Menu
▾
▴
rails-devel — List for discussion of Rails development
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(84) |
Apr
(76) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(50) |
Oct
(46) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(76) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(33) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(131) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(6) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(40) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(58) |
Nov
|
Dec
(10) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(50) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
|
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(64) |
Nov
(115) |
Dec
(47) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(30) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(132) |
Dec
(93) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(266) |
Feb
(120) |
Mar
(168) |
Apr
(127) |
May
(83) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(77) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(48) |
Feb
(81) |
Mar
(198) |
Apr
(174) |
May
(72) |
Jun
(101) |
Jul
(236) |
Aug
(144) |
Sep
(54) |
Oct
(132) |
Nov
(94) |
Dec
(111) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(135) |
Feb
(166) |
Mar
(86) |
Apr
(85) |
May
(137) |
Jun
(83) |
Jul
(54) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(37) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
|
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(23) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(63) |
Mar
(43) |
Apr
(60) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(36) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(30) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(63) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(11) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(6) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(10) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(9) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Michael A. <out...@gm...> - 2014-03-15 19:18:10
|
StartRound or StartCompany? You asked about StartCompany_1880, which I believe is used in StockRound_1880... and I don't recall writing that myself - you are sure that wasn't you Martin? :) Mike On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Stefan Frey <ste...@we...> wrote: > Ok I believe I understand now, however I wonder how the new classes are > backwards compatible with the old actions. Maybe Mike can give me a hint? > > > "Dr. Martin Brumm" <dr....@t-...> wrote: >> >> The function was replaced by Startround_sequential and >> Startround_investor_1880 startround_privates_1880 by Mike >> >> >> Von Samsung Mobile gesendet >> >> >> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- >> Von: Stefan Frey >> Datum:15.03.2014 14:27 (GMT+01:00) >> An: "Development list for Rails: an 18xx game" >> Betreff: Re: [Rails-devel] Progress of 1880 integration to Rails 2.0 and >> question on StartCompany_1880 >> >> Follow up question: How was the functionality of StartCompany_1880 >> replaced in the current version? Are your save files still loadable in >> 1.8.7? >> Thanks, >> Stefan >> >> >> "Dr. Martin Brumm" <dr....@t-...> wrote: >>> >>> StartComany_1880 is never used. The Use in save Files is an Artefact >>> from old versions. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Von Samsung-Tablet gesendet >>> >>> >>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- >>> Von: Stefan Frey >>> Datum:15.03.2014 11:37 (GMT+01:00) >>> An: "Development list for Rails: an 18xx game" >>> Betreff: [Rails-devel] Progress of 1880 integration to Rails 2.0 and >>> question on StartCompany_1880 >>> >>> Martin & Mike: >>> I have done further steps to integrate 1880 into the rails 2.0 branch. >>> The current state is in branch sfy_1880, which was updated today. >>> I will write more details what have been changed later this weekend. >>> >>> However I realized something strange: >>> >>> How do you use StartCompany_1880: There is no call to one of the >>> constructors of that action. And actions are never created dynamically, >>> as far as I know. >>> >>> And in fact the game engine only creates StartCompany actions. However >>> in Martins save file examples there are StartCompany_1880 actions >>> included. This does not work in Rails 2.0, as the check if the players >>> only execute allowed actions is active. And it checks that the actions >>> are of the same class. >>> >>> Could shed some light on this? I had a quick glance on your rails1.8.x >>> branch and it seems that there is neither a call to the constructors. >>> However in Rails 1.x the test if actions are allowed was never active. >>> >>> Thanks for your help, >>> Stefan >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book >>> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and >>> their >>> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, >>> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Rails-devel mailing list >>> Rai...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is >>> the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written >>> by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now >>> available. Download your free book today! >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech_______________________________________________Rails-devel mailing list >>> Rai...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is >> the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written >> by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now >> available. Download your free book today! >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech_______________________________________________Rails-devel mailing list >> Rai...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their > applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, > this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > > |
|
From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2014-03-15 19:11:02
|
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>Ok I believe I understand now, however I wonder how the new classes are backwards compatible with the old actions. Maybe Mike can give me a hint? <br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">"Dr. Martin Brumm" <dr....@t-...> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
The function was replaced by Startround_sequential and Startround_investor_1880 startround_privates_1880 by Mike
</div>
<div>
<br/>
</div>
<div>
<br/>
</div>
<div>
<div style="font-size: 9.0px;color: rgb(87,87,87);">
Von Samsung Mobile gesendet
</div>
</div>
<br/>
<br/>
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------<br/>
Von: Stefan Frey<br/>
Datum:15.03.2014 14:27 (GMT+01:00)<br/>
An: "Development list for Rails: an 18xx game"<br/>
Betreff: Re: [Rails-devel] Progress of 1880 integration to Rails 2.0 and question on StartCompany_1880<br/>
<br/>
Follow up question: How was the functionality of StartCompany_1880 replaced in the current version? Are your save files still loadable in 1.8.7?<br/>
Thanks,<br/>
Stefan<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<div class="gmail_quote">
"Dr. Martin Brumm" <dr....@t-...> wrote:
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0.0pt 0.0pt 0.0pt 0.8ex;border-left: 1.0px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left: 1.0ex;">
<div>
StartComany_1880 is never used. The Use in save Files is an Artefact from old versions.
</div>
<div>
<br/>
</div>
<div>
<br/>
</div>
<div>
<br/>
</div>
<div>
<br/>
</div>
<div>
<div style="font-size: 100.0%;">
Von Samsung-Tablet gesendet
</div>
</div>
<br/>
<br/>
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------<br/>
Von: Stefan Frey<br/>
Datum:15.03.2014 11:37 (GMT+01:00)<br/>
An: "Development list for Rails: an 18xx game"<br/>
Betreff: [Rails-devel] Progress of 1880 integration to Rails 2.0 and question on StartCompany_1880<br/>
<br/>
Martin & Mike:<br/>
I have done further steps to integrate 1880 into the rails 2.0 branch.<br/>
The current state is in branch sfy_1880, which was updated today.<br/>
I will write more details what have been changed later this weekend.<br/>
<br/>
However I realized something strange:<br/>
<br/>
How do you use StartCompany_1880: There is no call to one of the<br/>
constructors of that action. And actions are never created dynamically,<br/>
as far as I know.<br/>
<br/>
And in fact the game engine only creates StartCompany actions. However<br/>
in Martins save file examples there are StartCompany_1880 actions<br/>
included. This does not work in Rails 2.0, as the check if the players<br/>
only execute allowed actions is active. And it checks that the actions<br/>
are of the same class.<br/>
<br/>
Could shed some light on this? I had a quick glance on your rails1.8.x<br/>
branch and it seems that there is neither a call to the constructors.<br/>
However in Rails 1.x the test if actions are allowed was never active.<br/>
<br/>
Thanks for your help,<br/>
Stefan<br/>
<br/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br/>
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book<br/>
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their<br/>
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,<br/>
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!<br/>
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech<br/>
_______________________________________________<br/>
Rails-devel mailing list<br/>
Rai...@li...<br/>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel<br/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech_______________________________________________ Rails-devel mailing list Rai...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel
</blockquote>
</div>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech_______________________________________________ Rails-devel mailing list Rai...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel
</blockquote></div></body>
</html>
|
|
From: brett l. <bre...@gm...> - 2014-03-15 15:22:19
|
Done. ---Brett. On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Michael Alexander <out...@gm... > wrote: > Can I get edit permission as well? > > Mike > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:38 PM, brett lentz <bre...@gm...>wrote: > >> I see you have a wiki account already. I've made it an editor. You can >> now edit the wiki. :) >> >> ---Brett. >> >> >> ---Brett. >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:52 PM, John David Galt < >> jd...@di...> wrote: >> >>> How do I get permission to edit the wiki? >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT >>> organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance >>> affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into >>> your >>> Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of >>> AppDynamics Pro! >>> >>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Rails-devel mailing list >>> Rai...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT >> organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance >> affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your >> Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics >> Pro! >> >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails-devel mailing list >> Rai...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their > applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, > this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > > |
|
From: Dr. M. B. <dr....@t-...> - 2014-03-15 13:49:25
|
The function was replaced by Startround_sequential and Startround_investor_1880 startround_privates_1880 by Mike Von Samsung Mobile gesendet -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: Stefan Frey <ste...@we...> Datum:15.03.2014 14:27 (GMT+01:00) An: "Development list for Rails: an 18xx game" <rai...@li...> Betreff: Re: [Rails-devel] Progress of 1880 integration to Rails 2.0 and question on StartCompany_1880 Follow up question: How was the functionality of StartCompany_1880 replaced in the current version? Are your save files still loadable in 1.8.7? Thanks, Stefan "Dr. Martin Brumm" <dr....@t-...> wrote: StartComany_1880 is never used. The Use in save Files is an Artefact from old versions. Von Samsung-Tablet gesendet -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: Stefan Frey Datum:15.03.2014 11:37 (GMT+01:00) An: "Development list for Rails: an 18xx game" Betreff: [Rails-devel] Progress of 1880 integration to Rails 2.0 and question on StartCompany_1880 Martin & Mike: I have done further steps to integrate 1880 into the rails 2.0 branch. The current state is in branch sfy_1880, which was updated today. I will write more details what have been changed later this weekend. However I realized something strange: How do you use StartCompany_1880: There is no call to one of the constructors of that action. And actions are never created dynamically, as far as I know. And in fact the game engine only creates StartCompany actions. However in Martins save file examples there are StartCompany_1880 actions included. This does not work in Rails 2.0, as the check if the players only execute allowed actions is active. And it checks that the actions are of the same class. Could shed some light on this? I had a quick glance on your rails1.8.x branch and it seems that there is neither a call to the constructors. However in Rails 1.x the test if actions are allowed was never active. Thanks for your help, Stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech _______________________________________________ Rails-devel mailing list Rai...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech_______________________________________________ Rails-devel mailing list Rai...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel |
|
From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2014-03-15 13:27:34
|
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>Follow up question: How was the functionality of StartCompany_1880 replaced in the current version? Are your save files still loadable in 1.8.7?<br>
Thanks, <br>
Stefan<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">"Dr. Martin Brumm" <dr....@t-...> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
StartComany_1880 is never used. The Use in save Files is an Artefact from old versions.
</div>
<div>
<br/>
</div>
<div>
<br/>
</div>
<div>
<br/>
</div>
<div>
<br/>
</div>
<div>
<div style="font-size: 100.0%;">
Von Samsung-Tablet gesendet
</div>
</div>
<br/>
<br/>
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------<br/>
Von: Stefan Frey<br/>
Datum:15.03.2014 11:37 (GMT+01:00)<br/>
An: "Development list for Rails: an 18xx game"<br/>
Betreff: [Rails-devel] Progress of 1880 integration to Rails 2.0 and question on StartCompany_1880<br/>
<br/>
Martin & Mike:<br/>
I have done further steps to integrate 1880 into the rails 2.0 branch.<br/>
The current state is in branch sfy_1880, which was updated today.<br/>
I will write more details what have been changed later this weekend.<br/>
<br/>
However I realized something strange:<br/>
<br/>
How do you use StartCompany_1880: There is no call to one of the<br/>
constructors of that action. And actions are never created dynamically,<br/>
as far as I know.<br/>
<br/>
And in fact the game engine only creates StartCompany actions. However<br/>
in Martins save file examples there are StartCompany_1880 actions<br/>
included. This does not work in Rails 2.0, as the check if the players<br/>
only execute allowed actions is active. And it checks that the actions<br/>
are of the same class.<br/>
<br/>
Could shed some light on this? I had a quick glance on your rails1.8.x<br/>
branch and it seems that there is neither a call to the constructors.<br/>
However in Rails 1.x the test if actions are allowed was never active.<br/>
<br/>
Thanks for your help,<br/>
Stefan<br/>
<br/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br/>
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book<br/>
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their<br/>
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,<br/>
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!<br/>
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech<br/>
_______________________________________________<br/>
Rails-devel mailing list<br/>
Rai...@li...<br/>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel<br/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech_______________________________________________ Rails-devel mailing list Rai...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel
</blockquote></div></body>
</html>
|
|
From: Dr. M. B. <dr....@t-...> - 2014-03-15 12:22:00
|
StartComany_1880 is never used. The Use in save Files is an Artefact from old versions. Von Samsung-Tablet gesendet -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: Stefan Frey <ste...@we...> Datum:15.03.2014 11:37 (GMT+01:00) An: "Development list for Rails: an 18xx game" <rai...@li...> Betreff: [Rails-devel] Progress of 1880 integration to Rails 2.0 and question on StartCompany_1880 Martin & Mike: I have done further steps to integrate 1880 into the rails 2.0 branch. The current state is in branch sfy_1880, which was updated today. I will write more details what have been changed later this weekend. However I realized something strange: How do you use StartCompany_1880: There is no call to one of the constructors of that action. And actions are never created dynamically, as far as I know. And in fact the game engine only creates StartCompany actions. However in Martins save file examples there are StartCompany_1880 actions included. This does not work in Rails 2.0, as the check if the players only execute allowed actions is active. And it checks that the actions are of the same class. Could shed some light on this? I had a quick glance on your rails1.8.x branch and it seems that there is neither a call to the constructors. However in Rails 1.x the test if actions are allowed was never active. Thanks for your help, Stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech _______________________________________________ Rails-devel mailing list Rai...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel |
|
From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2014-03-15 10:37:15
|
Martin & Mike: I have done further steps to integrate 1880 into the rails 2.0 branch. The current state is in branch sfy_1880, which was updated today. I will write more details what have been changed later this weekend. However I realized something strange: How do you use StartCompany_1880: There is no call to one of the constructors of that action. And actions are never created dynamically, as far as I know. And in fact the game engine only creates StartCompany actions. However in Martins save file examples there are StartCompany_1880 actions included. This does not work in Rails 2.0, as the check if the players only execute allowed actions is active. And it checks that the actions are of the same class. Could shed some light on this? I had a quick glance on your rails1.8.x branch and it seems that there is neither a call to the constructors. However in Rails 1.x the test if actions are allowed was never active. Thanks for your help, Stefan |
|
From: Michael A. <out...@gm...> - 2014-03-15 03:04:35
|
Can I get edit permission as well? Mike On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:38 PM, brett lentz <bre...@gm...> wrote: > I see you have a wiki account already. I've made it an editor. You can now > edit the wiki. :) > > ---Brett. > > > ---Brett. > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:52 PM, John David Galt < > jd...@di...> wrote: > >> How do I get permission to edit the wiki? >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT >> organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance >> affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your >> Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics >> Pro! >> >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails-devel mailing list >> Rai...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics > Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > > |
|
From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2014-03-13 09:16:41
|
Again thanks for your detailed report. That is really helpful. Seems that all of them are easy to fix, so they should be closed in the next alpha release. I will add a list of open and closed bugs to the webpage for the next release to allow tracking which are still open and which I believe should be fixed. Stefan On 03/09/2014 08:30 PM, John David Galt wrote: > I've gotten a 4-player game of 1830 to run, but noticed these new > behaviors. > > * The "privates" line of the Game Status window is blank. Players do > get income for their privates and companies can buy them, but you can't > see who owns them. > > * Once a company does buy a private, it's also not shown as owning it. > Both the Game Status and Map windows have spaces for the purpose, and > both are left blank, at least initially. > > * When buying a share from the bank pool, this dialog comes up: > > Buy a 10% share of B&O from PortfolioModel for $82? > > * I can set "unlimited diesels" in the options screen, but the display > of future trains still says D(6), not D(+). > > * The next OR after my company has bought in privates, the names are > filled in on the Map window, but not the Status window. But at this > point, the only button not grayed out on the Map window is Buy Privates, > so the game can't continue. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. > With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. > Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the > freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > |
|
From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2014-03-13 09:07:18
|
Thanks for the report Justin, you are right that has to be fixed in Rails. Please be aware that 18TN is not frequently played, so please be careful to check if everything works fine. Especially those little details that are different to 1830 might not work as the rules claim. I would be happy to receive your save file after game end to add it to our sample of automated game tests. Stefan Details: Actually I realized that the rules for private company selling in 18TN are a little more complicated: Paragraph 4.2.6 in the current rules version, there two options to purchase a private company: * In the first OR each major may buy ONE private for face value. (A subtle question is if a short OR during the initial auction phase would be treated as the first OR with respect to this rule). * Otherwise after the first 3 train is purchased for 0.5 times face < price < 1.5 times value Thus the multiplier has to be changed and the first exception have to be added. I will fix those issues in Rails 2.0, however I doubt that it will be backported to Rails 1.x? On 03/10/2014 07:25 PM, Justin Rebelo wrote: > Sorry if this is known, but I checked the wiki and searched the ML and > did not see it listed. > > Currently, rails is allowing privates to be purchased for up to 200% of > face value but the correct limit should be 150% (after phase 3 has begun). > > Justin > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their > applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, > this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rails-users mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > |
|
From: John D. G. <jd...@di...> - 2014-03-09 19:30:55
|
I've gotten a 4-player game of 1830 to run, but noticed these new behaviors. * The "privates" line of the Game Status window is blank. Players do get income for their privates and companies can buy them, but you can't see who owns them. * Once a company does buy a private, it's also not shown as owning it. Both the Game Status and Map windows have spaces for the purpose, and both are left blank, at least initially. * When buying a share from the bank pool, this dialog comes up: Buy a 10% share of B&O from PortfolioModel for $82? * I can set "unlimited diesels" in the options screen, but the display of future trains still says D(6), not D(+). * The next OR after my company has bought in privates, the names are filled in on the Map window, but not the Status window. But at this point, the only button not grayed out on the Map window is Buy Privates, so the game can't continue. |
|
From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2014-03-09 17:53:42
|
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>Thanks for this and all the 1880 save games.<br>
I will add those to the automated tests.<br>
Stefan <br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Martin Brumm <dr....@t-...> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Stefan et al.<br/>
<br/>
Actions Taken,<br/>
<br/>
rails1.7.12_1880-> rails1.8.x<br/>
rails_2_develop_1880->mbr_rails_2_develop_1880<br/>
specific_1824->mbr_specific_1824<br/>
specific_1837->mbr_specific_1837<br/>
specific_1880->mbr_specific_1880<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Regards,<br/>
Martin<br/>
<br/>
Am 08.03.2014 13:35, schrieb Stefan Frey:<br/>
> I would like to clean up the names of the branches in the repo a little<br/>
> bit. I believe it is important to know, who is the owner of a (shared)<br/>
> feature branch and which are the official branches.<br/>
><br/>
> The remote branches are:<br/>
><br/>
> * 2.0 (prefix with owner)<br/>
> * 2.0_develop (prefix with owner)<br/>
><br/>
> master (keep, 1.x master branch)<br/>
> rails1.5.x (remove)<br/>
> rails1.6.x (remove)<br/>
> rails1.7.12_1880 (rename to rails1.8.x?)<br/>
> rails1.7.x (keep as official)<br/>
><br/>
> rails_2_develop (keep as official)<br/>
> * rails_2_develop_1880 (prefix with owner martin)<br/>
><br/>
> sfy_1880 (keep as mine current 1880 branch)<br/>
> sfy_token_algo (keep as mine current token/tile algo branch)<br/>
><br/>
> * specific_1824 (prefix with owner)<br/>
> * specific_1830_2nd (prefix with owner)<br/>
> * specific_1837 (prefix with owner)<br/>
> * specific_1880 (prefix with owner)<br/>
><br/>
> All with a star (*) above need some action from the owner to prefix with<br/>
> a good and short owner abbreviation (mine is sfy).<br/>
><br/>
> It should still be the case that we merge changes with the main branches<br/>
> (either rails1.8.x or rails_2_develop) early to avoid diverging branches<br/>
> for specific games.<br/>
><br/>
> Stefan<br/>
><br/>
> ***<br/>
> A good explanation to rename a git branch both locally and remote is<br/>
> given here:<br/>
><br/>
><a href="http://www.benjaminlhaas.com/blog/locally-and-remotely-renaming-branch-git" target="_blank"> http://www.benjaminlhaas.com/blog/locally-and-remotely-renaming-branch-git</a><br/>
><br/>
> In short:<br/>
> 1. rename locally,<br/>
> 2. delete the remote one with the old name<br/>
> 3. create a remote one with the new name.<br/>
><br/>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br/>
> Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.<br/>
> With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.<br/>
> Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the<br/>
> freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.<br/>
><a href="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk" target="_blank"> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk</a><br/>
> _______________________________________________<br/>
> Rails-devel mailing list<br/>
> Rai...@li...<br/>
><a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel" target="_blank"> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel</a><br/>
<br/>
<br/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br/>
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.<br/>
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.<br/>
Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the<br/>
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.<br/>
<a href="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________" target="_blank">http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________</a><br/>
Rails-devel mailing list<br/>
Rai...@li...<br/>
<a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel</a><br/>
</blockquote></div></body>
</html>
|
|
From: Martin B. <dr....@t-...> - 2014-03-09 16:44:02
|
Hi Stefan et al. Actions Taken, rails1.7.12_1880-> rails1.8.x rails_2_develop_1880->mbr_rails_2_develop_1880 specific_1824->mbr_specific_1824 specific_1837->mbr_specific_1837 specific_1880->mbr_specific_1880 Regards, Martin Am 08.03.2014 13:35, schrieb Stefan Frey: > I would like to clean up the names of the branches in the repo a little > bit. I believe it is important to know, who is the owner of a (shared) > feature branch and which are the official branches. > > The remote branches are: > > * 2.0 (prefix with owner) > * 2.0_develop (prefix with owner) > > master (keep, 1.x master branch) > rails1.5.x (remove) > rails1.6.x (remove) > rails1.7.12_1880 (rename to rails1.8.x?) > rails1.7.x (keep as official) > > rails_2_develop (keep as official) > * rails_2_develop_1880 (prefix with owner martin) > > sfy_1880 (keep as mine current 1880 branch) > sfy_token_algo (keep as mine current token/tile algo branch) > > * specific_1824 (prefix with owner) > * specific_1830_2nd (prefix with owner) > * specific_1837 (prefix with owner) > * specific_1880 (prefix with owner) > > All with a star (*) above need some action from the owner to prefix with > a good and short owner abbreviation (mine is sfy). > > It should still be the case that we merge changes with the main branches > (either rails1.8.x or rails_2_develop) early to avoid diverging branches > for specific games. > > Stefan > > *** > A good explanation to rename a git branch both locally and remote is > given here: > > http://www.benjaminlhaas.com/blog/locally-and-remotely-renaming-branch-git > > In short: > 1. rename locally, > 2. delete the remote one with the old name > 3. create a remote one with the new name. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. > With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. > Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the > freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel |
|
From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2014-03-08 16:50:11
|
To give the others an indication where to expect further changes in the code base in preparation of Rails 2.0 release: Currently: * Get the 1880 code running with 2.0 (with full undo functionality). * Refactor everything around StartRound (StartPacket, StartItems etc.) * Reenable special tile and token lays in the UI Up-Next: * Prepare a modular/factory based approach to create Round objects. * Move from serialization to a xml representation for save files. * Remove the current svg library (batik) and replace it by something less heavyweight, include some rewrite of the the Map drawing. * Prepare a more structure approach of the UI classes, similar to what we have for the engine classes: Both a hierarchical tree structure of the components, an improved separation for MVC. If anyone has further questions, what my plans are, please ask. Questions: * Could someone please supply me with some 1880 save files? * Is anyone interested in providing svg files for the company tokens to add those to the Rails map? Stefan |
|
From: James R. <rom...@gm...> - 2014-03-08 14:43:32
|
Thank you, Stefan. Jim On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Stefan Frey <ste...@we...> wrote: > Hi Jim, > yes it is possible to pass the rails file as a command-line option: > > The java jar command looks like the following: > java -jar rails-1.7.12.jar 1830.rails > > rails.bat and rails.sh are only wrappers around this command: > > Content of rails.bat e.g. is: > "java -jar rails-1.7.12.jar %1" > > So the first argument after rails.bat or rails.sh is given to Rails and > starts that save file. > > For Rails 2.0: > In the current Rails 2.0 alpha 4 release this does not work, as I > refactored game loading. However this is fixed now in rails_2_develop > branch. So this will be possible with the next alpha again. > > Stefan > > On 03/08/2014 03:38 AM, James Romano wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > I still like to see how you do this. > > > > I guess the real question is whether it's possible to pass the save file > > name into Rails when via the java command, somehow. > > > > Jim > > > > > > On 2/10/2014 2:00 PM, Tom McCorry wrote: > >> I can send when I am home this evening. > >> Sent via BlackBerry > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> *From: * James Romano <rom...@gm...> > >> *Date: *Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:58:46 -0600 > >> *To: *<tom...@gm...>; Development list for Rails: an 18xx > >> game<rai...@li...> > >> *Subject: *Re: [Rails-devel] double-clicking to run? > >> > >> Hi Tom, > >> > >> I could associate the .rails type to the .bat file that runs rails via > >> the java command. I think I could also set it up so that > >> double-clicking on the .rails file passes the save file (.rails file) > >> name to the .bat file and so that the .bat file would then pass the > >> the save file name into the java command somehow. Does the java > >> command allow such an argument, would it be passed along to Rails in a > >> sensible way, and would Rails interpret it as a save file to load? I > >> take it from your success that your answers to all those questions are > >> "yes." > >> > >> Could you share the java command used in your batch file so that I may > >> see how the file name argument should be passed along? > >> > >> Jim > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Tom McCorry <tom...@gm... > >> <mailto:tom...@gm...>> wrote: > >> > >> I have a batch file I use with Windows that I associate with the > >> .rails file type. This allows me to double-click on a .rails file > >> no matter what directory it resides in and have the Rails program > >> autostart. > >> > >> Sent via BlackBerry > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: James Romano <rom...@gm... > >> <mailto:rom...@gm...>> > >> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:33:26 > >> To: Development list for Rails: an 18xx > >> game<rai...@li... > >> <mailto:rai...@li...>> > >> Reply-To: "Development list for Rails: an 18xx game" > >> <rai...@li... > >> <mailto:rai...@li...>> > >> Subject: [Rails-devel] double-clicking to run? > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> Androi apps run on BlackBerry 10 > >> Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps. > >> Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more. > >> Get your Android app in front of a whole new audience. Start now. > >> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=124407151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> Androi apps run on BlackBerry 10 > >> Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps. > >> Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more. > >> Get your Android app in front of a whole new audience. Start now. > >> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=124407151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Rails-devel mailing list > >> Rai...@li... > >> <mailto:Rai...@li...> > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to > Perforce. > > With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. > > Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization > and the > > freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails-devel mailing list > > Rai...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to > Perforce. > With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. > Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and > the > freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > |
|
From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2014-03-08 12:35:40
|
I would like to clean up the names of the branches in the repo a little bit. I believe it is important to know, who is the owner of a (shared) feature branch and which are the official branches. The remote branches are: * 2.0 (prefix with owner) * 2.0_develop (prefix with owner) master (keep, 1.x master branch) rails1.5.x (remove) rails1.6.x (remove) rails1.7.12_1880 (rename to rails1.8.x?) rails1.7.x (keep as official) rails_2_develop (keep as official) * rails_2_develop_1880 (prefix with owner martin) sfy_1880 (keep as mine current 1880 branch) sfy_token_algo (keep as mine current token/tile algo branch) * specific_1824 (prefix with owner) * specific_1830_2nd (prefix with owner) * specific_1837 (prefix with owner) * specific_1880 (prefix with owner) All with a star (*) above need some action from the owner to prefix with a good and short owner abbreviation (mine is sfy). It should still be the case that we merge changes with the main branches (either rails1.8.x or rails_2_develop) early to avoid diverging branches for specific games. Stefan *** A good explanation to rename a git branch both locally and remote is given here: http://www.benjaminlhaas.com/blog/locally-and-remotely-renaming-branch-git In short: 1. rename locally, 2. delete the remote one with the old name 3. create a remote one with the new name. |
|
From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2014-03-08 12:12:25
|
Hi Jim, yes it is possible to pass the rails file as a command-line option: The java jar command looks like the following: java -jar rails-1.7.12.jar 1830.rails rails.bat and rails.sh are only wrappers around this command: Content of rails.bat e.g. is: "java -jar rails-1.7.12.jar %1" So the first argument after rails.bat or rails.sh is given to Rails and starts that save file. For Rails 2.0: In the current Rails 2.0 alpha 4 release this does not work, as I refactored game loading. However this is fixed now in rails_2_develop branch. So this will be possible with the next alpha again. Stefan On 03/08/2014 03:38 AM, James Romano wrote: > Hi Tom, > > I still like to see how you do this. > > I guess the real question is whether it's possible to pass the save file > name into Rails when via the java command, somehow. > > Jim > > > On 2/10/2014 2:00 PM, Tom McCorry wrote: >> I can send when I am home this evening. >> Sent via BlackBerry >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: * James Romano <rom...@gm...> >> *Date: *Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:58:46 -0600 >> *To: *<tom...@gm...>; Development list for Rails: an 18xx >> game<rai...@li...> >> *Subject: *Re: [Rails-devel] double-clicking to run? >> >> Hi Tom, >> >> I could associate the .rails type to the .bat file that runs rails via >> the java command. I think I could also set it up so that >> double-clicking on the .rails file passes the save file (.rails file) >> name to the .bat file and so that the .bat file would then pass the >> the save file name into the java command somehow. Does the java >> command allow such an argument, would it be passed along to Rails in a >> sensible way, and would Rails interpret it as a save file to load? I >> take it from your success that your answers to all those questions are >> "yes." >> >> Could you share the java command used in your batch file so that I may >> see how the file name argument should be passed along? >> >> Jim >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Tom McCorry <tom...@gm... >> <mailto:tom...@gm...>> wrote: >> >> I have a batch file I use with Windows that I associate with the >> .rails file type. This allows me to double-click on a .rails file >> no matter what directory it resides in and have the Rails program >> autostart. >> >> Sent via BlackBerry >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: James Romano <rom...@gm... >> <mailto:rom...@gm...>> >> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:33:26 >> To: Development list for Rails: an 18xx >> game<rai...@li... >> <mailto:rai...@li...>> >> Reply-To: "Development list for Rails: an 18xx game" >> <rai...@li... >> <mailto:rai...@li...>> >> Subject: [Rails-devel] double-clicking to run? >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Androi apps run on BlackBerry 10 >> Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps. >> Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more. >> Get your Android app in front of a whole new audience. Start now. >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=124407151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Androi apps run on BlackBerry 10 >> Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps. >> Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more. >> Get your Android app in front of a whole new audience. Start now. >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=124407151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails-devel mailing list >> Rai...@li... >> <mailto:Rai...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. > With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. > Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the > freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > |
|
From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2014-03-08 10:53:19
|
Thanks for your feedback. Laying the home tile on a blank hex is the "most basic special" case of tile laying and as such not yet fully supported yet by the UI. Should be fixed in the next alpha. However the OBB special tile is two fold: First it is the tile lay power, then the non-standard condition for closing the OBB. The first will be covered after rewriting the UI for special tile lays (you are right, this is one of the cases where there is no need to ask the owner if he wants to execute the power of the private). However there are other cases where it is necessary (either because closure of the private depends on execution and/or other effects depend on the execution). Will be included in one of the next alphas. The second case will be an application of a trigger effect, thus there is the need to monitor the two hexes and as soon as both are built, OBB has to close. This separate from the tile laying UI and will be done by the game engine. However as there is already a workaround for this (Close private in special menu) it will not be added very soon. On 03/07/2014 04:38 AM, John David Galt wrote: > On 2014-03-06 12:52, I wrote: >> I started this game to discover if the OBB tile-lay issues in 1.7.12 >> had been fixed, but I didn't get that far. > > I tried to resume this game from the save file and discovered it hangs. > > I should probably describe those OBB issues, too, because I haven't seen > them discussed here and someone will ask. > > (1) In 1.7.12, a major company whose president owns the OBB is > absolutely not allowed to lay tiles on both of the OBB locations in a > single turn. > > The comments in the code show that the author knew this was wrong, but > was making a quick-fix. But the rule should be, the OBB's *power* > cannot be used to lay tiles on both those locations in a single turn. > > The player ought to be allowed to lay them both in one turn, though, > if at least one of them is connected to a token of the major company, > so that the OBB's power doesn't have to be used for both. (There's no > need to ask the player whether he intends to use the OBB's power -- > just make sure that at least one of the tiles would have been a legal > play without the OBB, and then make only one of them give him an > "extra" tile lay.) > > (2) The OBB is supposed to close -- automatically and unconditionally > -- whenever both of its hexes have tiles on them. It doesn't matter > who lays the tiles, much less whether or not OBB's power was used to > lay them. In 1.7.12 this does not seem to happen unless OBB's power > was used. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. > With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. > Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the > freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > |
|
From: James R. <rom...@gm...> - 2014-03-08 02:39:02
|
Hi Tom, I still like to see how you do this. I guess the real question is whether it's possible to pass the save file name into Rails when via the java command, somehow. Jim On 2/10/2014 2:00 PM, Tom McCorry wrote: > I can send when I am home this evening. > Sent via BlackBerry > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From: * James Romano <rom...@gm...> > *Date: *Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:58:46 -0600 > *To: *<tom...@gm...>; Development list for Rails: an 18xx > game<rai...@li...> > *Subject: *Re: [Rails-devel] double-clicking to run? > > Hi Tom, > > I could associate the .rails type to the .bat file that runs rails via > the java command. I think I could also set it up so that > double-clicking on the .rails file passes the save file (.rails file) > name to the .bat file and so that the .bat file would then pass the > the save file name into the java command somehow. Does the java > command allow such an argument, would it be passed along to Rails in a > sensible way, and would Rails interpret it as a save file to load? I > take it from your success that your answers to all those questions are > "yes." > > Could you share the java command used in your batch file so that I may > see how the file name argument should be passed along? > > Jim > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Tom McCorry <tom...@gm... > <mailto:tom...@gm...>> wrote: > > I have a batch file I use with Windows that I associate with the > .rails file type. This allows me to double-click on a .rails file > no matter what directory it resides in and have the Rails program > autostart. > > Sent via BlackBerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: James Romano <rom...@gm... > <mailto:rom...@gm...>> > Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:33:26 > To: Development list for Rails: an 18xx > game<rai...@li... > <mailto:rai...@li...>> > Reply-To: "Development list for Rails: an 18xx game" > <rai...@li... > <mailto:rai...@li...>> > Subject: [Rails-devel] double-clicking to run? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Androi apps run on BlackBerry 10 > Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps. > Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more. > Get your Android app in front of a whole new audience. Start now. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=124407151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Androi apps run on BlackBerry 10 > Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps. > Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more. > Get your Android app in front of a whole new audience. Start now. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=124407151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Rails-devel mailing list > Rai...@li... > <mailto:Rai...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel > > |
|
From: John D. G. <jd...@di...> - 2014-03-07 03:38:42
|
On 2014-03-06 12:52, I wrote: > I started this game to discover if the OBB tile-lay issues in 1.7.12 > had been fixed, but I didn't get that far. I tried to resume this game from the save file and discovered it hangs. I should probably describe those OBB issues, too, because I haven't seen them discussed here and someone will ask. (1) In 1.7.12, a major company whose president owns the OBB is absolutely not allowed to lay tiles on both of the OBB locations in a single turn. The comments in the code show that the author knew this was wrong, but was making a quick-fix. But the rule should be, the OBB's *power* cannot be used to lay tiles on both those locations in a single turn. The player ought to be allowed to lay them both in one turn, though, if at least one of them is connected to a token of the major company, so that the OBB's power doesn't have to be used for both. (There's no need to ask the player whether he intends to use the OBB's power -- just make sure that at least one of the tiles would have been a legal play without the OBB, and then make only one of them give him an "extra" tile lay.) (2) The OBB is supposed to close -- automatically and unconditionally -- whenever both of its hexes have tiles on them. It doesn't matter who lays the tiles, much less whether or not OBB's power was used to lay them. In 1.7.12 this does not seem to happen unless OBB's power was used. |
|
From: John D. G. <jd...@di...> - 2014-03-06 20:52:27
|
I started this game to discover if the OBB tile-lay issues in 1.7.12 had been fixed, but I didn't get that far. |
|
From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2014-03-06 14:15:29
|
Another alpha release for Rails 2.0! Webstart the alpha release: http://rails.sf.net/webstart/rails.jnlp Or download a single jar and start it directly (by double-click or command line "java -jar" command). https://sourceforge.net/projects/rails/files/Rails/2.0/ It adds improved token lay functionality. The support for the standard cases of tile and token lay should be complete now. For the first time Rails now only allows valid tile and token lays. Caveats: => However special tile and token lays are not supported yet. => Map Correction mode currently deactivated. Major Bug-fixes: => Fixed bug in game saving, which prevented loading saved files generated by Rails 2.0. => Moved up to library logback 1.1.1, fixed logging errors on computers with names that include white-space characters. |
|
From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2014-03-06 10:10:07
|
I have added the .gitattributes to rails_2_develop and normalized the repo. Please check if everything still works fine with your settings after you pull rails_2_develop. Stefan On 10/14/2013 08:03 AM, Stefan Frey wrote: > Sorry for replying so late, I took me some time to understand how git > is working exactly. And as it is usual for difficult problems, there > are legacy issues involved, in this case it is an legacy issue of git > to solve a legacy issue of text files ;-) > > Best explanation I found was: > http://adaptivepatchwork.com/2012/03/01/mind-the-end-of-your-line/ > > Best stackoverflow entry (which points to the article above) > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/170961/whats-the-best-crlf-handling-strategy-with-git > > > Best template for of .gitattributes for a java repo: > https://github.com/Danimoth/gitattributes/blob/master/Java.gitattributes > > And the man page for gitattributes is very instructive as well. > > So for me it seems best way to solve that for future problems to add a > .gitattributes file similar to the java template above to the repo and > then commit the normalization to the repo. This has to be done once by > one user of the repo. > > I would to do this change, as soon as I have the "go ahead" command > from at least Erik and Brett. > > Stefan > > PS: > A) Interesting detail is the the best answer and the best article > still differ in best practice for including a default line in > .gitattributes: > > # Auto detect text files and perform LF normalization > * text=auto > > Article discourages such a strategy (see bottom paragraph), however > Stackoverflow answer example includes it: > > B) It seems that git normalizes to LF internally always. What you get > on checkout from the repo (or more precisely from your local copy of > the git object database) depends first on the setting of "eol" in > .gitattributes (if specified) and then on the local core.autocrlf > definition of the user. > > Thus in our scenario we would have LF internally, but still converting > to CRLF for the windows users. > > > > On 10/06/2013 05:16 PM, brett lentz wrote: >> The issue is that we want line endings to be consistent in the >> repository, regardless of platform. >> >> Text=auto just sets all of the line endings to whatever your platform is >> using. >> >> See the documentation on the core.autocrlf and core.safecrlf config >> options: >> https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-config.html >> >> Basically, we just need to agree whether LF or CRLF will be the >> "standard" for the repository, and ensure the repository is configured >> to auto-convert in the correct direction when committing and pushing >> changes. >> >> ---Brett. >> >> >> ---Brett. >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Martin Brumm >> <dr....@t-... <mailto:dr....@t-...>> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Brett, >> >> i rather thought it should be >> * text=auto ? >> >> Rgrds, >> Martin >> >> Am 04.10.2013 15:32, schrieb brett lentz: >>> +1 from me. >>> >>> IMO, it should be: >>> >>> >>> text eol=lf >>> >>> >>> >>> ---Brett. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Martin Brumm >>> <dr....@t-... <mailto:dr....@t-...>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> i am running into repeated whitespace problems again and again. >>> >>> Please have a look at the following article and lets discuss >>> if that is >>> a valid way to avoid them in the future :) >>> >>> https://help.github.com/articles/dealing-with-line-endings >>> >>> Kind Regards, >>> Martin >>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> October Webinars: Code for Performance >> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. >> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the >> most from >> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and >> register > >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails-devel mailing list >> Rai...@li... >> <mailto:Rai...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> October Webinars: Code for Performance >> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. >> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the >> most from >> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and >> register > >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails-devel mailing list >> Rai...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel >> > |
|
From: Stefan F. <ste...@we...> - 2014-02-23 13:54:04
|
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>Thanks for reporting those issues.<br>
<br>
The undo problems most likely are caused by non-state dynamic variables. Replacing those by their stateful counterparts will solve that. <br>
I offer to change that in Rails 2.0. I am already taking care of that in my current rewrite of the StartRounds of 1880.<br>
<br>
I can also fix issue number 2. The other issues are best addressed by Martin or Michael?<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">PETER LINDHOLM <pt...@me...> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<span style="font-size: 13.0px;">1880 Rails Issues in 1.8.7 </span>
<div style="font-size: 13.0px;">
I posted about an earlier version, and some fixes were implemented, but these items are still “buggy” and should be fixed.
</div>
<div style="font-size: 13.0px;">
<ol>
<li>
Undos in Rails do not reset completely to the state prior to the previous action
</li>
<ol>
<li>
Most obvious is when a company is started then an undo is performed if the player changes their mind and wishes to start another company. The “Undone” company still takes a slot in the par slot table.
</li>
</ol>
<li>
Rails does not automatically add the +50 for the Russia to Vladivostok run.
</li>
<li>
Communist Phase (Begins when 1st four train is bought, ends when first 6 train is bought)
</li>
<ol>
<li>
Rails does not prevent the a Foreign Investor that still exists from operating (there should be no track lay, no earnings).
</li>
<li>
Rails does not freeze the stock market (stock values should not move from operations and/or stock sales)
</li>
<li>
Rails does not prevent directors from selling their company stock (directors cannot sell shares in companies they control)
</li>
</ol>
<li>
Occasionally Rails retires trains after the companies operate around to the last train purchaser but then does not go into the stock round but sticks on “Done” clicks in the operating round window and starts deleting trains.
</li>
<li>
Rails does not make the “special” two trains ($250, takes up train slot on company but does not count as a required train for the company) available after the first 6 train is bought.
</li>
</ol>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper.<a href="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________" target="_blank"> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________</a> Rails-devel mailing list Rai...@li...<a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel" target="_blank"> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-devel</a>
</blockquote></div></body>
</html>
|
|
From: Tom M. <tom...@gm...> - 2014-02-21 16:36:33
|
Pete, Are you sure you are running Rails 1.8.7? For example, items 3 and 5 listed below didn't appear to be a problem in our games running Rails 1.8.7. Tom From: PETER LINDHOLM [mailto:pt...@me...] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 5:38 AM To: rai...@li... Subject: [Rails-devel] Rails 18xx 1.8.7 issues for 1880 1880 Rails Issues in 1.8.7 I posted about an earlier version, and some fixes were implemented, but these items are still "buggy" and should be fixed. 1. Undos in Rails do not reset completely to the state prior to the previous action 1. Most obvious is when a company is started then an undo is performed if the player changes their mind and wishes to start another company. The "Undone" company still takes a slot in the par slot table. 2. Rails does not automatically add the +50 for the Russia to Vladivostok run. 3. Communist Phase (Begins when 1st four train is bought, ends when first 6 train is bought) 1. Rails does not prevent the a Foreign Investor that still exists from operating (there should be no track lay, no earnings). 2. Rails does not freeze the stock market (stock values should not move from operations and/or stock sales) 3. Rails does not prevent directors from selling their company stock (directors cannot sell shares in companies they control) 4. Occasionally Rails retires trains after the companies operate around to the last train purchaser but then does not go into the stock round but sticks on "Done" clicks in the operating round window and starts deleting trains. 5. Rails does not make the "special" two trains ($250, takes up train slot on company but does not count as a required train for the company) available after the first 6 train is bought. |
99 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
