quickfix-users — QuickFIX user support

[Quickfix-users] QuickFIX 1.4.1 .NET API

[Oren M. <ore...@ya...>]

Carlos Yee just informed me that the 1.4.1 release package is missing the .NET code.  I did the release this time using the Windows XP zip tool instead of winzip.  Shame on me, I did not validate the package.  It looks like the XP tool ignores directories that start with a "."

I've re-released the zip package using winzip.  It may take a little time for the new file to propogate to all the mirrors.  If you are not using .NET, you need not concern yourself with this.

--oren



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more

[Quickfix-users] QuickFIX 1.4.1

[Oren M. <ore...@ya...>]

QuickFIX 1.4.1 is now available here:
http://quickfix.thoughtworks.com/download.html

release notes are here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=151463

Mostly bug fixes and compilation fixes.  If you has
trouble getting 1.4.0 working, this one probably
addresses your problem.  Also a fix for repeating
groups is in this version.

Experimental feature for displaying C++ call stack
after a crash can also be optionally enabled.  This
adds overhead and should be enabled if you are
experiencing a strange crash and need to know where it
is happening.  If your system provides you with a
coredump, you should compile with -g instead of using
this feature.

Most of the patches for this version came from various
contributors.  CONTRIBUTORS and THANKS files have been
added to the repository, acknowleding people who have
helped the project.  It isn't complete yet and I know
I'm missing several of you.


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com

RE: [Quickfix-users] Extending the Application interface

[Vamsi K. <Vam...@ib...>]

OnRun function..  when  does  it get invoked..

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Vamsi
Krishna
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 12:47 AM
To: 'Vamsi Krishna'; qui...@li...
Subject: RE: [Quickfix-users] Extending the Application interface

 

In other words, I need to include a facility to respond to an additional
set of events 

 

Where do I start looking for this?

 

-----Original Message-----
From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Vamsi
Krishna
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 11:14 PM
To: qui...@li...
Subject: [Quickfix-users] Extending the Application interface

 

Hi

I was trying  to extend the Application Interface (  abstract class ) in
Application .h and construct a derived class myApplication

I would like my Initiater and Acceptor to listen to certain commands on
the same port or different port for certain administrative messages (
proprietory)

Such as

==>  " Shutting down Acceptor after Trading Day"

==>  "Starting the initiator after receiving a proprietory "Good
Morning" message from Administrator  ( Starting here means that sending
a log on messages to specified server).

 

 

Can somebody give me whether its possible for Initiator or Acceptor to
listen on certain specific strings on the same port and/or different
port.

 

 

Thanks

 

Vamsi

RE: [Quickfix-users] Extending the Application interface

[Vamsi K. <Vam...@ib...>]

In other words, I need to include a facility to respond to an additional
set of events 

 

Where do I start looking for this?

 

-----Original Message-----
From: qui...@li...
[mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Vamsi
Krishna
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 11:14 PM
To: qui...@li...
Subject: [Quickfix-users] Extending the Application interface

 

Hi

I was trying  to extend the Application Interface (  abstract class ) in
Application .h and construct a derived class myApplication

I would like my Initiater and Acceptor to listen to certain commands on
the same port or different port for certain administrative messages (
proprietory)

Such as

==>  " Shutting down Acceptor after Trading Day"

==>  "Starting the initiator after receiving a proprietory "Good
Morning" message from Administrator  ( Starting here means that sending
a log on messages to specified server).

 

 

Can somebody give me whether its possible for Initiator or Acceptor to
listen on certain specific strings on the same port and/or different
port.

 

 

Thanks

 

Vamsi

[Quickfix-users] Extending the Application interface

[Vamsi K. <Vam...@ib...>]

Hi

I was trying  to extend the Application Interface (  abstract class ) in
Application .h and construct a derived class myApplication

I would like my Initiater and Acceptor to listen to certain commands on
the same port or different port for certain administrative messages (
proprietory)

Such as

==>  " Shutting down Acceptor after Trading Day"

==>  "Starting the initiator after receiving a proprietory "Good
Morning" message from Administrator  ( Starting here means that sending
a log on messages to specified server).

 

 

Can somebody give me whether its possible for Initiator or Acceptor to
listen on certain specific strings on the same port and/or different
port.

 

 

Thanks

 

Vamsi

Re: [Quickfix-users] install... unable to find jni.h

[Oren M. <ore...@ya...>]

Dave,
jni.h is part of the Java SDK.  Make sure you have it installed and the include and include\win32 paths under the home directory are in your include path.  See the quickfix java installation instructions for instructions on this:
http://quickfix.thoughtworks.com/documentation/install.html
 Dave <vog...@ya...> wrote:I'm getting the following error:

unable to find jni.h

I did a search and cannot find it in the
quickfix-1.4.0.zip
file either.

Any ideas?

Dave


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Quickfix-users mailing list
Qui...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more

[Quickfix-users] install... unable to find jni.h

[Dave <vog...@ya...>]

I'm getting the following error:

unable to find jni.h

I did a search and cannot find it in the
quickfix-1.4.0.zip
file either.

Any ideas?

Dave

Re: [Quickfix-users] QuickFix licensing

[<OM...@th...>]

You read the licence correctly, and there are in fact several products that
do this very thing.

--oren



                                                                                                                                                     
                      "Jo Janssens" <jo...@tr...>                                                                                                
                      Sent by:                               To:       qui...@li...                                          
                      qui...@li...ur        cc:       "Peter Krause" <kra...@ho...>                                       
                      ceforge.net                            Subject:  [Quickfix-users] QuickFix licensing                                           
                                                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                     
                      04/03/2003 01:12 PM                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                     




Hi,


We are thinking of using the QuickFix engine for our exchange connectivity


in a proprietary trading application. Although it seems pretty clear, I
would


like to verify that we would be able to sell any software we develop that
uses


the QuickFix engine and distribute it as part of that software, without
violating


your license agreement. We would, of course, provide all the notices of
acknowledgement


that are required in the license.





Thanks!


Jo Janssens


Telluride Asset Management

[Quickfix-users] QuickFix licensing

[Jo J. <jo...@tr...>]

Hi,
We are thinking of using the QuickFix engine for our exchange
connectivity
in a proprietary trading application. Although it seems pretty clear, I
would
like to verify that we would be able to sell any software we develop
that uses
the QuickFix engine and distribute it as part of that software, without
violating
your license agreement. We would, of course, provide all the notices of
acknowledgement
that are required in the license.
 
Thanks!
Jo Janssens
Telluride Asset Management

Re: [Quickfix-users] Loggin in

[<OM...@th...>]

Yes, that would be where you would do this.  However, as mentioned in an
earlier post, we have not implemented encryption.  What this means is that
we don't currently support fields that have a NUL or SOH character in them,
either of which could show up in an encypted byte array.  This has been on
our agenda for some time, but we have gotten very busy of late (a good
thing), and havn't put out an implementation yet.

--oren



                                                                                                                                                     
                      David Monheit                                                                                                                  
                      <dav...@ds...>          To:       "quickfix-users" <qui...@li...>                       
                      Sent by:                               cc:                                                                                     
                      qui...@li...ur        Subject:  [Quickfix-users] Loggin in                                                    
                      ceforge.net                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                     
                      03/20/2003 01:37 AM                                                                                                            
                      Please respond to david.monheit                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                     




Hi

The fix engine I am trying to connect to expects an encrypted password in
the
login message.  How would I go about inserting this tag before qf actually
sends it's message.  The docs seem to indicate that I have access to all
messages being sent out via the toAdmin and toApp callbacks.  Is this the
right place to do this?

Thanks
David

--
"Cuius testiculus habeas, habeas cardium et cerebellum" - Terry Pratchett


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink?
You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing.
What are you waiting for?
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en
_______________________________________________
Quickfix-users mailing list
Qui...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users

[Quickfix-users] Loggin in

[David M. <dav...@ds...>]

Hi

The fix engine I am trying to connect to expects an encrypted password in=
 the=20
login message.  How would I go about inserting this tag before qf actuall=
y=20
sends it's message.  The docs seem to indicate that I have access to all=20
messages being sent out via the toAdmin and toApp callbacks.  Is this the=
=20
right place to do this?

Thanks
David=20

--=20
"Cuius testiculus habeas, habeas cardium et cerebellum" - Terry Pratchett

[Quickfix-users] How to be logout initiator?

[Mike S. <ms...@yo...>]

I can't see how one can initiate a logout sequence.  To try to fix this I
put a method in the Session that calls the generateLogout() method.  This
seems to work part of the time, but it seems there is an internal race
condition in which the engine thinks it is a logout acceptor even though it
initiated to logout sequence.  Anyway does anyone know how to act as the
logout initiator?
 
Mike Simon

RE: [Quickfix-users] A small bug ?

[Stancescu C. <Con...@sw...>]

What disturbs me is only the case where the connection is not
established because=20
now - creationTime > UTC_DAY
Note that in normal operation this should never happen, and that
a program will never be able to get out of it !=20
In facta reset(), as for session creation, could be even better then an
error message.
The case where now is outside session time but=20
now - creationTime <=3D UTC_DAY is OK as it is.=20

-----Original Message-----
From: OM...@th... [mailto:OM...@th...]
Sent: Samstag, 15. M=E4rz 2003 20:50
To: Stancescu Constantin
Cc: qui...@li...;
qui...@li...
Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] A small bug ?



Yup.  I wrote a test test case to expose this which looks like this.

// start time is greater than end time
start =3D UtcTimeOnly( 18, 0, 0 );
end =3D UtcTimeOnly( 3, 0, 0 );
...
// time 1 is 25 hours greater than time 2
time1 =3D UtcTimeStamp( 21, 0, 0, 11, 10, 2000 );
time2 =3D UtcTimeStamp( 20, 0, 0, 10, 10, 2000 );
assert( !Session::isSameSession( start, end, time1, time2 ) );

The old code failed this test while your submission passed.  The change =
has
been checked in,  thanks.

I'm not sure about your point concerning the call to connect.  The =
connect
method gets called frequently (everytime the reconect interval expires).
Are you saying that you want a report each time this method gets called =
for
every session that is not active?  Do you consider it an error condition
when it decides not to attempt connection because it is outside the =
session
parameters?

--oren



                                                                         =
                                                                         =
  =20
                      "Stancescu Constantin"                             =
                                                                         =
  =20
                      <Con...@sw...>         To:       =
<qui...@li...>                                   =
    =20
                      Sent by:                               cc:         =
                                                                         =
  =20
                      qui...@li...ur        Subject:  =
[Quickfix-users] A small bug ?                                           =
    =20
                      ceforge.net                                        =
                                                                         =
  =20
                                                                         =
                                                                         =
  =20
                                                                         =
                                                                         =
  =20
                      03/15/2003 07:58 AM                                =
                                                                         =
  =20
                                                                         =
                                                                         =
  =20
                                                                         =
                                                                         =
  =20




I think there is a small bug in Session::isSameSession.
If IsSessionTime() && start >=3D end
the function returns true even if
abs( time1Date - time2Date ) =3D=3D 1and
time1Date - time2Date  > UTC_DAY
which I think is not what you expect.
I changed the code to
bool Session::isSameSession( const UtcTimeOnly& start,
                             const UtcTimeOnly& end,
                             const UtcTimeStamp& time1,
                             const UtcTimeStamp& time2 )
{
  if ( !isSessionTime( start, end, time1 ) ) return false;
  if ( !isSessionTime( start, end, time2 ) ) return false;

  return (time1 - time2 <=3D UTC_DAY) ;
}

And something not very nice from the admin point of view.
Initiator::connect() calls Session::checkSessionTime and if the return
value
is false(this is in fact an error situation) there is no attempt to
connect
and no error reporting; it will be nice to be informed about such a
situation, i.e.
some admin message....
Regards,
Constantin

This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently
and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your
system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message.
You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print,
or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail
communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender, except where the message
states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the
views of the sender's company.




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
_______________________________________________
Quickfix-users mailing list
Qui...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users

Re: [Quickfix-users] A small bug ?

[<OM...@th...>]

Yup.  I wrote a test test case to expose this which looks like this.

// start time is greater than end time
start = UtcTimeOnly( 18, 0, 0 );
end = UtcTimeOnly( 3, 0, 0 );
...
// time 1 is 25 hours greater than time 2
time1 = UtcTimeStamp( 21, 0, 0, 11, 10, 2000 );
time2 = UtcTimeStamp( 20, 0, 0, 10, 10, 2000 );
assert( !Session::isSameSession( start, end, time1, time2 ) );

The old code failed this test while your submission passed.  The change has
been checked in,  thanks.

I'm not sure about your point concerning the call to connect.  The connect
method gets called frequently (everytime the reconect interval expires).
Are you saying that you want a report each time this method gets called for
every session that is not active?  Do you consider it an error condition
when it decides not to attempt connection because it is outside the session
parameters?

--oren



                                                                                                                                                     
                      "Stancescu Constantin"                                                                                                         
                      <Con...@sw...>         To:       <qui...@li...>                                        
                      Sent by:                               cc:                                                                                     
                      qui...@li...ur        Subject:  [Quickfix-users] A small bug ?                                                
                      ceforge.net                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                     
                      03/15/2003 07:58 AM                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                     




I think there is a small bug in Session::isSameSession.
If IsSessionTime() && start >= end
the function returns true even if
abs( time1Date - time2Date ) == 1and
time1Date - time2Date  > UTC_DAY
which I think is not what you expect.
I changed the code to
bool Session::isSameSession( const UtcTimeOnly& start,
                             const UtcTimeOnly& end,
                             const UtcTimeStamp& time1,
                             const UtcTimeStamp& time2 )
{
  if ( !isSessionTime( start, end, time1 ) ) return false;
  if ( !isSessionTime( start, end, time2 ) ) return false;

  return (time1 - time2 <= UTC_DAY) ;
}

And something not very nice from the admin point of view.
Initiator::connect() calls Session::checkSessionTime and if the return
value
is false(this is in fact an error situation) there is no attempt to
connect
and no error reporting; it will be nice to be informed about such a
situation, i.e.
some admin message....
Regards,
Constantin

This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently
and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your
system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message.
You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print,
or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail
communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender, except where the message
states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the
views of the sender's company.




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
_______________________________________________
Quickfix-users mailing list
Qui...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users

[Quickfix-users] A small bug ?

[Stancescu C. <Con...@sw...>]

I think there is a small bug in Session::isSameSession.
If IsSessionTime() && start >= end 
the function returns true even if
abs( time1Date - time2Date ) == 1and  
time1Date - time2Date  > UTC_DAY
which I think is not what you expect.
I changed the code to 
bool Session::isSameSession( const UtcTimeOnly& start,
                             const UtcTimeOnly& end,
                             const UtcTimeStamp& time1,
                             const UtcTimeStamp& time2 )
{
  if ( !isSessionTime( start, end, time1 ) ) return false;
  if ( !isSessionTime( start, end, time2 ) ) return false;

  return (time1 - time2 <= UTC_DAY) ;
}

And something not very nice from the admin point of view.
Initiator::connect() calls Session::checkSessionTime and if the return
value
is false(this is in fact an error situation) there is no attempt to
connect 
and no error reporting; it will be nice to be informed about such a
situation, i.e.
some admin message....

Regards,
Constantin

This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently
and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your
system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message.
You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print,
or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail
communications through their networks. Any views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender, except where the message
states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the
views of the sender's company. 

Re: [Quickfix-users] ExiryDate

[<OM...@th...>]

We currently don't provide a convertor for fields of type LocalMktDate, so
they are returned to you as a string.  You would have to convert this
yourself if you wanted to pull out the individual fields.  You can use
strptime (if you are using C++, use the appropriate date methods in Java or
.NET) to convert it to a tm struct.  We will be supplying more internal
convertors in the future.

--oren



                                                                                                                                                     
                      Jerry Westrick                                                                                                                 
                      <je...@we...>                   To:       qui...@li...                                          
                      Sent by:                               cc:                                                                                     
                      qui...@li...ur        Subject:  [Quickfix-users] ExiryDate                                                    
                      ceforge.net                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                     
                      03/14/2003 08:12 AM                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                     






Dear sirs:

Thanks you for your super software kit!

I've managed to develope with it.

But I got a problem I can't seem to resolve:

How do I access the sub-fields of the ExpiryDate field?


Jerry Westrick



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
_______________________________________________
Quickfix-users mailing list
Qui...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users

[Quickfix-users] ExiryDate

[Jerry W. <je...@we...>]

Dear sirs:

Thanks you for your super software kit!

I've managed to develope with it.

But I got a problem I can't seem to resolve:

How do I access the sub-fields of the ExpiryDate field?


Jerry Westrick

[Quickfix-users] Re: [Quickfix-developers] Version 1.4.0 available

[C J. <jav...@ce...>]

Oren-

A big thanks to you and the team at ThoughtWorks for making this a great
product!


Good job guys, looking forward to the next year!


-cedrick


On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 10:47, Oren Miller wrote:
> Version 1.4.0, is now available from
> http://quickfix.thoughtworks.com.
> 
> There were a lot of things done here, and I'm sure
> that some were missed even in the release notes.  But
> this release is most important to the following
> people.
> 
> 1) People wishing to use FIX 4.3: this is the first
> public release that supports this version of the
> protocol.
> 
> 2) Anyone using the JNI/Java layer: The Java API has
> been further stabalized and memory leaks were tracked
> down and removed.  Anyone use the JAVA api is strongly
> encouraged to upgrade. (special thanks to the guys at
> Aegis Software for providing test cases for these)
> 
> 3) Anyone wishing to use QuickFIX through VB.NET:
> Namespace clashes have been resolved.
> 
> Please also take note of the new XML data dictionary
> format.  You old data dictionaries are backwards
> compatible, however the new format doesn't require as
> much redundant information.
> 
> The full release notes are availble here:
> http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?group_id=37535&release_id=145058
> 
> On another note, March 1st was the 1st anniversary of
> the release of version 1.0.0.  The earliest major
> adopters we know of have been running QuickFIX in
> production for 9-10 months now.  Thanks to everyone
> who has supported this project.  It's success over the
> past year was exceeded all expectations.
> 
> --oren
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
> http://taxes.yahoo.com/
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfix-developers mailing list
> Qui...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-developers

[Quickfix-users] Version 1.4.0 available

[Oren M. <ore...@ya...>]

Version 1.4.0, is now available from
http://quickfix.thoughtworks.com.

There were a lot of things done here, and I'm sure
that some were missed even in the release notes.  But
this release is most important to the following
people.

1) People wishing to use FIX 4.3: this is the first
public release that supports this version of the
protocol.

2) Anyone using the JNI/Java layer: The Java API has
been further stabalized and memory leaks were tracked
down and removed.  Anyone use the JAVA api is strongly
encouraged to upgrade. (special thanks to the guys at
Aegis Software for providing test cases for these)

3) Anyone wishing to use QuickFIX through VB.NET:
Namespace clashes have been resolved.

Please also take note of the new XML data dictionary
format.  You old data dictionaries are backwards
compatible, however the new format doesn't require as
much redundant information.

The full release notes are availble here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?group_id=37535&release_id=145058

On another note, March 1st was the 1st anniversary of
the release of version 1.0.0.  The earliest major
adopters we know of have been running QuickFIX in
production for 9-10 months now.  Thanks to everyone
who has supported this project.  It's success over the
past year was exceeded all expectations.

--oren

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/

Re: [Quickfix-users] FIXML XML Schema - ( rather than DTD)

[<OM...@th...>]

What are you using to convert the schema.  I ran it through the perl script
dtd2xsd.pl (http://www.w3.org/2000/04/schema_hack/), and it looked like it
was processed ok.

I have talked to some of the people who would be responsible for putting
this together for fixprotocol.org, and from what I can tell they want to do
it but I do not believe they have started and it will probably be some time
until one comes out.  You may want to ask this question on one of their
discussion boards.

We do have our own markup language for defining the FIX protocol
(http://quickfix.thoughtworks.com/xml.html).  It isn't an XSD, but you
could probably write an xslt that would create one based on that document.

--oren



                                                                                                                                                     
                      "Warden, Anthony"                                                                                                              
                      <Aw...@le...>                   To:       "'qui...@li...'"                                      
                      Sent by:                                <qui...@li...>                                                 
                      qui...@li...ur        cc:                                                                                     
                      ceforge.net                            Subject:  [Quickfix-users] FIXML XML Schema - ( rather than DTD)                        
                                                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                     
                      02/20/2003 11:50 AM                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                     





Do you have an XML schema ( .xsd file) for any versions of FIX(ML)?

I can see DTD's on fixprotocol.org and talk of an XML schema - but can't
find one.....

I've tried generating XSD from the DTD for 4.3 but there are
errors.[Warden, Anthony] ...

I'm experimenting with JAXB  Java-XML data binding - in case you're
wondering what I'm up to  - or I would be if I could get a valid xml schema
to compile my code from.


thanks

Anthony



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient
of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This
communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded
as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial
product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official
statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information
is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All
information is subject to change without notice.

[Quickfix-users] FIXML XML Schema - ( rather than DTD)

[Warden, A. <Aw...@le...>]

 
Do you have an XML schema ( .xsd file) for any versions of FIX(ML)?
 
I can see DTD's on fixprotocol.org and talk of an XML schema - but can't
find one.....
 
I've tried generating XSD from the DTD for 4.3 but there are errors.[Warden,
Anthony] ... 
 
I'm experimenting with JAXB  Java-XML data binding - in case you're
wondering what I'm up to  - or I would be if I could get a valid xml schema
to compile my code from.
 
 
thanks
 
Anthony

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such.  All information is subject to change without notice.

[Quickfix-users] ASIAN FIX Conference 2003

[Asian F. <asi...@eu...>]

<html>
<head>
	<title>Asian Fix Conference 2003</title>
</head>

<body bgcolor="White">
<table border="0" width="600" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
	<tr>
		<td colspan="2"><img
src="http://www.asianfix2003.com/images/invitetop.gif" border="0"></td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td><a href="http://www.asianfix2003.com/"><img
src="http://www.asianfix2003.com/images/asianfixlogo.gif"
border="0"></a></td>
		<td align="center"><b><font face="Arial" size="4"><font color="Navy">The
Life Cycle of a Trade</font><br>
			<font color="Crimson"> - achieving a seamless front to back process
utilising FIX and STP</font>
			</font></b><br>
		<a href="http://www.asianfix2003.com/registration.asp"><img
src="http://www.asianfix2003.com/images/button.gif" border="0"></a></td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td colspan="2">
			<p><b><font face="Arial" size="2">The Asian Pacific FIX* (Financial
Information eXchange) 
			Committee will host the FIRST Asian FIX conference this March in Hong
Kong. This event 
			seeks to leverage the phenomenal success of the European FIX
conferences. Where buy and sell 
			side participants and vendor specialists, have explored the dynamic
world of electronic trading 
			and connectivity, to formulate solutions to the automated trading
challenge.</font></b></p>
			<p><b><font face="Arial" size="2">The one-day event features a series
of presentations, 
			panel discussions, working group and interactive voting covering the
general theme of the 
			past, present and future of trading technologies and technological
advancements.</font></b></p>
			<p><b><font face="Arial" size="2">The day will be brought to a close
with a cocktail evening, 
			giving you the opportunity to talk to everyone involved on the day.    
PLEASE REQUEST FOR AN INVITATION NOW!!!!</font></b></p>
			<p><b><font face="Arial" size="2"><i>More information is available at 
			<a href="http://www.asianfix2003.com">www.asianfix2003.com</a>. For
enquiries, please 
			contact Barbara Law via <a
href="mailto:bar...@eu...">bar...@eu...</a> 
			or at (852) 2810 6201.</i></font></b></p>
			<p align="right"><a href="http://www.fixprotocol.org/"><img
src="http://www.asianfix2003.com/images/fixprotocol.gif" border="0"></a>
		</td>
	</tr>
</table>


</body>
</html>

[Quickfix-users] any FIX test gateway available ? Archive link is dead

[Joe R. <jo...@ya...>]

Hello all,

I am new to this list and my firsst question is, if there is any (free) FIX
gateway to test my application.

I wanted to serach the archives for any infos on that, butthe archive link
on the webpage is broken !

Thanks for anyhelp

Joe Robe

[Quickfix-users] RE: Value missing from ExecInst in FIXxx.xml

[<OM...@th...>]

You can add it manually.  We will also update the parser so the value will
be included in future versions.

--oren



                                                                                                                                       
                      "El-Abid, Bassam"                                                                                                
                      <babid@sectordata        To:       "'OM...@th...'" <OM...@th...>, "El-Abid, Bassam"    
                      .com>                     <ba...@se...>                                                                 
                                               cc:       "'qui...@li...'"                                      
                      01/15/2003 10:58          <qui...@li...>, qui...@li...     
                      AM                       Subject:  RE: Value missing from ExecInst in FIXxx.xml                                  
                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                       




 So do I add the missing values manually or should I wait for a new
FIXxx.xml file from you?

 Thanks,

Bassam El-Abid
Software Engineer
Sector Data, LLC
222 Sutter Street, Suite 450
San Francisco, CA  94108
Main: 415.782.0454 x245
Fax:   415.782.0474
Mob:  415.652.2390
email:ba...@se...


-----Original Message-----
From: OM...@th... [mailto:OM...@th...]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 5:11 PM
To: ba...@se...
Cc: 'qui...@li...';
qui...@li...
Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] RE: Quickfix-users digest, Vol 1 #22 - 1 msg



It's possible that parser missed this.  This xml file is generated from the
FIX org's published HTML spec, which was done by hand.  Sometimes this
means
that certain parts of it were done a little differently which confuses the
parser.  The parser just needs to be made aware of that special case.
These
show up pretty rarely, but are found once in a while.

--oren




                      "El-Abid, Bassam"

                      <ba...@se...>                 To:
"'qui...@li...'"

                      Sent by:
<qui...@li...>

                      qui...@li...ur        cc:

                      ceforge.net                            Subject:
[Quickfix-users] RE: Quickfix-users digest, Vol 1 #22 - 1 msg





                      01/14/2003 04:41 PM









Hello,

In the FIX42.xml, FIX41.xml, and FIX40.xml, "P = Market peg" for tag
"ExcecInst" is missing. The value P was mentioned in
fix-42-with_errata_20010501.html for New Order
- Single.
FIXimate for 4.0, 4.1, and 4.2 on www.fixprotocol.org has "P = Market peg"
as a value for "ExcecInst".

Did anyone notice this? Are there any other values missing in the xml file?

Bassam


_____________________________________________________
Sector Data, LLC, is not affiliated with Sector, Inc., or SIAC

[Quickfix-users] RE: Value missing from ExecInst in FIXxx.xml

[El-Abid, B. <ba...@se...>]

 So do I add the missing values manually or should I wait for a new
FIXxx.xml file from you?

 Thanks,

Bassam El-Abid
Software Engineer
Sector Data, LLC
222 Sutter Street, Suite 450
San Francisco, CA  94108
Main: 415.782.0454 x245
Fax:   415.782.0474
Mob:  415.652.2390
email:ba...@se...


-----Original Message-----
From: OM...@th... [mailto:OM...@th...] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 5:11 PM
To: ba...@se...
Cc: 'qui...@li...';
qui...@li...
Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] RE: Quickfix-users digest, Vol 1 #22 - 1 msg



It's possible that parser missed this.  This xml file is generated from the
FIX org's published HTML spec, which was done by hand.  Sometimes this means
that certain parts of it were done a little differently which confuses the
parser.  The parser just needs to be made aware of that special case.  These
show up pretty rarely, but are found once in a while.

--oren


 

                      "El-Abid, Bassam"

                      <ba...@se...>                 To:
"'qui...@li...'"

                      Sent by:
<qui...@li...>

                      qui...@li...ur        cc:

                      ceforge.net                            Subject:
[Quickfix-users] RE: Quickfix-users digest, Vol 1 #22 - 1 msg

 

 

                      01/14/2003 04:41 PM

 

 





Hello,

In the FIX42.xml, FIX41.xml, and FIX40.xml, "P = Market peg" for tag
"ExcecInst" is missing. The value P was mentioned in
fix-42-with_errata_20010501.html for New Order
- Single.
FIXimate for 4.0, 4.1, and 4.2 on www.fixprotocol.org has "P = Market peg"
as a value for "ExcecInst".

Did anyone notice this? Are there any other values missing in the xml file?

Bassam


_____________________________________________________
Sector Data, LLC, is not affiliated with Sector, Inc., or SIAC