quickfix-users Mailing List for QuickFIX (Page 88)
Brought to you by:
orenmnero
Menu
▾
▴
quickfix-users — QuickFIX user support
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(63) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(33) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
|
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(54) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(43) |
Sep
(37) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(28) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(38) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(36) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(7) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
(7) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Oren M. <ore...@ya...> - 2003-05-12 21:39:54
|
That's a preview version. Try using the current stable release 1.6.8. SOL ZADEH <sol...@ya...> wrote:I'm running Ruby 1.8.0. Regards --- Oren Miller wrote: > Well, the test runner will report a syntax error > when it finds an unrecognized command in the test > script. Did something happen to your test scripts? > What version of ruby are you running? > SOL ZADEH wrote: > I've tried to carry out the test supplied with the > quickfix: > > runat.bat debug 12345 > But got many syntax errors such as below: > > name='definitions/server/fix40/7_ReceiveRejectMessage.def' > result='failure > ' > > > Syntax error > > 3 > > > > final error count is : > > > Any ideas ? > p.s. My intention is to use the quickfix for a buy > side client. > > Regards > Sol. > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > http://search.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, > 2003, Santa Clara > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux > enterprise solutions > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ Quickfix-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. |
|
From: SOL Z. <sol...@ya...> - 2003-05-12 21:11:38
|
I'm running Ruby 1.8.0. Regards --- Oren Miller <ore...@ya...> wrote: > Well, the test runner will report a syntax error > when it finds an unrecognized command in the test > script. Did something happen to your test scripts? > What version of ruby are you running? > SOL ZADEH <sol...@ya...> wrote: > I've tried to carry out the test supplied with the > quickfix: > > runat.bat debug 12345 > But got many syntax errors such as below: > > name='definitions/server/fix40/7_ReceiveRejectMessage.def' > result='failure > ' > > > Syntax error > > 3 > > > > final error count is : > > > Any ideas ? > p.s. My intention is to use the quickfix for a buy > side client. > > Regards > Sol. > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > http://search.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, > 2003, Santa Clara > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux > enterprise solutions > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com |
|
From: Oren M. <ore...@ya...> - 2003-05-12 20:23:42
|
You may need to get the latest DataDictionary.h and DataDictionary.cpp source files, they were patched to fix a problem with nested repeating groups. Do you know if your allocation messages have nested repeating groups? Jerry Westrick <je...@we...> wrote:I'm using the standard fix42.xml On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 17:23, OM...@th... wrote: > http://quickfix.thoughtworks.com/documentation/configuration.html > > Look at the DataDictionary setting. You need to supply a valid value in > that field. > > --oren > > > > > Jerry Westrick > Sent by: qui...@li... > 05/12/2003 10:08 AM > > > To: Oren Miller > cc: qui...@li... > Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] Allocation aren't received... > > > > Where can I find out more about this common problem? > > > On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 16:32, Oren Miller wrote: > > Looks like the common problem of not providing a DataDictionary. I > believe allocations have repeating groups which require one. Otherwise, > the message will appear corrupted and the session will go bad. This is > being made more obvious in the next release. --oren > > > > Jerry Westrick wrote:Thank you for your responce... > > > > first of, I'm receiving allocations, not sending (guess I wasn't clear > > about that) > > > > I've managed to reproduce this with breaks in the debugger... > > It Looks as if the error is in the field "BodyLength", but this > > is not yet confirmed. > > > > What is wrong, is that after catching the InvalidMessage error, > > further messages are not read! > > > > Of course, if the error is in physical length of the message, > > anything is possible.... > > > > Stay tuned... > > WOrking on it.... > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 14:57, Oren Miller wrote: > > > Where are you sending the allocation too. Are you sure the allocation > isn't causing the other side to stop responding for some reason? You say > it hangs but then you say that heartbeats are sent, so it sounds like your > process is still alive. Is everything back to normal when QF tries to > logon again? > > > > > > Jerry Westrick wrote:Dear Sirs: > > > > > > I've got a problem, with quickfix. > > > > > > I've got an Initiator program, > > > Everything works fine, till an Allocation is sent, > > > then the quickFix lib hangs, and does not receive any > > > more messages, (causing a HB timeout, 3 resends, then > > > a logout). In recovery, the Allocation is lost. > > > > > > Does anybody have an Idea of what I could be doing wrong? > > > > > > How can I confirm the version of QuickFix I'm using? > > > > > > I'm sure that I'm doing something wrong... > > > > > > any help appreceated > > > > > > Jerry Westrick > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara > > > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise > solutions > > > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Quickfix-users mailing list > > > Qui...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara > > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions > > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Quickfix-users mailing list > > Qui...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > > > --------------------------------- > > Do you Yahoo!? > > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ Quickfix-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. |
|
From: Oren M. <ore...@ya...> - 2003-05-12 20:21:47
|
Well, the test runner will report a syntax error when it finds an unrecognized command in the test script. Did something happen to your test scripts? What version of ruby are you running? SOL ZADEH <sol...@ya...> wrote: I've tried to carry out the test supplied with the quickfix: > runat.bat debug 12345 But got many syntax errors such as below: name='definitions/server/fix40/7_ReceiveRejectMessage.def' result='failure ' > Syntax error 3 final error count is : Any ideas ? p.s. My intention is to use the quickfix for a buy side client. Regards Sol. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ Quickfix-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. |
|
From: SOL Z. <sol...@ya...> - 2003-05-12 19:44:30
|
I've tried to carry out the test supplied with the
quickfix:
> runat.bat debug 12345
But got many syntax errors such as below:
</test>
<test
name='definitions/server/fix40/7_ReceiveRejectMessage.def'
result='failure
' >
<message>
Syntax error
<line>3</line>
</message>
</test>
final error count is :
<results total='202' failures='198'/>
Any ideas ?
p.s. My intention is to use the quickfix for a buy
side client.
Regards
Sol.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
|
|
From: Jerry W. <je...@we...> - 2003-05-12 17:00:33
|
I'm using the standard fix42.xml On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 17:23, OM...@th... wrote: > http://quickfix.thoughtworks.com/documentation/configuration.html > > Look at the DataDictionary setting. You need to supply a valid value in > that field. > > --oren > > > > > Jerry Westrick <je...@we...> > Sent by: qui...@li... > 05/12/2003 10:08 AM > > > To: Oren Miller <ore...@ya...> > cc: qui...@li... > Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] Allocation aren't received... > > > > Where can I find out more about this common problem? > > > On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 16:32, Oren Miller wrote: > > Looks like the common problem of not providing a DataDictionary. I > believe allocations have repeating groups which require one. Otherwise, > the message will appear corrupted and the session will go bad. This is > being made more obvious in the next release. --oren > > > > Jerry Westrick <je...@we...> wrote:Thank you for your responce... > > > > first of, I'm receiving allocations, not sending (guess I wasn't clear > > about that) > > > > I've managed to reproduce this with breaks in the debugger... > > It Looks as if the error is in the field "BodyLength", but this > > is not yet confirmed. > > > > What is wrong, is that after catching the InvalidMessage error, > > further messages are not read! > > > > Of course, if the error is in physical length of the message, > > anything is possible.... > > > > Stay tuned... > > WOrking on it.... > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 14:57, Oren Miller wrote: > > > Where are you sending the allocation too. Are you sure the allocation > isn't causing the other side to stop responding for some reason? You say > it hangs but then you say that heartbeats are sent, so it sounds like your > process is still alive. Is everything back to normal when QF tries to > logon again? > > > > > > Jerry Westrick wrote:Dear Sirs: > > > > > > I've got a problem, with quickfix. > > > > > > I've got an Initiator program, > > > Everything works fine, till an Allocation is sent, > > > then the quickFix lib hangs, and does not receive any > > > more messages, (causing a HB timeout, 3 resends, then > > > a logout). In recovery, the Allocation is lost. > > > > > > Does anybody have an Idea of what I could be doing wrong? > > > > > > How can I confirm the version of QuickFix I'm using? > > > > > > I'm sure that I'm doing something wrong... > > > > > > any help appreceated > > > > > > Jerry Westrick > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara > > > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise > solutions > > > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Quickfix-users mailing list > > > Qui...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara > > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions > > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Quickfix-users mailing list > > Qui...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > > > --------------------------------- > > Do you Yahoo!? > > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > |
|
From: <OM...@th...> - 2003-05-12 15:24:22
|
http://quickfix.thoughtworks.com/documentation/configuration.html Look at the DataDictionary setting. You need to supply a valid value in that field. --oren Jerry Westrick <je...@we...> Sent by: qui...@li... 05/12/2003 10:08 AM To: Oren Miller <ore...@ya...> cc: qui...@li... Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] Allocation aren't received... Where can I find out more about this common problem? On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 16:32, Oren Miller wrote: > Looks like the common problem of not providing a DataDictionary. I believe allocations have repeating groups which require one. Otherwise, the message will appear corrupted and the session will go bad. This is being made more obvious in the next release. --oren > > Jerry Westrick <je...@we...> wrote:Thank you for your responce... > > first of, I'm receiving allocations, not sending (guess I wasn't clear > about that) > > I've managed to reproduce this with breaks in the debugger... > It Looks as if the error is in the field "BodyLength", but this > is not yet confirmed. > > What is wrong, is that after catching the InvalidMessage error, > further messages are not read! > > Of course, if the error is in physical length of the message, > anything is possible.... > > Stay tuned... > WOrking on it.... > > > > On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 14:57, Oren Miller wrote: > > Where are you sending the allocation too. Are you sure the allocation isn't causing the other side to stop responding for some reason? You say it hangs but then you say that heartbeats are sent, so it sounds like your process is still alive. Is everything back to normal when QF tries to logon again? > > > > Jerry Westrick wrote:Dear Sirs: > > > > I've got a problem, with quickfix. > > > > I've got an Initiator program, > > Everything works fine, till an Allocation is sent, > > then the quickFix lib hangs, and does not receive any > > more messages, (causing a HB timeout, 3 resends, then > > a logout). In recovery, the Allocation is lost. > > > > Does anybody have an Idea of what I could be doing wrong? > > > > How can I confirm the version of QuickFix I'm using? > > > > I'm sure that I'm doing something wrong... > > > > any help appreceated > > > > Jerry Westrick > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara > > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions > > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Quickfix-users mailing list > > Qui...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > > > --------------------------------- > > Do you Yahoo!? > > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ Quickfix-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users |
|
From: Jerry W. <je...@we...> - 2003-05-12 15:06:03
|
Where can I find out more about this common problem? On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 16:32, Oren Miller wrote: > Looks like the common problem of not providing a DataDictionary. I believe allocations have repeating groups which require one. Otherwise, the message will appear corrupted and the session will go bad. This is being made more obvious in the next release. --oren > > Jerry Westrick <je...@we...> wrote:Thank you for your responce... > > first of, I'm receiving allocations, not sending (guess I wasn't clear > about that) > > I've managed to reproduce this with breaks in the debugger... > It Looks as if the error is in the field "BodyLength", but this > is not yet confirmed. > > What is wrong, is that after catching the InvalidMessage error, > further messages are not read! > > Of course, if the error is in physical length of the message, > anything is possible.... > > Stay tuned... > WOrking on it.... > > > > On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 14:57, Oren Miller wrote: > > Where are you sending the allocation too. Are you sure the allocation isn't causing the other side to stop responding for some reason? You say it hangs but then you say that heartbeats are sent, so it sounds like your process is still alive. Is everything back to normal when QF tries to logon again? > > > > Jerry Westrick wrote:Dear Sirs: > > > > I've got a problem, with quickfix. > > > > I've got an Initiator program, > > Everything works fine, till an Allocation is sent, > > then the quickFix lib hangs, and does not receive any > > more messages, (causing a HB timeout, 3 resends, then > > a logout). In recovery, the Allocation is lost. > > > > Does anybody have an Idea of what I could be doing wrong? > > > > How can I confirm the version of QuickFix I'm using? > > > > I'm sure that I'm doing something wrong... > > > > any help appreceated > > > > Jerry Westrick > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara > > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions > > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Quickfix-users mailing list > > Qui...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > > > --------------------------------- > > Do you Yahoo!? > > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. |
|
From: Jerry W. <je...@we...> - 2003-05-12 14:44:56
|
Aaaaahhhhh! Did I understand you correctly? each group must have at least one occurence? If it does not, does the messge not conform to FIX 4.2? or is it conform, but does not pass the parser? Jerry... On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 16:32, Oren Miller wrote: > Looks like the common problem of not providing a DataDictionary. I believe allocations have repeating groups which require one. Otherwise, the message will appear corrupted and the session will go bad. This is being made more obvious in the next release. --oren > > Jerry Westrick <je...@we...> wrote:Thank you for your responce... > > first of, I'm receiving allocations, not sending (guess I wasn't clear > about that) > > I've managed to reproduce this with breaks in the debugger... > It Looks as if the error is in the field "BodyLength", but this > is not yet confirmed. > > What is wrong, is that after catching the InvalidMessage error, > further messages are not read! > > Of course, if the error is in physical length of the message, > anything is possible.... > > Stay tuned... > WOrking on it.... > > > > On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 14:57, Oren Miller wrote: > > Where are you sending the allocation too. Are you sure the allocation isn't causing the other side to stop responding for some reason? You say it hangs but then you say that heartbeats are sent, so it sounds like your process is still alive. Is everything back to normal when QF tries to logon again? > > > > Jerry Westrick wrote:Dear Sirs: > > > > I've got a problem, with quickfix. > > > > I've got an Initiator program, > > Everything works fine, till an Allocation is sent, > > then the quickFix lib hangs, and does not receive any > > more messages, (causing a HB timeout, 3 resends, then > > a logout). In recovery, the Allocation is lost. > > > > Does anybody have an Idea of what I could be doing wrong? > > > > How can I confirm the version of QuickFix I'm using? > > > > I'm sure that I'm doing something wrong... > > > > any help appreceated > > > > Jerry Westrick > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara > > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions > > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Quickfix-users mailing list > > Qui...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > > > --------------------------------- > > Do you Yahoo!? > > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. |
|
From: Oren M. <ore...@ya...> - 2003-05-12 14:32:32
|
Looks like the common problem of not providing a DataDictionary. I believe allocations have repeating groups which require one. Otherwise, the message will appear corrupted and the session will go bad. This is being made more obvious in the next release. --oren Jerry Westrick <je...@we...> wrote:Thank you for your responce... first of, I'm receiving allocations, not sending (guess I wasn't clear about that) I've managed to reproduce this with breaks in the debugger... It Looks as if the error is in the field "BodyLength", but this is not yet confirmed. What is wrong, is that after catching the InvalidMessage error, further messages are not read! Of course, if the error is in physical length of the message, anything is possible.... Stay tuned... WOrking on it.... On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 14:57, Oren Miller wrote: > Where are you sending the allocation too. Are you sure the allocation isn't causing the other side to stop responding for some reason? You say it hangs but then you say that heartbeats are sent, so it sounds like your process is still alive. Is everything back to normal when QF tries to logon again? > > Jerry Westrick wrote:Dear Sirs: > > I've got a problem, with quickfix. > > I've got an Initiator program, > Everything works fine, till an Allocation is sent, > then the quickFix lib hangs, and does not receive any > more messages, (causing a HB timeout, 3 resends, then > a logout). In recovery, the Allocation is lost. > > Does anybody have an Idea of what I could be doing wrong? > > How can I confirm the version of QuickFix I'm using? > > I'm sure that I'm doing something wrong... > > any help appreceated > > Jerry Westrick > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ Quickfix-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. |
|
From: Jerry W. <je...@we...> - 2003-05-12 13:35:53
|
Thank you for your responce... first of, I'm receiving allocations, not sending (guess I wasn't clear about that) I've managed to reproduce this with breaks in the debugger... It Looks as if the error is in the field "BodyLength", but this is not yet confirmed. What is wrong, is that after catching the InvalidMessage error, further messages are not read! Of course, if the error is in physical length of the message, anything is possible.... Stay tuned... WOrking on it.... On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 14:57, Oren Miller wrote: > Where are you sending the allocation too. Are you sure the allocation isn't causing the other side to stop responding for some reason? You say it hangs but then you say that heartbeats are sent, so it sounds like your process is still alive. Is everything back to normal when QF tries to logon again? > > Jerry Westrick <je...@we...> wrote:Dear Sirs: > > I've got a problem, with quickfix. > > I've got an Initiator program, > Everything works fine, till an Allocation is sent, > then the quickFix lib hangs, and does not receive any > more messages, (causing a HB timeout, 3 resends, then > a logout). In recovery, the Allocation is lost. > > Does anybody have an Idea of what I could be doing wrong? > > How can I confirm the version of QuickFix I'm using? > > I'm sure that I'm doing something wrong... > > any help appreceated > > Jerry Westrick > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > _______________________________________________ > Quickfix-users mailing list > Qui...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. |
|
From: Oren M. <ore...@ya...> - 2003-05-12 12:57:44
|
Where are you sending the allocation too. Are you sure the allocation isn't causing the other side to stop responding for some reason? You say it hangs but then you say that heartbeats are sent, so it sounds like your process is still alive. Is everything back to normal when QF tries to logon again? Jerry Westrick <je...@we...> wrote:Dear Sirs: I've got a problem, with quickfix. I've got an Initiator program, Everything works fine, till an Allocation is sent, then the quickFix lib hangs, and does not receive any more messages, (causing a HB timeout, 3 resends, then a logout). In recovery, the Allocation is lost. Does anybody have an Idea of what I could be doing wrong? How can I confirm the version of QuickFix I'm using? I'm sure that I'm doing something wrong... any help appreceated Jerry Westrick ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ Quickfix-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. |
|
From: Jerry W. <je...@we...> - 2003-05-12 09:13:48
|
Dear Sirs: I've got a problem, with quickfix. I've got an Initiator program, Everything works fine, till an Allocation is sent, then the quickFix lib hangs, and does not receive any more messages, (causing a HB timeout, 3 resends, then a logout). In recovery, the Allocation is lost. Does anybody have an Idea of what I could be doing wrong? How can I confirm the version of QuickFix I'm using? I'm sure that I'm doing something wrong... any help appreceated Jerry Westrick |
|
From: David S. <ds...@an...> - 2003-05-09 15:46:35
|
Jim, Take a look at MySQLStore and MySQLLog. If you maintain state in a MySQL db on a third machine, machines 1 and 2 (your main and backup FIX servers) can share that state. Dave On Fri, 9 May 2003, Jim Morgan wrote: [...] > > I'm planning to run QuickFIX on Linux, on two servers. If the primary > server goes down, the secondary server should cut in, and instantly be able > to pick up where the primary left off, using the same message sequence > numbers and message store location. The only information I've found so far [...] > > Jim |
|
From: Juergen J. <je...@gm...> - 2003-05-09 15:10:25
|
Hello all, we are using quickfix with failover in a production environment : BUT currently quickfix is a library that implements the FIX standards. NOT a full featured production system . We put the quickfix lib in a J2EE environment with already build-in clustering on a high level. Regards, Juergen jetm -----Original Message----- From: qui...@li... [mailto:qui...@li...] On Behalf Of Oren Miller Sent: Freitag, 9. Mai 2003 13:25 To: Jim Morgan; qui...@li... Subject: Re: [Quickfix-users] Failover. The SocketConnectHost<n> and SocketConnectPort<n> allows you to set up a round robbin connection from your initiator to several acceptors that already exist in a failover system. This doesn't sound like what you are looking for, at least not entirely. QuickFIX is currently distributed as a development library instead of a standalone server, which allows for a lot of flexibility, but lacks many of the built in admin features some of the commercial vendors have. The advantage is you can integrate QF with third party or proprietary failover systems. Setting up a single location from which sequence numbers and the message store is received is easy if you use a database or an NFS drive. QuickFIX comes with a FileStore, so NFS should be easy to setup. It also comes with a MySQL store, but people have also written Oracle and MSSQL adapters as well. So what you are missing is something that can start and stop the appropriate servers as needed. For this you need to currently use a third party system (which would a product that focuses on failover and would likely be superior in that respect anyway). Or you can create something yourself, which has the advantage of you having total control. If you must have an engine that has failover built in, then unfortunately QuickFIX will not be the best choice for you at this time. Jim Morgan <per...@my...> wrote: I'm evaluating FIX systems for a client. QuickFIX is obviously very attractive because of its Open Source nature. However there is little to be seen in the documentation about how to set it up to allow for failover. Am I missing something, or could someone point me towards any resources on the subject. I'm planning to run QuickFIX on Linux, on two servers. If the primary server goes down, the secondary server should cut in, and instantly be able to pick up where the primary left off, using the same message sequence numbers and message store location. The only information I've found so far relevant to failover is the SocketConnectHost and SocketConnectPort settings in the configuration file, and its not clear to me how the machines should be set up, either physically, or in terms of software configuration. Has anyone set up this kind of arrangement already, and would you be prepared to share your experiences? Jim ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ Quickfix-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users _____ Do you Yahoo!? The New <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/search/mailsig/*http:/search.yahoo.com> Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. |
|
From: Oren M. <ore...@ya...> - 2003-05-09 11:34:15
|
The SocketConnectHost<n> and SocketConnectPort<n> allows you to set up a round robbin connection from your initiator to several acceptors that already exist in a failover system. This doesn't sound like what you are looking for, at least not entirely. QuickFIX is currently distributed as a development library instead of a standalone server, which allows for a lot of flexibility, but lacks many of the built in admin features some of the commercial vendors have. The advantage is you can integrate QF with third party or proprietary failover systems. Setting up a single location from which sequence numbers and the message store is received is easy if you use a database or an NFS drive. QuickFIX comes with a FileStore, so NFS should be easy to setup. It also comes with a MySQL store, but people have also written Oracle and MSSQL adapters as well. So what you are missing is something that can start and stop the appropriate servers as needed. For this you need to currently use a third party system (which would a product that focuses on failover and would likely be superior in that respect anyway). Or you can create something yourself, which has the advantage of you having total control. If you must have an engine that has failover built in, then unfortunately QuickFIX will not be the best choice for you at this time. Jim Morgan <per...@my...> wrote:I'm evaluating FIX systems for a client. QuickFIX is obviously very attractive because of its Open Source nature. However there is little to be seen in the documentation about how to set it up to allow for failover. Am I missing something, or could someone point me towards any resources on the subject. I'm planning to run QuickFIX on Linux, on two servers. If the primary server goes down, the secondary server should cut in, and instantly be able to pick up where the primary left off, using the same message sequence numbers and message store location. The only information I've found so far relevant to failover is the SocketConnectHost and SocketConnectPort settings in the configuration file, and its not clear to me how the machines should be set up, either physically, or in terms of software configuration. Has anyone set up this kind of arrangement already, and would you be prepared to share your experiences? Jim ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ Quickfix-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. |
|
From: Jim M. <per...@my...> - 2003-05-09 02:19:06
|
I'm evaluating FIX systems for a client. QuickFIX is obviously very attractive because of its Open Source nature. However there is little to be seen in the documentation about how to set it up to allow for failover. Am I missing something, or could someone point me towards any resources on the subject. I'm planning to run QuickFIX on Linux, on two servers. If the primary server goes down, the secondary server should cut in, and instantly be able to pick up where the primary left off, using the same message sequence numbers and message store location. The only information I've found so far relevant to failover is the SocketConnectHost and SocketConnectPort settings in the configuration file, and its not clear to me how the machines should be set up, either physically, or in terms of software configuration. Has anyone set up this kind of arrangement already, and would you be prepared to share your experiences? Jim |
|
From: Dani, R. <rd...@al...> - 2003-05-01 20:47:14
|
Hello, Is it possible to instantiate quickfix Message object with FIXML 4.2 xml string? One way I can think of is to use set() methods on each attribute, but we have the valid FIXML string available, is there any easier approach? Regards, Raju |
|
From: vera <chi...@vi...> - 2003-05-01 10:16:41
|
Dear Sir/Madame, My name is Vera and I am Vice President of Sales at the largest Chinese language financial web site in North America and in Asia. We have over 6,000,000 impressions/page views and 48,000,000+ hits to our web site every month. We have over 750,000 email Chinese investors database . Our customer base consists of HIGHLY motivated Chinese gamblers in the world. I would like to talk to you about driving more traffic to your web site with our pre-qualified quality/wealthy Chinese cust omers. We are very reasonable in rates and we will do other services to feature you (such as Emails, and Pop Windows).Please reply my email to ve...@ch... Thank you. Best regards, Vera . Vice President of Sales PH:1-800-808-8771 FX:1-626-628-3619 |
|
From: Oren M. <ore...@ya...> - 2003-04-28 18:01:29
|
1) Yes, there is a setting called Disable mail delivery. If you set this to 'on' you should be able to post without receiving messages. There is however the popular digest mode option, which will send you the days activity at the end of the day in a single message. This is nice because you don't get too far behind, but you only need to deal with one message a day. You can also set a filter in your mail client to stick them 2) Thank you for finding this Joerg! That location is unexpected. I had been looking for that myself. 3) I have not seen this option, it might be worth inquiring to sourceforge about this. 4) You guys seem to be determining this more than me. This was the sourceforge recommended setup for mailing lists, but I think it is more geared towards end-user applications. Since QF is a dev library, it's generally all development related stuff. I've been considering just merging the two. At some point if QF has some sort of server version version that doesn't require so much development, the users list may pick up some more. Joerg Thoennes <Joe...@ma...> wrote:Hello Matt, > 1.) is there a "write only" membership for the quickfix mailingslists ? I only > want to be able to write to the mailinglist but do not want to receive all these messages. > When I need some information from previous messages I want to go to the web-site > and search through the forum. Just check the Lists section of http://sourceforge.net/projects/quickfix/, perhaps you can enter new messages here. Currently, the access to sourceforge lists seems to give ERRORS so I cannot try this myself. > 2.) Is there a search field function for the message archive at the web site ? Yes, the search function of sourceforge is always on the left side, immediately below the login section. It is context sensitive, that is if you are viewing mailing lists you can search inside the current list. It took me some time to get aware of this unexpected location of the search function... > 3.) Is there a monthly or yearly (!!!) digest (=collection) of all old quickfix mailinglist messages > within one single file (which can be downloaded) ? See my answer to the first message. > 4.) Is the quickfix developer mailingslist for users that are developing quickfix itself or for users > which are developing other applications with embedded quickfix (or both) ? I think the quickfix-users list was intended for users developing applications with QuickFIX, but there is nearly no traffic in this lists since all questions related to the usage of QuickFIX are also discussed in the developers list which is probably intended for the development of QuickFIX. So the best would be to post all your questions on the developers list. Just my experience -- I hope I do not speak against your policy, Oren. Cheers, Jörg -- Joerg Thoennes http://macd.com Tel.: +49 (0)241 44597-24 Macdonald Associates GmbH Fax : +49 (0)241 44597-10 Lothringer Str. 52, D-52070 Aachen ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Quickfix-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. |
|
From: Oren M. <ore...@ya...> - 2003-04-28 17:37:05
|
Sorry, I mean the "toAdmin" method! Oren Miller <ore...@ya...> wrote:Any additional fields you need to add to a logon message can be done from the toApp method. This method gives you the opportunity to tack on any additional fields you want including passwords and such. This allows you to store your password in whatever secure manner you like instead of having to keep it lying around in a clear text file (you can of course do this as well :) ma...@Ge... wrote: I am new to FIX and Quick FIX. We have a trade order management system that runs on Windows provider by our broker. I want to automatically send trades from Linux and they don't have a Linux API. However, the vendor will let me send FIX messages to their server which will in turn be displayed on my Windows client apps. So, I want to use QuickFIX as a sort of API. I would think that I need to put account/password info into my QuickFIX session settings file. However, I do not see that in the examples. What other information should I need there? Please advise. Thank you, Marc --------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Schwarzschild 1-646-825-2163 Gerber Capital Management Inc. 120 Broadway, NYC ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Quickfix-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. |
|
From: Oren M. <ore...@ya...> - 2003-04-28 17:33:52
|
Any additional fields you need to add to a logon message can be done from the toApp method. This method gives you the opportunity to tack on any additional fields you want including passwords and such. This allows you to store your password in whatever secure manner you like instead of having to keep it lying around in a clear text file (you can of course do this as well :) ma...@Ge... wrote: I am new to FIX and Quick FIX. We have a trade order management system that runs on Windows provider by our broker. I want to automatically send trades from Linux and they don't have a Linux API. However, the vendor will let me send FIX messages to their server which will in turn be displayed on my Windows client apps. So, I want to use QuickFIX as a sort of API. I would think that I need to put account/password info into my QuickFIX session settings file. However, I do not see that in the examples. What other information should I need there? Please advise. Thank you, Marc --------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Schwarzschild 1-646-825-2163 Gerber Capital Management Inc. 120 Broadway, NYC ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Quickfix-users mailing list Qui...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfix-users --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. |
|
From: <ma...@Ge...> - 2003-04-28 15:22:40
|
I am new to FIX and Quick FIX. We have a trade order management system that runs on Windows provider by our broker. I want to automatically send trades from Linux and they don't have a Linux API. However, the vendor will let me send FIX messages to their server which will in turn be displayed on my Windows client apps. So, I want to use QuickFIX as a sort of API. I would think that I need to put account/password info into my QuickFIX session settings file. However, I do not see that in the examples. What other information should I need there? Please advise. Thank you, Marc --------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Schwarzschild 1-646-825-2163 Gerber Capital Management Inc. 120 Broadway, NYC |
|
From: Joerg T. <Joe...@ma...> - 2003-04-27 17:34:11
|
Hello Matt, > 1.) is there a "write only" membership for the quickfix mailingslists ? I only > want to be able to write to the mailinglist but do not want to receive all these messages. > When I need some information from previous messages I want to go to the web-site > and search through the forum. Just check the Lists section of http://sourceforge.net/projects/quickfix/, perhaps you can enter new messages here. Currently, the access to sourceforge lists seems to give ERRORS so I cannot try this myself. > 2.) Is there a search field function for the message archive at the web site ? Yes, the search function of sourceforge is always on the left side, immediately below the login section. It is context sensitive, that is if you are viewing mailing lists you can search inside the current list. It took me some time to get aware of this unexpected location of the search function... > 3.) Is there a monthly or yearly (!!!) digest (=collection) of all old quickfix mailinglist messages > within one single file (which can be downloaded) ? See my answer to the first message. > 4.) Is the quickfix developer mailingslist for users that are developing quickfix itself or for users > which are developing other applications with embedded quickfix (or both) ? I think the quickfix-users list was intended for users developing applications with QuickFIX, but there is nearly no traffic in this lists since all questions related to the usage of QuickFIX are also discussed in the developers list which is probably intended for the development of QuickFIX. So the best would be to post all your questions on the developers list. Just my experience -- I hope I do not speak against your policy, Oren. Cheers, Jörg -- Joerg Thoennes http://macd.com Tel.: +49 (0)241 44597-24 Macdonald Associates GmbH Fax : +49 (0)241 44597-10 Lothringer Str. 52, D-52070 Aachen |
|
From: Matt A. <ma...@em...> - 2003-04-27 07:25:41
|
Hello, 1.) is there a "write only" membership for the quickfix mailingslists ? I only want to be able to write to the mailinglist but do not want to receive all these messages. When I need some information from previous messages I want to go to the web-site and search through the forum. 2.) Is there a search field function for the message archive at the web site ? 3.) Is there a monthly or yearly (!!!) digest (=collection) of all old quickfix mailinglist messages within one single file (which can be downloaded) ? 4.) Is the quickfix developer mailingslist for users that are developing quickfix itself or for users which are developing other applications with embedded quickfix (or both) ? Thank you in advance Matt Adams -- _______________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup |
38 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
