Re: [Qtractor-devel] Qtractor svn native Linux VST's

[Jeremy J. <je...@au...>]

On 11/04/2010 10:07 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> On 11/04/2010 04:30 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
>> On 11/04/2010 03:20 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
>>> On 11/04/2010 05:04 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
>>>> On 11/04/2010 05:02 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
>>>>    
>>>>> Anybody else with similar experiences?
>>>>>      
>>>> ...With Qtractor 0.4.7 on a 64bit install?
>>>>    
>>> Afaik it's a well known fact that vst on linux 64 bit (with fst) has 
>>> problems. I think thorben is working on 64bit improvements for fst lately.
>>>
>>> I could be wrong...
>>>
>>> \r
>>
>>
>> I don't use fst. This is about native Linux VST's in Qtractor compiled
>> with the Vestige headers. But maybe this also applies for native Linux
>> VST's?
>>
> 
> what happens if you use the steinberg vst-sdk headers instead?
> 
> fwiw, i don't have issues with it (32 or 64bit) -- i confess i have some
> reluctance in building any native linux vst plugins with the vestige
> headers, but one day i'll try :)
> 
> in another note, are both the host (qtractor) and the plugins compiled
> for x86_64 with the same compiler flags, specially -fPIC ?
> 
> seeya

Hello Rui,

The Linux VST plugins I've tried are all build with the Steinberg
headers. So maybe I have to rephrase. This is about native Linux VST's
build with the Steinberg headers in Qtractor build with the Vestige
headers. I'll check the -fPIC flag, I don't think it's there. And are
you using Qtractor with the Vestige or the Steinberg headers yourself?

Best,

Jeremy