2>&1");
> >
> >Interesting in how many different way a list can be passed to rsync. Is
> >there a matter for the different ways? I have somewhere heard about a
> >maximum length of the command line. Do you know how long a command line
> >can be?


> >$dryrun or -d "$destdir/var/." or mkdir "$destdir/var",0755 or die "cann=
ot=20
> >make $destdir/var";;
> >dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt  --include '+ */' --exclude '- *'=20
> >${model}::replicator/var/. $destdir/var/.");
> >foreach (@var_include) {
> >dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt ${model}::replicator/var/$_/ $destdir/var/$_=
=20
> >2>&1");
> >}
> >
> >For what is the "+" and the "-" sign in the [ei][xn]clude-rules? Is ist
> >perl-syntax or parsed by rsync?

Can you enlight this ?



> >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> >4) Correct "repli-update" and/or call it with other params
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------

> >- What do you think about a @change_hostname list with files in which
> > the name of the model should be replaced with the name of the target
> > host. This can be implemented in repli-update or the example
> > repli-postint.
> I don't understand.

After repli-install there are some files in which the name of the model
must be replaced with the name of the targed. eg:
	/etc/hostname
        /etc/hosts
        /etc/logcheck/ignore.d/local (in my setup)
        /etc/mailname
        /etc/motd
        /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf
I think it is nice to have a list to put such files in to let
replicator do the replacing (e.g. using seed).
I want files like /etc/logcheck/ingore.d/local and
/etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf updated during repli-sync. So the names must
replaced often.



> >- The config files replicator.conf and update_rules are not copied to
> > the target during repli-install bacause of the default
> > @shlash_exclude list. If we need them for repli.sync we should remove
> > /etc/replicator from this list.
> I did notice this too.

Because /etc/replicator in the modell contains only the following files
I feel it is save to remove them from #slash_exclude

bilbo:/etc/replicator# ls -l
insgesamt 32
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         6661 21. Sep 19:28 replicator.conf
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          684 21. Sep 19:32 repli-postinst
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root           94 26. Aug 12:03 repli-sync.conf
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          215 20. Aug 17:14 rsyncd.conf
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         1780 26. Aug 11:17 update_rules


> >- More ideas ?
> Yes, a lot.
> Sadly, I don't have access today to the machine were my replicator has=20
> been modified. I cannot tell much more today, and probably this week.

I like to hear.


Regards,
Bernd

Re: [Replicator-users] A look in "repli-update"

[Jerome W. <jwa...@bx...>]

Before anything else, tell me which version you are currently using.


Bernd Harmsen wrote:

>Hello Jerome,
>
>On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 09:04:28PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
>  
>
>>>At first I feel, that there is less concept or less (detailed)
>>>      
>>>
>>You do not mean "less", but "not much".
>>    
>>
>
>Ok, my english is not the best.
>  
>
You don't have to apologize, I probably make other mistakes.
I just wanted you to know so that you learn something.
:-)

>>I can help documenting the whole lot, but starting with repli-sync and 
>>repli-update is a good idea, as I'll have to use them soon also, and 
>>have recently put an eye on them.
>>    
>>
>
>Ok, lets start with repli-update.
>  
>
Ok, as it is the next tool I'll have to use.

>>Sadly, I'm not someone who makes things by itself, I always need a reason.
>>The maintainers are good-willing, off course, but have other things to 
>>do right now, as I understood.
>>    
>>
>
>Ok, I hope, that there is at leat a bit more of dokumentation
>afterwards, to make it easier for other people to work on or use
>replicator.
>  
>
Replicator is truly a cool tool, working surprisingly well... when you 
are able to fix the big bugs you find in it.
Hopefully, we will fix those very soon.

>>>What do you think the next step should be?
>>>      
>>>
>>We should contact each other and discuss (on IRC) about the code (I know 
>>it enough to reply to common questions).
>>    
>>
>
>I have never used IRC and I'm not shure if I will like it. I like using
>a dictionarie wenn writing english texts and this slow down my
>typespeed very much.
>
>  
>
Well, let's forget it then.

>I, think we should do the following things next. (No matter, how we
>communicate). I already started a bit.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>1) Write a short overview of how "repli-update" should work.
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>1. root-filesystem without @slash_exclude
>It replicates the root (/) filesystem except for what is mentioned in
>@slash_exclude. If you use cfengine, replicator parses
>/etc/cfengine/cfengine.conf and does not copy files handled by cfengine
>copying facility. 
>
>2. /usr-directory without @usr_exclude
>It replicates the /usr directory (not the filesystem) except for what
>is mentioned in @usr_exclude. Be aware that it may cross filesytems to
>acheive this.
>
>3. /var structure and files mentioned in @var_include 
>It replicates the directories structure of /var (only directories, no
>files). It replicates the contents of the /var subdirectories mentioned
>in @var_include.
>
>This meschanism should be the same, no matter if repli-update is called
>from repli-install or repli-sync
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>2) Write a list of the Param "repli-update" understands and what they
>should do.
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Because the first replication is working for me with repli-install but
>not with repli-sync, and repli-sync uses other params to call
>repli-update then repli-install, maybe there is a fault.
>
>Correct me if I'm wrong, please.
>
>--model <masterdir>
>  Name of the Modell host, e.g. DNS-Name. No directory.
>  
>
Ok, but you can also use an ip address, I think.

>--destdir
>  Directorie-tree which content should be synchroniced with the model.
>  During repli-sync this should be "/"
>  
>
Ok

>--real
>  Sets the variable $dryrun to "", else ist is $dryrun="--dry-run"
>  which is an option to rsync.
>
>--dev
>  Sets the variable $withdev=1 (true). This adds the string "/dev" to
>  the list @slash_exclude bevor syncing the root-filesystem.
>
>--nousr
>  Sets the variable $nousr=1 (true). (Default is 0 ?????). This
>  completly skips the replication of the /usr-directory.
>
>--cfengine
>  Sets variable $cfengine=1 (true). Bevor the sync of / the config from
>  cfengine is copied from the model. Using the local cfengine all files
>  handled by this tool are extracted and added to the list @slash_exclude
>
>--noboot
>  Sets $noboot=1 and skips a separately rsync for the /boot-directory.
>  This rsync-run is necessary if /boot is as usual a own partition,
>  because repli-update only syncs the root-filesystem, not the
>  directory. (/boot is in the default @slash_exclude list to.)
>
>-e
>  Get the cfengine configuration from the model using ssh and scp
>  instead of rsh and rcp.
>
>--exclude
>  Adds the argument to the @slash_exclude list.
>
>--usr_exclude
>  Adds the armunet to the @usr_exclude list.
>  
>--config
>  Additional reads the given file. Can be used to set additional
>  variables and override settings in /etc/replicator/replicator.conf,
>  which is alway loaded first by repli-common.
>
>
>repli-install calls:
>repli-update --config $confile $ssh_opt --dev $rupdate_dry $netcopy_exclude --model $model --destdir $installtarget
>But I don't know, what is in the variables at that time.
>
>
>repli-sync calls:
>$share_dir_on_server/repli-update --destdir / --model $model --config $confile @ARGV
>$confile is "/etc/replicator/repli-sync" on the replicated host and
>$model ist taken from that file.
>
>Why these calls behave different ?
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>3) Take a deeper look in the code of "repli-update" and understand
>what is doing what.
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>rsync is startet with different params during repli-update. I don't
>understand some things, maybe because of my perl knowledge. Can you
>help me ?
>
>
>dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt ${model}::replicator/boot/ $destdir/boot/. 2>&1");
>Clear.
>
>
>$excludefile = "/tmp/excl.rsync.$$";
>$fh = new FileHandle $excludefile,"w" or die "opening exclude file:$!\n";;
>foreach (@slash_exclude) { print $fh "- $_\n"; }
>$fh->close;  
>dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt --one-file-system --exclude-from=$excludefile ${model}::replicator/ $destdir 2>&1");
>
>The content of the list @slash_exclude is written to a file, line by
>line. But for what is the "-" in { print $fh "- $_\n"; } ?
>
>
>my $usr_exclude = '';
>foreach (@usr_exclude) { $usr_exclude .= " --exclude '- $_' "; }     
>dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt $usr_exclude  ${model}::replicator/usr/. $destdir/usr/. 2>&1");
>
>Interesting in how many different way a list can be passed to rsync. Is
>there a matter for the different ways? I have somewhere heard about a
>maximum length of the command line. Do you know how long a command line
>can be?
>
>
>$dryrun or -d "$destdir/var/." or mkdir "$destdir/var",0755 or die "cannot make $destdir/var";;
>dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt  --include '+ */' --exclude '- *' ${model}::replicator/var/. $destdir/var/.");
>foreach (@var_include) {
>dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt ${model}::replicator/var/$_/ $destdir/var/$_ 2>&1");
>}
>
>For what is the "+" and the "-" sign in the [ei][xn]clude-rules? Is ist
>perl-syntax or parsed by rsync?
>
>
>What more?
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>4) Correct "repli-update" and/or call it with other params
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>- Do you have write access to the CVS-repository?
>  
>
No, I don't, but we may ask, and I'll probably get it.

>- What do you think about a @change_hostname list with files in which
>  the name of the model should be replaced with the name of the target
>  host. This can be implemented in repli-update or the example
>  repli-postint.
>  
>
I don't understand.

>- The config files replicator.conf and update_rules are not copied to
>  the target during repli-install bacause of the default
>  @shlash_exclude list. If we need them for repli.sync we should remove
>  /etc/replicator from this list.
>  
>
I did notice this too.

>  
>- More ideas ?
>  
>
Yes, a lot.
Sadly, I don't have access today to the machine were my replicator has 
been modified. I cannot tell much more today, and probably this week.

>  
>Enough for today.
>What du you think about that?
>  
>
Tell me the exact version you are using before anything else.

>Regards,
>Bernd
>  
>

[Replicator-users] A look in "repli-update"

[Bernd H. <bj...@da...>]

Hello Jerome,

On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 09:04:28PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> >At first I feel, that there is less concept or less (detailed)
> You do not mean "less", but "not much".

Ok, my english is not the best.

> I can help documenting the whole lot, but starting with repli-sync and=20
> repli-update is a good idea, as I'll have to use them soon also, and=20
> have recently put an eye on them.

Ok, lets start with repli-update.

> Sadly, I'm not someone who makes things by itself, I always need a reason.
> The maintainers are good-willing, off course, but have other things to=20
> do right now, as I understood.

Ok, I hope, that there is at leat a bit more of dokumentation
afterwards, to make it easier for other people to work on or use
replicator.


> >What do you think the next step should be?
> We should contact each other and discuss (on IRC) about the code (I know=
=20
> it enough to reply to common questions).

I have never used IRC and I'm not shure if I will like it. I like using
a dictionarie wenn writing english texts and this slow down my
typespeed very much.


I, think we should do the following things next. (No matter, how we
communicate). I already started a bit.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
1) Write a short overview of how "repli-update" should work.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

1. root-filesystem without @slash_exclude
It replicates the root (/) filesystem except for what is mentioned in
@slash_exclude. If you use cfengine, replicator parses
/etc/cfengine/cfengine.conf and does not copy files handled by cfengine
copying facility.=20

2. /usr-directory without @usr_exclude
It replicates the /usr directory (not the filesystem) except for what
is mentioned in @usr_exclude. Be aware that it may cross filesytems to
acheive this.

3. /var structure and files mentioned in @var_include=20
It replicates the directories structure of /var (only directories, no
files). It replicates the contents of the /var subdirectories mentioned
in @var_include.

This meschanism should be the same, no matter if repli-update is called
from repli-install or repli-sync


--------------------------------------------------------------------
2) Write a list of the Param "repli-update" understands and what they
should do.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Because the first replication is working for me with repli-install but
not with repli-sync, and repli-sync uses other params to call
repli-update then repli-install, maybe there is a fault.

Correct me if I'm wrong, please.

--model <masterdir>
  Name of the Modell host, e.g. DNS-Name. No directory.

--destdir
  Directorie-tree which content should be synchroniced with the model.
  During repli-sync this should be "/"

--real
  Sets the variable $dryrun to "", else ist is $dryrun=3D"--dry-run"
  which is an option to rsync.

--dev
  Sets the variable $withdev=3D1 (true). This adds the string "/dev" to
  the list @slash_exclude bevor syncing the root-filesystem.

--nousr
  Sets the variable $nousr=3D1 (true). (Default is 0 ?????). This
  completly skips the replication of the /usr-directory.

--cfengine
  Sets variable $cfengine=3D1 (true). Bevor the sync of / the config from
  cfengine is copied from the model. Using the local cfengine all files
  handled by this tool are extracted and added to the list @slash_exclude

--noboot
  Sets $noboot=3D1 and skips a separately rsync for the /boot-directory.
  This rsync-run is necessary if /boot is as usual a own partition,
  because repli-update only syncs the root-filesystem, not the
  directory. (/boot is in the default @slash_exclude list to.)

-e
  Get the cfengine configuration from the model using ssh and scp
  instead of rsh and rcp.

--exclude
  Adds the argument to the @slash_exclude list.

--usr_exclude
  Adds the armunet to the @usr_exclude list.
 =20
--config
  Additional reads the given file. Can be used to set additional
  variables and override settings in /etc/replicator/replicator.conf,
  which is alway loaded first by repli-common.


repli-install calls:
repli-update --config $confile $ssh_opt --dev $rupdate_dry $netcopy_exclude=
 --model $model --destdir $installtarget
But I don't know, what is in the variables at that time.


repli-sync calls:
$share_dir_on_server/repli-update --destdir / --model $model --config $conf=
ile @ARGV
$confile is "/etc/replicator/repli-sync" on the replicated host and
$model ist taken from that file.

Why these calls behave different ?


--------------------------------------------------------------------
3) Take a deeper look in the code of "repli-update" and understand
what is doing what.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

rsync is startet with different params during repli-update. I don't
understand some things, maybe because of my perl knowledge. Can you
help me ?


dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt ${model}::replicator/boot/ $destdir/boot/. 2>&1");
Clear.


$excludefile =3D "/tmp/excl.rsync.$$";
$fh =3D new FileHandle $excludefile,"w" or die "opening exclude file:$!\n";;
foreach (@slash_exclude) { print $fh "- $_\n"; }
$fh->close; =20
dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt --one-file-system --exclude-from=3D$excludefile $=
{model}::replicator/ $destdir 2>&1");

The content of the list @slash_exclude is written to a file, line by
line. But for what is the "-" in { print $fh "- $_\n"; } ?


my $usr_exclude =3D '';
foreach (@usr_exclude) { $usr_exclude .=3D " --exclude '- $_' "; }    =20
dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt $usr_exclude  ${model}::replicator/usr/. $destdir=
/usr/. 2>&1");

Interesting in how many different way a list can be passed to rsync. Is
there a matter for the different ways? I have somewhere heard about a
maximum length of the command line. Do you know how long a command line
can be?


$dryrun or -d "$destdir/var/." or mkdir "$destdir/var",0755 or die "cannot =
make $destdir/var";;
dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt  --include '+ */' --exclude '- *' ${model}::repli=
cator/var/. $destdir/var/.");
foreach (@var_include) {
dosystem("rsync $rsyncopt ${model}::replicator/var/$_/ $destdir/var/$_ 2>&1=
");
}

For what is the "+" and the "-" sign in the [ei][xn]clude-rules? Is ist
perl-syntax or parsed by rsync?


What more?



--------------------------------------------------------------------
4) Correct "repli-update" and/or call it with other params
--------------------------------------------------------------------

- Do you have write access to the CVS-repository?

- What do you think about a @change_hostname list with files in which
  the name of the model should be replaced with the name of the target
  host. This can be implemented in repli-update or the example
  repli-postint.
 =20
- The config files replicator.conf and update_rules are not copied to
  the target during repli-install bacause of the default
  @shlash_exclude list. If we need them for repli.sync we should remove
  /etc/replicator from this list.
 =20
- More ideas ?
 =20
 =20
Enough for today.
What du you think about that?

Regards,
Bernd