Re: [Qucs-devel] Legal problem concerning adms and qucs

[roucaries b. <rou...@gm...>]

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Richard Crozier <r.c...@ed...> wrote:
> On 23/07/2013 07:56, Frans Schreuder wrote:
>>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> I just built both versions using the adms disciplines and constants and
>> the qucs disciplines and constants. Then ran a diff on all generated cpp and
>> h files.
>> It turns out that all files are equal, diff couldn't find any differences
>> so I am quite sure we can replace the two files.
>>
>> Frans
>>
>
> ok, good, well I say go ahead then, we know where to get the old ones if we
> ever need to go back.

Good solution for the short term. The longer term we need a clean room
implementation in order to look like standard.

Even if your solution is free , it will impose that ADMS model are
under GPL2+ due to including this two files. Even if it is free it is
not really nice to our user.

Thanks to keep freeness of qucs
>
> Richard
>
> --
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>